That line is hyperbole, but the point of the article is not. We're seeing stubbornness out of the officials and/or Riveron.
In my mind, it's compounded by the ludicrous flexibility of the overturn standard, as was illustrated on the White TD overturn. The consensus of the game thread was, in an objective sense, White probably didn't get there before his arm was down, but there was no camera angle that showed it conclusively - you simply had to let the call stand. Nope, overturn! If the actual de-facto standard is "we're going to try and get the call as right as we can perceive it", that's fine, but then stop making up this BS about "clear and convincing evidence". All it's been is a crutch for inconsistent rulings.