2024 Core

Brohamer of the Gods

Well-Known Member
Silver Supporter
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
3,995
Warwick, RI
It's hard for me to see how the offense is going to improve in 2024, apart from guys just hitting better. Let's say their main lineup is back for next year.

C Wong - .708 ops, 88 ops+ - definitely room for improvement from him, but this may be what he is offensively
1b Casas - .870 ops, 131 ops+ - clearly trending in the right direction to be an absolute monster at the plate; 2024 could/should be even better
2b Urias - .667 ops, 81 ops+ - no idea what he ought to be or if he will even be the 2b next year
3b - Devers - .848 ops, 124 ops+ - his ops+ is exactly what his career ops+ is; I think he can do better, but this is basically normal Devers
SS - Story - .507 ops, 35 ops+ - this is THE key position. RH bat, doing absolutely nothing at the plate, if he gets it going, that's huge
LF - Yoshida - .821 ops, 118 ops+ - really solid bat all year long; he's not GREAT, but he's just solid
CF - Duran - .828 ops, 120 ops+ - room for improvement, but it's also possible this is max Duran
RF - Verdugo - .790 ops, 111 ops+ - having a year that's slightly better than his career numbers
DH - Turner - .835 ops, 122 ops+ - solid, professional hitter; not GREAT, but solid

So of this group, I see two guys who have the potential to be monsters offensively: Casas and Devers. They are LH heavy, with Casas, Devers, Yoshida, Duran, and Verdugo. Their worst hitters this year are all RH bats - Wong, Urias, and Story. We may see Teel arrive by the end of 2024 to be a much better offensive player than Wong, and we also might see Rafaela and/or Abreu a lot more next year (hopefully!). But that's a lot of guys who bat lefty.

They'll need Story to be much better, which of course he's capable of. It would be foolish to expect him to hit like he did in Coors (.972 career ops), but it's not unreasonable to think that he can be at least a high .700s ops guy (like, .780-.790).

What this team doesn't have is a RH masher. Is that guy out there to be had?

The Sox have some really good pieces if they want to move them, but move them for...what?

What would, say, Verdugo + a prospect get you? Or...what would it take to get Luis Robert of the White Sox? Obviously a LOT more than Verdugo + prospect.

I just ran Verdugo + Rafaela + Duran for Roberts through the MLB trade value machine, and it wasn't accepted. No idea how accurate that is, but that would feel like giving up a TON, but I think it wasn't accepted because Roberts is worth more than all three combined. So maybe a guy like that simply is unattainable for Boston.

Which is fine. But there aren't a ton of RH bats that are between, say, Justin Turner and a guy like Roberts. They could make a move for Pete Alonso maybe, but they'd have to pay an arm and a leg and he'd have to share 1b/DH with Casas (which could work I guess). Maybe a guy like Jorge Soler of the Marlins? 35 homers this year. $9m salary for 2024. Currently 31 years of age. He might be a guy that could improve the offense. But he's not good defensively, and the Sox don't really need more bad defensive players.

So this is going to be tricky for them. As is, they've got tons of solid bats, and a couple of LH guys who could mash, but very little real RH power.
I am watching when Duvall plays RF with some interest, because if he can handle playing it in Fenway resigning Duvall and trading Verdugo + prospects for pitching could help out two positions.

I'd also be in favor of resigning Turner with an eye towards him taking 25-30 starts at both 1B and 3B, with Raffy and Casas DHing when they don't just get a day off.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,862
I am watching when Duvall plays RF with some interest, because if he can handle playing it in Fenway resigning Duvall and trading Verdugo + prospects for pitching could help out two positions.

I'd also be in favor of resigning Turner with an eye towards him taking 25-30 starts at both 1B and 3B, with Raffy and Casas DHing when they don't just get a day off.
I deliberately left Duvall off this list because he's not under any contract for 2024. But yes, he appears to be a solid RH power bat that this team could use. The problem is that they really need a BETTER RH power bat. The question is: how to get it?
 

RS2004foreever

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2022
703
I think there will be a major push to keep Turner (who is 17th in the majors in OPS since May 1).
Speaking of which Casas since May 1 is 9th in the majors in OPS and RC+. Casas RC+ is 150 since May 1st. Devers BEST year is RC+ 140.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,862
Having Casas and Devers - two potential monster LH power bats - anchoring the lineup for many, many, many years to come is a really good start when it comes to making a major league lineup.
 

Brohamer of the Gods

Well-Known Member
Silver Supporter
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
3,995
Warwick, RI
I deliberately left Duvall off this list because he's not under any contract for 2024. But yes, he appears to be a solid RH power bat that this team could use. The problem is that they really need a BETTER RH power bat. The question is: how to get it?
And also where will this RH power bat will play if two of the traditional power slots at 1B and 3B are covered, and this team can't carry a full time DH.

But to quote the great sage Cyndi Lauper, money changes everything.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,862
And also where will this RH power bat will play if two of the traditional power slots at 1B and 3B are covered, and this team can't carry a full time DH.

But to quote the great sage Cyndi Lauper, money changes everything.
It would make an enormous difference if they could get 20 homers and an .800 ops from Story for a full season, while also getting similar production from the right side from the DH spot (like Turner this year). I think it won't be long before Teel is their full time catcher, and he's fantastic (and hopefully will be great at the MLB level), but he's also a lefty.

And if Mayer arrives relatively soon, he also is a lefty.

C - Teel (L)
1b - Casas (L)
2b - Story (R)
3b - Devers (L)
SS - Mayer (L)
LF - Yoshida (L)
CF - Duran (L)
RF - Verdugo/Abreu (L/L)
DH - ??

That's a lot of lefties. Maybe the key guy is Rafaela?
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
6,190
It would make an enormous difference if they could get 20 homers and an .800 ops from Story for a full season, while also getting similar production from the right side from the DH spot (like Turner this year). I think it won't be long before Teel is their full time catcher, and he's fantastic (and hopefully will be great at the MLB level), but he's also a lefty.

And if Mayer arrives relatively soon, he also is a lefty.

C - Teel (L)
1b - Casas (L)
2b - Story (R)
3b - Devers (L)
SS - Mayer (L)
LF - Yoshida (L)
CF - Duran (L)
RF - Verdugo/Abreu (L/L)
DH - ??

That's a lot of lefties. Maybe the key guy is Rafaela?
Yeah, Rafaela is a big question mark. The team needs him next year because they need the outfield defense to improve. Much as I love Duran and Verdugo, Verdugo is merely above-average and Duran is below average.

If Rafaela can rake, too, that'd be great, but I'm willing to survive a dip in offense if he can solidify the outfield defense. I think the concerns about his discipline are slightly overblown, for what it's worth, especially if the team has three or four guys in the lineup who have great plate discipline (some combination of Casas, Urias, Abreu, and Scott, if he forces his way up, I'm guessing).
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,862
If Urias actually can get back to his 2021-22 form and be a +100 ops+ bat, and if Story can be what he normally is (even "normal" away from Coors is still good), and if Rafaela can step in and be a power RH bat while providing excellent defense (you can live with lower OBP and higher K rates from Rafaela if he gives you this), that gives you three solid RH bats in the lineup to complement all those lefties.

Those are three big IFs though. Which is why I really want one stud RH bat in there somewhere.

I'm also super curious to see how Wong/Teel shakes out in the long run. Wong obviously isn't a plus bat, but he's ELITE defensively (and actually has a 1.2 oWAR this year, so technically not bad even offensively for the position). But Teel...man...that guy looks like a superduperstar in the making. That would make for a HELL of a C combo.
 

Brohamer of the Gods

Well-Known Member
Silver Supporter
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
3,995
Warwick, RI
I can't see the Red Sox regularly trotting out a line up with 7 or 8 LHs. If Teel and Mayer are what they project to be, we are looking for RH outfielders.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,680
I'd be happy to keep Turner, but switch-hitting Josh Bell is an interesting alternative, assuming he opts out of his 1/$16.5M contract.

Bell's always solid against LHP but can struggle against righties, going through stints of hitting too many grounders. He's been inconsistent but is on the right track again, hitting .277/.344/.503 (131 wRC+) since July 7th. He could also provide some (bad) defensive support at 1B.

With the sheer number of lefties we've got in the lineup, it'd be cool to slot him right near Devers and Casas. One possibility:

Duran - CF
Devers - 3B
Bell - DH
Casas - 1B
Story - SS
Yoshida - LF
Duvall - RF
Wong/McGuire - C
Urias - 2B
 

The_Dali

New Member
Jul 2, 2021
141
I'd be happy to keep Turner, but switch-hitting Josh Bell is an interesting alternative, assuming he opts out of his 1/$16.5M contract.

Bell's always solid against LHP but can struggle against righties, going through stints of hitting too many grounders. He's been inconsistent but is on the right track again, hitting .277/.344/.503 (131 wRC+) since July 7th. He could also provide some (bad) defensive support at 1B.

With the sheer number of lefties we've got in the lineup, it'd be cool to slot him right near Devers and Casas. One possibility:

Duran - CF
Devers - 3B
Bell - DH
Casas - 1B
Story - SS
Yoshida - LF
Duvall - RF
Wong/McGuire - C
Urias - 2B
I don’t see this team flexing to another DH-only type player. I feel like the value of Turner to this management was the versatility of playing the field.I’d expect them to rework a deal with Turner or use the DH role in a “resting players” fashion. We do need RH hitting, but the last thing we need are more limited defensive players.
 

Sin Duda

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
856
(B)Austin Texas
I know he just turned 35, but if Duvall really likes playing in Boston and was "guaranteed" 400 PAs, I'd like to see a reasonable 2-year offer to him. Maybe they can even offer another 1 year pillow contract since he missed so much time this season. Is he an attractive RH hitting RF at 2, $20M?
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,680
I don’t see this team flexing to another DH-only type player. I feel like the value of Turner to this management was the versatility of playing the field.I’d expect them to rework a deal with Turner or use the DH role in a “resting players” fashion. We do need RH hitting, but the last thing we need are more limited defensive players.
I think that's fair, though I'm not sure how much difference there is in defensive value between a 39-year-old Justin Turner playing 1B and Bell, who has ranked as a slightly below-average first baseman the last few years.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,862
Projected 2024 salaries of this projected starting lineup

C - Wong - $750k
1b - Casas - $750k
2b - Urias - $5m
3b - Devers - $29.5m
SS - Story - $22.5m
LF - Yoshida - $18.6m
CF - Duran - $750k
RF - Verdugo - $10m
DH - Abreu - $750k

TOTAL: $88.6 million

Good balance of some higher priced guys, some mid-range guys, and some extremely cheap guys.
 

Yo La Tengo

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 21, 2005
934
Ceddanne Rafaela playing excellent defense at multiple positions and providing a league average bat with some power would resolve so many of the current question marks. Unfortunately, I don't think anyone is going to be ready to commit this winter to him being a regular next year. As this thread shows, the alternatives aren't very appealing.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
6,190
Why not consider playing Ceddanne at second? Could save the $5M earmarked for Urias.
I think he'd be great at 2B, but unless you think Urias is going to net you something decent, I don't see why they don't head into next year with both of them. 5m is cheap for a guy with 2-3 WAR seasons in the immediate rearview, and Ceddane's value right now is that he can back up all three outfield positions and give the infielders a break.

You could start Ceddane, but without Urias, slotting Ceddane into 2B, you have to go out and find somebody else to back up the rest of the positions, and that player likely is not going to be nearly as good as Ceddane - we start getting into David Hamilton, Yu Chang, Pablo Reyes territory (no doubt Pablo had a great year). There's not really anybody who's immediately knocking on the 2B door, except for Yorke, and I'm skeptical of how his bat will play in the bigs.

Plus, you get a year of letting Ceddane ease his way into the bigs. When someone goes down - and someone almost always does - he can take their spot and play to his heart's delight. And if Urias is somehow cooked at 26 years old, then Ceddane can try that out permanently.

If you're looking to clear 5 million or so in salary, McGuire and Refsnyder seem like the obvious ones to throw in a bag for some players who are soon to be Rule V eligible. Both are still pretty cheap, neither are game-changers, and I think both are going to get more expensive in their arb years, and I think you could probably pretty reliably replace their production? I don't know.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,543
Why not consider playing Ceddanne at second? Could save the $5M earmarked for Urias.
I'm still not ready to just toss him into a FT starting role. I think he could hide his likely struggles a bit by being a super-sub at CF, SS and 2B for next season but Urias should be penciled in as the starter for next season IMO. Casas was penciled in as the starter at 1B this year, but Turner was absolutely brought in to take that position if Casas was really struggling.*
*I know he had a pretty terrible first month and a week but his underlying metrics were good. Great batting eye already which Rafaela does not have. Cedanne has the hitter's profile of someone who could really get twisted up and F'ed up if he's just given that role.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,405
Well, I’d rather keep Reyes at the minimum than Urias at $5M. I don’t see how you can keep both of them and have Rafaela on the roster, without trading an OF. Ultimately, starting Rafaela in Worcester is the most likely route to maintaining as many assets as possible. Of course, he could also be a key piece to adding a starter, too.
 

sezwho

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
2,036
Isle of Plum
Why not consider playing Ceddanne at second? Could save the $5M earmarked for Urias.
Based on the other replies it seems like I’m on an island, as I think just having him someplace consistent will accelerate adjustment.

Heck, I think I just saw Mookie miss an out or two related to his position churn. I don’t know that this has been analyzed, but my eyes say swapping positions comes at a real cost. Also Cora took months to have Casas hit lefties, so there does seem value in minimizing variables for rookies.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
6,190
Well, I’d rather keep Reyes at the minimum than Urias at $5M. I don’t see how you can keep both of them and have Rafaela on the roster, without trading an OF. Ultimately, starting Rafaela in Worcester is the most likely route to maintaining as many assets as possible. Of course, he could also be a key piece to adding a starter, too.
Why? Strikes me as recency bias. Reyes had a pretty good month before getting hurt, and Urias has been bad this year, but Urias has been a solidly above average second basemen for much longer, is younger, and arguably still has upside.

I get that he's been tough to watch, but I feel fairly confident he's gonna bounce back.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,405
Based on the other replies it seems like I’m on an island, as I think just having him someplace consistent will accelerate adjustment.

Heck, I think I just saw Mookie miss an out or two related to his position churn. I don’t know that this has been analyzed, but my eyes say swapping positions comes at a real cost. Also Cora took months to have Casas hit lefties, so there does seem value in minimizing variables for rookies.
Yeah, that too. I also think the expectations for offensive production out of 2b would be pretty low- given what the Sox got out of the position this year, slotting him there would likely be an easy way to improve. I don’t see the same thing happening in CF, which also requires moving a pretty good player.
 

derekson

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2010
6,266
Cedanne as a guy who can play good defense all around the infield and outfield and be in the lineup in most days to give anyone else a break seems like a perfect role for him to break into the majors. Given that the entire roster is a puzzle of who to fit in how he seems like a piece.

My bigger questions are about Abreu and his defense. He's been in CF with Duvall in RF when he's started. Duvall is a bit stretched in CF but he's okay, is Abreu really better? I know we've seen his arm is a cannon. If he can actually play a solid CF that changes a lot of things.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
21,002
Maine
Well, I’d rather keep Reyes at the minimum than Urias at $5M. I don’t see how you can keep both of them and have Rafaela on the roster, without trading an OF. Ultimately, starting Rafaela in Worcester is the most likely route to maintaining as many assets as possible. Of course, he could also be a key piece to adding a starter, too.
I agree with this, especially the Rafaela starting the season in Worcester part. While he put up great numbers during his brief time with the WooSox this summer, I'm not convinced he can be a regular major leaguer yet. Certainly not as a starter. If I'm Bloom/Cora, I'm treating him like Duran was at the start of this year. Let him start in Worcester and be the first call up when someone goes down. And with Rafaela's versatility, who that might be could be just about anyone in the lineup outside of Casas, Wong, and McGuire.
 

jbupstate

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2022
617
New York, USA
I think you keep Urias. He has a track record and if he gets back on track is useful to the Sox at 2b and a Trade candidate. I keep reading about Reyes but am not buying it.

I’d also keep Refsnyder because against LHP he is a game changer.
 

bloodysox

New Member
Sep 25, 2011
2,808
Louisville, Colorado
I know he just turned 35, but if Duvall really likes playing in Boston and was "guaranteed" 400 PAs, I'd like to see a reasonable 2-year offer to him. Maybe they can even offer another 1 year pillow contract since he missed so much time this season. Is he an attractive RH hitting RF at 2, $20M?
Absolutely. I'd honestly rather see him in RF next year than Verdugo, and include Verdugo with prospects for a starter as a part of a 3 team trade. I don't see them extending Verdugo and I also think Duvall is a better fit in our lineup due to his power.

Trade would look like this:

Red Sox: trade Verdugo+prospects for a legit starter like Cease

Team B (contender in need of an OF): Gets Verdugo, sends prospects to team C

Team C (rebuilding team like White Sox): Gets prospects from Red Sox and team B.

And obviously sign Duvall, then roll with an OF of Yoshida, Duvall, Duran, Rafaela, and Abreu. Have Yoshida DH for the most part to minimize fatigue issues, with Devers/Story/Abreu at DH on occasion.
 

AB in DC

OG Football Writing
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2002
13,995
Springfield, VA
Absolutely. I'd honestly rather see him in RF next year than Verdugo, and include Verdugo with prospects for a starter as a part of a 3 team trade. I don't see them extending Verdugo and I also think Duvall is a better fit in our lineup due to his power.

Trade would look like this:

Red Sox: trade Verdugo+prospects for a legit starter like Cease

Team B (contender in need of an OF): Gets Verdugo, sends prospects to team C

Team C (rebuilding team like White Sox): Gets prospects from Red Sox and team B.

And obviously sign Duvall, then roll with an OF of Yoshida, Duvall, Duran, Rafaela, and Abreu. Have Yoshida DH for the most part to minimize fatigue issues, with Devers/Story/Abreu at DH on occasion.
If it's just about 2024, I'd prefer Duvall to Verdugo too. But Duvall turns 36 next year and doesn't have anywhere near the long-term value that a Verdugo extension might give. Gotta at least try to agree on a Verdugo contract first before exploring trades.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
Absolutely. I'd honestly rather see him in RF next year than Verdugo, and include Verdugo with prospects for a starter as a part of a 3 team trade. I don't see them extending Verdugo and I also think Duvall is a better fit in our lineup due to his power.

Trade would look like this:

Red Sox: trade Verdugo+prospects for a legit starter like Cease

Team B (contender in need of an OF): Gets Verdugo, sends prospects to team C

Team C (rebuilding team like White Sox): Gets prospects from Red Sox and team B.

And obviously sign Duvall, then roll with an OF of Yoshida, Duvall, Duran, Rafaela, and Abreu. Have Yoshida DH for the most part to minimize fatigue issues, with Devers/Story/Abreu at DH on occasion.
This makes sense. The Sox could stand to turn multiple players/quantity into a quality upgrade. Verdugo seems emblematic of the offensive inconsistency we can't keep falling into, at a position that they can deal from.
 

TFisNEXT

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
12,539
I think you keep Urias. He has a track record and if he gets back on track is useful to the Sox at 2b and a Trade candidate. I keep reading about Reyes but am not buying it.

I’d also keep Refsnyder because against LHP he is a game changer.
Yeah I think you have to at least see if he can give you 2021/2022 Urias before just moving on from him. He’s a super valuable piece of a contending team if he does that.

Hes not a 33 or 34 year old…he’s 26 so there’s reason to think this year was mostly injury-related (nasty hamstring pull first game of season which put him out a couple months) and has a good chance of bouncing back. If it looks like he’s actually cooked a couple months in, they can always try out Rafaela, but a healthy Urias really extends that lineup with his plate discipline.
 

Yo La Tengo

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 21, 2005
934
As we think about Mayer, the Diamondbacks are promoting Jordan Lawlar to the MLB squad. Arizona drafted Lawlar sixth overall in 2021 and he is a few months older . He put up a .291/.390/.503 slash line with 36 homers and 76 stolen bases over a combined 207 minor-league games.

Lawlar had 20 homers with 26 steals and an .874 OPS over 105 contests between Double-A and Triple-A this season.

https://www.mlb.com/news/marcelo-mayer-vs-jordan-lawlar-draft-debate
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,755
Rogers Park
Absolutely. I'd honestly rather see him in RF next year than Verdugo, and include Verdugo with prospects for a starter as a part of a 3 team trade. I don't see them extending Verdugo and I also think Duvall is a better fit in our lineup due to his power.

Trade would look like this:

Red Sox: trade Verdugo+prospects for a legit starter like Cease

Team B (contender in need of an OF): Gets Verdugo, sends prospects to team C

Team C (rebuilding team like White Sox): Gets prospects from Red Sox and team B.

And obviously sign Duvall, then roll with an OF of Yoshida, Duvall, Duran, Rafaela, and Abreu. Have Yoshida DH for the most part to minimize fatigue issues, with Devers/Story/Abreu at DH on occasion.
I spent a few minutes thinking through the framework bloodysox proposed above, and here is a three-team fake internet trade for you all to criticize:

BOSTON sends CHICAGO: 2B Nick Yorke, SS Brainer Bonaci, SP Brandon Walter.
SAN FRANCISCO sends CHICAGO: 3B Casey Schmitt, SP Carson Whisenhunt.
BOSTON sends SAN FRANCISCO: OF Alex Verdugo, SP Nick Pivetta.
CHICAGO sends BOSTON: SP Dylan Cease, IF Yoan Moncada.

Moncada comes back primarily as a salary dump: to take $14m in AAV and a good bit more in actual dollars off of a rebuilding Chicago's payroll. If he can get his herniated disc back into shape, he has a $25m team option/$5m buyout for 2025. In the meantime, he joins Chang and Arroyo among our pile of promising infielders on the 60-day IL. Still, if you had to pick a dark horse candidate to be '24's or '25's Cody Bellinger, he'd be a solid choice. From Boston's perspective, Cease's arb 2 and arb 3 seasons are obviously the real prize. His FIP is a run better than his ERA this year and was a run worse last year, when he got amazing BABIP and HR/FB luck en route to finishing second in the Cy Young vote. That was a career year most likely, but he throws a lot of innings by modern standards, and that is an attribute we could really use on the staff. Maybe an extension is possible.

It's a pretty cynical trade for Chicago. Too cynical? Maybe. That's a pretty cynical organization. They get three young infielders and two interesting pitchers, but send away two of their star players (albeit one hurt, with an underwater contract) for a package in which Nick Yorke is the best prospect. Eh, maybe Schmitt is. It's not a terrible package.

Nice piece of work for San Francisco, turning a good-not-great 3B prospect and a decent SP in AA into a #2 hitter and a good swingman who would slay in their ballpark. They have a pretty good roster, but an outfield with a combined .678 line. Verdugo could help them a lot in a season when they should have a pretty exciting pitching staff.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,543
This makes sense. The Sox could stand to turn multiple players/quantity into a quality upgrade. Verdugo seems emblematic of the offensive inconsistency we can't keep falling into, at a position that they can deal from.
Verdugo has been getting unfairly maligned here. I don’t know since I only really watch the Sox, but are offensive inconsistencies more the norm across all players? I suspect that they are outside an elite dozen or so. At the end of the season he’s a good defensive RF in a tough RF with a good overall offensive profile.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
5,516
Exactly. Verdugo's "offensive inconsistency" has produced a 110 WRC+ and he's been a positive asset at a tough defensive position. We don't have a proven in-house upgrade and it's not like there are a bunch of Tatises lying around on the market.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
6,190
Verdugo has been getting unfairly maligned here. I don’t know since I only really watch the Sox, but are offensive inconsistencies more the norm across all players? I suspect that they are outside an elite dozen or so. At the end of the season he’s a good defensive RF in a tough RF with a good overall offensive profile.
Exactly. Verdugo's "offensive inconsistency" has produced a 110 WRC+ and he's been a positive asset at a tough defensive position. We don't have a proven in-house upgrade and it's not like there are a bunch of Tatises lying around on the market.
As someone who has speculated about Verdugo being traded, let me say I don't want to malign him.

Verdugo is having the best season of his career. He's been above-average offensively -- a 110 wrc+ is solidly above average, and in line with his career number of about 108. He's also been above average defensively, although as far as I can tell, the numbers think only slightly so. That is indeed a very valuable player. He got himself into shape this offseason after two kind of pathetic years, and he deserves credit for that.

The fact of the matter is that by most measures, he's both been the Sox most valuable player in the field, while also being one you have to ask yourself if you want to pay for. He's going to become more expensive this offseason, and then more expensive again next offseason, and has only been very good 1 out of last 3 years. Add to that he's basically a platoon player (career .669 OPS against LHP) who would, I'm guessing, throw an ever-living fit if he was platooned, and while he's above average in right field, he's not great. (While I understand the concerns about team defense, a full season of Rafaela in the outfield and Story and Urias up the middle would solve a lot of problems).

Can you replace his production? Maybe with a free agent? What about in-house options? I think his defensive production can be replaced by Rafaela. Abreu is a big question-mark defensively (clearly he has a cannon), although I sincerely think the guy can mash as well if not better than Verdugo.

So the Sox have a glut of outfielders between Little Raffy, Duran, Yoshida, Abreu, Refsnyder, and Verdugo, and Verdugo is the most expensive one besides Yoshida. One of them is a trade chip, undoubtedly - maybe Duran is the better option to trade since he's cost-controlled and posted a BABIP that would make Devers cry this year. Then you can plant Yoshida at DH, Rafaela in CF and Verdugo in right for a year, and try out a platoon of Abreu and Refsnyder in LF.

The safest move, undoubtedly, is hanging on to Verdugo for another year while you coax the kiddies into the big leagues. He was your best player this year even if he hasn't always been good and in shape, and who knows if Rafaela and Abreu are going to work out?

The Bloom move, I would guess, is flipping Verdugo for prospects before he gets expensive and putting Wilyer and Rafaela in right field and Duran in center.

I don't really know which one is right. I think whether they flip Verdugo might depend on the package they get back.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
Exactly. Verdugo's "offensive inconsistency" has produced a 110 WRC+ and he's been a positive asset at a tough defensive position. We don't have a proven in-house upgrade and it's not like there are a bunch of Tatises lying around on the market.
Sure, that’s a decent return on his current contract, but between that, his negative defensive numbers last year, his need for pep talks to stay focused… I think it is very much worth wondering if he will be a decent or even acceptable value on his next deal.
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
I think he'd be great at 2B, but unless you think Urias is going to net you something decent, I don't see why they don't head into next year with both of them. 5m is cheap for a guy with 2-3 WAR seasons in the immediate rearview, and Ceddane's value right now is that he can back up all three outfield positions and give the infielders a break.

You could start Ceddane, but without Urias, slotting Ceddane into 2B, you have to go out and find somebody else to back up the rest of the positions, and that player likely is not going to be nearly as good as Ceddane - we start getting into David Hamilton, Yu Chang, Pablo Reyes territory (no doubt Pablo had a great year). There's not really anybody who's immediately knocking on the 2B door, except for Yorke, and I'm skeptical of how his bat will play in the bigs.

Plus, you get a year of letting Ceddane ease his way into the bigs. When someone goes down - and someone almost always does - he can take their spot and play to his heart's delight. And if Urias is somehow cooked at 26 years old, then Ceddane can try that out permanently.

If you're looking to clear 5 million or so in salary, McGuire and Refsnyder seem like the obvious ones to throw in a bag for some players who are soon to be Rule V eligible. Both are still pretty cheap, neither are game-changers, and I think both are going to get more expensive in their arb years, and I think you could probably pretty reliably replace their production? I don't know.
I'm not saying that he's got to be on next year's roster, but if you dump McGuire (1.23 M this season, arb eligible next season) you're still going to need to replace him and he's not making a ton of money. I suppose that it's possible, but if he goes I don't see the position being filled with an equally competent or better player at much of a savings. Hernandez is on the 40 man and has shown a bit of power in AAA these past 2 seasons, but from what I'm reading he's not very good defensively.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
5,516
Sure, that’s a decent return on his current contract, but between that, his negative defensive numbers last year, his need for pep talks to stay focused… I think it is very much worth wondering if he will be a decent or even acceptable value on his next deal.
As a 2025 question I think that's valid, but I see his final year of control as a slam dunk to retain rather than try to trade away.

(re: his 2022 problems, we know he was playing injured for a big chunk of the season, and he's clearly proven himself to be a different player this year, so I don't see cause for concern there)
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
21,002
Maine
I'm not saying that he's got to be on next year's roster, but if you dump McGuire (1.23 M this season, arb eligible next season) you're still going to need to replace him and he's not making a ton of money. I suppose that it's possible, but if he goes I don't see the position being filled with an equally competent or better player at much of a savings. Hernandez is on the 40 man and has shown a bit of power in AAA these past 2 seasons, but from what I'm reading he's not very good defensively.
Slight nit, but Hernandez is not on the 40-man. Wong and McGuire are the only catchers on the 40-man at present.

I see absolutely no reason to move McGuire unless, as you say, they find someone equally competent or better at a lower price which is a tall order. McGuire isn't free agent eligible until after 2025 which seemingly makes him a pretty solid bridge to Teel. Running it back with the same catching pair next year would be a prudent move unless a JP Realmuto or Will Smith type inexplicably falls in their lap.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
6,190
I'm not saying that he's got to be on next year's roster, but if you dump McGuire (1.23 M this season, arb eligible next season) you're still going to need to replace him and he's not making a ton of money. I suppose that it's possible, but if he goes I don't see the position being filled with an equally competent or better player at much of a savings. Hernandez is on the 40 man and has shown a bit of power in AAA these past 2 seasons, but from what I'm reading he's not very good defensively.
I hear you, but they've protected Ronaldo,(EDIT: they have NOT protected him according to the above post) so I think they at least think he might be viable. His passed ball and CS numbers are good for his age and level, as far as I can tell, and Wong has a reverse split... so McGuire has never really a good match for Wong.

Hernandez has also made a big adjustment in his plate approach, cutting his K rate and doubling his BB rate, so he might provide some of the right-handed power they've so sorely needed. He's been killed by BABIP this year, which I think is disguising an offensive breakout.

McGuire also has been miserable at controlling the running game this year. It just seems like a position to me where the Sox could upgrade potentially just by promoting internally.
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
Slight nit, but Hernandez is not on the 40-man. Wong and McGuire are the only catchers on the 40-man at present.

I see absolutely no reason to move McGuire unless, as you say, they find someone equally competent or better at a lower price which is a tall order. McGuire isn't free agent eligible until after 2025 which seemingly makes him a pretty solid bridge to Teel. Running it back with the same catching pair next year would be a prudent move unless a JP Realmuto or Will Smith type inexplicably falls in their lap.
Right I was thinking he was put on the 40 and was with the team back in July (?), but that was Caleb Hamilton.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
21,002
Maine
I hear you, but they've protected Ronaldo,(EDIT: they have NOT protected him according to the above post) so I think they at least think he might be viable. His passed ball and CS numbers are good for his age and level, as far as I can tell, and Wong has a reverse split... so McGuire has never really a good match for Wong.

Hernandez has also made a big adjustment in his plate approach, cutting his K rate and doubling his BB rate, so he might provide some of the right-handed power they've so sorely needed. He's been killed by BABIP this year, which I think is disguising an offensive breakout.

McGuire also has been miserable at controlling the running game this year. It just seems like a position to me where the Sox could upgrade potentially just by promoting internally.
Hernandez was outrighted off the 40-man (so cleared waivers) in December and was not selected in the rule 5 draft, so I think they feel safe in his not going anywhere being left unprotected.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
6,190
Hernandez was outrighted off the 40-man (so cleared waivers) in December and was not selected in the rule 5 draft, so I think they feel safe in his not going anywhere being left unprotected.
Fair enough.

Catcher just seems a place where you've got a couple of guys who are JAGs and seeing whether what you've got in the minors will play seems worthwhile.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,679
Hernandez was outrighted off the 40-man (so cleared waivers) in December and was not selected in the rule 5 draft, so I think they feel safe in his not going anywhere being left unprotected.
Well, they definitely felt safe last year. He has improved a lot year over year, though.

Strikeout rate: 21% to 16.8%
Walk rate: 4.8% to 10.7%
ISO: .190 to .221
CS%: 24.6% to 28%
PB: 1 per 44.4 innings to 1 per 75.5 innings

However, despite all those improvements, his wRC+ has only improved from 93 to 96, in large part because his BABIP has decreased from .295 to .244. That could be a sign for optimism that he is just getting unlucky, but it does come with a decrease in LD% from 21.8% last year to 16.9% this year, & with an increase in FB% from 33.5% to 39.7%, so the large discrepancy cannot be attributed only to bad BABIP luck.

Hernandez turns 26 in November & has no options left - meaning that even if they did add him to the 40-man, he would have to pass through waivers to play for Worcester, so you would have to be really sure he would stick in MLB in order to want to use a slot on him. I can't imagine they would have the confidence in him to do that at this point, so I think you kind of have to let him go if someone wants him, which they might.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
5,516
I don't know where to go to track league-wide stats, but how does Hernandez's offensive "resurgence" track against the rest of AAA? Can it be attributed mostly/solely to the smaller automated strike zone there this year?
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
6,190
I don't know where to go to track league-wide stats, but how does Hernandez's offensive "resurgence" track against the rest of AAA? Can it be attributed mostly/solely to the smaller automated strike zone there this year?
Well, Bobby D is still striking out 35% of the time down there, so I don't know how much of an effect the automated strike zone is having. It's been a league with a lot of offense, but I think everyone's looking for explanations for the offensive explosion there other than the obvious one, which is there's a lot of pretty good hitters down there.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,679
International League...2022 v. 2023:

K%: 23.3% to 22.5%
BB%: 10.1% to 11.8%
Runs/Game: 4.98 to 5.54
Avg: .251 to .262
OBP: .336 to .357
SLG: .414 to .442
OPS: .750 to .799

Hernandez's OPS went from .749 to .805.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,723
As a 2025 question I think that's valid, but I see his final year of control as a slam dunk to retain rather than try to trade away.

(re: his 2022 problems, we know he was playing injured for a big chunk of the season, and he's clearly proven himself to be a different player this year, so I don't see cause for concern there)
I don’t think it’s a slam dunk. His trade value is probably higher than the value of the comp pick. And if you’re trading for a starting pitcher, you’d rather hold on to the inexpensive Little Raffy rather than the more expensive pending free agent.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
5,516
Unless you're punting next year, who do you want in RF if you're trading Verdugo this winter? Is anyone comfortable handing the starting job to Abreu or Rafaela after one month playing part time in the majors? I'm not yet. Both are coming up from AAA with too many questions.
 

Bob Montgomerys Helmet Hat

has big, douchey shoulders
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Unless you're punting next year, who do you want in RF if you're trading Verdugo this winter? Is anyone comfortable handing the starting job to Abreu or Rafaela after one month playing part time in the majors? I'm not yet. Both are coming up from AAA with too many questions.
I think you’d have to sign Duvall in conjunction with the trade. Righty hitter, short deal.
Personally, I’d rather trade Duran, keep Verdugo, and bring Duvall back, but I could see this being an option too.