How do you solve a problem like Yoshida?

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,303
We are seriously just 25 games into the season with some pretty extreme situations that are forcing some unconventional decisions. Oh and the team is currently sporting a record that is better than the majority of us felt possible at this point under the best of circumstances.
And that's great. But where am I wrong about Yoshida's usage pattern, and the concerns that it brings up? Do you expect him to play in the OF at all going forward? And I'm not even saying he should. I'm saying that if he isn't (outside of an emergency), it brings up some tough questions that must be asked.
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
I'm not a huge Cora supporter, but ATM he's doing the best he can with what he has and the team is responding. Raffy's going to DH and he feels that RFsnyder is the best choice in this moment. It's not a matter of any of us being right or wrong, it's just looking at the situation and seeing it for what it is.
 

Fishercat

Svelte and sexy!
SoSH Member
May 18, 2007
8,368
Manchester, N.H.
I'm not nearly as critical on the benchings as I thought I would be - there's legit reasons for all of it, but in no world is a 40-man spot more important than an OF who is an above league average bat. If they decide to trade him it should be because they're VERY comfortable with their OF/DH/3B situation going forward not because of this 40 man crunch right now.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,303
I'm not nearly as critical on the benchings as I thought I would be - there's legit reasons for all of it, but in no world is a 40-man spot more important than an OF who is an above league average bat. If they decide to trade him it should be because they're VERY comfortable with their OF/DH/3B situation going forward not because of this 40 man crunch right now.
But he's no longer a viable OF, in the eyes of the club anyway. That's a big distinction. He's played 1 inning there, in an emergency.
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,761
Miami (oh, Miami!)
And that's great. But where am I wrong about Yoshida's usage pattern, and the concerns that it brings up? Do you expect him to play in the OF at all going forward? And I'm not even saying he should. I'm saying that if he isn't (outside of an emergency), it brings up some tough questions that must be asked.
Devers is going to DH over him. Refsnyder is a better fielder, so he'll play the OF over him. (Moreover, Refsnyder has been swinging a hot bat.)

You can't ignore the other pieces. I would like Yoshida to fire up again, so that this would be an agonizing decision or something. But agonizing or not, it might well be the same.

But at the moment it's not, and it's no big deal.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,861
Yoshida's ops+ is 102, a tick above average. His career ops+ is 109, decently above average.

He's a pretty decent hitter. He can't field, but you don't just jettison a guy like this unless you're getting something pretty decent in return.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
5,480
I don't understand the agita about Yoshida in this thread. His baseline is a solid hitter who lengthens the lineup. His upside is massively higher than that. His current 105 wrc+ is exactly what Boston got from their DHs as a whole last year, and would have outproduced half the teams in baseball at that spot. He is not a DFA candidate, FFS.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,303
I don't understand the agita about Yoshida in this thread. His baseline is a solid hitter who lengthens the lineup. His upside is massively higher than that. His current 105 wrc+ is exactly what Boston got from their DHs as a whole last year, and would have outproduced half the teams in baseball at that spot. He is not a DFA candidate, FFS.
I'm not suggesting they DFA him. If he's a 105+ guy, he's worth keeping around. I expect he will pay a bunch once Devers fully heals. But if he truly is a DH-only, who won't even do that sometimes vs LHP, we have to ask how much worse he can get and still keep his job. Because devoting a roster spot to a guy who can't play the field is pretty limiting. You have to hit well to overcome that.
 

Fishercat

Svelte and sexy!
SoSH Member
May 18, 2007
8,368
Manchester, N.H.
But he's no longer a viable OF, in the eyes of the club anyway. That's a big distinction. He's played 1 inning there, in an emergency.
Is it that he's no longer a viable OF or that Cora thinks there are three better options for that spot at this moment? And how long are Jarren Duran, TON, and Abreu going to stay healthy for?

The Sox played Manny Ramirez in LF for years, bad defense can play.
 

TheYellowDart5

Hustle and bustle
SoSH Member
Apr 16, 2003
9,325
NYC
Is it that he's no longer a viable OF or that Cora thinks there are three better options for that spot at this moment? And how long are Jarren Duran, TON, and Abreu going to stay healthy for?

The Sox played Manny Ramirez in LF for years, bad defense can play.
Bad defense can play if you hit like prime Manny Ramirez. Bad defense doesn't play if you hit like late-career Manny Ramirez.

The problem with Yoshida is the same problem as the team ran into with J.D. Martinez at the end: when he's not hitting, he's borderline impossible to roster given his inability to do anything else. And even Martinez put up a 117 OPS+ that last season in Boston. The bar for Yoshida isn't simply "he's a better-than-average DH," it has to be "he's a much better than average DH" because the cost of rostering him unless he's comfortably hitting well is high. The major gamble that Bloom took (beyond that Yoshida would adapt to MLB pitching) was that his defense would be passable enough. So far that's not been the case, and it's hard to be optimistic that it will be given his age and physical traits.
 

jteders1

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 5, 2022
135
Why not put Rfsnyder at first, put Yoshi in left and bench Dalbec. Really, let's be honest, that's the most logical solution.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,528
Why not put Rfsnyder at first, put Yoshi in left and bench Dalbec. Really, let's be honest, that's the most logical solution.
Defensively that’s a major downgrade. Keeping Yoshida out of the field with Abreu, Duran and O’Neill seems optimal on both sides of the ball.
I do think Refsnyder should be tried out at 1B and even against RHP, his overall performance should be more valuable than Dalbec even with Bobby’s seemingly improved defense
 

Fishercat

Svelte and sexy!
SoSH Member
May 18, 2007
8,368
Manchester, N.H.
Bad defense can play if you hit like prime Manny Ramirez. Bad defense doesn't play if you hit like late-career Manny Ramirez.

The problem with Yoshida is the same problem as the team ran into with J.D. Martinez at the end: when he's not hitting, he's borderline impossible to roster given his inability to do anything else. And even Martinez put up a 117 OPS+ that last season in Boston. The bar for Yoshida isn't simply "he's a better-than-average DH," it has to be "he's a much better than average DH" because the cost of rostering him unless he's comfortably hitting well is high. The major gamble that Bloom took (beyond that Yoshida would adapt to MLB pitching) was that his defense would be passable enough. So far that's not been the case, and it's hard to be optimistic that it will be given his age and physical traits.
And the Sox rostered JDM to the very end. Like, I have no issue with the benching in this scenario, but my main point is that Yoshida isn't unplayable in LF unless he truly is MUCH worse than most people think - some truly egregious butchers have played and will continue to play COF roles - and the Sox don't otherwise have a full-time DH.

To suggest cutting bait on a good bat when you're playing Bobby Dalbec and Pablo Reyes at the corners is wild to me. I'd go as far as to say they should try something much more radical - including seeing if Yoshida or Refsnyder could take to 1B - before you would cut or trade him for nothing.

I think folks might be overstating the general quality of DHs as well - his stat line last year would put him safely in the middle of the DH crop this year. I think the only justification for cutting bait is if Boston truly believes he's outright unplayable in LF AND Devers needs the DH spot longer term (and they have a capable 3B to take that slot), because I don't think this offense can afford to lose even a slightly above average bat when you're running automatic outs in Rafaela, Reyes, Dalbec, Hamilton, and/or Valdez out on a regular basis. And if Devers needs DH longer term, well that's two worrisome contracts then.
 
Last edited:

shaggydog2000

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 5, 2007
11,634
So you'd bench either O'neill or Abreu who are both better fielders and currently hitting better than Yoshida? Refsnyder playing first is fine, but doesn't have to impact Yoshida. Yoshida is on the roster and will stay there because while he's not a great hitter, he is miles better as a hitter than the bench guys, and the front office probably feels he is just as likely or more likely to hit well for the rest of the season than a guy they could promote from AAA, sign off of the street, or find available on the trade market in April. That shouldn't be a surprise.
 

TheYellowDart5

Hustle and bustle
SoSH Member
Apr 16, 2003
9,325
NYC
And the Sox rostered JDM to the very end. Like, I have no issue with the benching in this scenario, but my main point is that Yoshida isn't unplayable in LF unless he truly is MUCH worse than most people think - some truly egregious butchers have played and will continue to play COF roles - and the Sox don't otherwise have a full-time DH.
But that's the thing: Yoshida *is* unplayable in left. He finished 31st of 35 qualified leftfielders last season in Outs Above Average at -8; by overall Fielding Runs Value, he was in the bottom 1.3% of all players in the majors. You can be a butcher to that degree if you're putting up Kyle Schwarber/Juan Soto levels of offense to make up for it, but that's not Yoshida; every single thing he gives you with the bat is wiped out and then some by his glove. That's how he ended up a 0 fWAR player last year.

To suggest cutting bait on a good bat when you're playing Bobby Dalbec and Pablo Reyes at the corners is wild to me. I'd go as far as to say they should try something much more radical - including seeing if Yoshida or Refsnyder could take to 1B - before you would cut or trade him for nothing.
Learning and playing first base at the major league level is insanely difficult though. (Cue Ron Washington.) Remember the Kyle Schwarber experiment? There's no reason to think Yoshida, who never played even an inning at first in Japan, would do any better. It'd just be trading a problem in left field for a problem at first.

I think folks might be overstating the general quality of DHs as well - his stat line last year would put him safely in the middle of the DH crop this year. I think the only justification for cutting bait is if Boston truly believes he's outright unplayable in LF AND Devers needs the DH spot longer term (and they have a capable 3B to take that slot), because I don't think this offense can afford to lose even a slightly above average bat when you're running automatic outs in Rafaela, Reyes, Dalbec, Hamilton, and/or Valdez out on a regular basis. And if Devers needs DH longer term, well that's two worrisome contracts then.
I fully agree that there's no reason to cut him in a world where the roster is fully healthy and Devers is the regular third baseman; he's probably a fine DH, albeit one with what seems to be a pretty low ceiling. But he's a horrendous fit on a roster that's suffering a lot of injuries, and while I don't expect the FO to cut him just because of that, it does highlight his severe limitations and how poor an overall fit he is. As you said, if Devers needs to be a long-term DH, whither Yoshida?
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
13,783
The return for that should only net you a player of similar abilities at 3B.
Agreed.

Trading Yoshida for an overpriced 3B of similar value might sound nice until you realize that hypothetical player is likely to be terrible.

If he can be close to competent at 3B defensively, the hitting will be horrific (otherwise, that player would be far more valuable than Yoshida).

It still might be a reasonable move, but we're talking about a marginal player you don't want as an everyday 3B.
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,752
Rogers Park
Yoshida moved for a similar 3B contract would solve some issues and let Raffy DH.
The return for that should only net you a player of similar abilities at 3B.
Or a much more expensive one. Would you take back Rendon? ~3/$105 remaining compared to Yoshida's ~4/$72.

The glove has fallen off from its elite days, but is still *probably* above average — given all his recent health woes, the recent numbers are a mixed bag, but that's probably a scouting judgment. The bat, health, and general vibes are pretty dubious. It's been years since he's slugged even .400. Maybe getting back to the East Coast would be good for him, despite himself.

FWIW (not a ton), BTV sees Yoshida at par and Rendon a cool $80m below par. I don't actually think that either Rendon's deal is quite that far underwater or that Yoshida's is in quite that good shape; let's say the discrepancy is more like $40m. I imagine the Angels would leap at something like Yoshida and maybe one of our mid-list infield prospects (Eddinson Paulino?) for Rendon and still-only-25 post-prospect Jo Adell and, say, $30m: maybe we'd accept even less in money if Breslow and Bailey could pick one or two from among the Angels dozen or so B+ pitching prospects.

On paper, that still wildly favors the Angels, and it would allow them to shed Rendon and his money and play Yoshida half and half in LF — sharing the corner duties with Ward, Hicks, and Moniak — and at DH, sharing with the RH Sanó. Sanó is nominally a 3B, but I imagine they'd want to play one of Drury or Rengifo there. (They can have a lightly used Bobby Dalbec if they want.)

Rendon is, after all, a player who has finished high in MVP voting more than once, and his acquisition would allow Devers to DH and give us another RHH. He's basically a singles hitter at this point, but he makes good contact and draws a ton of walks. Adell would be a Franchy Cordero-style flier. He's a tools monster (he's hit a ball 117 mph and has high-end sprint speed) off to a hot start, but only in like 40 PA. He hasn't performed in several stints and is now out of options.

edit: to be clear, I don't know that I think this is terribly smart. I think I would rather just wait and see with Yoshida, even if the roster is clunky as a result.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,345
Or a much more expensive one. Would you take back Rendon? ~3/$105 remaining compared to Yoshida's ~4/$72.

The glove has fallen off from its elite days, but is still *probably* above average — given all his recent health woes, the recent numbers are a mixed bag, but that's probably a scouting judgment. The bat, health, and general vibes are pretty dubious. It's been years since he's slugged even .400. Maybe getting back to the East Coast would be good for him, despite himself.

FWIW (not a ton), BTV sees Yoshida at par and Rendon a cool $80m below par. I don't actually think that either Rendon's deal is quite that far underwater or that Yoshida's is in quite that good shape; let's say the discrepancy is more like $40m. I imagine the Angels would leap at something like Yoshida and maybe one of our mid-list infield prospects (Eddinson Paulino?) for Rendon and still-only-25 post-prospect Jo Adell and, say, $30m: maybe we'd accept even less in money if Breslow and Bailey could pick one or two from among the Angels dozen or so B+ pitching prospects.

On paper, that still wildly favors the Angels, and it would allow them to shed Rendon and his money and play Yoshida half and half in LF — sharing the corner duties with Ward, Hicks, and Moniak — and at DH, sharing with the RH Sanó. Sanó is nominally a 3B, but I imagine they'd want to play one of Drury or Rengifo there. (They can have a lightly used Bobby Dalbec if they want.)

Rendon is, after all, a player who has finished high in MVP voting more than once, and his acquisition would allow Devers to DH and give us another RHH. He's basically a singles hitter at this point, but he makes good contact and draws a ton of walks. Adell would be a Franchy Cordero-style flier. He's a tools monster (he's hit a ball 117 mph and has high-end sprint speed) off to a hot start, but only in like 40 PA. He hasn't performed in several stints and is now out of options.
Maybe you know this but Rendon is on the IL again currently.
 

TheYellowDart5

Hustle and bustle
SoSH Member
Apr 16, 2003
9,325
NYC
It's hard to imagine a worse fit for the Boston media and fanbase than Rendon, who has about as much enthusiasm for playing baseball as most people have for doing their taxes.
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,752
Rogers Park
It seemed like you had talked yourself out of the idea by the end of your second or third sentence anyway. ;)
LOL. I was never really in. I am actually bullish on Yoshida making the needed adjustments, but he is a pretty terrible fit for the roster in its battered state and his upside isn't all that high as a good-not-great hitter with only one low-value defensive position that he plays poorly.

It's hard to imagine a worse fit for the Boston media and fanbase than Rendon, who has about as much enthusiasm for playing baseball as most people have for doing their taxes.
Oh, agreed. But there's not a lot out there at the position that might plausibly be traded. Maybe Eugenio Suaréz gets dealt if things go south in Phoenix, but I can't see them making a move early or being interested in Yoshida as part of a return if they did.

edited to add: Jeimer Candelario, maybe? Cinci is the rare team for whom Yoshida would be an upgrade at DH.
 

Fishercat

Svelte and sexy!
SoSH Member
May 18, 2007
8,368
Manchester, N.H.
But that's the thing: Yoshida *is* unplayable in left. He finished 31st of 35 qualified leftfielders last season in Outs Above Average at -8; by overall Fielding Runs Value, he was in the bottom 1.3% of all players in the majors. You can be a butcher to that degree if you're putting up Kyle Schwarber/Juan Soto levels of offense to make up for it, but that's not Yoshida; every single thing he gives you with the bat is wiped out and then some by his glove. That's how he ended up a 0 fWAR player last year.


Learning and playing first base at the major league level is insanely difficult though. (Cue Ron Washington.) Remember the Kyle Schwarber experiment? There's no reason to think Yoshida, who never played even an inning at first in Japan, would do any better. It'd just be trading a problem in left field for a problem at first.


I fully agree that there's no reason to cut him in a world where the roster is fully healthy and Devers is the regular third baseman; he's probably a fine DH, albeit one with what seems to be a pretty low ceiling. But he's a horrendous fit on a roster that's suffering a lot of injuries, and while I don't expect the FO to cut him just because of that, it does highlight his severe limitations and how poor an overall fit he is. As you said, if Devers needs to be a long-term DH, whither Yoshida?
I don't think we're particularly far out on any of this to be honest. I agree he isn't in the ideal lineup construction while Devers has to be a DH (and rushing him back to the field isn't worth that risk), and you agree we have no reason to cut him presently. I think we also agree on the team as constructed today - and likely for the forseeable future - it's not a great fit. Yoshida being upset about being benched is understandable but it's likely best for the team. So I don't want to belabor much, just two things I guess.

The first is that I think -8 OAA doesn't make a guy unplayable. He's bad, absolutely he's bad, and I'd probably agree any "improvement' in getting used to the monster and acclimating to the U.S. pace of play over a season is likely offset by aging curves. But the gap between Kyle Schwarber and Masataka Yoshida in the field last year by OAA was 11 runs - that's the gap between Yoshida and the #2 Corbin Carroll. Schwarber's slash lines weren't dramatically better at the plate than Yoshida this year or last year (better yes but the gap isn't huge like Soto). I certainly don't think he should be out there with Duran, Refsnyder, TON, and Abreu as COF options and without a premier defensive CF like CR could be, but I think in a world where TON and Abreu would be hurt (for instance), you can still put him in LF and he can, for the most part, not completely embarass himself. Taking into account all of Baseball Savant's tracked qualifying LF seasons, Yoshida's 2023 was 217th of 244 - which bad, but some bad I think survivable if the other pieces are there. Like, the Sox played Benintendi in 2019 out in left and he has a -10 OAA. It wasn't fun but like, the whole field won't collapse.

For the conversion to 1B, I agree...but my idea was that it should be tried before giving up. Now if Casas was healthy it'd be a no go, and I think a healthy Casas with Devers forced at DH would really make this a tougher call, but I also think crazier things have happened. At the very least, Refsnyder has some minimal big league 1B experience, so if he could play a passable 1B that opens up the OF slot without as much a downside.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,376
Yoshida is 5’8. Best I can tell, Ronnie Belliard (33 games in 08) is the only player that short to log significant time at the position in the last fifty years.
 

Fishercat

Svelte and sexy!
SoSH Member
May 18, 2007
8,368
Manchester, N.H.
Yoshida is 5’8. Best I can tell, Ronnie Belliard (33 games in 08) is the only player that short to log significant time at the position in the last fifty years.
Matt Stairs is 5'9" and played 294 games at first, Pablo Sandoval is 5'10" and played some first. While a legit substantial disadvantage, first base isn't a carnival ride.

Again, this is a "last ditch" suggestion and Refsnyder actually has MLB play time there and is the more obvious move, but honestly, for as long a shot as this is, the Red Sox are actively playing a first baseman who is 2 for 37 with 19 strikeouts with a negative 40 OPS+ right now. How far back do you have to go to find a team who played that level of offensive ineptitude at first for a full season?

I would assume the Sox would actually just try and trade him for a 1B/3B guy and some salary evening instead of doing this, but Yoshida at least has an MLB level tool in his arsenal and it's the important one, saying he's not worth a 40 man slot doesn't fly to me - the suggestion around that would be to at least try that before cutting a guy with a substantial guaranteed contract and a hit tool while actively playing multiple offensive black holes on the roster.
 
Last edited:

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,995
Maine
Matt Stairs is 5'9" and played 294 games at first, Pablo Sandoval is 5'10" and played some first. While a legit substantial disadvantage, first base isn't a carnival ride.

Again, this is a "last ditch" suggestion and Refsnyder actually has MLB play time there and is the more obvious move, but honestly, for as long a shot as this is, the Red Sox are actively playing a first baseman who is 2 for 37 with 19 strikeouts with a negative 40 OPS+ right now. How far back do you have to go to find a team who played that level of offensive ineptitude at first for a full season?

I would assume the Sox would actually just try and trade him for a 1B/3B guy and some salary evening instead of doing this, but Yoshida at least has an MLB level tool in his arsenal and it's the important one, saying he's not worth a 40 man slot doesn't fly to me.
Pablo Reyes is listed at 5' 8" and if not for the injuries that have placed Dalbec on the roster for all but about 5 games, he'd have been the only back-up 1B on the roster (heck, he played more 1B in spring training than Dalbec did). I don't think height is going to prevent the Sox from trying Masa at 1B if they think he can handle it and it's the best way to get his bat in the lineup more.

But per Cora, Devers is expected to return to 3B over the weekend and that will open up the DH spot for Yoshida to play. He's going nowhere and I don't understand the drum beat to move him.
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
Agreed.

Trading Yoshida for an overpriced 3B of similar value might sound nice until you realize that hypothetical player is likely to be terrible.

If he can be close to competent at 3B defensively, the hitting will be horrific (otherwise, that player would be far more valuable than Yoshida).

It still might be a reasonable move, but we're talking about a marginal player you don't want as an everyday 3B.
Yep.
 

Fishercat

Svelte and sexy!
SoSH Member
May 18, 2007
8,368
Manchester, N.H.
Agreed.

Trading Yoshida for an overpriced 3B of similar value might sound nice until you realize that hypothetical player is likely to be terrible.

If he can be close to competent at 3B defensively, the hitting will be horrific (otherwise, that player would be far more valuable than Yoshida).

It still might be a reasonable move, but we're talking about a marginal player you don't want as an everyday 3B.
Just to echo this, here are the 3B who would be even somewhat viable trade targets making 10m+ per year

Yoan Moncada (24.8m)
Chris Taylor (13m)
Ryan McMahon (12m)
Eugenio Suarez (11.25m)

Moncada is on the 60 Day IL, Chris Taylor is hitting .051 and has two years left on his deal, Ryan McMahon would likely be quite expensive to acquire as he's under a reasonable extension, and Eugenio Suarez might be a decent target but Arizona has no place to play Yoshida - maybe he'd take Jake McCarthy's place in RF in the short term but that's not an upgrade, and Alek Thomas is due back soon, and Joc Pederson is raking in their DH slot.

A Taylor for Yoshida swap has some backing at least, Taylor is playing LF right now and Yoshida is definitely going to outhit him, and Taylor's utility value combined with what has to be a better bat than he's shown this year would work, but like...that's the target probably - and Taylor has bee na very valuable Dodger player for a long time now, so they may want to give him some time to find his bat.
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,761
Miami (oh, Miami!)
But per Cora, Devers is expected to return to 3B over the weekend and that will open up the DH spot for Yoshida to play. He's going nowhere and I don't understand the drum beat to move him.
If Yoshida had magically retired before the season began, the Sox could have signed a bat-first DH type with more offensive upside than Yoshida, or a 3B to spell Devers while Devers got some DH appearances.

I think people are still on that train and haven't noticed that it's already stopped at the destination. Meaning, the off-season is over, and they're playing now. (Or perhaps they do and believe if they angst enough about it, the FO will cave to their personal wishes or something.)

But moving him does not magically open up any of those options. Dumping him does not relieve them of his contract. Moreover, he's not blocking anybody, and has a decent upside as a hitter, which he demonstrated last year. Trading him would be doing so when his value is at a low ebb. And there's no clear type of player you want back for that value. Do you want an equal bat DH? Why?

So, ultimately, I don't get it either. It's currently a non-problem.
 

jbupstate

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2022
617
New York, USA
Looking at b-ref and Yoshida has a dWAR of -0.2 in 1 inning of play.

How is that possible? Is the threat of a ball being hit near him that great?
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
6,184
I think in his one inning he did have what I remembered to be a pretty easy line drive go right over his head for extra bases? I can't remember quite.
 

jbupstate

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2022
617
New York, USA
Looking at b-ref and Yoshida has a dWAR of -0.2 in 1 inning of play.

How is that possible? Is the threat of a ball being hit near him that great?
I guess it could be worse. Schwarber is -0.2 and has only played DH.

Did a quick compare of Yoshida and Schwarber 23 to current. Schwarber has been terrible!
 

derekson

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2010
6,265
Looking at b-ref and Yoshida has a dWAR of -0.2 in 1 inning of play.

How is that possible? Is the threat of a ball being hit near him that great?
dWAR includes the position adjustment and fielding runs, so a DH gets negative position adjustment runs.
 

StupendousMan

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
1,927
Yoshida Twitter is kind of interesting.

A: Masataka Yoshida conspiracy theories.

B: Some kind of comic (e.g.)
Image


C: Awesome prints:
Image




Image
The prints are by Japanese artist Hasui Kawase, who blended traditional styles of ukiyo-e woodblock prints with influences from European art; he was active in the early twentieth century, when Japan was enthusiastically adopting a number of Western ideas. He’s one of my favorite artists - a Hasui calendar hangs on the wall of my office.

Whatever else one might say about Yoshida, one can’t deny his taste in art :)
 

RS2004foreever

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2022
698
I have no idea what Cora is thinking when it comes to Yoshida. The idea that Dalbec is such a massive defensive upgrade over Refs at first that he has to play while Yoshi rides the pine for over a week doesn't make much sense to me, particularly when we are running a lineup that is starved for offense. It looks like deliberate sabotage of a player. Yoshi was a decent major league hitter last year and it is not like the current lineup is chocked full of guys like that.
 

HfxBob

New Member
Nov 13, 2005
636
Definitely feels like Cora and Bloom were at odds on team building.
In this case I think you have to give the nod to Cora. Yoshida was a dreadful signing given his cost and the team's needs. Bloom signed 2 expensive DH's last offseason in Turner and Yoshida.
 

Lose Remerswaal

Experiencing Furry Panic
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
The prints are by Japanese artist Hasui Kawase, who blended traditional styles of ukiyo-e woodblock prints with influences from European art; he was active in the early twentieth century, when Japan was enthusiastically adopting a number of Western ideas. He’s one of my favorite artists - a Hasui calendar hangs on the wall of my office.

Whatever else one might say about Yoshida, one can’t deny his taste in art :)
A definite A-ha vibe to that comic. The others are beautiful
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,528
I have no idea what Cora is thinking when it comes to Yoshida. The idea that Dalbec is such a massive defensive upgrade over Refs at first that he has to play while Yoshi rides the pine for over a week doesn't make much sense to me, particularly when we are running a lineup that is starved for offense. It looks like deliberate sabotage of a player. Yoshi was a decent major league hitter last year and it is not like the current lineup is chocked full of guys like that.
Has any member of the press asked Cora about Refsnyder at 1B? He played there in ST…. Presumably for this exact situation. Cora apparently either forgot or the experience was horrifying.
I can’t find game logs, but it appears in limited time there he didn’t destroy the team.
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,761
Miami (oh, Miami!)
The prints are by Japanese artist Hasui Kawase, who blended traditional styles of ukiyo-e woodblock prints with influences from European art; he was active in the early twentieth century, when Japan was enthusiastically adopting a number of Western ideas. He’s one of my favorite artists - a Hasui calendar hangs on the wall of my office.

Whatever else one might say about Yoshida, one can’t deny his taste in art :)
They're from Hiroshi Yoshida, I believe. . .. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiroshi_Yoshida
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,376
I don’t think so; I assume Breslow was the driving force behind Yoshida ditching his glove. That he didn’t admit to it immediately in off-season was likely because he wanted to talk to Yoshi about it in person.