So, I'm kicking around whether or not to pay for full coverage.
I'm leaning against it because the free Boston.com articles are an embarrassment to any city that calls itself a Sports Town.
Steve Silva? Really? That's what coverage has come to?
I'm concerned that the paid portion of the site is what we see for free online + Nick Cafardo...hardly worth it.
Also, the free section is technically terrible, and contains a remarkable amount of out-of-date content - with real updates few and far between (and late).
Lastly, if i click one more "photo-sequence-essay" posted in the guise of a real article, I'll need to kill myself rather than the site.
So my question is this - for those of you who read the print edition: is subscribing to the online version worthwhile? Judging from the free portions online, I remain skeptical.
I'm leaning against it because the free Boston.com articles are an embarrassment to any city that calls itself a Sports Town.
Steve Silva? Really? That's what coverage has come to?
I'm concerned that the paid portion of the site is what we see for free online + Nick Cafardo...hardly worth it.
Also, the free section is technically terrible, and contains a remarkable amount of out-of-date content - with real updates few and far between (and late).
Lastly, if i click one more "photo-sequence-essay" posted in the guise of a real article, I'll need to kill myself rather than the site.
So my question is this - for those of you who read the print edition: is subscribing to the online version worthwhile? Judging from the free portions online, I remain skeptical.