This is now: BB and the direction of the Patriots

Status
Not open for further replies.

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,375
The Patriots are the most popular team in the region by a wide margin and it would take years of losing seasons to change that. Their pre-season games had higher ratings than quite a few Celtics playoff games.
The NFL is far more popular than other sports, which plays a huge role here. I’m not saying we’re going back to the Rod Rust days but the other teams have an opportunity to claw back some of the attention. We’ll see what happens as the dynasty gets further and further in the rear view mirror and especially once BB leaves.
 

JimD

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2001
8,699
Going to be very interesting to see how ownership responds. Most likely course of action remains running it back with BB but the thought of BB leaving is now no longer inconceivable.
Curious why 'running it back with BB' seems to be the default assumption of so many observers. If we and the Krafts have learned anything from Bill over these years, it's that the coach ruthlessly believes that nobody should be paid or retained based primarily on past performance. I fully believe that Bob Kraft put Belichick 'on notice' as much as he could this offseason and directed him to fix last year's mess, as illustrated by the hiring of Bill O'Brien (and more importantly, Belichick's demeanor when O'Brien was hired). I'm sure Belichick offered his boss assurances that this year's team had an excellent chance to make the playoffs. Given the shitshow that has ensued, I'm not sure that Kraft should have the same confidence going forward that Bill can truly turn things around on an acceptable timetable. Now, I fully acknowledge that any replacement coach/GM combo is unlikely to execute an immediate turnaround either, but they will have the benefit of some amount of goodwill and patience from the fanbase. Belichick has exhausted his reservoir of goodwill with a large segment of the Patriots faithful, as unfair as that may be given his accomplishments for their team.

I also don't understand the thought process of 'Kraft saw Brady leave NE and win a Super Bowl elsewhere, he's not going to make that mistake again with BB'. If Belichick went to, say, San Diego and won a title in a year or two, would anyone be delusional enough to blame Kraft for letting him go, after the last two years? I believe that if there was any frustration among the fans, it would be more along the lines of 'Oh sure, he left a mess behind for (insert new coach's name here) and stepped into a much better situation'. I'd also add that given RKK's closeness with Brady, nothing could have hurt worse than seeing the QB he saw as 'another son' finish his career elsewhere, and that a similar Belichick departure wouldn't come close to having the same impact.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,286
Do we need to start a 2024 Patriots Draft thread? We need to start rooting for the Bears and Panthers.

Who are we hoping for here? Williams, Maye, Ewers, Harrison seem to be the top 4 skill guys. I've seen Penix more a middle of first round guy, and some with McCarthy from Michigan in that area too.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
25,135
Unreal America
The NFL is far more popular than other sports, which plays a huge role here. I’m not saying we’re going back to the Rod Rust days but the other teams have an opportunity to claw back some of the attention. We’ll see what happens as the dynasty gets further and further in the rear view mirror and especially once BB leaves.
I was going to challenge the "afterthought" framing, but I agree with this. Boston was one of the last markets to be absorbed by the NFL borg, but that happened in 1994. The biggest opportunity now is for the Sox, IMO. They can reclaim some buzz this offseason, and build some genuine excitement heading into April 2024, if they make a splash in the FA market. That's been lacking for a long time.

Separate thought... I just listened to Bob Sochi's weekly segment on 98.5, and he did not hold back. He criticized every aspect of the franchise. Not often you hear that kind of candor from the team-hired PxP guy. Clearly he feels unencumbered to talk trash about the team. Speaks volumes.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,375
I was going to challenge the "afterthought" framing, but I agree with this. Boston was one of the last markets to be absorbed by the NFL borg, but that happened in 1994. The biggest opportunity now is for the Sox, IMO. They can reclaim some buzz this offseason, and build some genuine excitement heading into April 2024, if they make a splash in the FA market. That's been lacking for a long time.

Separate thought... I just listened to Bob Sochi's weekly segment on 98.5, and he did not hold back. He criticized every aspect of the franchise. Not often you hear that kind of candor from the team-hired PxP guy. Clearly he feels unencumbered to talk trash about the team. Speaks volumes.
Yes, "afterthought" was a poor choice of words on my end - a little too harsh so that pushback makes sense. The last 20 years will prevent the Patriots from ever truly being an afterthought but I think the Boston sports pecking order is constantly evolving and remains fluid. The Celtics have the best chance at a title and are, objectively, a top 3 team in the league. And they're likely to play an exciting brand of basketball on top of it. The Red Sox are a bit of a mess right now but things could change quickly next year if they bring in guys like Yamamoto or even Ohtani and see some of the kids start to arrive and make a difference. The Bruins play more of a niche sport so I don't think they'll ever approach the Patriots broader following but this is a team that was very exciting during last year's regular season.

There is a lot of headwind for the Pats right now but they should have the highest pick we've seen since, when, Richard Seymour in 2001? And they have cap space to make some FA splashes. There is a path to a decent turnaround to at least WC contention in the short-term. But a lot of it hinges on what they do with BB, which should dominate the discussion of the team locally.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
38,151
Hingham, MA
Yes, "afterthought" was a poor choice of words on my end - a little too harsh so that pushback makes sense. The last 20 years will prevent the Patriots from ever truly being an afterthought but I think the Boston sports pecking order is constantly evolving and remains fluid. The Celtics have the best chance at a title and are, objectively, a top 3 team in the league. And they're likely to play an exciting brand of basketball on top of it. The Red Sox are a bit of a mess right now but things could change quickly next year if they bring in guys like Yamamoto or even Ohtani and see some of the kids start to arrive and make a difference. The Bruins play more of a niche sport so I don't think they'll ever approach the Patriots broader following but this is a team that was very exciting during last year's regular season.

There is a lot of headwind for the Pats right now but they should have the highest pick we've seen since, when, Richard Seymour in 2001? And they have cap space to make some FA splashes. There is a path to a decent turnaround to at least WC contention in the short-term. But a lot of it hinges on what they do with BB, which should dominate the discussion of the team locally.
The irony here is that as much as interest may be down, you could argue the situation they are in is the most interesting in the last 20 years, maybe aside from Brady leaving. There is just much more to think about and discuss than when they were dominating.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
25,135
Unreal America
Yes, "afterthought" was a poor choice of words on my end - a little too harsh so that pushback makes sense. The last 20 years will prevent the Patriots from ever truly being an afterthought but I think the Boston sports pecking order is constantly evolving and remains fluid. The Celtics have the best chance at a title and are, objectively, a top 3 team in the league. And they're likely to play an exciting brand of basketball on top of it. The Red Sox are a bit of a mess right now but things could change quickly next year if they bring in guys like Yamamoto or even Ohtani and see some of the kids start to arrive and make a difference. The Bruins play more of a niche sport so I don't think they'll ever approach the Patriots broader following but this is a team that was very exciting during last year's regular season.

There is a lot of headwind for the Pats right now but they should have the highest pick we've seen since, when, Richard Seymour in 2001? And they have cap space to make some FA splashes. There is a path to a decent turnaround to at least WC contention in the short-term. But a lot of it hinges on what they do with BB, which should dominate the discussion of the team locally.
Absolutely. I grew up in Foxboro, and I remember many of my classmates being fans of other NFL teams -- not the franchise that literally played in our hometown -- because the Pats were such a joke of an organization. Of course, they all came around over the past 30 years. But I know the shameful secret of their youth. ;)

During the game yesterday I had a conversation with my teenage son and told him he's now getting the same experience I had when I was his age (1989). except of course that he got to enjoy 2014/16/18.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,375
Absolutely. I grew up in Foxboro, and I remember many of my classmates being fans of other NFL teams -- not the franchise that literally played in our hometown -- because the Pats were such a joke of an organization. Of course, they all came around over the past 30 years. But I know the shameful secret of their youth. ;)

During the game yesterday I had a conversation with my teenage son and told him he's now getting the same experience I had when I was his age (1989). except of course that he got to enjoy 2014/16/18.
Yeah, I'm 41 and went to a few games in the late 80s/early 90s with my dad before we moved out of state. I was obviously quite young then so this really is my first go round as an adult with the Patriots being a true laughing stock. I'm constantly on the receiving end of texts every week of fans of other teams looking to send it back to me after all the gloating I did at their expense. Fortunately, my experience as a BC fan has given me some laughing stock experience to pull from.

End of the day, I don't need another dynasty. Truthfully, I don't need another title. But I want to be entertained by football on the weekend and this iteration is just so awful and unwatchable. Like, if you're going to be bad, at least be interesting. And don't do things like punt on 4th and 3 at the opponent's 40 yard line down 24-0.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
25,135
Unreal America
Yeah, I'm 41 and went to a few games in the late 80s/early 90s with my dad before we moved out of state. I was obviously quite young then so this really is my first go round as an adult with the Patriots being a true laughing stock. I'm constantly on the receiving end of texts every week of fans of other teams looking to send it back to me after all the gloating I did at their expense. Fortunately, my experience as a BC fan has given me some laughing stock experience to pull from.

End of the day, I don't need another dynasty. Truthfully, I don't need another title. But I want to be entertained by football on the weekend and this iteration is just so awful and unwatchable. Like, if you're going to be bad, at least be interesting. And don't do things like punt on 4th and 3 at the opponent's 40 yard line down 24-0.
I hear ya. For as much as people like to talk about how "awful" the Pats were back in the day, that's not entirely true. Save for one horrible season in 1981 -- which so happened to be the year I remember first following the team (I was 8) -- the Pats were anywhere from average to pretty good from 1976 to 1988. I think people remember what a joke the ownership of the franchise was back then, and all of the calamities that occurred, and forget that the team on the field was very competitive.

1989-1992 was the true Dark Ages. Abysmal football *and* calamitous ownership. But then we hired Tuna, drafted Drew, and off we went.

I said last week that this is the most hopeless I've felt as a Pats fan since 1992, and I think that math checks out.
 

Traut

lost his degree
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
12,799
My Desk
The irony here is that as much as interest may be down, you could argue the situation they are in is the most interesting in the last 20 years, maybe aside from Brady leaving. There is just much more to think about and discuss than when they were dominating.
I would trade never having to watch the terrible "football" that was "played" yesterday in Foxboro for years of boring talk radio.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
25,135
Unreal America
I would trade never having to watch the terrible "football" that was "played" yesterday in Foxboro for years of boring talk radio.
I'm also wracking my brain to recall a time since 2001 that Pats talk was considered "boring".
 

Traut

lost his degree
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
12,799
My Desk
I'm also wracking my brain to recall a time since 2001 that Pats talk was considered "boring".
The weren't. You had Brady-Manning, Brady-Giselle, Moss, a near undefeated season, 6 Super Bowl Wins, Gronk, AB, Deflategate and on and on if storylines are your thing.
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
2,569
I hear ya. For as much as people like to talk about how "awful" the Pats were back in the day, that's not entirely true. Save for one horrible season in 1981 -- which so happened to be the year I remember first following the team (I was 8) -- the Pats were anywhere from average to pretty good from 1976 to 1988. I think people remember what a joke the ownership of the franchise was back then, and all of the calamities that occurred, and forget that the team on the field was very competitive.

1989-1992 was the true Dark Ages. Abysmal football *and* calamitous ownership. But then we hired Tuna, drafted Drew, and off we went.

I said last week that this is the most hopeless I've felt as a Pats fan since 1992, and I think that math checks out.
The bad thing is we might be in 1989, not 1992. We won't know until the end of the season, management changes and the draft. To be honest this would all be easier to stomach if it was happening without BB. Losing abysmally is one thing, but having to compare it to 20 years of brilliance under the same HC is somehow worse.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,395
AZ
One thing I wonder is how well Bill is able to adapt his methods to a bad team. It's hard to teach a dog new tricks, and he's had the luxury of rarely having a team out of contention. He also has a story he can sell to his players. But that's got to be much harder now. Getting guys to give 100 percent when they think they are doing it to get the 1 percent edge that will beat the Chiefs (or Colts or Steelers) and get to go to the Superbowl is easier when you're good. Who is running hills right now? If he makes them, they will obviously. But it's hard to convince them -- this will pay off in February. Ball security? Sure, nobody wants to get benched. But it's pretty different when next-man-up really makes you fear for losing your job because the next man up might be able to plug behind a line with James Devlin making holes and Gronk pancaking guys. Now? It's a little easy for players to think "ok, old timer, what are you going to do?"

I think coaching gets harder and harder, or at least changes, with each new generation. And Bill's methods -- or at least the ones we get to see bite-size pieces of in various NFL productions or whatever -- seem very well calibrated for the teams that he's had. I know there's a chicken and egg thing there, but I don wonder how adaptable he is. I guess we'll see.
 

Mystic Merlin

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 21, 2007
47,212
Hartford, CT
He’s been coaching since the 1970s, I think ‘adaptability’ has to be in his repertoire. He isn’t Bear Bryant with the Junction Boys.

I’m sure some players - particularly the ones who can afford to - will increasingly make business decisions on certain plays and not try to play through certain injuries, but most of these guys need to put good tape out there to survive in the league.
 

The Social Chair

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 17, 2010
6,137
He’s been coaching since the 1970s, I think ‘adaptability’ has to be in his repertoire. He isn’t Bear Bryant with the Junction Boys.


He will only hire high level assistants from his coaching or family tree.

He was quoted as saying the following

At this point in my career, I want to coach guys I like. I want to coach guys I want to be around and that’s it.’ He said, ‘I’m not going to coach anybody else
Is he still spending the offseaon learning from college coaches? You don't hear those stories anymore.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
25,135
Unreal America
One thing I wonder is how well Bill is able to adapt his methods to a bad team.
It's certainly been a while, but he did just this with both the Browns and Pats. Maybe he can't recapture that past ability, but it's not like he's a stranger to the methods.

In fairness, I don't think the Pats have ever played as listlessly as they have this season under BB.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,886
Oregon
Anonymous execs talk to The Athletic (spoiler'd for length):

“Bill is brilliant and provides a lot of value,” another exec said. “He needs help with player acquisition. The question is, will he accept it or fight it? He’s going to have to make sacrifices to get that all-time record for wins.”
The case for moving forward with Belichick requires compromise.
“Bill is brilliant and provides a lot of value,” another exec said. “He needs help with player acquisition. The question is, will he accept it or fight it? He’s going to have to make sacrifices to get that all-time record for wins.”
We have detailed in the past how much institutional knowledge Belichick and the Patriots have lost. Ernie Adams, Nick Caserio, Dave Ziegler, Josh McDaniels, Dante Scarnecchia, Josh Boyer, Brian Flores, Chad O’Shea were with Belichick as coaches, evaluators and confidants for decades. All are gone.
“The idea that all Bill needs is help is pretty compelling,” a third exec said. “Bill always had a development system for coaches and personnel people, including people like Caserio, who coached wide receivers and then, next thing you know, he is director of player personnel. My question is, where is the next Caserio? Are we going to declare in 2023 that this is it, Bill needs help, and he can’t go to his farm and get the people he needs?”
Getting help for Belichick sounds great, but isn’t necessarily practical.
“Who would take a job in personnel there and think that they have real power?” a fourth exec said. “How do you get somebody? I’m wondering if that is why they ended up with Patricia and Judge a year ago, and Bill O’Brien now. Maybe nobody else wanted the jobs.”
https://theathletic.com/4939133/2023/10/09/patriots-bill-belichick-future-quarterback/
 

54thMA

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2012
10,170
Westwood MA
I'll defer to people here who know a lot more about the inner workings of the team; that said, don't they have a head of scouting/scouting department that evaluates talent? When people say "Belichick shops for the groceries" is he actually the one making the picks and if so, what is the basis for that? He's the head coach of the team, how many hours in the day are there for him to also go over film of potential draft picks to make a decision as to who he wants.

Again, I'll defer to others here who can enlighten me as to how the whole process actually works regarding scouting, drafting, etc, etc.

Is Belichick taking the word of college coach friends of his on kids they think he should keep an eye on in the draft?

Just curious as to the whole process works is all.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,319
306, row 14
Bill has full control over the football operation. He makes the final decisions on roster, coaching staff, front office, support staff, etc. He obviously has people who do some leg work, scouting, etc. but he makes the ultimate decision.
 

sezwho

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
2,042
Isle of Plum
Bill has full control over the football operation. He makes the final decisions on roster, coaching staff, front office, support staff, etc. He obviously has people who do some leg work, scouting, etc. but he makes the ultimate decision.
He also sets the specific agenda for that personnel person so they are in sync.

It’s a while back now but I remember (will hunt a link) Phil Perry on Next Pats gave an astonishingly specific and detailed breakdown of how the Pats scouted and scored and assigned grades to rookies. They are following process of BB’s to the letter.

Edit - sorry still can’t find link…
 
Last edited:

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
49,011
As a side note, the Pats sinking into a Chernobyl dumpster fire has been a huge boost to Jules' media career. He was already doing the talking head thing everywhere as the season began but he is definitely in-demand as a guest who has some insight into what might actually be going in Foxboro. At least Edelman stays winning.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,966
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
Interesting to hear Jules call out some past WR draft picks. He thinks BB needs help (and has needed help) picking offensive players. Also was a big Jakobi Meyers fan.
I do think we are seeing BB being re-evaluated as coach only and not GM going forward around the league. Does he accept that? I honestly don't know.
View: https://youtu.be/WdSbJ1JCXbc?si=rwbOi5gFnVimQJfU
Flat out stating the players knew right away Harry sucked lol.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,030
Mansfield MA
He will only hire high level assistants from his coaching or family tree.
This is basically how he's always done things. He initially hired Weis and Crennel, dudes he worked with in New York. Then he hired entry-level guys and brought them up: McDaniels, Patricia, O'Brien, Flores, Daboll, Joe Judge, none of these guys had much if any NFL experience before they joined NE. He does the same on the personnel side. A lot of the new hires are via referral (all the John Carroll guys) but he finds off-the-wall dudes sometimes too.

Flat out stating the players knew right away Harry sucked lol.
I think the coaches knew too; it was a major red flag when they put him on IR even though he was already back at practice.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,395
AZ
I know we focus alot on Brady's departure, but nobody talks very much about Ernie's departure. I don't know too much about what Ernie actually did. I guess I have a sense from various articles and post-championship films, but it's an interesting question to wonder how losing one of his 20-year sidekicks has impacted Belichick.
 

ShaneTrot

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2002
6,471
Overland Park, KS
I am kind of shocked at how putrid the offense line is, I thought they needed a tackle but who knew all the guys on the offensive line would be hurt or awful. If you dump a highly drafted QB in here next year, wouldn't he be ruined just as much as Mac is?
 

jcd0805

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 3, 2007
4,041
Florida
I know we focus alot on Brady's departure, but nobody talks very much about Ernie's departure. I don't know too much about what Ernie actually did. I guess I have a sense from various articles and post-championship films, but it's an interesting question to wonder how losing one of his 20-year sidekicks has impacted Belichick.
Ernie and Scar, those two were enormous pieces to the Pats success.
 

Garshaparra

New Member
Feb 27, 2008
546
McCarver's Mushy Mouth
I am kind of shocked at how putrid the offense line is, I thought they needed a tackle but who knew all the guys on the offensive line would be hurt or awful. If you dump a highly drafted QB in here next year, wouldn't he be ruined just as much as Mac is?
Really, they needed two tackles, with Brown clearly not getting it done since returning in 2021. With Wynn's departure, that freed up $10M to play with. They then drafted...no tackles at all, depending on free agency. How'd that go?

- Riley Reiff (who couldn't start at tackle for one of the worst o-lines in 2022, but somehow was worth $5M guaranteed) had a lousy camp and got hurt late, landing on IR.
- Calvin Anderson (who, stop me if you've heard this before, couldn't start at tackle for one of the worst o-lines in 2022, got $7M/$4M guaranteed) missed all of camp with an unexplained illness, started the first 2 games and was highly ineffective. He didn't play at all vs. NO last week.
- Conor McDermott was re-signed to be the swing tackle ($2.8M/700K guaranteed) after an ok 2022 after being pulled off the Jets PS. He had a lousy camp, got injured, and released.

...and that's the $10M they had for Wynn, trading a dime for 3 pennies. For his part, Brown has actually been very good, but that's a lotta fail at the other end of the line.
 

bigq

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
11,319
The last time they were this bad, Dick MacPherson was on the sideline.
Losing two games by a combined score of 72-3 is unprecedented in Patriots' history.

MacPherson's teams never got pasted this badly in back to back games and neither did Rod Rust's 1990 sad sack of a squad.

The closest comparison I can find is 1970 when in weeks 7 and 8 the Patriots lost back to back games by a combined score 76-10.

What a mess.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,869
Losing two games by a combined score of 72-3 is unprecedented in Patriots' history.

MacPherson's teams never got pasted this badly in back to back games and neither did Rod Rust's 1990 sad sack of a squad.

The closest comparison I can find is 1970 when in weeks 7 and 8 the Patriots lost back to back games by a combined score 76-10.

What a mess.
Thank God that they only still count as 2 losses, and not like 10. Because it sure feels like they lost 10 games in the last two weeks.
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,176
Thank God that they only still count as 2 losses, and not like 10. Because it sure feels like they lost 10 games in the last two weeks.
I'd prefer we just get the 10 losses out of the way, rip the band-aid off and move onto the draft. At least there will be some intrigue in the season as we scoreboard watch to see which teams suck worse than NE and risk our draft position. In a way it will be better than the Cam season when we had no hope but also no shot at a top 3 draft pick.
 

sezwho

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
2,042
Isle of Plum
Really, they needed two tackles, with Brown clearly not getting it done since returning in 2021. With Wynn's departure, that freed up $10M to play with. They then drafted...no tackles at all, depending on free agency. How'd that go?

- Riley Reiff (who couldn't start at tackle for one of the worst o-lines in 2022, but somehow was worth $5M guaranteed) had a lousy camp and got hurt late, landing on IR.
- Calvin Anderson (who, stop me if you've heard this before, couldn't start at tackle for one of the worst o-lines in 2022, got $7M/$4M guaranteed) missed all of camp with an unexplained illness, started the first 2 games and was highly ineffective. He didn't play at all vs. NO last week.
- Conor McDermott was re-signed to be the swing tackle ($2.8M/700K guaranteed) after an ok 2022 after being pulled off the Jets PS. He had a lousy camp, got injured, and released.

...and that's the $10M they had for Wynn, trading a dime for 3 pennies. For his part, Brown has actually been very good, but that's a lotta fail at the other end of the line.
Thanks for breaking down the penny wise pound foolishness. You can do the same for letting Shaq Mason go, the bird in hand, to save money. 12m vs 3m is significant but we’re still wondering if Strange can play and it’s been pretty rough even when healthy.

It’s critical they get two tackles. Properly motivated Trent is solid, but our flukey high maintenance talent should be at WR or RB not LT. That should be a metronome of constancy: case in point he just got a couple million ‘incentives’ cash in season just to keep playing this year.

I want to be positive for a minute though, as the parts are there if they are healthy to get an oline together(edit-maybe except RT)…which allows some crack for everyone else to get to their potential. Come on Klemm, show us you’re not just another FOB.
 

bigq

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
11,319
Thank God that they only still count as 2 losses, and not like 10. Because it sure feels like they lost 10 games in the last two weeks.
It's still early and getting back to .500 this season may be unlikely but is possible. I'm having a hard time trying to decide whether that is even a desirable outcome. I think it is because I want the team to be competitive and I root for them to win each week. Furthermore building something out of this low point would feel like a step in the right direction and this team could use some silver linings. I can't root for the team to lose and hope to get a winning lottery ticket with an early pick in the draft. I'm not wired that way. I may change my mind if they continue to get throttled every week but the more likely outcome is I just tune the team out.
 

ShaneTrot

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2002
6,471
Overland Park, KS
It's still early and getting back to .500 this season may be unlikely but is possible. I'm having a hard time trying to decide whether that is even a desirable outcome. I think it is because I want the team to be competitive and I root for them to win each week. Furthermore building something out of this low point would feel like a step in the right direction and this team could use some silver linings. I can't root for the team to lose and hope to get a winning lottery ticket with an early pick in the draft. I'm not wired that way. I may change my mind if they continue to get throttled every week but the more likely outcome is I just tune the team out.
I am actively rooting for them but I want them to suck. They are devoid of top-end talent. Who is the best non-injured player on this team right now? Dugger, Bentley, Barmore, Uche? Compare the rosters in the AFC East at what position do the Pats have the best player at his position? I honestly cannot think of one.
 

bigq

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
11,319
I am actively rooting for them but I want them to suck. They are devoid of top-end talent. Who is the best non-injured player on this team right now? Dugger, Bentley, Barmore, Uche? Compare the rosters in the AFC East at what position do the Pats have the best player at his position? I honestly cannot think of one.
It does feel somewhat hopeless and I agree the roster is devoid of bright spots however they may have really bottomed out with nowhere to go but up. A lot can change over the course of 12 weeks and I am interested to see how it plays out.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
25,135
Unreal America
Losing two games by a combined score of 72-3 is unprecedented in Patriots' history.

MacPherson's teams never got pasted this badly in back to back games and neither did Rod Rust's 1990 sad sack of a squad.

The closest comparison I can find is 1970 when in weeks 7 and 8 the Patriots lost back to back games by a combined score 76-10.

What a mess.
Today I had my son watch a 30 minute YouTube video of every Pats game highlight package from NFL PrimeTime in 1990.

Yes, the full Steve Grogan/Marc Wilson/Tommy Hodson experience.

They got thumped in almost every game and had three losses by 30 or more points. But never consecutively.

Insanity.
 

nattysez

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2010
8,574
I previously posted that I thought Kraft and BB would find BB a soft landing with another NFL team. I don't think that's a possibility anymore. The film on this team is just too lousy.

The only question is whether BB and Kraft can reach agreement on language about BB "stepping away" or if BB forces Kraft to say Kraft is letting him go. Maybe this will be the first big decision (that I can recall) that Jonathan owns entirely.
 

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 22, 2008
36,204
I previously posted that I thought Kraft and BB would find BB a soft landing with another NFL team. I don't think that's a possibility anymore. The film on this team is just too lousy.

The only question is whether BB and Kraft can reach agreement on language about BB "stepping away" or if BB forces Kraft to say Kraft is letting him go. Maybe this will be the first big decision (that I can recall) that Jonathan owns entirely.
BB will get another coaching gig if he and the Pats part ways, but no one will offer control over personnel like he has now. I don’t know if that would interest him.
 

Salva135

Cassandra
Oct 19, 2008
1,572
Boston
Zero chance he goes somewhere else, simply because no one is giving him the personnel gig he has right now.

My biggest fear is that this ends poorly and BB takes his ball and goes home, depriving us of his opportunities in the media. He could have any gig he wants, but he might not want anything.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,375
Zero chance he goes somewhere else, simply because no one is giving him the personnel gig he has right now.

My biggest fear is that this ends poorly and BB takes his ball and goes home, depriving us of his opportunities in the media. He could have any gig he wants, but he might not want anything.
He’s 71 so he might just prefer going to Nantucket at this point. I’m not convinced he’s overly motivated by the Shula thing.
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
2,569
I think he'd rather coach Wesleyan's lax team then go start over with another owner. It's been a hell of a run. He should go be a football evangelist. I think he cares about Shula because it got personal, but I'm sure this year is taking a lot out of him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.