Lucas Giolito has an elbow issue.

Apisith

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2007
3,218
Bangkok
Oh for fuck’s sake. If he gets TJ he’s almost done for next year as well. Almost $38m gone.
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,692
Rogers Park
Oh, brutal. This just goes to show for the millionth time that even the pitchers who reliably take the ball, for whom health is a skill, are just one elbow twinge away…
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,536
Ryu went back to Korea and signed with his old KBO team.

The theme of this Red Sox offseason should be "play stupid games, win stupid prizes"
Uh no... Lucas Giolito has rarely missed extended time... this was not like signing Sale...
Oh, brutal. This just goes to show for the millionth time that even the pitchers who reliably take the ball, for whom health is a skill, are just one elbow twinge away…
Exactly
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
13,748
Wow, that's rough.

Just another example why these player opt-outs for pitchers in the future are hugely valuable to them.
 

DeadlySplitter

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 20, 2015
33,653
So both our major acquisitions this off-season are hurt by March 5, and Sale apparently has looked great.

Could be absolutely snakebit on injury luck.
 

TheYellowDart5

Hustle and bustle
SoSH Member
Apr 16, 2003
9,307
NYC
Uh no... Lucas Giolito has rarely missed extended time... this was not like signing Sale...

Exactly
That's not in response to Giolito's health but to the highly risky contract he was given that's already blowing up in the FO's face; they tried to get cute to avoid a bigger commitment elsewhere, and now they're paying for it
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,605
Miami (oh, Miami!)
Well, he got a significant velocity bump from some new mechanics. Perhaps this is something that will clear up.

Oh for fuck’s sake. If he gets TJ he’s almost done for next year as well. Almost $38m gone.
Let's wait for the test results. While not dispositive, at least it's not the dreaded "forearm tightness."
 

gibreel

New Member
Apr 14, 2006
38
https://twitter.com/JeffPassan

Brutal news: Initial imaging showed Boston Red Sox starter Lucas Giolito likely has a partially torn UCL and flexor strain and could miss the 2024 season, league sources tell ESPN. Giolito, who signed a two-year deal with Boston, may need surgery to repair the right-elbow damage.
 

6-5 Sadler

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
218
@JeffPassan
Brutal news: Initial imaging showed Boston Red Sox starter Lucas Giolito likely has a partially torn UCL and flexor strain and could miss the 2024 season, league sources tell ESPN. Giolito, who signed a two-year deal with Boston, may need surgery to repair the right-elbow damage.
 

Time to Mo Vaughn

RIP Dernell
SoSH Member
Mar 24, 2008
7,274
What sort of elbow issue would cause a SP to be out at least a month, but not ultimately require Tommy John? I mean besides a partially torn UCL healed from platelets and deer antler spray of course.

Tendinitis seems like it wouldn't crop up quite this early, but I am not a doctor and have no idea what I'm talking about. Bone spurs?
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,605
Miami (oh, Miami!)
That's not in response to Giolito's health but to the highly risky contract he was given that's already blowing up in the FO's face; they tried to get cute to avoid a bigger commitment elsewhere, and now they're paying for it
Gonna strongly disagree here.

The primary risk in Giolitto's contract was that he'd continue to suck and be homer-prone. If he's fixable in bounceback/mechanical sense, and can revert to his 2021 form, it's a good contract. (And partially, it's a good contract because this is his age 29 season, and it's for short years.)

There wasn't (IIRC) a significant medical risk with Giolitto. He's made 30 starts in the past 3 years.

***
Imagine if we signed Montgomery and he came down with the same injury. Gone for 1.5 years, with the potential repeat of the Chris Sale Saga. But without as high a ceiling.
 

johnnywayback

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 8, 2004
1,422
Or it’s an argument that they did not have enough pitching to begin with because injuries happen and this rotation wasn’t nearly good enough even if Giolito was good.
I mean, that's the argument I would make, but it's pretty obvious ownership doesn't see it that way...
 

TheYellowDart5

Hustle and bustle
SoSH Member
Apr 16, 2003
9,307
NYC
The funniest outcome of this is Garrett Whitlock going back into the rotation full-time and SJH's head exploding
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,852
It would seem like this would be a new issue that wasn't apparent with the Sox first signed him, but could there be any relation to his horrible second-half of the season and him pitching at less than 100%, and then something flared back up once he started ramping things up during Spring Training?
 

SouthernBoSox

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2005
12,119
Tanner Houck and Whitlock are in the rotation right now.

You are ONE(!!) injury away from another opener situation.

Injuries always happen. Always, which is why the plan should have always been to have Houck and Whitlock in the pen
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,270
Great job giving that player option. Left all the downside risk to the Sox.
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,552
Man, that really sucks. Not counting 2020 his IP by full season was:
  • 173
  • 176
  • 178
  • 161
  • 184
What can you say? Whether you liked the signing or not it's just shit luck and more than ever it's clear that any path to success demands a real commitment to developing pitchers en masse because otherwise the value is clearly never going to be right for this FO to find outside solutions to build a rotation.

Have felt the team had some juice to be decently fun to follow—if not great—if things broke right, so this has me bummed out quite a bit as having another guy to take the ball and be not godawful every 5th day was a big part of things breaking right.
 

SouthernBoSox

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2005
12,119
Man, that really sucks. Not counting 2020 his IP by full season was:
  • 173
  • 176
  • 178
  • 161
  • 184
What can you say? Whether you liked the signing or not it's just shit luck and more than ever it's clear that any path to success demands a real commitment to developing pitchers en masse.

Have felt the team had some juice to be decently fun to follow—if not great—if things broke right, so this has me bummed out quite a bit as having another guy to take the ball and be not godawful every 5th day was a big part of things breaking right.
Injuries ALWAYS HAPPEN.

I mean they need to sign Montgomery AND Michael Lorenzen
 

DeadlySplitter

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 20, 2015
33,653
This team *should* have too much talent to bottom out at 95+ losses.

But 90+ losses? I think it's on the table. Right now the projected OD roster is the 2023 roster... minus Sale. With some bullpen reconfiguring as usual, but that is truly the case right now.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,540
Hingham, MA
That’s a pretty rosy outlook on what Giolito would have done.
Disagree, there are downstream effects here. It's not that he would have provided 6-7 extra wins himself. But if those 160-180 innings end up being fewer, less effective starter innings, it will tax the bullpen even further, and it will lead to a bunch of extra losses in August and September.