You’ll need to defend this.Peacock is fine
Ok, features I rarely use or notice.You’ll need to defend this.
Peacock doesn’t support joining late and starting from the beginning. You can’t fast forward or rewind live events. The stream quality and framerate varies week to week from “1995” to “2017.” The interface is clunky and not intuitive.
It’s not even borderline acceptable, let alone “fine.”
Noticeable about 50 seconds before the rhapsodizing stoppedOff?
They’re not thick enough for that fairly substantial offside.What happened to the thick lines for VAR?
IOW, the only reason this is on peacock is greed. The only programming choice that would make me angrier is if they were showing infomercials.NBCSN is showing car auctions. Cool
I have have Peacock through Comcast, their parent company, and it's unbelievable how unresponsive the interface is to the Comcast remote. It's so bad that I avoid using Peacock unless absolutely necessary. If there's a choice between watching an episode of B99 on NBC on Demand with commercials or on Peacock without, I'll still choose to watch the NBC rather than deal with the Peacock interface.You’ll need to defend this.
Peacock doesn’t support joining late and starting from the beginning. You can’t fast forward or rewind live events. The stream quality and framerate varies week to week from “1995” to “2017.” The interface is clunky and not intuitive.
It’s not even borderline acceptable, let alone “fine.”
Are you saying you haven't been following Bremen the last few years? You've really been missing out.I had no idea Rashica is pronounced with a soft c or s sound
This is the main problem I have... if Peacock were amazing..then fine. BUT NBC has gained all of the US' access to the best EPL Games.. and they've regressed to taking all of those games off of TV where most users/ cable subscribers can watch them and put them on a highly inferior streaming service solely for the reason of charging more money. They're taking advantage of a new fan base to try and make money, but simultaneously reducing that audience by making them watch on a streaming TV or computer... Let me watch over my cable connection so I don't have to worry about my wifi connection every time I watch a game. Put the best matches on TV and streaming instead of only streaming.. they're making people hate their service by forcing people on to it. If they did something additive to the coverage so that watching on Peacock was a bonus..that would be a draw...but instead it's another hurdle to watch the best games.IOW, the only reason this is on peacock is greed. The only programming choice that would make me angrier is if they were showing infomercials.
In what universe is car buying a “sport”?
What's especially annoying about Peacock is that, for games NBC broadcasts on NBC/NBCSN, it streams them on the NBCSports platform, which is a superior platform with richer features than Peacock. NBC could have just used that platform for Peacock; instead, NBC intentionally put the subscription platform on a worse platform.Peacock is a downgrade from the NBC Sports Gold feature set. Two years in, that’s utterly inexcusable.
I can’t get started on the double dip that’s become standard, requiring subscribers to have some sort of obsolete cable account in addition to the network’s offering. We, as consumers, utterly failed to push back effectively early enough to head that off.