Not sure if that looks quite as good now, a much worse (but still solid) 2023 and now TJS and he will miss all of 2024.I agree about the Marlins org being possibly suspect, but on the other side of the balance sheet we should probably note the 5/56 extension she got done with Alcantara the winter before he won the CY.
I mean, that's fine, but his '22 was only a little bit better than his '21 so it's not like she bought super low.I agree about the Marlins org being possibly suspect, but on the other side of the balance sheet we should probably note the 5/56 extension she got done with Alcantara the winter before he won the CY.
If we go by this valuation of ~$5.5m per fWAR, he's already been worth nearly $48m in the first two years. He can take 2024 off and the club can still come out way ahead.Not sure if that looks quite as good now, a much worse (but still solid) 2023 and now TJS and he will miss all of 2024.
That's not really how it works as they bought out 3 arb years & he wasn't about to be a free agent.If we go by this valuation of ~$5.5m per fWAR, he's already been worth nearly $48m in the first two years. He can take 2024 off and the club can still come out way ahead.
As someone who has no interest in hiring an "Anti-Bloom", that doesn't hold a huge amount of appeal to me.I'm not sure I understand the criticisms of Ng - she's been on the job less than three years, but by all accounts has begun building a strong culture within the Marlins organization. She's also been the anti-Bloom, willing to trade from an area of surplus (minor league pitching) to improve the ML roster, and she moved aggressively this past trade deadline when Miami found itself in the thick of the wild-card race and her moves helped capture a playoff spot. I honestly don't see her walking away from what she's building there to come to Boston, but I'd be excited if a candidate of her caliber was hired by the Red Sox.
Under this methodology, in 2018 Dave D was arguably the best GM in historyAre Pythagorean record and farm system rankings really how we should be assessing GM’s, though? Actual performance of the big league team is most important, isn’t it? Marlins were a .391 and .352 team the two full years before Ng took over.
The farm system may have been highly rated, but TNSTAAPP, right?
https://www.mlb.com/prospects/2021/marlins/
Well, he’s probably in the conversation….Under this methodology, in 2018 Dave D was arguably the best GM in history
Well, pythag record tells you the team probably isn't that good & will need to become significantly better to compete again next year.Are Pythagorean record and farm system rankings really how we should be assessing GM’s, though? Actual performance of the big league team is most important, isn’t it? Marlins were a .391 and .352 team the two full years before Ng took over.
The farm system may have been highly rated, but TNSTAAPP, right?
https://www.mlb.com/prospects/2021/marlins/
Contending in the NL East without a huge payroll is pretty impressive, at the very least.
Did they really contend in the division? 20 games out of first place. And yes, they made the WC, but with a run diff 53 runs worse than the Red Sox. If the Marlins’ actual record lined up with their pythag record, we’re not having this conversation. I’m not betting on the possibility that she has discovered the secret to building a team that outperforms their run diff.Are Pythagorean record and farm system rankings really how we should be assessing GM’s, though? Actual performance of the big league team is most important, isn’t it? Marlins were a .391 and .352 team the two full years before Ng took over.
The farm system may have been highly rated, but TNSTAAPP, right?
https://www.mlb.com/prospects/2021/marlins/
Contending in the NL East without a huge payroll is pretty impressive, at the very least.
Making the playoffs without a huge payroll at the very least speaks well for the organization. As for contending, I'm assuming you mean contending for a playoff spot and not the division as they finished 20 games behind Atlanta. While they were 26-26 in the division, they went 11-2 vs Washington and 15-24 vs the rest. (4-9 vs the Mets, 4-9 vs the Phillies and 7-6 vs the Braves)Are Pythagorean record and farm system rankings really how we should be assessing GM’s, though? Actual performance of the big league team is most important, isn’t it? Marlins were a .391 and .352 team the two full years before Ng took over.
The farm system may have been highly rated, but TNSTAAPP, right?
https://www.mlb.com/prospects/2021/marlins/
Contending in the NL East without a huge payroll is pretty impressive, at the very least.
Eh, I would say consistently making the playoffs without a huge payroll speaks well for an organization.Making the playoffs without a huge payroll at the very least speaks well for the organization. As for contending, I'm assuming you mean contending for a playoff spot and not the division as they finished 20 games behind Atlanta. While they were 26-26 in the division, they went 11-2 vs Washington and 15-24 vs the rest. (4-9 vs the Mets, 4-9 vs the Phillies and 7-6 vs the Braves)
FWIW, I wasn't advocating for Ng or the Marlins model. I think she's done fine , but my point was that while Miami accounted well for itself the NL East didn't seem the beast that it was thought to be heading into the season and that the Marlins dominated the worst team within the division which pretty much accounted for their record being north of .500.Eh, I would say consistently making the playoffs without a huge payroll speaks well for an organization.
The Orioles & Rays both have lower payrolls & won significantly more games & are much better set up for the long term.
The Guardians & Reds had lower payrolls, better run differentials, & are also both better set up for the future.
But we did the Rays portion of a rebuild & now we need what the truly successful franchises do & maintain that level while keeping their systems strong, which is the Dodgers model & to a lesser extent the Braves & Astros models.
There are other organizations like the Twins, Brewers & Cards who also have had pretty consistent success without large payrolls.
Even the Yankees, Phillies, Blue Jays, Cubs & Rangers have had some success with higher payrolls.
In a vacuum, I would rather model around any of those other teams I just listed more so than the Marlins.
There's also positives to the approaches of teams like the Mariners, DBacks & Padres.
I tend to agree with you, but that ship has sailed. Just got to trust the process or something.I still think that Bloom deserved one more season. To me, he was two starting pitchers away from consistent competition (88-92 wins) and another RH power threat from a top 95-99 win team for the next 4-6 seasons, and it really seemed like he was set up to do those two things. AND if he was able to do that AND Cora was able to manage that team(s) to those points then I would've extended both of them. But anyhow.....
Is the post-season really a reason for this to be delayed? Does Sam Fuld really have so many day-to-day responsibilities with the Phillies that he can't take a meeting, or even a phone call? It's been nearly a month since Bloom was canned.Well Byrnes and Gomes are officially available. I’m surprised it’s taking this long.
Permission is needed to talk. If the Phillies (or whomever) don't want their people interviewing during the playoffs, what can be done?Is the post-season really a reason for this to be delayed? Does Sam Fuld really have so many day-to-day responsibilities with the Phillies that he can't take a meeting, or even a phone call? It's been nearly a month since Bloom was canned.
I'm not nervous...yet. But I'll be annoyed if this isn't settled by the end of the WS.
I thought permission was only needed if it wasn’t a promotion? Or does that not apply during the season?Permission is needed to talk. If the Phillies (or whomever) don't want their people interviewing during the playoffs, what can be done?
My understanding is permission is always needed to interview someone under contract with another team, but there is a cultural expectation that permission will not be denied when it's a promotion.I thought permission was only needed if it wasn’t a promotion? Or does that not apply during the season?
Did they really contend in the division? 20 games out of first place. And yes, they made the WC, but with a run diff 53 runs worse than the Red Sox. If the Marlins’ actual record lined up with their pythag record, we’re not having this conversation. I’m not betting on the possibility that she has discovered the secret to building a team that outperforms their run diff.
Just looking at the list of current MLB GMs and the dates on which they were officially hired, and it seems to contradict the idea that it's getting to be too late to get up to speed for the off-season ahead. I count 14 that were hired between October 15 and December 31 and a handful more that got the job between January 1 and Opening Day.I keep coming back to the fact that there is no way for a new GM to come on board at this point and get up to speed on the minor league system (or even who needs to be on the 40 man roster) sufficient to make independent decisions about who to protect/who to trade. Which is a key factor in deciding whether/how to overpay in the free agent market in conjunction with pursuing trades to fill gaps in the lineup. Because, in reality, if the new GM is an external hire, they are going to be relying on the same folks already in the building who assembled the team that finished in last place last year and this year, some of whom were hired/promoted by Bloom.
It is like trying to steer an oil tanker. At best, the ownership is strongly signalling that they want a change in approach with the hope that the infrastructure already in place can adjust and support a new GM in an incredibly short period of time.
No doubt there will be lots of action, but I think it will be driven largely by folks already in the organization. Any trends on number of wins added in the season following the hiring of a new GM?Just looking at the list of current MLB GMs and the dates on which they were officially hired, and it seems to contradict the idea that it's getting to be too late to get up to speed for the off-season ahead. I count 14 that were hired between October 15 and December 31 and a handful more that got the job between January 1 and Opening Day.
No matter when the hiring happens, I think the new person is going to have to rely on incumbent staff or leftover scouting reports to begin their tenure. We know that O'Halloran and Romero and Ferriera aren't going anywhere. They'll provide plenty of input to aid the new hire.
Most top management jobs at big companies are "like trying to steer an oil tanker". Although this one happens to have a whole press crew ready to pounce on every mistake, large or small.I keep coming back to the fact that there is no way for a new GM to come on board at this point and get up to speed on the minor league system (or even who needs to be on the 40 man roster) sufficient to make independent decisions about who to protect/who to trade. Which is a key factor in deciding whether/how to overpay in the free agent market in conjunction with pursuing trades to fill gaps in the lineup. Because, in reality, if the new GM is an external hire, they are going to be relying on the same folks already in the building who assembled the team that finished in last place last year and this year, some of whom were hired/promoted by Bloom.
It is like trying to steer an oil tanker. At best, the ownership is strongly signalling that they want a change in approach with the hope that the infrastructure already in place can adjust and support a new GM in an incredibly short period of time.
No, I said it in other forums the day Bloom was fired. But knowing the facts behind Hazen, it was a non-starter.Yes you’re way behind on this:
https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2023/10/diamondbacks-extend-gm-mike-hazen.html
McAdam: multiple people have turned down the job, the leading candidate is a guy who the Marlins fired in 2020 after 1 playoff appearance in 11 years and his since been working for MLB, in charge of umpires and on-field discipline.
Fingers really, really crossed that they are looking at guys from the Braves/Phillies/Dodgers/Astros that they've not yet been in contact with.
https://www.masslive.com/redsox/2023/10/mlb-notebook-red-sox-encounter-resistance-in-front-office-search-but-one-target-surfaces.html
OTOH, Michael Hill acquired Zac Gallen and Sandy Alcantara for two years Marcell Ozuna and Pablo López for two months of David Phelps.McAdam: multiple people have turned down the job, the leading candidate is a guy who the Marlins fired in 2020 after 1 playoff appearance in 11 years and his since been working for MLB, in charge of umpires and on-field discipline.
Fingers really, really crossed that they are looking at guys from the Braves/Phillies/Dodgers/Astros that they've not yet been in contact with.
https://www.masslive.com/redsox/2023/10/mlb-notebook-red-sox-encounter-resistance-in-front-office-search-but-one-target-surfaces.html
IDK, it's not clear to me why it'd be preferable for a candidate to come in and get full autonomy with their handpicked team of personnel, at least right away. Seems like an enormous amount of work to step into a FO leadership role with a ton of vacancies to fill, conduct interviews and hire the right candidates, learn the players and the clubhouse vibe, find a manager who complements them, and still orchestrate the kind of pivotal offseason the franchise and fan base expects this winter. I would much rather step into a role with institutional knowledge in place!Weird. How could anyone have possibly guessed that good candidates would want autonomy.
You can have the latter. There doesn't have to be a "ton of vacancies". Any candidate worth his or her salt will take advantage of what is in place, learn and make personel decisions based on what they have learn. Wanting autonomy doesn't mean the need for wholesale changes on day one.OTOH, Michael Hill acquired Zac Gallen and Sandy Alcantara for two years Marcell Ozuna and Pablo López for two months of David Phelps.
Regardless, I kind of don't buy this report from McAdam. Or don't really buy that it's a big deal. He's careful not to make a causal link between the "number of rejections by some targeted candidates" to the group of "some...prospective hires (who have been) put off by the level of turnover."
IDK, it's not clear to me why it'd be preferable for a candidate to come in and get full autonomy with their handpicked team of personnel, at least right away. Seems like an enormous amount of work to step into a FO leadership role with a ton of vacancies to fill, conduct interviews and hire the right candidates, learn the players and the clubhouse vibe, find a manager who complements them, and still orchestrate the kind of pivotal offseason the franchise and fan base expects this winter. I would much rather step into a role with institutional knowledge in place!
To add to what YTF said, there's a huge difference between A) walking into a role with staff in place that you have the chance to assess and determine fit and B) walking into a role where the de facto head of everything publicly announced that "these are our guys you're inheriting".OTOH, Michael Hill acquired Zac Gallen and Sandy Alcantara for two years Marcell Ozuna and Pablo López for two months of David Phelps.
Regardless, I kind of don't buy this report from McAdam. Or don't really buy that it's a big deal. He's careful not to make a causal link between the "number of rejections by some targeted candidates" to the group of "some...prospective hires (who have been) put off by the level of turnover."
IDK, it's not clear to me why it'd be preferable for a candidate to come in and get full autonomy with their handpicked team of personnel, at least right away. Seems like an enormous amount of work to step into a FO leadership role with a ton of vacancies to fill, conduct interviews and hire the right candidates, learn the players and the clubhouse vibe, find a manager who complements them, and still orchestrate the kind of pivotal offseason the franchise and fan base expects this winter. I would much rather step into a role with institutional knowledge in place!
Is this an actual quote? Where’s it from?To add to what YTF said, there's a huge difference between A) walking into a role with staff in place that you have the chance to assess and determine fit and B) walking into a role where the de facto head of everything publicly announced that "these are our guys you're inheriting".
And your last sentence is what concerns me the most about this. Maybe they get lucky and the limited pool that they've created contains the very best candidate, but on the other hand they may have put themselves in a position to have to settle for choosing from a lesser pool of applicants.To add to what YTF said, there's a huge difference between A) walking into a role with staff in place that you have the chance to assess and determine fit and B) walking into a role where the de facto head of everything publicly announced that "these are our guys you're inheriting".
It is entirely unsurprising that we might be seeing folks lose interest in an org that seems to be hiring a CBOINO. What we'll end up getting is someone that wants the title so much that they're willing to do the job with handcuffs and a staff with batphones to Kennedy and Henry.
How the sausage gets made is a pretty messy affair in every company. The Red Sox are just exceptionally good at blasting their internal shit all over the media sphere.Honestly.... the Red Sox Front Office has been pretty damned dysfunctional since mid-Theo-era. Despite winning 3 World Series since the gorilla suit incident, they've hired some terrible head coaches, had GM's come in and then they've undermined them and changed directions.
I just don't understand deciding Cora was so valuable that the new front office has to roll with him. It's not like he's some Johnny Pesky/Red Auerbach figure that's been with the organization for 50 years or whatever. Who do we thing the chief meddler is? Kennedy? Romero? Ferreira? Henry?Nothing really new to add to this, but I agree with YTF & Jimbo.
Having smart people around is great. But not having the autonomy to evaluate the people in house & replace them with your own people if you think they would be a better fit, on your timeline, is something 99.9% of external candidates would be less happy about. It might not be a deal-breaker for all, but it makes it a less appealing position.
I know I mentioned this earlier in the thread (or one of the Bloom threads) but all things considered, I don't really hate this set up should it come to pass.Is going to be Romero and a de facto Cora. It’s seemed like that as soon as Cora said “I’m not ready to be a GM yet”