Rodman is a complete clown and a troll (the guy LITERALLY signed up to be a PR stooge for North Korea!!!!) so I do not want to feed the troll.
The Bird-Jokic comparision is to me a pretty interesting one. Positionally, they are pretty different as Bird was a 3/4 in his day and would be a stretch 4 today rather than a center. But the games and skills, there's so many ways they are similar---ballhandling, shooting at all three levels effectively, probably the two best frontcourt passers in NBA history, defensive capability oriented towards team/help rather than man, rebounding strength. Joker is a better rebounder and interior defender; Bird a better shooter; Jokic a better post player.
The 'era' comparison is so complicated---on balance, I'd guess Bird 'improves' in the era swap but it's all speculative. Bird would be virtually unguardable today, and the increased spacing would make his passing and shooting even more impactful. In today's game Bird would be there with Steph Curry as a shooter---relative to era he has a case as the best outside shooter there has ever been and that would only be increased in an era with more focus and comfort on the three. Defensively, he'd be a 4 and while still slow his anticipation would make him a better switch defender than his skills suggest. Jokic would be dealing with a lot more bulk from defenders than he does today, and with overall bigger lineups....this would likely harm his post game and rebounding a bit while providing opportunities for his mid-outside shooting and off the bounce game. Defensively he would be better in the 80s style because he would be able to park in the paint vs getting exposed a bit on switches as he does today. Net that all out how you want.
I do think Jokic is more like Bird than most of the centers he is compared to, and that (in terms of impact) they'd each be MVP-level players in either era....shooting and passing are impacted less than other things by era changes.
