NBA 75: Ranking The 75 Best Players in History

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,244
People who think Wilt was the best player ever, or think Wilt was better than Russell, are mostly people who have done very surface-level analysis on NBA history and the 50 ppg and the 100 point game and since those numbers are so mind-blowing within a modern context of the game, it makes people think that Wilt is clearly the best player ever.

I didn't watch the video, but I assume it talks about the insane pace of the 1962 season, combined with bad shooting percentages, that allowed a player like Wilt to put up unheard of stats and therefore gain immortality of the most dominant statistical player in the history of the game.
That's correct. It also highlighted the fact that Wilt's scoring average was over 13 less when facing Russell in 1962 (37 ppg vs. Russell; 51 ppg vs rest of the NBA). I get irritated when people say that Wilt dominated Russell, when in reality Russell's overall play, in particular his defense, contributed more to his team's winning.
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,853
That's correct. It also highlighted the fact that Wilt's scoring average was over 13 less when facing Russell in 1962 (37 ppg vs. Russell; 51 ppg vs rest of the NBA). I get irritated when people say that Wilt dominated Russell, when in reality Russell's overall play, in particular his defense, contributed more to his team's winning.
All you need to know is that in 1962, Russell won the MVP, not Wilt. In his own time, Wilt's accomplishments were not seen as impressive as they would become later as they emerged as more of a historical outlier.

In his book, Bill Simmons makes an interesting argument that Kareem's best season (his 1971-72 season) where he averages 35-16, is more impressive than Wilt in 1962. Basically the gap shrinks if you quantify their per 100 possession numbers, since Wilt played in a much faster-paced NBA than Kareem would, and you assess the quality of Centers they played against.

A big reason for Wilt/Russell's dominance was because the Mikan-esque type of Center was what the league had when they first came into the league. Slow, skinny, earth-bound players that relied on wacky hook shots. Look at the Centers in the league in 1962; Red Kerr, Jim Krebs, Phil Jordan, etc. There was no athleticism at all at the position, which gave a player who was bigger, faster, stronger like Wilt a massive advantage. That allowed a guard like Oscar Robertson to average 12.5 rpg that season; so many of the frontcourt players were dinosaurs playing a fading style of basketball.

If you look at the 71-72 season, the Centers that have emerged are totally different. They are not necessarily bigger than their predecessors a decade prior, but they are faster, stronger, agile and more athletic than the previous generation. Wes Unseld, Elvin Hayes, Bob Lanier, Willis Reed, Dave Cowens, Nate Thurmond; it's just a totally different environment for a player like Kareem to be dominating that kind of game than Wilt did in 1962.

You can look at how Wilt's stats decline over his career as the old Centers get phased out and the new centers enter the league; during the second half of his career he goes from being an immortal statistical monster, to merely a typical All-NBA performer. Historically his dip in scoring gets remembered as Wilt becoming a more unselfish player and not being so focused on scoring, and that is certainly true to an extent, but the fact that it wasn't so easy for him to completely dominate his opponents also plays a factor.
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,853
Duncan rarely gets his due on these kinds of lists. People took his success for granted for some reason. Best player on at least four title teams, and you could easily make the case he was the best player on the 13-14 champions as well. Won a title with Stephen Jackson as his best teammate. Incredible post-season performer with a ton of memorable ass-kicking games. All-time great teammate and unselfish player. But because he played in San Antonio and because he was a boring post-up player in a post-Jordan era, he will probably always be underrated. To me, there is no way that Wilt Chamberlain can be ranked higher than Duncan. Wilt has the absurd numbers, but just forget about that for a second and look at how successful their teams were. One guy was clearly a winning player and the other was not. I think you can make a case he should be higher than Shaq or Bird or Magic and it would still be defensible. At least they didn't put Kobe in front of him.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,557
around the way
Agree on Kobe, but I always think Kareem has been terribly underrated by most people.
Seems like every couple of years one of these lists come out, and I end up arguing with you and Kliq.

And the post just above yours, Kliq is saying that we should ignore Wilt's production because his teams didn't win, and I want to make a sarcastic comment about how unfortunate it is for Wilt that he didn't get to play with Magic.

Edit: the main point of his post is that Duncan is criminally underrated, and I completely agree with that.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,685
Seems like every couple of years one of these lists come out, and I end up arguing with you and Kliq.

And the post just above yours, Kliq is saying that we should ignore Wilt's production because his teams didn't win, and I want to make a sarcastic comment about how unfortunate it is for Wilt that he didn't get to play with Magic.
I applaud your restraint in not making that sarcastic comment
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,853
Seems like every couple of years one of these lists come out, and I end up arguing with you and Kliq.

And the post just above yours, Kliq is saying that we should ignore Wilt's production because his teams didn't win, and I want to make a sarcastic comment about how unfortunate it is for Wilt that he didn't get to play with Magic.
Wilt played basically his entire career with multiple Hall of Fame players. He didn't play with Magic but he did play with Paul Arizin, Guy Rodgers, Nate Thurmond, Hal Greer, Billy Cunningham, Jerry West, Elgin Baylor and Gail Goodrich.
 

coremiller

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
5,854
Seems like every couple of years one of these lists come out, and I end up arguing with you and Kliq.

And the post just above yours, Kliq is saying that we should ignore Wilt's production because his teams didn't win, and I want to make a sarcastic comment about how unfortunate it is for Wilt that he didn't get to play with Magic.

Edit: the main point of his post is that Duncan is criminally underrated, and I completely agree with that.
Wilt's early Warriors teams weren't that great, but once he was traded to the 76ers and then to the Lakers his teams were pretty talented. Wilt won two titles (67, 72) and if he'd been a better big game player, it could easily have been four or five. HIs teams were probably more talented and should have won in 68 (blew a 3-1 lead to the Celtics, including a game 7 where he attempted just 9 shots), 69 (blew a 3-2 lead to the Celtics, Wilt got pulled during crunch time in Game 7), and 70 (the Willis Reed game). And they could also have won in 62 (lost Game 7 to the Celtics, Wilt scored only 22 points in the season where he averaged 50) and 66 (lost another Game 7 to the Celtics, although Wilt played well this time).
 

Saints Rest

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
This morning I heard some talking head on sports radio (I know, I know) talking about the three-headed brilliance of KD/Harden/Kyrie. We Celtics fans always have our "Big Three" to think were the best of all time. But I've been wondering, what was the greatest trio in NBA history. It seems like a simple way to quantify it would be the lowest combined score unit this Top-75 list. For example, . . .
  • KD/Harden/Kyrie yields a score of at least 102 (13 + 33 + >76)
  • Bird/McHale/Parish yields no worse than 131 (<9 + 49 + 74).
  • The latter-day Celtic Big 3 (Garnett/Pierce/Allen) is 119.
  • MJ/Pippen/Rodman is no worse than 102 (and likely under 100).
Who else you got?
 

HowBoutDemSox

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 12, 2009
10,176
This morning I heard some talking head on sports radio (I know, I know) talking about the three-headed brilliance of KD/Harden/Kyrie. We Celtics fans always have our "Big Three" to think were the best of all time. But I've been wondering, what was the greatest trio in NBA history. It seems like a simple way to quantify it would be the lowest combined score unit this Top-75 list. For example, . . .
  • KD/Harden/Kyrie yields a score of at least 102 (13 + 33 + >76)
  • Bird/McHale/Parish yields no worse than 131 (<9 + 49 + 74).
  • The latter-day Celtic Big 3 (Garnett/Pierce/Allen) is 119.
  • MJ/Pippen/Rodman is no worse than 102 (and likely under 100).
Who else you got?
The 1969 Lakers had Wilt (somewhere in the top 8), Elgin Baylor (23) and Jerry West (14), so somewhere in the 38 to 45 range.

And they STILL couldn’t beat Russell’s final Celtics team.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,775
This morning I heard some talking head on sports radio (I know, I know) talking about the three-headed brilliance of KD/Harden/Kyrie. We Celtics fans always have our "Big Three" to think were the best of all time. But I've been wondering, what was the greatest trio in NBA history. It seems like a simple way to quantify it would be the lowest combined score unit this Top-75 list. For example, . . .
  • KD/Harden/Kyrie yields a score of at least 102 (13 + 33 + >76)
  • Bird/McHale/Parish yields no worse than 131 (<9 + 49 + 74).
  • The latter-day Celtic Big 3 (Garnett/Pierce/Allen) is 119.
  • MJ/Pippen/Rodman is no worse than 102 (and likely under 100).
Who else you got?
Kareem/Magic/Worthy was pretty awesome for the Lakers, even as Kareem was starting to decline. Magic was MVP level and Worthy was becoming an absolute monster. Three no doubt hall of famers.

Doing this on my phone so I can’t see the list so I don’t know what their trio score would be. Maybe Worthy isn’t even on the list. But that dude was awesome.

Edit: ok looked at the list. Worthy at 59 kills this but he’ll be teamed with two top-9 guys. Pretty solid.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,416
The 1969 Lakers had Wilt (somewhere in the top 8), Elgin Baylor (23) and Jerry West (14), so somewhere in the 38 to 45 range.

And they STILL couldn’t beat Russell’s final Celtics team.
This is part of why I always push for people not to underestimate Russell---I know the individual stats don't tell the story but the winning almost EVERY time: in his last 15 seasons---2 college and 13 pro---he was healthy in 14 of them and won 13 titles! Across all sorts of different supporting casts. It isn't just a coincidence...

I wish we had on/off or other advanced stats to compare Russell and Chamberlain...though there wasn't much 'off' in those days
 

coremiller

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
5,854
The 2004 Lakers had Shaq (top 8), Kobe (10), and Karl Malone (16), as well as Gary Payton (48), although Malone and Payton were pretty washed up. That's a range of 27 - 34 for the top 3, depending on where Shaq lands.

The Rockets in the late 90s had Olajuwon (11), Barkley (22), and Drexler (43) for a total of 76.

Of course, the Thunder had Durant (13), Harden (33), and Westbrook (46), for 92.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,557
around the way
This is part of why I always push for people not to underestimate Russell---I know the individual stats don't tell the story but the winning almost EVERY time: in his last 15 seasons---2 college and 13 pro---he was healthy in 14 of them and won 13 titles! Across all sorts of different supporting casts. It isn't just a coincidence...

I wish we had on/off or other advanced stats to compare Russell and Chamberlain...though there wasn't much 'off' in those days
If we even had blocks and steals, people would give a shit. Kliq does well to remind us that the pace in those days was absurd. But Russell and Wilt had games with 10 blocks. Russell definitely had games with 10 steals too.

Nobody ever had a run like Russell, unless you count straight individual sports like that Greco Roman guy who lost like once in his career. Nobody ever will. If prime Lebron played his whole career in the G league, he could do it.
 

cheech13

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 5, 2006
1,608
Maybe I’m jaded by some of his recent playoff performances, but Doc feels like the huge outliers there. Never really considered him an elite head coach.
 

bosockboy

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
20,048
St. Louis, MO
Maybe I’m jaded by some of his recent playoff performances, but Doc feels like the huge outliers there. Never really considered him an elite head coach.
On second glance I agree. Doc over Rudy T or Karl is rough. Spo does have the two rings.

No love for Billy Cunningham either.
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,853
Shaquille O’Neal came in at 8th on the list.
I think Shaq is underrated; 8th isn't terrible but you could make an argument he should be higher. The way he dominated in his back-to-back-to-back years is unheard of in the modern game with the exception of Jordan. It appeared that things came so easy to him that I don't think he ever got the credit he deserved for just how insanely dominant and successful he was as a player. At his peak he was completely unstoppable; all time great defensive Centers like Hakeem and Mutombo were afraid to guard him.
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,853
This is a worse list than the players. It's missing John Kundla, who won five titles (six if you count a pre-NBA NBL title) with the Mikan Lakers. Yeah it was a million years ago, but the list with the players did a good job representing all of basketball history and it's a shame this list had to include Doc, Sloan, Spo, etc. over Kundla.

The other guy I'd throw in is Alex Hannum, who was an innovator as a coach and holds the distinction of being the only coach to ever beat Bill Russell in a playoff series, doing it for two champions; the 57-58 Hawks, and the 66-67 76ers.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,416
I love KC Jones and what he did with the Celts, but he is not one of the 15 best coaches ever.
 

Sam Ray Not

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
8,871
NYC
Billy Cunningham’s omission is also perplexing to me. He’s #2 all-time in regular season winning % at .698 (Phil Jackson #1 at .704, Kerr #3 at .694) and #3 all-time in playoff winning % among coaches with at least 100 wins at .629 (Kerr #1 at .733, Jackson #2 at .688).

You could ding him for not having coached that many games, but he’s coached more than Kerr, who merited inclusion. Recency bias strikes again, it seems.
 

cheech13

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 5, 2006
1,608
They leaned heavy on coaches with titles but I would have also considered Hubie Brown, Rick Adelman and even D’Antoni over Spo and Doc. Not sold on Kerr’s resume yet but the winning % and titles is almost impossible to argue against.
 

Huntington Avenue Grounds

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2008
1,901
Lunenburg, MA
I love KC Jones and what he did with the Celts, but he is not one of the 15 best coaches ever.
I've been scratching my head over KC on this list, but can't tell if I over or under rate him based on my green tinted glasses. Was he a right guy/right time for that team coming from the Bill Fitch years, or did he possess some coaching chops beyond putting three all time greats on the floor?
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,853
I've been scratching my head over KC on this list, but can't tell if I over or under rate him based on my green tinted glasses. Was he a right guy/right time for that team coming from the Bill Fitch years, or did he possess some coaching chops beyond putting three all time greats on the floor?
I don't think KC is one of the 15 best coaches ever, but he did coach the 74-75 Bullets to the NBA Finals. After the Celtics he spent two seasons as a .500 coach with the Supersonics. His other head coaching gigs are the San Diego Conquistadors, the New England Blizzard of the women's ABL, and Brandei's women's basketball team.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,244
I've been scratching my head over KC on this list, but can't tell if I over or under rate him based on my green tinted glasses. Was he a right guy/right time for that team coming from the Bill Fitch years, or did he possess some coaching chops beyond putting three all time greats on the floor?
I think KC deserves credit for getting the various egos that made up the Celtics from 1983-88 to play together and win. Things could have went sideways during the 1984 Finals when the Lakers took a 2-1 series lead that could easily had been a 3-0 lead.

The biggest complaint is that he never really worked to get the bench players into the rotation as much as he could. But some years the Celtics bench was pretty bad.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,416
I think KC deserves credit for getting the various egos that made up the Celtics from 1983-88 to play together and win. Things could have went sideways during the 1984 Finals when the Lakers took a 2-1 series lead that could easily had been a 3-0 lead.

The biggest complaint is that he never really worked to get the bench players into the rotation as much as he could. But some years the Celtics bench was pretty bad.
I agree and I do think he's a good to very good coach. It is just not clear to me he's close to the top 15 ever!
 

reggiecleveland

sublime
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2004
28,014
Saskatoon Canada
I love KC Jones and what he did with the Celts, but he is not one of the 15 best coaches ever.
KC and Doc are on the list (Ime is the first black coach in Celtic history!) IMHO because of the frankly shameful lack of black coaches. KC is underrated. He was a big part of turning the Lakers into a running team as an assistant there and won as a head coach in Washington. He was given a bad shake because one of the rare TV entrances into a timeout showed KC let his assistant Bernie Bickerstaff do the talking. at the time KC a quiet warrior who was not a quote factory was written up as a figurehead. Further review shows his low-profile approach worked great.
 

Lose Remerswaal

Experiencing Furry Panic
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
I don't think KC is one of the 15 best coaches ever, but he did coach the 74-75 Bullets to the NBA Finals. After the Celtics he spent two seasons as a .500 coach with the Supersonics. His other head coaching gigs are the San Diego Conquistadors, the New England Blizzard of the women's ABL, and Brandei's women's basketball team.
Not a big deal and I like your rankings, but KC coached the Judge's Mens team https://www.brandeis.edu/magazine/2021/spring/the-brief/k.c.jones.html
 

TheRooster

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2001
2,490
They leaned heavy on coaches with titles but I would have also considered Hubie Brown, Rick Adelman and even D’Antoni over Spo and Doc. Not sold on Kerr’s resume yet but the winning % and titles is almost impossible to argue against.
Hubie was UNDER .500 for his career even if you include his two very successful ABA seasons. Spo was handed some nice toys, but he/they delivered.
 

jmcc5400

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2000
5,356
Tommy Heinsohn was pretty much the John Madden of the NBA (except, of course, Tommy had a hall of fame playing career as well). Great coach who burnt out young, boisterous personality, colorful broadcaster and beer spokesman. He at least belongs in the conversation for this list.
 

Spelunker

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
12,003
KC and Doc are on the list (Ime is the first black coach in Celtic history!) IMHO because of the frankly shameful lack of black coaches. KC is underrated. He was a big part of turning the Lakers into a running team as an assistant there and won as a head coach in Washington. He was given a bad shake because one of the rare TV entrances into a timeout showed KC let his assistant Bernie Bickerstaff do the talking. at the time KC a quiet warrior who was not a quote factory was written up as a figurehead. Further review shows his low-profile approach worked great.
Huh?
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,685
Guessing it will now go
6. Magic
5. Wilt
4. Russell
3. Kareem
2. LeBron
1. MJ
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,416
I've explained here before why you can't really make an on-the-merits case for Magic above Bird, nor did ANYONE who was watching them in their primes. Amazing as Magic was, he wasn't even the best player on his own team for half his career.

Magic has picked up support and 'passed' Bird well after they both retired, for reasons somewhat legitimate (advanced stats, though with flaws, help Magic's case) and illegitimate (Magic has had a much higher media/public profile) which is fine---this is all subjective and both are amazing and very different players.
 

reggiecleveland

sublime
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2004
28,014
Saskatoon Canada
I'll just reiterate again that I think Wilt is too high.
I have read everything and been lucky enough to talk to some old-timers, and the guys who were around when WIlt played, if you listen, praise his abilities, his athleticism, etc. But you never hear about him making his team better or doing what it took to win. He would get crazy ideas in his head, and no coach could change his mind. Phil Jackson said he would get a charge called on him and stop going to the hoop for a month. He lead the league in assists, but that was his goal, not winning. To me that's a sign of how selfish he was. Yu read about that year they would dump it into him with some overmatched 210 pound stiff guarding him and he would yell at people to cut, so he could get an assist. If a teammate missed a layup from his pass he was pissed. It was like Westbrook demanding every uncontested defensive board. He was going to the beach playing beach volleyball on game day during the playoffs with the Lakers. The only reason he is considered a great volleyball player is he started the pro league and paid for everything as long as he was MVP.

He would not outlet the ball, so his team didn't run, because he wanted the ball. Then later with the Lakers he'd outlet but not cross half court. You read about his speed, but after his first year or two there is no film, or no accounts of him running the floor. In fact, imagine this, young Shaq was separated from Wilt by many guys who saw them both because he ran harder than Wilt.

If I get to coach all-time game in the after life I pick Shaq, Kareem, Russell, Hakeem over Wilt, and depending on who else I get, and assuming afterword Walton and Ralph Sampson have healthy feet I may pick one of them. If I end up with Magic I'd take the Chief over Wilt because he would run.
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,853
I have read everything and been lucky enough to talk to some old-timers, and the guys who were around when WIlt played, if you listen, praise his abilities, his athleticism, etc. But you never hear about him making his team better or doing what it took to win. He would get crazy ideas in his head, and no coach could change his mind. Phil Jackson said he would get a charge called on him and stop going to the hoop for a month. He lead the league in assists, but that was his goal, not winning. To me that's a sign of how selfish he was. Yu read about that year they would dump it into him with some overmatched 210 pound stiff guarding him and he would yell at people to cut, so he could get an assist. If a teammate missed a layup from his pass he was pissed. It was like Westbrook demanding every uncontested defensive board. He was going to the beach playing beach volleyball on game day during the playoffs with the Lakers. The only reason he is considered a great volleyball player is he started the pro league and paid for everything as long as he was MVP.

He would not outlet the ball, so his team didn't run, because he wanted the ball. Then later with the Lakers he'd outlet but not cross half court. You read about his speed, but after his first year or two there is no film, or no accounts of him running the floor. In fact, imagine this, young Shaq was separated from Wilt by many guys who saw them both because he ran harder than Wilt.

If I get to coach all-time game in the after life I pick Shaq, Kareem, Russell, Hakeem over Wilt, and depending on who else I get, and assuming afterword Walton and Ralph Sampson have healthy feet I may pick one of them. If I end up with Magic I'd take the Chief over Wilt because he would run.
Yeah, I've been thinking about this and Wilt reminds me almost of James Harden in some ways. Wilt was obsessed with his own statistics more than I think any other player in history, but more than that, his skill never translated to success the way you would expect. He also just quit on a bunch of teams. He quit on the Warriors and he quit on the 76ers, demanding trades both times. It's really crazy he was traded twice in his prime, that didn't happen back then. Russell, Baylor, West were never traded as active players. Oscar was traded once at the tail end of his prime. Kareem did demand a trade in his prime, but only once. If you read contemporary accounts, very few players would have chosen Wilt over Russell. Elgin, who played with Wilt, CRUSHES Wilt in his autobiography to a startling degree.

Wilt is a weird player in that he gets a benefit from being an old-time player, where I think it hinders Russell, West, Baylor, Oscar, Cousy, etc. His stats have aged so well that people give him a lot of praise without looking at his glaring weaknesses, mostly because many people don't know any better. Wilt won two titles total, and was the best player on only one of them. Compare that to the other people in this Top 10. MJ has 6, LeBron has 4, Russell has 11, Bird has 3, Shaq has 4, Duncan has 5 (probably 4 as the best player), Kareem has 6 (3-4 as best player). How did such a dominant player end up with the weakest resume out of the Top 10?
 

bakahump

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 8, 2001
7,568
Maine
Damning stories and observations @reggiecleveland

And far be it for me to defend Wilt. I agree from what I have read that he was selfish.
But I wonder if for guys like him (the few) if sometimes the game is too easy. He KNEW....I mean KNEW....he could literally score 100 on a given night. So does the mind start coming up with new challenges? "......hmmm lead the league in assists.....yeah....yeah...". So your competitive nature turns that into "Yelling at teammates who miss"? Or "F this ref....call a charge on me....I will shoot 15 footers for a month".

Larry and the left hand?

Obviously we as fans want Winning to be that Challenge. And for Russ (and Larry and Jordan) it was exactly that. But some guys arent built that way, the game is still incredibly (/too) easy for them. Easy enough that they needed to try to do "weird shit" just to stay motivated.

Hell he may also have been like "Hell I cant WIN against Russell so I might as well find other things I can get accolades for."

Hard to fathom what a mind f*ck Russell had to be for guys. Especially his biggest rival.
Think Brady (to Manning say) on steriods. "HOW DOES THAT GUY KEEP BEATING ME!!??"
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,416
At the apex---guys who can be MVPs, and who end up on top 20 all time lists---how important winning is to you really matters a lot, imo.

Guys like Russell, Jordan, Magic, Bird, Lebron were totally consumed with winning. They would do anything---in a game, in an offseason, in a practice---to win. That drives them and drives their team. I fully believe that matters in terms of actual teams winning actual championships. I absolutely believe all five of those guys would happily score zero points if that was what it took, or spend 100% of their energy defending someone if that was what it took.

As great as Shaq was---and he was the equal of all those guys in any given game---he was not as consumed with winning. That, imo, is why he doesn't belong at the top of the list. Kareem is a tougher case, because his stoic personality hid the fire some....but also limited him as a leader. Duncan was more like Kareem. But, you will not find a quote from a teammate for either of those guys that they didn't care, that they didn't practice/play hard, etc. They cared.

Wilt cared less than all of those guys. And less than most of the next ten guys too. At the apex, I really believe that matters. If Wilt cared about winning as much as Russell, Bird, Magic Lebron and MJ did he probably would have been the best player ever. But he didn't, and he wasn't.
 

snowmanny

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
15,780
Kareem is a funny case for me. Not sure where to rank him. 4th would be fine, and like I said before if you included college and not just NBA you can put him anywhere.

I was a kid in 1971 but I was aware enough to know that Bucks team looked like it was unstoppable against any team ever. I also think the Bucks could have should have beaten the celebrated ‘72 Lakers in the playoffs. And of course they could have won it all in ‘74 as well.

That being said, if the Lakers had traded Kareem to Portland or Indiana or something for a top pick in the 1978 draft and ended up with Bird and Magic as rookies in 1979...I’d bet they would have ended up with more titles. It didn’t happen and Kareem was a huge part of the five rings they got, but he wasn’t the same guy in the 80’s that he was in the late 60’s and 70’s.