Who is @James_Holzhauer? We're thrilled to welcome "Jeopardy! James" to The Athletic as a new sports betting contributor: https://bit.ly/3pVlkIw
Mike Sweeney, Royals first baseman: In 2000, I was part of the MLB All-Star team that went to Japan to play in the Goodwill Series against the Japanese all-stars. Ichiro didn’t play because he was preparing to sign with Seattle. Everyone knew about Ichiro. While we were in Japan, every time an American player got a base hit, you’d hear the term, “Nice batting,” in a Japanese accent over the speaker system. It would say on the jumbotron: “Nice batting.” I thought, “Wow, that’s a kind common gesture.” So in 2001, it’s the first few weeks of the season, and we’re playing against the Mariners. So, of course, he hits a line drive over the shortstop’s head for a single. With total respect, I didn’t know if he knew any English. So I looked over, and, in my imitation of what I heard in Japan, I said, “Ichiro, nice batting.” And he looks at me and goes, “Mike Sweeney, nice ass.”
Shawn Kelley, Mariners teammate: He’s hilarious. Absolutely hilarious.
Bret Boone, Mariners teammate:Opening Day, 2001. I’m taking my position at second base, and there was a veteran umpire out there, a guy that’s been there forever. He comes up to me and goes, “Boonie, what’s up, how are you doing?” And he goes, “What the hell’s up with your right fielder?” I said, “What are you talking about?” He goes, “He runs by me and I say to him, ‘Hey, Ichiro, welcome to America.’” And Ichiro looks at him and says, “What’s happening, home slice,” and keeps running to his position.
Great article - thanks for sharing. Although I could have done without the photo of Jeter covered inThis piece on Ichiro stories is hilarious. From the opening:
This was my favorite story:This piece on Ichiro stories is hilarious. From the opening:
Strange-Gordon: He had just signed with the Marlins, and we hit every day. You know me: I’m just watching everything. I go, “Ichi, question. At the beginning of the second half last year, they told me they wanted me to walk more, so I started taking pitches, but I started to strike out.” He said, “No, no, no.” I said, “So how do I walk?” He said, “You rake first, then they’ll walk you.”
Tremendous. “Be Barry Bonds” is impeccable hitting advice.This was my favorite story:
PM pendingDoes anyone have a guest pass to The Athletic they could throw my way please?
Remember this article if anyone involved with MLB/RSNs/Cable decries pirating. The end of music pirating came about because tech companies dragged the record companies kicking and screaming to a model that was more appealing to than downloading music for free.Informative yet depressing article in The Athletic about TV blackouts in baseball. There are no good guys, just more ways for us to get screwed due to greedy owners:
https://theathletic.com/2788096/2021/08/31/streaming-the-future-whats-behind-mlbs-tv-blackout-and-direct-to-consumer-woes/
One of the commenters had this to say, and I second and third it:
One of the items that bothers me the most from the above article is that the middlemen trying to suck any last dollar out of this sport are more important to the owners than the fans or the product. The RSN subscriber fee from customers who don't watch baseball is more important than the fans who do want to watch it. They're fighting to take dollars from people who have no interest in their product and this system is so important to them they won't just let fans stream games.
This is why I have zero issue pirating sports where they leave me no reasonable way of watching otherwise.Remember this article if anyone involved with MLB/RSNs/Cable decries pirating. The end of music pirating came about because tech companies dragged the record companies kicking and screaming to a model that was more appealing to than downloading music for free.
I hope it's not as bad as it sounds, I've grown to rely on the Athletic more than any other source out there. Consistently great coverage of the teams I care about.Is it bad? They were growing like crazy so I’d expect them to be going through cash. The bigger questions are whether they actually keep subscribers and how much these subscribers are actually paying.
I think it’s bad. Lombardi mentioned a bunch of layoffs (probably not proper nomenclature, might be non-renewals) for writersIs it bad? They were growing like crazy so I’d expect them to be going through cash. The bigger questions are whether they actually keep subscribers and how much these subscribers are actually paying.
I just subscribed - thanks for the tip!
My subscription doesn't expire until the end of the year but this still worked for me. Thanks.So for those who signed up for $1 a month last year... if you go to cancel it will give you an offer of another year at $21.59, so a massive discount still off the regular price it would renew at.
With less than a year’s worth of cash on hand, Mather and Hansmann have been looking for an exit, after missed consummations with The New York Times and Axios. This time around, they hired the Zelig-like mega-media-banker Aryeh Bourkoff‘s LionTree to help facilitate a sale that would value the company at around $750 million, which is a fair amount more than the $530 million valuation set by their last financing round. (I haven’t seen the deck but that would suggest an aggressive multiple on the known revenue, or more scintillating recent revenue numbers.) Earlier this week, Front Office Sports reported that deal talks had heated up again with the Times. Now I can report that both parties have entered exclusive deal negotiations. And while all the normal caveats that you normally read in the Journal still apply—yes, sure, this could all fall apart at any minute for a variety of reasons—this latest development is a serious step forward and suggests that most key items have been covered over. (Mather did not respond to my interview request. Eileen Murphy, a spokesperson for the Times, declined to comment.)
Obviously there might be promotions, but I got an email this week letting me know that my annual subscription is going to be renewed at $75 next month. I won’t be renewing.Cash burn is exactly what you'd expect for a growing business on a subscription basis - everything is getting/retaining customers.
If they have a year's cash on hand, theres no way they are taking a down round/pricing. There is plenty of time to raise more financing, especially if their customer base is growing at an acceptable subscription price (probably doesnt need to be full price, but $1 month wont cut it). I paid $35 for the year and got a $25 Amex statement credit back in October. Would happily renew in the $40-$50 a year range.
Out of curiosity, why not?Obviously there might be promotions, but I got an email this week letting me know that my annual subscription is going to be renewed at $75 next month. I won’t be renewing.
Guessing the average subscriber is paying closer to $1/month than $6 hence why they are bleeding so much cash.Cash burn is exactly what you'd expect for a growing business on a subscription basis - everything is getting/retaining customers.
If they have a year's cash on hand, theres no way they are taking a down round/pricing. There is plenty of time to raise more financing, especially if their customer base is growing at an acceptable subscription price (probably doesnt need to be full price, but $1 month wont cut it). I paid $35 for the year and got a $25 Amex statement credit back in October. Would happily renew in the $40-$50 a year range.
I think I've gotten lazy in my sports journalism consumption. Between here and Twitter and Posnanski's departure, I rarely visit the site.Out of curiosity, why not?
It is the best sports journalism out there for basically all the major sports.
Probably not. I imagine they'll offer the Athletic subscription as an add-on, like the crossword.Does this mean that I now have an online subscription to the NYT?
Judging from their subscription model, you probably don’t even have a sub to The Athletic anymore.Does this mean that I now have an online subscription to the NYT?
The second part is probably right and that sucks. They're going to strip it and make it efficient, which is too bad because there's a lot of talent there. The take away from the Internet is don't get too attached to something you enjoy because it's never going to last.Judging from their subscription model, you probably don’t even have a sub to The Athletic anymore.
Some people seem to be cheering this, but The Athletic is operating at a loss. NYT is probably going to chop a decent portion of writers and leave the big names to carry them. Not sure I see this as a “win” for anyone other than the early investors and the execs of The Athletic.
Today marks an incredible milestone for The Athletic. We are thrilled to announce that we have entered into an agreement to be acquired by The New York Times Company, a transaction that is expected to close in the first quarter of 2022.
The New York Times Company has set the standard for excellence in journalism, and as we look towards the future, their support will enable us to continue producing the best sports coverage on earth for an even wider audience.
Nothing about your The Athletic subscription is changing at this time. We will continue to invest in our world-class newsroom and the local and national coverage you can’t get anywhere else.
We cannot mark this important moment without offering our profound gratitude to you, our subscribers. When we founded the company in 2016, we hoped to become the sports page for every city worldwide. Your readership and unwavering support have allowed us to hire the best people in the business who in turn create the best sports content in the world.
Here’s to the future of The Athletic with The New York Times Company behind us. Thank you for believing in the power of great sports journalism and for supporting us as we embark on this new chapter. Onward!
Adam & Alex
Co-Founders of The Athletic
This was always the end game. There was no long term outcome for The Athletic that didn’t involve a sale. There is no way to successfully maintain a content-driven journalistic enterprise without scale, and a sports-only entity was never going to achieve that. I’m thankful it’s the Times that bought them, and not some ghoulish hedge fund that owns local “newspapers” or something. At least with the Times there’s a chance it’ll still be worth subscribing to in a year.Judging from their subscription model, you probably don’t even have a sub to The Athletic anymore.
Some people seem to be cheering this, but The Athletic is operating at a loss. NYT is probably going to chop a decent portion of writers and leave the big names to carry them. Not sure I see this as a “win” for anyone other than the early investors and the execs of The Athletic.