Not to defend Draymond but this rule change is a clear positive.That NBA rule changed years ago (unsure of the college rule) to where there must be a vibration and an effect on the shot.
Not to defend Draymond but this rule change is a clear positive.That NBA rule changed years ago (unsure of the college rule) to where there must be a vibration and an effect on the shot.
Draymond was out of control on other plays, and Draymonding very hard. However, on this play, justice was served. If that had been a goaltend, the goaltending rule would be wrong.Not to defend Draymond but this rule change is a clear positive.
If the tournament games all stay as intense as the games last night, you'll get no argument from me about this.Disagree: I think making tourney's value almost purely intrinsic has the best chance of cementing its status over time.
Adding extrinsic basketball-related motivation cheapens the tourney. It's like getting money for your birthday present.
But this is all abstract. Empirically, the games last night were awesome and intense, and I see no reason that will change. You DEFINITELY don't want to wreck something that's empirically working by changing the incentives.
it feels like it'd be extremely complicatedHere’s what I want to know, who is the absolute madman who wrote the scheduling algorithm to have the regular season schedule support this?
You know what might be cool and go with the City theme? Have each end of the court be a map of the city in team colors, meeting in the middle. Boston in green and white with the Charles Rivers meeting at center court would be sweet.The NBA needs to explore matte finish on the In-Season Tournament floors, the shine is jarring
AI. Whether that means Artiticial Intelligence or Allen Iverson, I'm not sure though.Here’s what I want to know, who is the absolute madman who wrote the scheduling algorithm to have the regular season schedule support this?
who is saying the tournament is "garbage"?This whole thing has been a huge success already. Some of y'all need to embrace change and get over the whole "this court doesn't look like other courts therefore it is garbage" takes
Many a late night in the computer lab at GTown.Iverson writing the NBA schedule?
Coding? We talkin about codin??Many a late night in the computer lab at GTown.
Rumors have it that those coding sessions led to missing morning practices
Yup, nearly everything about it is awesome.This whole thing has been a huge success already. Some of y'all need to embrace change and get over the whole "this court doesn't look like other courts therefore it is garbage" takes
We're sorry, the word was actually codeine. We regret the error.Coding? We talkin about codin??
Totally agree. The broadcast last night made fun of the court in Chicago, but I thought it looked like they were playing on a pool of lava at the gates of Hell. That court was fuckin' metal.That said, the bright red court made the Portland/Memphis game feel particularly intense down the stretch. Definitely added to the atmosphere.
No truth to the rumor that Hyland was answering a question about defensive rotations.
I figured the bold courts were to help the causal fan understand when it's a tournament game. But it may help the players play harder too!
Shaughnessy (I know) threw up all over the concept in his scathing “thought” column. Unfortunately, his take will get repeated as nauseum on local sports talk.who is saying the tournament is "garbage"?
no parquetAnyone recall for sure whether Celtics played on the parquet or the “local” court when they used to play home games in Hartford in 1980s?
so on brand for CHB...Shaughnessy (I know) threw up all over the concept in his scathing “thought” column. Unfortunately, his take will get repeated as nauseum on local sports talk.
I’m just surprised someone read something by him. I don’t think I have read a word of his in 20 years. I’m surprised he’s still alive.so on brand for CHB...
I don't follow Boston sports media, but does anyone really take his opinions on the Celtics seriously?
Not sure anyone in the Cellar has been negative on the IST
coincidentally that’s also about how long it’s been since Shank did any real work…I’m just surprised someone read something by him. I don’t think I have read a word of his in 20 years. I’m surprised he’s still alive.
AI's AI: Nothing is practice to us.Many a late night in the computer lab at GTown.
Rumors have it that those coding sessions led to missing morning practices
I cant find a link, but im pretty sure i recall stories of Bill Bradley telling MSG personnel when the basket height was millimeters off.maybe Grant can snag a Behr or Loew's commercial
https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/38811296/wrongly-measured-3-point-line-nuggets-court-repainted-tipoff-vs-mavs
IIRC John Havlicek also did this.I cant find a link, but im pretty sure i recall stories of Bill Bradley telling MSG personnel when the basket height was millimeters off.
Exactly.My thing with the alternative courts is that they are all almost the same design, just with different color patterns. They could have had some really cool, unique to each city, court designs and instead they just used the Microsoft Paint bucket tool to fill in parts of the court.
Being single elimination I wouldn't at all be surprised by at least one unexpected team in the Championship Game if not two. The Celtics and Nuggets are the two favorites and they are both 7-1I have to say that the idea of a potential Nuggets-Celtics tourney final - both teams knowing they're favorites to go to the actual finals -- has me salivating. If the NBA is lucky enough to not just have two clear conference favorites and lucky enough to have those two each get to the tourney final, they'll count their blessings as I think it'll really get a ton of eyeballs and excitement as a pre-championship championship game.
Maybe for the championship game I could see but you can't change the rules of regular season games which is what all of these tonight were.I thought Chris Vernon had a great idea saying they should use The Elam Ending for the in season tournament games.
Would be great for the championship. Probably would require a CBA change to do it for regular season games though, right?Maybe for the championship game I could see but you can't change the rules of regular season games which is what all of these tonight were.
Agreed on the second part. The flooring is doing its job imo in how fans/viewers can differentiate these games from a regular regular season contest. It is a constant reminder throughout the game, and the pregame/postgame highlights, that these games do carry additional meaning. The fact that the floors are creating a buzz, both + and -, seems to accomplish its objective.I'm torn on the red courts. On the one hand, they make it legitimately hard to follow the ball.
On the other, they seem to amp up the atmosphere, almost as if the oversaturated red hits players and fans emotionally...which it may?
They are accomplishing that but they also could have done a better job with the designs. Must be a million gamers and artists out there they could have asked for proposals. Hopefully they make some adjustments next year.Agreed on the second part. The flooring is doing its job imo in how fans/viewers can differentiate these games from a regular regular season contest. It is a constant reminder throughout the game, and the pregame/postgame highlights, that these games do carry additional meaning. The fact that the floors are creating a buzz, both + and -, seems to accomplish its objective.
That it true. It would be awesome for the Championship game.Maybe for the championship game I could see but you can't change the rules of regular season games which is what all of these tonight were.
And we'd be correct?I feel like if we were around in 1969, we'd be hearing about how much the new League Championship Series cheapened the World Series, cheapened the regular season, rewarded mediocrity, and was a "gimmick".