Vaakanainen with Tinordi:
30 minutes TOI, 42% CF, 43% SF, 26% scoring chances, 10% high danger, 28% xGF actual goals are 0-0
Vaakanainen without Tinordi:
30 minutes TOI, 48% CF, 57% Shots, 51% scoring chances, 45% high danger, 49% xGF, actual goals 3-7
Tinordi without Vaakanainen
70 minutes, 37% CF, 39% Shots, 36% scoring chances, 42% high danger, 36% xGF, actual goals are 2-5.
Vaakanainen has not been great, but he has been significantly better away from Tinordi. I would also argue that John Moore is a better hockey player than Tinordi but they seem to disagree.
I understand I'm basically channeling my rage for the team against Tinordi. He's far from the only problem but it's their decision making that makes me scratch my head and wonder if they know what they are doing and can lead them out of the current situation.