Add another punt and pick, now 14 straight garbage possessions.
This is just brutally bad football.I feel like the NFL should give me a $100 gift certificate in their official store for watching this game all the way through.
The Patriots play both these teams this seasonThis is just brutally bad football.
announcing. hyde is subject to a sparking runWhat's worse: The play on the field or the announcing?
I would listen to a good game announced by Gilbert Gottfried and Fran Drescher over this game with any announcer team.What's worse: The play on the field or the announcing?
It's a beautiful thing.The Patriots play both these teams this season
On multiple occasionsDenver tried to trade for Case Keenum this offseason.
he held him the whole time in the end zoneThat was a soft ass penalty honestly. Didn't see the official contact.
No I meant calling the shove just because the helmet came off, it wasn't egregious.he held him the whole time in the end zone
to be fair it think the grabbing him behind the neck warranted it. really think the shitty tackle and dragging kneet and feed into Gabberts head was borderline as well. Just a pissy way to playNo I meant calling the shove just because the helmet came off, it wasn't egregious.
playing two games on monday night is for the birds. i'm not a fanI know this has been the case for a while now since it was switched off of network television, but SNF has far eclipsed MNF as far as getting the marquee game of the week. Look at the schedules for this season and it isn't even close, plus NBC gets to flex late season games around to get better games down the stretch.
Hey, we get double the Peyton Manning commercials.playing two games on monday night is for the birds. i'm not a fan
Apparently, the Rams feel the same way.playing two games on monday night is for the birds. i'm not a fan
This is an all-time great moment in the history of broadcasting; it makes the shitty game completely worth it in my mind.
bet the NFL was thrilled that the national radio call included a note that a drunk guy on the field was the most interesting part of the game. I bet Roger was PISSED.This is an all-time great moment in the history of broadcasting; it makes the shitty game completely worth it in my mind.
He runs to the 50! He runs to the 40! The Guy is drunk! But there he goes!
After that stirring win over the high flying Cowboys, the Giants are well on their way to another Super Bowl title if we factor in the four year plan.Well, it's been 4 years since the last Giants title...
But I'm just messing with you. The NFC East sucks and I wish we could play them every year.
This is absolutely fantastic.This is an all-time great moment in the history of broadcasting; it makes the shitty game completely worth it in my mind.
He runs to the 50! He runs to the 40! The Guy is drunk! But there he goes!
Covering one side is common if you're team plays a bunch of zone, which Seattle does. Playing one side doesn't make much sense when you're playing man on Antonio Brown, which is what the Skins did last night. The only reason I can think is they wanted the Steelers to think they were in zone and played man, but its just stupid on several levels. They played Breeland on Brown in man coverage with zero safety help a bunch, left Norman off him and he killed them.So, I am admittedly not very smart when it comes to X's and O's of football. Most of what I do know I learn from here or watching some analysis on TV. But is there a simple reason that Josh Norman is not able to cover a different side of the field? I know the Seahawks do the same thing with Sherman (or at least used to). If you're a defense with an elite CB (and one you're paying like a billion dollars), why would you not force him to shadow the other team's best WR, no matter where he is lining up? I'm sure there is some intricacies such as what type of defense you are playing. But Brown just went off last night and it didn't seem like Norman covered him once.
I know it worked for us last SB when we were able to move Edelman around and get him involved. But it seems silly that teams/players would continue to keep CB's on one side of the field.
Pittsburgh was smart about taking their shots, too. The first TD to Brown over Breeland came on 4th-and-1, when Washington was geared up to stop the run, and the second came on 3rd-and-3 when you would expect the short pass. Those are situations where it's tough to give safety help over the top because then you're just basically handing the O the first down.Breeland was arguably the absolute goat of the game on the defensive side. Williams ran through or around him multiple times in the second half alone and Antonio put up red headed stepchild numbers on him. Got to the point I almost felt bad for him. He was badly outmatched and his coaches didn't make any adjustments to get him some help.
That makes sense. Thanks.Covering one side is common if you're team plays a bunch of zone, which Seattle does. Playing one side doesn't make much sense when you're playing man on Antonio Brown, which is what the Skins did last night. The only reason I can think is they wanted the Steelers to think they were in zone and played man, but its just stupid on several levels. They played Breeland on Brown in man coverage with zero safety help a bunch, left Norman off him and he killed them.