WHAAAAAAAAAIf you want to really cry, he won NABC DPOY in 2016
I’m not offended, but you’re wrong. Tatum does have cold stretches, which I get finding frustrating, but even when he’s missing everything he’s still a good player. He actually is remarkably good at continuing to positively impact the game even when his scoring isn’t there, like that possession where he drove, collapsed the defense, and got Jaylen an open three.I know this will offend the Tatum can do no wrong crew (it’s obvious who these posters are) but his production within the game is a rollercoaster. He often has quarters where he’s literally the worst player on the court but he normally rebounds.
Let’s hope that’s the case here, because it’s another dog shit quarter from him
She was quoting Doc Rivers.Did she just say, “emotional terrorism”?
That's the rule I would change (in the "what rule would you change" thread). None of this "see if it goes in" shit. It's a foul or it isn't, ref. Cut the shit.it went tatum's way but that ref legit watched the shot and waited for it to miss to call that. feels like thats been happening a lot recently.
Because they are making shots and the Celtics are playing like assWhy does it feel like Philly has shot 85% lately
He has company on the Celtics right nowBrogdon plays 0 defense
Also they're hunting Jaylen on screens and getting good shots off it, either he dies and his man is open or they switch and it's a quick guy on HorfordBecause they are making shots and the Celtics are playing like ass
If this is your stance then you have literally no bar for him. He could step onto the court and he’s automatically great.I’m not offended, but you’re wrong. Tatum does have cold stretches, which I get finding frustrating, but even when he’s missing everything he’s still a good player. He actually is remarkably good at continuing to positively impact the game even when his scoring isn’t there, like that possession where he drove, collapsed the defense, and got Jaylen an open three.
What rule is it that you would change?That's the rule I would change (in the "what rule would you change" thread). None of this "see if it goes in" shit. It's a foul or it isn't, ref. Cut the shit.
Yes. The part I don't know is if they are legal screens or not.Also they're hunting Jaylen on screens and getting good shots off it, either he dies and his man is open or they switch and it's a quick guy on Horford
Dude….that’s not what’s happening at all. Have you watched this game? As soon as 13 steps on the court, it’s open season. Literally all of their actions involve himAlso they're hunting Jaylen on screens and getting good shots off it, either he dies and his man is open or they switch and it's a quick guy on Horford
The unwritten one, of course!What rule is it that you would change?
Coaching sucks and is inexperienced?Why don't the Celtics set screens? Philly is feasting on a single screen getting an open shot at the top of the arc.
They are good when teams miss wide open 3sAnybody remember how good this team used to be defensively?
It's not like that's a rule today. It's a ref cognitive bias. How do you implement what you're saying?That's the rule I would change (in the "what rule would you change" thread). None of this "see if it goes in" shit. It's a foul or it isn't, ref. Cut the shit.
Ask the Coach who also doesn't believe in timeouts and lets the sixth best offensive player on the team dominate the offense in the fourth quarter.Why don't the Celtics set screens? Philly is feasting on a single screen getting an open shot at the top of the arc.
He hit his first 2 which means he will be on a game long heat checkoh. well I need to pay more attention