First, I appreciate you coming back and clarifying your response.
I also want to add that you and JMOH are entirely justified in not giving anyone from Barstool the benefit of the doubt. They clearly haven't earned it. I only listen to PMT and I find their content stands apart from the rest of the brand but I understand if others refuse to listen because they are associated with a brand that is unquestionably offensive.
Some people might argue that there is a distinction to be made between the Barstool blogger in question, who made a racist comment but isn't an active, frothing hate-filled person and, say, a member of The Proud Boys or a neo-Nazi group. However, I don't fault others if they don't believe there is a fundamental difference between the two.
With regard to the speed of social change, I get that you and others are frustrated with how long it takes. Furthermore, its non-linear and the real victims of "isms" are justified in being frustrated at the two-steps forward, two-steps back dynamic that often occurs.
Finally, I don't want to invoke those who aren't parties to this discussion anymore because its inappropriate - they aren't here to defend their viewpoint. That said, with a few exceptions, the members of this board have proven to be generally decent and open minded. As such, I don't think its fair to go in on them every time there is a perceived difference of opinion. However some posters think scorched earth is the only way to go and it has the net effect, for me at least, of forcing me to fight through my dislike of the poster's approach/demeanor while still generally agreeing with their viewpoint. In short, its a crappy way to persuade hearts and minds who might otherwise be sympathetic or open to a different way of looking at things.
I know its easy to paint everyone who appears to disagree with you as something evil but its a horrible approach if you really desire change and not simply virtue signaling as MC notes upthread.