Pritchard Extended

chilidawg

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 22, 2015
6,018
Cultural hub of the universe
I don't think PP and Hauser need to be uprraded necessarily. I think what they need is a wing who puts more emphasis on the D side of 3&D, as well as a big who can bang. The 7-10 spots in the playoffs will be really 1-2 players who need to be matchup dependent. Some days they will need a guy who can rain 3s (Hauser or PP); sometimes a guy who can help shut down a wing scorer; sometimes a big who can bang Embiid or Giannis. Grant Williams could often fill a couple of these roles; the bench guys now really are one -trick ponies.
Well they've got Brisset, Stevens and even Walsh for that wing defender, so I think that's not a priority. There's bodies at the 3rd big and point as well that will be fine for the regular season and probably for limited playoff minutes. The question should be that if one of the top six is out in the playoffs, is there a guy or two who can step up and play 20-25 minutes effectively. That's one of the questions that needs to be answered in the first half of the season.
 

DavidTai

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2003
1,255
Herndon, VA
I'm more than satisfied with keeping Hauser as the 3 and D guy. If "D" is really your concern, then you -should- keep Hauser in there because, so long as teams keep thinking they can switch and iso on him, their prowess actually declines to the point that the team defensive ratings go UP with him.

It's counterintuitive, perhaps, but iso ball tends to produce less points than other plays and a large part of that is that a) teams tend to target Hauser and b) Hauser is not by any means a bad defender.

Celticsblog did an article on this last year https://www.celticsblog.com/2023/3/7/23628062/the-not-so-obvious-reason-why-sam-hauser-deserves-more-minutes-boston-celtics-joe-mazzulla
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,312
Well they've got Brisset, Stevens and even Walsh for that wing defender, so I think that's not a priority. There's bodies at the 3rd big and point as well that will be fine for the regular season and probably for limited playoff minutes. The question should be that if one of the top six is out in the playoffs, is there a guy or two who can step up and play 20-25 minutes effectively. That's one of the questions that needs to be answered in the first half of the season.
Right, Stevens can go bang with anyone, and Brisset is decent there too. Can they shoot? Not really, but a version of them who can shoot and play real offense costs way more than the Celtics can afford in matching salary and draft capital.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,427
Santa Monica
I'm more than satisfied with keeping Hauser as the 3 and D guy. If "D" is really your concern, then you -should- keep Hauser in there because, so long as teams keep thinking they can switch and iso on him, their prowess actually declines to the point that the team defensive ratings go UP with him.

It's counterintuitive, perhaps, but iso ball tends to produce less points than other plays and a large part of that is that a) teams tend to target Hauser and b) Hauser is not by any means a bad defender.

Celticsblog did an article on this last year https://www.celticsblog.com/2023/3/7/23628062/the-not-so-obvious-reason-why-sam-hauser-deserves-more-minutes-boston-celtics-joe-mazzulla
That article should be required reading for anyone concerned about the bench or Hauser's D.
 

DavidTai

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2003
1,255
Herndon, VA
That article should be required reading for anyone concerned about the bench or Hauser's D.
Interesting to read the comments in that article as it might have foreshadowed Smart's departure (and Grant's too, as Hauser was outperforming Grant defensively). One example:

The other thing that stood out to me was this surprising little nugget: I saw that in the last fifteen games almost all of our worst net ratings come from lineups featuring all three of Horford, Smart, and Tatum. In fact, out of six iterations, only the one with Jaylen and White managed a positive net rating. Nearly all the other most-used lineups have a positive net rating, but put Al, Smart and Jayson out there and they lose ground unless White and Brown are on the court with them. And that pattern holds across the whole season. No idea why, since that wasn't the case last year.
So we replaced Smart with Holiday and we put Porzingis in the starting lineup and demoted Al to Grant's role this year...
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,312
Interesting to read the comments in that article as it might have foreshadowed Smart's departure (and Grant's too, as Hauser was outperforming Grant defensively). One example:



So we replaced Smart with Holiday and we put Porzingis in the starting lineup and demoted Al to Grant's role this year...
Smart slipped a lot on D, relative to other guards with elite reputations. It was heresy early on, but I think it's pretty easy to see now that we have the eyetest comparison with Jrue.

Brad sold very high there, and it's funny now to look back at all the hand-wringing from July. Smart just isn't that guy anymore.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,299
Pittsburgh, PA
God I miss Healthy TimeLord. He was just so damn much fun. Him at 15-20' per game with the second unit would've been perfect this year, alas.

But yes, "Hauser is actually a good defender and can defend 1-4" is something I think the Port Cellar is generally aware of. I do wonder a bit whether the league has caught on, and is hunting him less this year. It's hard to tell because Pritchard is such a juicier target, and they're usually on the floor together.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,427
Santa Monica
God I miss Healthy TimeLord. He was just so damn much fun. Him at 15-20' per game with the second unit would've been perfect this year, alas.

But yes, "Hauser is actually a good defender and can defend 1-4" is something I think the Port Cellar is generally aware of. I do wonder a bit whether the league has caught on, and is hunting him less this year. It's hard to tell because Pritchard is such a juicier target, and they're usually on the floor together.
Healthy Timelord was the Celtic's best, most impactful defender in 2021-22, regardless of the DPOY Award. After working closely with him for 5 seasons I imagine Boston's doctors/trainers just couldn't figure out a way to keep him together for extended periods of time. I expect PDX will limit TL's minutes and deal him to a contender for draft assets by the trade deadline.

Agree, Pritchard is the red meat every opponent is looking to attack.
Hiding PP with 2nd units, playing him with +++ defensive teammates (White/Tatum/Al), and having him burn opponent's shot clock with full-court pressure can limit the effectiveness of the PP Iso hunt.
 

slamminsammya

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
9,443
San Francisco
Sam Hauser is a great case study on the principle that prejudice drives people to do things that are not beneficial for themselves. you can explain much human history with watching guys attack Hauser one on one.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,427
Santa Monica
Smart slipped a lot on D, relative to other guards with elite reputations. It was heresy early on, but I think it's pretty easy to see now that we have the eyetest comparison with Jrue.

Brad sold very high there, and it's funny now to look back at all the hand-wringing from July. Smart just isn't that guy anymore.
I'm not quite sure how Brad turned
1. Marcus Smart into 2 Firsts + Tyus Jones then traded
2. Jones + Gallinari/Muscala (salary filler) + a 2nd for Porzingis
3. Then extended Porzinigis at $30MM for 2 more seasons

Three absolute HEISTS. You would have been laughed off this Board if you suggested any one of those things happening.

I love the Jrue deal, but that was much more equitable for both sides.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,312
I'm not quite sure how Brad turned
1. Marcus Smart into 2 Firsts + Tyus Jones then traded
2. Jones + Gallinari/Muscala (salary filler) + a 2nd for Porzingis
3. Then extended Porzinigis at $30MM for 2 more seasons

Three absolute HEISTS. You would have been laughed off this Board if you suggested any one of those things happening.

I love the Jrue deal, but that was much more equitable for both sides.
The KP part of the deal is simple: he was going to decline his option and sign on the open market if Washington didn't do a Boston deal.

At that point, it just became about Boston finding the salary match and S&T-level assets before the opt-in deadline hit.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,427
Santa Monica
The KP part of the deal is simple: he was going to decline his option and sign on the open market if Washington didn't do a Boston deal.

At that point, it just became about Boston finding the salary match and S&T-level assets before the opt-in deadline hit.
Where were the other NBA-contending GMs? a 2nd + Jones + filler for a cusp All-Star willing to extend on a discount

Why wasn't there a bidding war the week before the trade?

or did KP only want to play in Boston.

if I'm an opposing fan I'm like WTF how did Boston get KP that cheaply
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,312
Where were the other NBA-contending GMs? a 2nd + Jones + filler for a cusp All-Star willing to extend on a discount

Why wasn't there a bidding war the week before the trade?

or did KP only want to play in Boston.

if I'm an opposing fan I'm like WTF how did they get KP that cheaply
KP wanted to go to Boston. It's the usual dynamics with a S&T: guy has a place he wants to go, so he gets there in exchange for some minimal assets.

KP mentioned that he had higher $$ offers, but wanted to go to Boston (and extended at a discount because he wanted to be there).

The opposing teams don't seem to have had a chance to get him at this asset+dollar price.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,236
Here
Healthy Timelord was the Celtic's best, most impactful defender in 2021-22, regardless of the DPOY Award. After working closely with him for 5 seasons I imagine Boston's doctors/trainers just couldn't figure out a way to keep him together for extended periods of time. I expect PDX will limit TL's minutes and deal him to a contender for draft assets by the trade deadline.

Agree, Pritchard is the red meat every opponent is looking to attack.
Hiding PP with 2nd units, playing him with +++ defensive teammates (White/Tatum/Al), and having him burn opponent's shot clock with full-court pressure can limit the effectiveness of the PP Iso hunt.
Healthy Timelord was potentially a generational talent on D, a more athletic Ben Wallace.

I have a buddy who's a diehard Trailblazers guy (still reeling over the draft miss) and he says Old Timelord just appears to be gone forever. I know we suspected it, but he's still not what he was, and at this point I don't see how that ever comes back. He can still be an impactful player, but the ceiling has shrunk significantly. Sad.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,312
Healthy Timelord was potentially a generational talent on D, a more athletic Ben Wallace.

I have a buddy who's a diehard Trailblazers guy (still reeling over the draft miss) and he says Old Timelord just appears to be gone forever. I know we suspected it, but he's still not what he was, and at this point I don't see how that ever comes back. He can still be an impactful player, but the ceiling has shrunk significantly. Sad.
Brad sold high again......

I predict that, within 6-12 months, we will look back at unloading Smart, TL and Brogdon (plus a 2029 pick) for Jrue+KP as a completely ridiculous (and well-timed) heist.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,418
Where were the other NBA-contending GMs? a 2nd + Jones + filler for a cusp All-Star willing to extend on a discount

Why wasn't there a bidding war the week before the trade?

or did KP only want to play in Boston.

if I'm an opposing fan I'm like WTF how did Boston get KP that cheaply
It's the value of having a great agent so you don't end up in Portland during a rebuild.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,821
Pritchard's game log so far:

11 min, 1-4 FG, 0-3 3pt, 4 pts, 1 assist
13 min, 1-1 FG, 1-1 3pt, 3 pts, 1 assist
25 min, 0-8 FG, 0-6 3pt, 0 pts, 6 assists
20 min, 6-10 FG, 2-3 3pt, 15 pts, 9 assists (155 points scored by Boston)
19 min, 0-4 FG, 0-4 3pt, 0 pts, 2 assists
20 min, 0-3 FG, 0-1 3pt, 0 pts, 3 assists
16 min, 0-4 FG, 0-2 3pt, 0 pts, 4 assists

1 game: 20 min, 6-10 FG, 2-3 3pt, 15 pts, 9 assists
6 games: 104 min, 2-24 FG, 1-17 3pt, 7 pts, 17 assists

Oof.
 

bigq

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
11,230
With a SSS caveat his per 36 rebounds (5.5) and assists (7.1) are pretty good. And he does not turn the ball over at a high rate. His shooting is dreadful however that is likely to improve. I think he is okay in a ~15 minute per game back up role.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,312
He's been godawful: he's there to shoot, and he can't shoot right now. These things rarely last, so I'd expect him to be fine as the season drags on into its boring phase.
 

Dahabenzapple2

Mr. McGuire / Axl's Counter
SoSH Member
Jun 20, 2011
8,927
Wayne, NJ
Pritchard's game log so far:

11 min, 1-4 FG, 0-3 3pt, 4 pts, 1 assist
13 min, 1-1 FG, 1-1 3pt, 3 pts, 1 assist
25 min, 0-8 FG, 0-6 3pt, 0 pts, 6 assists
20 min, 6-10 FG, 2-3 3pt, 15 pts, 9 assists (155 points scored by Boston)
19 min, 0-4 FG, 0-4 3pt, 0 pts, 2 assists
20 min, 0-3 FG, 0-1 3pt, 0 pts, 3 assists
16 min, 0-4 FG, 0-2 3pt, 0 pts, 4 assists

1 game: 20 min, 6-10 FG, 2-3 3pt, 15 pts, 9 assists
6 games: 104 min, 2-24 FG, 1-17 3pt, 7 pts, 17 assists

Oof.
I’m having nightmares of him driving into traffic in the paint aimlessly and having to escape. If he his at least more than 1-17 from 3 he might be playable. Last night was awful. As were all the other nights except the 1 good game. Huge weak link in the chain right now. The dude HAS to hit shots. Without that he’s a big problem.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,847
Melrose, MA
I think his shot is not falling but that will come around, as it seems to have sone with Hauser. Of the 8 players who are getting 1at least 10 minutes per game, he is, weirdly, 4th in offensive rebound rate. He actually leads the team in assist rate, though the turnovers are a little high for now.
 

bigq

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
11,230
He's been godawful: he's there to shoot, and he can't shoot right now. These things rarely last, so I'd expect him to be fine as the season drags on into its boring phase.
I don’t think that shooting is his primary role with this team. Pritchard’s role is mostly 2nd unit ball handler and offense initiator. He seems to be doing okay at that upping his assist rate and keeping turnovers relatively low. I like that he consistently pushes pace. Someone here described him as a 2 in the size of a 1. I think that is generally accurate however there is no role for him as a 2 on this team. I do think his shooting will come around.

This team is thin at the PG position. I hope PP continues to develop and grow his PG role as he is one DW or JH injury away from playing a lot of minutes for this team.
 

chilidawg

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 22, 2015
6,018
Cultural hub of the universe
I don’t think that shooting is his primary role with this team. Pritchard’s role is mostly 2nd unit ball handler and offense initiator. He seems to be doing okay at that upping his assist rate and keeping turnovers relatively low. I like that he consistently pushes pace. Someone here described him as a 2 in the size of a 1. I think that is generally accurate however there is no role for him as a 2 on this team. I do think his shooting will come around.

This team is thin at the PG position. I hope PP continues to develop and grow his PG role as he is one DW or JH injury away from playing a lot of minutes for this team.
His minutes didn't go up in the two games DW missed. I think Joe recognizes that he's not going to be good in extended minutes.
 

bigq

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
11,230
His minutes didn't go up in the two games DW missed. I think Joe recognizes that he's not going to be good in extended minutes.
I'm not sure about that. His minutes per game were boosted by two blow out games where the starters sat for the 4th quarter. In those games he played more than 25 minutes. Prior to the two blow outs he was getting 11-12 minutes per game. In the two games DW missed he played 19 and 20 minutes.

If White or Holiday were to miss an extended period I would guess PP would be counted on for a lot of minutes.
 

Montana Fan

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 18, 2000
8,930
Twin Bridges, Mt.
I’m having nightmares of him driving into traffic in the paint aimlessly and having to escape. If he his at least more than 1-17 from 3 he might be playable. Last night was awful. As were all the other nights except the 1 good game. Huge weak link in the chain right now. The dude HAS to hit shots. Without that he’s a big problem.
I’m right with you regarding his driving deep and then stopping his dribble among a bunch of 6’8” plus guys. I figure they’re going to give him about 20 games to figure things out but IMO Svi could fit nicely into Pritchard’s role. Svi is a decent ball handler and PP is typically on the court with 1-2 of White/Jrue/Tatum so him needing to handle the ball is reduced. If PP doesn’t come around, I hope Svi gets a good look.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,418
An example that i mentioned in Silver Dollar about numbers lying. 4Q offense in a 50-pt has little value in and of itself. There is a small chance that the confidence gained could assist to some degree however the same skill level and limitations that existed yesterday remain today. As I've repeated numerous times it isn't the regular season I'm concerned about as both players should be able to perform reasonably well in that role maybe slightly below league avg....but it is for the playoffs where they should and likely will be upgraded.
Pritchard 0-10 3-pt in the three games since Indiana (post motivated by Jaylens 28% on years sans Wizards game).
 

kazuneko

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
2,845
Honolulu HI
Payton Pritchard now leads the league in offensive rebounds per game for players under 6 ft 4 - and he’s doing that in only 20 minutes a game.
 

GeorgeCostanza

tiger king
SoSH Member
May 16, 2009
7,286
Go f*ck yourself
I think it’s a factor of two things. One, he clearly just has a nose for the ball. I’m not sure this is something that can even be taught. It’s not like he battling for great position or anything. He’s just there all of a sudden. I can’t stand playing against guys like this. Love playing with them. And two, the trees tend not to pay much mind to the bushes in the paint. I wonder if we’ll start to see that change wrt to Pritch.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,847
Melrose, MA
PP is now third on the team with 14 offensive rebounds, behind Al (17) and Holiday (16).

Among the top 10 Celtics in minutes, he is 4th in offensive rebound rate (8.2) behind Korney (11.6), Brissett (9.8), and Al (9.6).

What is sort of interesting is that in games 1 to 5, PP had 2 offensive rebounds in 95 minutes. In games 6 to 9, PP had 12 offensive rebounds in 91 minutes.

His career high for offensive rebounds in 33 in a season, set in his rookie year. Coming into this year his career high per 36 minutes was 1.4 (set last year), which he is on a pace to nearly double (2.7). Same with his offensive rebound rate (4.3 last year, 8.2 so far this year).

He's not doing this in garbage time. Cleaning the glass has Pritchard third on the team in non-garbage time offensive rebound rate behind Horford and Brissett, and rates his offensive rebounding as being in the 97th percentile of point guards. With Pritchard on the floor in non-garbage minutes, the Celtics offensive rebound rate as a team is +14.8%, good for 100th percentile.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,312
PP is now third on the team with 14 offensive rebounds, behind Al (17) and Holiday (16).

Among the top 10 Celtics in minutes, he is 4th in offensive rebound rate (8.2) behind Korney (11.6), Brissett (9.8), and Al (9.6).

What is sort of interesting is that in games 1 to 5, PP had 2 offensive rebounds in 95 minutes. In games 6 to 9, PP had 12 offensive rebounds in 91 minutes.

His career high for offensive rebounds in 33 in a season, set in his rookie year. Coming into this year his career high per 36 minutes was 1.4 (set last year), which he is on a pace to nearly double (2.7). Same with his offensive rebound rate (4.3 last year, 8.2 so far this year).

He's not doing this in garbage time. Cleaning the glass has Pritchard third on the team in non-garbage time offensive rebound rate behind Horford and Brissett, and rates his offensive rebounding as being in the 97th percentile of point guards. With Pritchard on the floor in non-garbage minutes, the Celtics offensive rebound rate as a team is +14.8%, good for 100th percentile.
Think Joe gets a lot of credit for encouraging the guards to crash (and organizing the team so that that doesn't kill them in transition). PP has a nose for the ball, and this lets him use it to the fullest.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,427
Santa Monica
Nice job by Coach Joe to use PP at the end of the Philly game. After Tatum was ejected I was expecting a heavy dose of Hauser in Q4. Instead, CJM used PP's ball handling with Philly in full ballhawk mode. Not a huge assist guy, but his 5-1 assist/TO ratio added ball security which the game called for. PP could also focus on guarding PatBev since nobody else was stopping him.

Almost 26, Pritchard is developing man strength so he doesn't get bullied as much on both sides of the ball. The question still is, can his defense hold up in a tight playoff game? I'd like Joe to play PP more minutes to see if he can hang defensively. Reducing a very physical Jrue Holiday's (34.5 mpg) work load (days off) also isn't a bad idea. Again, we shouldn't be overly concerned with W/L pre-All-Star game.

After Jan 15th he's trade-eligible. If Brad used PP as part of a package to land a better/more experienced player I wouldn't be shocked
 

chilidawg

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 22, 2015
6,018
Cultural hub of the universe
Nice thread. Consistent playing time is really helping him figure out how to work his drives better. The difference from the start of the season is night and day.
His playmaking and defense are far better than I'd expected coming into the year. Just behind Jrue and DW in Assist%, excellent Ast/TO ratio. Team has a net rating of +13.4 when he's on the floor. I give the coaching staff props for continuing to help guys like PP and Hauser develop into dependable rotation players.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,859
Almost 26, Pritchard is developing man strength so he doesn't get bullied as much on both sides of the ball. The question still is, can his defense hold up in a tight playoff game? I'd like Joe to play PP more minutes to see if he can hang defensively. Reducing a very physical Jrue Holiday's (34.5 mpg) work load (days off) also isn't a bad idea. Again, we shouldn't be overly concerned with W/L pre-All-Star game.
PHI tried to isolate Harris on PP at least a couple of times and without going back through the game, my recollection is that PP held up at least okay.

I know that Al's TO to Queta resulted from a Harris TO when he was being guarded by PP.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,312
PP is totally playable on defense now against all but a very small handful of guys, right? He's really put in work there.
 

Imbricus

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 26, 2017
4,879
Yeah, he's fine on defense, for the most part. His big vulnerability would be if he gets switched onto a big who backs him down in the post, but whenever you see a big calling for the ball so he can try to do that, Pritchard goes into "angry hornet" mode and gets really active, bodying the guy, pushing him away from the basket. Pritchard usually does a good job of staying in front of guards.

I think a lot of the narratives on this board were off base about Pritchard. "He can't pass." "He can't run an offense." "His only value is in three-point shooting." I mean, he won the Bob Cousy Award for point guard of the year in college. He has an average of 2.9 assists to 0.6 turnovers per game this year; that's a turnover to assists ratio of almost 5, which is pretty good. When he brings up the ball, he's looking to press the pace, and for openings in the defense.

His big problem is he's too small and not that athletic, but he's getting smarter about how to play within those limitations. I'd be interested to learn at some point how much work he's been putting in with Cassell and the bench coaches. I think he's definitely feeling more secure about his role this year (after a horrid start on three-point shooting, he now is at 39.5%, so close to the roughly 41% mark he started his career at).
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,312
Yeah, he's fine on defense, for the most part. His big vulnerability would be if he gets switched onto a big who backs him down in the post, but whenever you see a big calling for the ball so he can try to do that, Pritchard goes into "angry hornet" mode and gets really active, bodying the guy, pushing him away from the basket. Pritchard usually does a good job of staying in front of guards.

I think a lot of the narratives on this board were off base about Pritchard. "He can't pass." "He can't run an offense." "His only value is in three-point shooting." I mean, he won the Bob Cousy Award for point guard of the year in college. He has an average of 2.9 assists to 0.6 turnovers per game this year; that's a turnover to assists ratio of almost 5, which is pretty good. When he brings up the ball, he's looking to press the pace, and for openings in the defense.

His big problem is he's too small and not that athletic, but he's getting smarter about how to play within those limitations. I'd be interested to learn at some point how much work he's been putting in with Cassell and the bench coaches. I think he's definitely feeling more secure about his role this year (after a horrid start on three-point shooting, he now is at 39.5%, so close to the roughly 41% mark he started his career at).
He's strong, which goes a very long way as a small guard. You can be a lot longer and skinnier, like Halliburton, and NBA players will just drive through you and dismiss you.

Everyone under 6-3 in the NBA has the "bigger guy can go at you" problem. (Against KP, even 6-7 guys like Kevin Huerter have this problem.)

The big thing is how you manage that, whether you're strong enough to hold your ground, and whether you can use your hands to pressure the ball.
 

MyDaughterLovesTomGordon

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2006
14,317
Starting with the Hornets game, where he broke out with a 5-8 shooting night from three, PP is at 48.5% on just under 5 attempts a game, with 9.2 points, 3.1 boards, and 2.6 assists in just over 20 minutes. That's a pretty good player.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,427
Santa Monica
PP should get plenty of regular season minutes to see if he could add value in the playoffs. I'm a hair skeptical, BUT if he shoots 41% from very deep, can handle the ball vs. pressure, & increases PACE he fills a need.

Showcasing him will only increase his trade value if they need to backfill an injury. His contract is insanely cheap for the player Tom Gordon described above.

PP and Hauser are smashing the weak bench narrative from NBA media
 

TripleOT

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2007
7,784
PP is more physical and more confident defending when switched on bigger players. He’s better at running a team and getting his team a good shot. He’s shooting with the kind of confidence a 40+% vet should have. He is rebounding very well. I don’t know why some of this can’t translate into 15 minutes in the playoffs.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,701
Hingham, MA
Pritchard is over 5.4 A:T this year. That's remarkable. His previous career high is 2.3!!

He's also shooting 49.3% from 3 over his last 16 games, after shooting 23.1% in his first 12.

He's really come into his own and found his place on this team.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,312
Pritchard is over 5.4 A:T this year. That's remarkable. His previous career high is 2.3!!

He's also shooting 49.3% from 3 over his last 16 games, after shooting 23.1% in his first 12.

He's really come into his own and found his place on this team.
He's playing with FORCE. Every drive has purpose now, and he's not freaking out that he can't get his shot off against length inside. He knows what he wants to do from each spot on the floor.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,312
Looks like that is third in the league among PGs behind Chris Paul and Tyus Jones
Which is interesting, because Tyus Jones was probably coming in to play ahead of Pritchard, had the Brogdon deal not fallen through.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,495
He's strong, which goes a very long way as a small guard. You can be a lot longer and skinnier, like Halliburton, and NBA players will just drive through you and dismiss you.

Everyone under 6-3 in the NBA has the "bigger guy can go at you" problem. (Against KP, even 6-7 guys like Kevin Huerter have this problem.)

The big thing is how you manage that, whether you're strong enough to hold your ground, and whether you can use your hands to pressure the ball.
I made a point that Brad seems opposed to tiny PGs and someone cited PP. to me, the strength is a huge difference—-he’s not great but he can hold up in switch or when posted in a way IT (because of size) and Kemba (strength) just couldn’t. It matters—especially when role is 15 min a game vs 35
 

JakeRae

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
8,189
New York, NY
Shooting is so much about confidence. This version of him is a legit piece of a championship team.
I don’t really understand this. The one thing that I think we all agreed on coming into this season was that Pritchard is a 40% shooter on reasonably high volume. Yet there was a real debate here whether he is a rotation player in the playoffs. The areas Pritchard is advancing his game on offense is creation and ball security. He’s creating a good amount more assists and has significantly reduced turnovers. Some folks here think he’s really taken a step forward defensively as well, something I’m personally less convinced of but more because I was on the high side of folks here on his defensive ability going into the season than because I’m seeing something different from others this year.