I think it's just that people now "know" these particular mock simulators, and can either sense or actually SEE that certain QBs are going to fall, so they make the trade, fully confident that Daniels or Maye will still be there at #6, so why not add capital "for free?" I tend to not do that, and just TAKE the QB if he's there at #3 b/c that feels more realistic, but to each his own.I am perplexed by mocks where someone trades out of three - which implies that you have no particular faith in whatever QB is sitting at three, and you’re pretty sure you can get a surer talent at another position a bit lower - and then goes ahead and picks the QB a lower anyway after it turns out other teams had the same qualms about the guy and the guy slips. If you like them, take them at three, if you don’t, take the WR at 6/7/11
Now tell me why I’m full of it.
edit BECAUSE I NEVER DON'T MAKE A MISTAKE.