The Crossover one kind of seemed too easy (9/9, rank: 1,064). I went 5/5 on the pitchers accomplishments without knowing for a fact that any of them were right. It was simply safe to assume that just about any starting pitcher with a decent career has both homered and had a 10 strikeout game at some point.
What would you have thought if it had to be the same season? I kind of wanted to be like this ideally, meaning the player would've had to have had a 10+ K start and a home run that same year, rather than wide-spacing career margins. I fathom the concern was that this might be genuinely too hard. All about balance and ensuring the lack of barriers to entry and play.
Terrific @Brand Name! your Crossover Grid has some great names! Orval Overall sounds like a comic book character. By day he is a bank teller but at night he is fighting crime known as "The Ocelot"
My Crossover Grid went pretty good. I'm very proud of the Middle/Right. Surprised Middle/Middle wasn't higher.
9/9 Score: 68.11 Rank: 632/6,212
Thank you! I love pitchers who rake, honestly, so this (linky goodness to my work here) felt like a fun tribute to that. You're missing out on one of the 25 though to fit ex-Red Sox to homer for the Braves... Derek Lowe. You could also take one of the 25 to mean a member of the original team that won the first official/modern World Series in 1903, in which case Bill Dinneen is right, though he played for the Braves/Beaneaters first.
4.24 (listed as 5) on Ref Grid, 3.75 on Crossover for my own Grid. Can you find the pattern I did on the AVG screen for the former, and the unique, one-off stats/games associated with guys in the latter? I think at least half have unique places in baseball history for Cross over..
On the Crossover grid lower right, does the player need to have homered during a game they pitched and got ten Ks or is it each event occurred at least once during their career? Assuming the latter but got snakebit a couple times in Immaculate early on before I picked up on the rules.
On the Crossover grid lower right, does the player need to have homered during a game they pitched and got ten Ks or is it each event occurred at least once during their career? Assuming the latter but got snakebit a couple times in Immaculate early on before I picked up on the rules.
What would you have thought if it had to be the same season? I kind of wanted to be like this ideally, meaning the player would've had to have had a 10+ K start and a home run that same year, rather than wide-spacing career margins. I fathom the concern was that this might be genuinely too hard. All about balance and ensuring the lack of barriers to entry and play.
I think the same season probably would be a little too difficult or random since it's not really a feat anyone would take notice of. I'm not opposed to an easy category – I enjoy recalling a number of nondescript players and going with the one I feel is least memorable – but I think in this case it was two categories that were at least borderline too easy in the same grid. I don't know how much control you have over such things or if the categories are all just entered ahead of time and then randomly generated. Probably my fix would be to change the "pitcher 1+ home run" category because even terrible hitting pitchers almost always did it eventually if they spent a few years in the NL or pre-DH majors. For example, Charlie Puleo randomly popped into my head from baseball card collecting 35 years ago... he pitched for several years in "The Launching Pad" and is a guy few people remember, so I went with him. It turns out he couldn't hit, even for a pitcher, but sure enough, he homered once. I would probably adjust that one to a pitcher who hit 3 or 5 home runs or something that's more of an accomplishment.
9/9 rarity score 158 because I had 3 of the top answers. Given the recency bias to this game I'm a little surprised that Papi was only at 3% for bottom right.
Tough day to break 100. 9/9...RS 149...3 Red Sox I could only think of 4 Angels with 40+ HRs. Turns out that there are only four and lucky for me I opted to use Reggie Jackson elsewhere, because while I was certain that he was one of the four he wasn't.
That 40+ HR column is rough. Four choices for each, only one of whom I would have categorized as somewhat obscure. Ended up nailing the most common answer for both just to be safe.
Yep. I think everyone just assumes the more famous guy was completely useless the whole time he was an Angel, when in fact he was just mostly useless. (I like how I’m still not saying his name as though people couldn’t figure it out.)
I knew who I wanted to guess for Orioles/Astros, but just couldn't remember his name. I saw his face about 9,000 times coming out of packs of 1987 Topps cards. I whiffed on the square and finally was able to look up Glenn Davis.
I knew who I wanted to guess for Orioles/Astros, but just couldn't remember his name. I saw his face about 9,000 times coming out of packs of 1987 Topps cards. I whiffed on the square and finally was able to look up Glenn Davis.
Tough day to break 100. 9/9...RS 149...3 Red Sox I could only think of 4 Angels with 40+ HRs. Turns out that there are only four and lucky for me I opted to use Reggie Jackson elsewhere, because while I was certain that he was one of the four he wasn't.
8/9
RS- 154
My center left pick was a @Brand Name pick, literally. That should tell you it was by far my lowest score
My Pirates 200 K pick was John Candelaria. He never came close to 200 in a season I could have gone with Michael Chavis or Brandon Moss with my Bos/Pit pick but I wanted to go with Wake.
You know, I once said to myself that if there was ever a Braves-Red Sox square, I’d pick your pick, but in the moment I forgot and went with Nick Esasky instead. Still a sub-1%, presumably all SoSH lurkers.
Also the IG-playing segment of baseball fandom has completely forgotten the existence of Javy Vazquez, I use him once a week or so and it’s always a low score.
You know, I once said to myself that if there was ever a Braves-Red Sox square, I’d pick your pick, but in the moment I forgot and went with Nick Esasky instead. Still a sub-1%, presumably all SoSH lurkers.
Also the IG-playing segment of baseball fandom has completely forgotten the existence of Javy Vazquez, I use him once a week or so and it’s always a low score.
Only 8/9, 119 today. After I struck out on the Pirates 200 strikeout pitcher, I decided to have some fun and just go for my most black and white grid... but I still stumbled there and couldn't come up with an old timer for the center square (too many guys were either AL or NL players back in the day). I'm definitely filing Ol' Cannonball away in the memory bank for the next time I need a Pirates pitcher.
I didn't bother posting mine today (Cristian Guzman screwed me by coming up 2 stolen bases short), but that's some crazy odds that we both picked Mack, Jeltz and Samuel.
I didn't bother posting mine today (Cristian Guzman screwed me by coming up 2 stolen bases short), but that's some crazy odds that we both picked Mack, Jeltz and Samuel.
Hi! It looks like you are not logged in. SoSH has a bunch of content only available to users who have registered so we suggest creating one.
If you are seeing this because of a supposed issue using the site, all site outage notices will be posted to our official Twitter account at
SoSH on Twitter.
Thanks!