Patriots' 2024 Free Agency Thread

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,198
I don't think #3 is redshirting either. He may take a seat for the first 4-8 games. But I can't imagine burning a whole year.

And yes, I know the Packers did with Jordan Love.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,552
around the way
I don't think #3 is redshirting either. He may take a seat for the first 4-8 games. But I can't imagine burning a whole year.

And yes, I know the Packers did with Jordan Love.
Nobody serious is anticipating that #3 will redshirt this year in Foxboro. This is a weird offshoot of the "we didn't get Calvin Ridley!!!111" conversation.
 

Red Averages

owes you $50
SoSH Member
Apr 20, 2003
9,215
Nobody serious is anticipating that #3 will redshirt this year in Foxboro. This is a weird offshoot of the "we didn't get Calvin Ridley!!!111" conversation.
Seems most probable he won’t start the year and will take over as the season progresses (week 8?). Under those conditions is it worth burning cap vs pushing to next year or front loading contracts this year to create an optimal point in 2-3 years to GFIN as the #3 pick enters the last few years of his contract and has presumably been starting for 2 years?
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,552
around the way
Seems most probable he won’t start the year and will take over as the season progresses (week 8?). Under those conditions is it worth burning cap vs pushing to next year or front loading contracts this year to create an optimal point in 2-3 years to GFIN as the #3 pick enters the last few years of his contract and has presumably been starting for 2 years?
That's fair. We wouldn't want him starting until we're sure that the OL is better than the screen door on a submarine certainly. Hopefully that's only a few weeks. And agreed that we probably should be looking at a point beyond 2024 for the GFIN phase. I love the idea of spending cap now via some frontloading strategy to free up cap later.

It seems silly to sign guys to one year deals for a GFIN 2024 that doesn't exist. There are probably multiple ways to set up for the 4 year window of a rookie QB.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,935
Nobody serious is anticipating that #3 will redshirt this year in Foxboro. This is a weird offshoot of the "we didn't get Calvin Ridley!!!111" conversation.
There has been some discussion that if it's Maye he would get time to rebuild his footwork/motion before the put him in the fire, whether that is 4, 8, or even the full season.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,552
around the way
There has been some discussion that if it's Maye he would get time to rebuild his footwork/motion before the put him in the fire, whether that is 4, 8, or even the full season.
A full season seems crazy. I don't see any reason why he can't work on his mechanics continuously, even while he's getting starts.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,935
A full season seems crazy. I don't see any reason why he can't work on his mechanics continuously, even while he's getting starts.
It's a lot to put on a guy's plate, and often the footwork goes out the window when they're trying to read a defense, react, avoid the rush, etc. Just look at Mac... he came into year 2 with all this talk about how he spent camp working on footwork... first preseason game he saw a bit of pressure and it was back foot.

I don't think it would be full season for Maye, but maybe 6 or 8 weeks to get him settled in, get the muscle memory going, let him be in the film sessions seeing live play, then make the switch. Full season would be if the progress is slow or he picks up an injury... or if the line is crushed by injuries like last year. Let the line jell too, so he's stepping in the most prepared and with the most prepared teammates he can.
 

CoffeeNerdness

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 6, 2012
8,872
Only 14 QBs started more than 15 games last season, so even with a redshirt plan it's likely that the backup gets some starts regardless.
 

NickEsasky

Please Hammer, Don't Hurt 'Em
Silver Supporter
SoSH Member
Jul 24, 2001
9,211
Why can't it be as simple as he will get as much leash as he shows he deserves? If he's playing well in camp and pre-season then he will start if he looks like confused dogshit he won't.
 

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
19,597
Somewhere
If the Patriots are in on Smith, then they probably won’t have too much cap space to spare once extensions and injury insurance comes into play.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,924
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
It's a lot to put on a guy's plate, and often the footwork goes out the window when they're trying to read a defense, react, avoid the rush, etc. Just look at Mac... he came into year 2 with all this talk about how he spent camp working on footwork... first preseason game he saw a bit of pressure and it was back foot.

I don't think it would be full season for Maye, but maybe 6 or 8 weeks to get him settled in, get the muscle memory going, let him be in the film sessions seeing live play, then make the switch. Full season would be if the progress is slow or he picks up an injury... or if the line is crushed by injuries like last year. Let the line jell too, so he's stepping in the most prepared and with the most prepared teammates he can.
I don't think throwing off your back foot in the face of pressure is fixable with mechanics coaching, it's a lot more related to toughness, ability to perceive space and timing, many more innate components. Now, throwing from a solid platform from clean pockets/being more consistent in repeating mechanics with good footwork are teachable, and it's what happened to Josh Allen, Lamar Jackson and even Mahomes to a lesser extent. Maye could use that so he'd stop missing as many layups and spraying the ball at times, but if you're flinching in the face of pressure like Mac was, you're toast, man. Especially if you don't have the arm to throw the ball on a rope while fading away from the rush. Fatal flaw.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,674
Oregon
Why can't it be as simple as he will get as much leash as he shows he deserves? If he's playing well in camp and pre-season then he will start if he looks like confused dogshit he won't.
Because apparently this has to be decided RIGHT NOW
 

singaporesoxfan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2004
11,889
Washington, DC
It would be keeping in character for the Players Union to negotiate for something that looked good on paper but was ultimately meaningless because it could easily be sidestepped or manipulated by the owners.
To be fair, much as I don't think much of the Union, my sense is that the reason that the floor doesn't really play is that teams just manage their cash spending to the cap. What the players negotiated in 2011 was that they managed to make sure the spending is real cash spending, and ended the prior practice of giving ridiculous bonuses that couldn't be achieved (asking the kicker to lead the team in tackles etc.). As far as I can tell, teams do actually spend real cash within the various periods to meet their requirements. It's just that cap accounting tactics (proration, void years, etc.) are sufficiently flexible to allow teams to basically move their actual cash spending to whichever years they want that spending to be booked in. That's not terrible manipulation - where the real manipulation happens is what actually counts as revenue that has to be shared under the cap.

Also, a slight correction (or someone please correct me): my understanding the 4-year/89% cap spending floor period under the CBA was for 2017-2020. Right now it's a set of 3-year periods with a minimum 90% cash spending:
For the four-League Year period covering the 2017–2020 League Years, there shall be a guaranteed Minimum Team Cash Spending of 89% of the Salary Caps for such period.
For each of the following multi-League-Year periods 2021–2023 (three League Years), 2024–2026 (three League Years), and 2027–2030 (four League Years), there shall be a guaranteed Minimum Team Cash Spending of 90% of the Salary Caps for such periods.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,552
around the way
I don't think throwing off your back foot in the face of pressure is fixable with mechanics coaching, it's a lot more related to toughness, ability to perceive space and timing, many more innate components. Now, throwing from a solid platform from clean pockets/being more consistent in repeating mechanics with good footwork are teachable, and it's what happened to Josh Allen, Lamar Jackson and even Mahomes to a lesser extent. Maye could use that so he'd stop missing as many layups and spraying the ball at times, but if you're flinching in the face of pressure like Mac was, you're toast, man. Especially if you don't have the arm to throw the ball on a rope while fading away from the rush. Fatal flaw.
Maye has the arm to throw ropes on one leg. It's probably his biggest selling point. Him executing NFL throws under pressure off-platform is probably the only thing that I'm not worried about with him. He can also get outside and downfield when the pressure is too much for any QB to handle. It's his accuracy off-platform that's sometimes suspect, which is fixable with teaching as you note.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,198
Lots of threads out there, so if I missed this, my bad, but the Pats did call on Allen. Just didn't want to give up a 4th.

 

ZMart100

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2008
3,220
ended the prior practice of giving ridiculous bonuses that couldn't be achieved (asking the kicker to lead the team in tackles etc.).
I don't think that was a thing. To the extent it happened those would have been NLTBE bonuses and would not have counted against the cap unless earned. I think the fear was what was happening in MLB with some teams perpetually having low payrolls.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,924
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
Maye has the arm to throw ropes on one leg. It's probably his biggest selling point. Him executing NFL throws under pressure off-platform is probably the only thing that I'm not worried about with him. He can also get outside and downfield when the pressure is too much for any QB to handle. It's his accuracy off-platform that's sometimes suspect, which is fixable with teaching as you note.
Yeah, Maye does, Mac didn't, which is why I don't think it would be a fatal flaw to him. I also like his aggressivenes and think he's the best intermediate middle of the field thrower in the class, and that's where high level QBs live in the NFL. I also believe he's tougher than Mac and most of his fade away throws are to buy time to get the ball out due to his delivery being slower than I'd like, and not necessarily a fear of the rush (and due to the arm talent, the ball can get there). I really like him as a prospect and to me the footwork stuff is very fixable, I do worry a bit about his trigger, though. Feel he's not always on time with the read and he needs to be because the ball doesn't come out fast with his motion.

I was in love with Anthony Richardson last year due to his explosiveness inside the pocket, his pocket navigation skills and his decision making, even though his accuracy was pretty much the worst I've seen in the past decade out of first round QB prospects. I like Maye for some of the same reasons, even though Richardsons's physical tools far exceed his. I feel like Maye understands leverage, anticipates space well, already manipulates defenders with his eyes, I just don't think he sees it fast enough at this point, and that's one thing I feel like experience and coaching can improve, but there's a limit. Still, like him much more than Daniels (who I feel is a limited passer - more accurate, more mechanically sound, but doesn't have the best pocket presence and lives on the sidelines).
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,552
around the way
Yeah, Maye does, Mac didn't, which is why I don't think it would be a fatal flaw to him. I also like his aggressivenes and think he's the best intermediate middle of the field thrower in the class, and that's where high level QBs live in the NFL. I also believe he's tougher than Mac and most of his fade away throws are to buy time to get the ball out due to his delivery being slower than I'd like, and not necessarily a fear of the rush (and due to the arm talent, the ball can get there). I really like him as a prospect and to me the footwork stuff is very fixable, I do worry a bit about his trigger, though. Feel he's not always on time with the read and he needs to be because the ball doesn't come out fast with his motion.
Yeah his reads are supposedly a bit slow for sure, another area of possible development.
 
Oct 12, 2023
720
A lot of them do? I think it's dumb to redshirt a top 3 pick and waste time when he could be learning the offense and the league in game reps unless he is totally not getting it in practice, in which case you have bigger problems. We don't have a hall of famer for the new guy to learn from and we're most likely not having a prospect fall to us in the 20s like GB did, twice.

I don't think missing on Allen is a huge problem but I'd feel a lot better if they added a veteran to the worst receivers room in the league.

If the plan is to suck for another high pick then sure, throw Brissett out there all year I guess. But you don't learn a whole lot about what you have.
At this point it sure looks like the plan is punt on 2024. The chances of landing a franchise QB, high end LT and starting WR in the draft class are very slim simply because most prospects fail. So why throw Maye to the wolves with Okorafor or McDermott protecting his blindside and Bourne/Douglas as his top receivers?

Start Brissett, if the OL and WR come together better than expected, maybe the rookie gets an earlier look. But between bad WR and a porous OL, the Pats QB will be taking a beating or running for his life a whole lot. No need to risk injury or pull a Couch/David Carr and destroy a guy’s confidence in a write off season.
 

singaporesoxfan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2004
11,889
Washington, DC
I don't think that was a thing. To the extent it happened those would have been NLTBE bonuses and would not have counted against the cap unless earned. I think the fear was what was happening in MLB with some teams perpetually having low payrolls.
You are right, I was mixing up a bunch of facts about 2011 in my mind. What 2011 allowed was cap to be carried over formally, rather than the practice of issuing ridiculous NLTBE bonuses like what I described in order to say they weren’t earned and thus allowing that cap space to be carried over. Previously it was use it or lose it
 

NomarsFool

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 21, 2001
8,263
I don’t see a fourth as a particularly high price to pay for a player like Keenan Allen. I also think, giving up a fourth for a low commitment isn’t a bad cost as well. I’m not sure I would qualify it as a GFIN, but as a way to have a functional team that isn’t a disaster in 2024. So, you have Allen and you draft a WR either in the 2nd or 3rd and he can hopefully also contribute to his success as well. Anyway, I’m just surprised the Patriots weren’t in on this.
 

ehaz

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2007
4,973
Quarterback or no quarterback, the pressure that is going to be placed on any offensive player in the Patriots 2024 draft class is going to be enormous.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,935
Dammit. That seemed like SUCH an easy, obvious sign for the Patriots. No idea if they even put in an effort, if they even wanted him. But they had a glaring need, tons of cap space, and an opportunity to sign him. (kind of like Boston and Montgomery)

Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
By all accounts they were in on him. But let's be honest, all they could offer was the most money. Most guys go for that, but Smith may have been more interested in a playoff roster
 

Bowser

New Member
Sep 27, 2019
431
There's not a single Patriots player or coach any free agent would come to Foxboro specifically to play with or for. Mystique and Aura have danced their last dance. We're basically the 1976 Tampa Bay Bucs.
 

Salem's Lot

Andy Moog! Andy God Damn Moog!
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
14,650
Gallows Hill
There's not a single Patriots player or coach any free agent would come to Foxboro specifically to play with or for. Mystique and Aura have danced their last dance. We're basically the 1976 Tampa Bay Bucs.
Yup. People (especially in the media) have to realize that this is going to have to be rebuilt through the draft like everyone else. There are no quick fixes.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,767
Becton is still a free agent. Always wary of signing Jets castoffs, and he hasn't been great for them, but he has enough talent to be a first round pick not that long ago. Worth a shot?
 

P'tucket rhymes with...

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2006
11,656
The Coney Island of my mind
Dammit. That seemed like SUCH an easy, obvious sign for the Patriots. No idea if they even put in an effort, if they even wanted him. But they had a glaring need, tons of cap space, and an opportunity to sign him. (kind of like Boston and Montgomery)

Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Really? You're not sure they "even put in an effort?" Is it difficult to envision why a premium-tier guy on the back nine might choose a playoff-bound team rather than being an Act I character in the Patriots Rebuild?
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,889
Becton is still a free agent. Always wary of signing Jets castoffs, and he hasn't been great for them, but he has enough talent to be a first round pick not that long ago. Worth a shot?
He had some flashes in run blocking but nothing like his rookie year where he was smashing guys regularly. He has had injuries. I hope he figures it out. I wouldn’t want him protecting a rookie right now.
 

Morgan's Magic Snowplow

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 2, 2006
22,429
Philadelphia
From the comments coming out, it’s pretty clear that playing with Rodgers and having a (perceived) opportunity to win was important to Smith. I doubt he really considered us. Probably between Dallas and the Jets the whole time.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,767
Really? You're not sure they "even put in an effort?" Is it difficult to envision why a premium-tier guy on the back nine might choose a playoff-bound team rather than being an Act I character in the Patriots Rebuild?
No, I literally meant that I have no idea if they even liked him and pursued him. Maybe they didn't want him at all. I wasn't saying anything in the affirmative. I was just saying I don't know what their level of interest even was. Maybe they're thinking about this totally differently than I am, or maybe they're thinking the same and he just chose the Jets for reasons you suggest - though the Jets can hardly be called, at this point, a "playoff-bound team". They seem like a better bet than New England but they're hardly any sort of playoff lock.
 

bsj

Renegade Crazed Genius
SoSH Member
Dec 6, 2003
22,801
Central NJ SoSH Chapter
I remember back in the early 90s, NO free agents wanted to play for New England. Then we had a 20+ year run where they all did. Have we fallen back towards that already? Not trying to be hyperbolic, legit asking the Q. The shine seems gone until we hit in the draft and then create a couple home grown stars, which can then hopefully attract others. Judon's lobbying doesn't seems to be enough.
 

Red Averages

owes you $50
SoSH Member
Apr 20, 2003
9,215
I remember back in the early 90s, NO free agents wanted to play for New England. Then we had a 20+ year run where they all did. Have we fallen back towards that already? Not trying to be hyperbolic, legit asking the Q. The shine seems gone until we hit in the draft and then create a couple home grown stars, which can then hopefully attract others. Judon's lobbying doesn't seems to be enough.
People want to play for winners. If you win you get some concessions on $ for offering other benefits (winning, coaching, better chance for great contract after a short stint winning). It’s not complicated. No need to go back 15 years or 40.
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
2,511
People want to play for winners. If you win you get some concessions on $ for offering other benefits (winning, coaching, better chance for great contract after a short stint winning). It’s not complicated. No need to go back 15 years or 40.
I think if we want a historical comparison it's 1993. Blank slate. Develop some homegrown talent, show some potential, and we'll get some FA interest.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,540
Hingham, MA
I think it's actually telling that so many guys re-signed. They all could have found offers elsewhere. They chose to be back in New England. We aren't talking about scrubs. Bourne, Henry, Onwenu, Uche, Jennings - these guys are all solid NFL caliber players. It's not like the Pats gave them absurd contracts. They have to believe in Mayo and what the team is doing.
 

CoffeeNerdness

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 6, 2012
8,872
Also, Mayo has only played/coached in NE so he's doesn't really have that pull from outside of the organization that other new HCs have.
 
Oct 12, 2023
720
“People want to play for winners”

Yet we saw Tennessee, Washington and Carolina spend massive dollars and bring in plenty of new players. Brian Burns had no issue re-signing with the Giants after the trade. Arizona has Kyler Murray, granted, but still a bad roster overall and landed a couple key players.

Players will go where the money is usually. Sure, sometimes a guy wants to play with his buddy, or a guy at the end is chasing a ring. But money talks.

The difference between the Pats and the other awful teams from last year is those other teams are willing to pay top dollar for less than top talent and the Pats don’t seem to be.

Let’s not kid ourselves into thinking the Raiders, who landed arguably the biggest prize (Wilkins) of free agency are too much different than the Pats. Bad roster with a young “players coach”.

Unless Wolf ends up to be a historically great drafter, they’re going to need to shell out some “bad” contracts because that’s the nature of free agency.