2014 Miami Dolphins: Raw Doggin' It

Status
Not open for further replies.

pdaj

Fantasy Maven
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2002
3,385
From Springfield to Providence
OL Update:
 
The Shelley Smith at C project is over -- already. Samson Satele was signed a couple days ago and is expected to start in place of Pouncey. Right now, the competition looks like this:
 
RT Albert
RG Colledge -- Turner
C  Satele -- Garner -- Brenner
LG Smith -- Thomas
LT James
 
Even with James starting, this unit has a ton of NFL experience between them. The issue? It's still a weak-to-average unit. But they shouldn't be awful.
 

sodenj5

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
6,623
CT
pdaj said:
OL Update:
 
The Shelley Smith at C project is over -- already. Samson Satele was signed a couple days ago and is expected to start in place of Pouncey. Right now, the competition looks like this:
 
RT Albert
RG Colledge -- Turner
C  Satele -- Garner -- Brenner
LG Smith -- Thomas
LT James
 
Even with James starting, this unit has a ton of NFL experience between them. The issue? It's still a weak-to-average unit. But they shouldn't be awful.
I feel like the line looks completely backwards left to right.

Pouncey keeps saying his goal is to be cleared for week 1. I don't know if he'll make it for week 1, but I'm optimistic he'll miss limited time.
 

pdaj

Fantasy Maven
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2002
3,385
From Springfield to Providence
sodenj5 said:
I feel like the line looks completely backwards left to right.

Pouncey keeps saying his goal is to be cleared for week 1. I don't know if he'll make it for week 1, but I'm optimistic he'll miss limited time.
 
You're right. That's what I get for posting after an all-nighter.
 
Corrected:
 
LT Albert
LG Colledge -- Turner
C  Satele -- Garner -- Brenner
RG Smith -- Thomas
RT James
 
I think Pouncey's talking' the talk. I'd be surprised if he returns prior to Week 6.
 

Clears Cleaver

Lil' Bill
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2001
11,370
there is so little depth on the o-line. maybe could trade from WR and/or DL depth to get a serviceable backup T?
 
the Grantland article was good and balanced. the key to me is being able to run effectively on first down and third and short. will make tannehill's job so much easier
 

pdaj

Fantasy Maven
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2002
3,385
From Springfield to Providence
jsinger121 said:
Albert Breer@AlbertBreer 3m
Dolphins S Reshad Jones has been suspended for four games for violating the PED policy.
 
 Idiotic. Jimmy Wilson will most likely fill in; he's a decent replacement. At this point, I'd be elated if Miami is 2-2 headed into their Week 5 BYE. Dion, Reshad, and (hopefully) Pouncey will return by then.
 
Edit:
 
Per Rotoworld --
 
NFL suspended Dolphins SS Reshad Jones four games for violating the league's policy against performance enhancing drugs.
 
He'll join DE Dion Jordan on the sidelines for the first month. (Jordan was popped for the same infraction.) Jones' loss is a big blow to the back end of Miami's defense, where he is an every-down player and excels in run support. "I worked closely with the union to investigate what happened, and I learned that a supplement I took caused the positive test," said Jones in a statement. "I deeply regret not investigating the supplement carefully before I took it, and I will never again take a supplement without having it checked." The Fins figure to turn to CB/S Jimmy Wilson at strong safety for the first four games.
 
 

sodenj5

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
6,623
CT
pdaj said:
 
 Idiotic. Jimmy Wilson will most likely fill in; he's a decent replacement. At this point, I'd be elated if Miami is 2-2 headed into their Week 5 BYE. Dion, Reshad, and (hopefully) Pouncey will return by then.
 
Edit:
 
Per Rotoworld --
 
 
Jesus H. That's 2 definite starters in Jones and Pouncey as well as another guy that should be a key contributor in Jordan gone for the first ¼ of the season. 
 
In a more positive light, Tannehilll looked good in his limited action. Not that it means too much, but its better than going out there and stinking the joint up. 
 

pdaj

Fantasy Maven
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2002
3,385
From Springfield to Providence
sodenj5 said:
 
Jesus H. That's 2 definite starters in Jones and Pouncey as well as another guy that should be a key contributor in Jordan gone for the first ¼ of the season. 
 
In a more positive light, Tannehilll looked good in his limited action. Not that it means too much, but its better than going out there and stinking the joint up. 
 
It was only one series, but Miami's revamped offensive line looked really good in pass protection. Hopefully that's a sign of future performance. Ju'waun James was given quite a bit of PT; and while he graded very well in pass protection, he struggled with his run blocking, particularly on the edge. That'll be something to pay attention to going forward. If the offensive line can be just average, I like the potential of this offense with Miller/Moreno and Wallace-Hartline-Gibson-Matthews-Landry-Clay.
 
My new top concern? This linebacking unit. Misi looked a bit lost at times at the Mike, and he's absolutely horrific in coverage. A 2-down guy in the past, is this a dude we really want to see on the field on 3rd downs? Meanwhile, Wheeler continues to suck, while Ellerbe made several poor reads. Right now, this is easily the team's worst unit. On the bright side, Tripp looked pretty good.
 
I was disappointed in DJ's first game. He played nearly 3 quarters, registered just 1 tackle, and created zero pass rush. I was looking to see him dominate Atlanta's 2nd-team. In the secondary, Will Davis got challenged often and looked pretty good; while Jamar was God-awful. 
 

Clears Cleaver

Lil' Bill
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2001
11,370
I just watched the Falcons game on tape. holy crap they cannot tackle. embarrassing. evidently philbin put them through a practive devopted to fundamentals and tackling today and the beat guys were all pissing on how bad it was. basically there isn't one NFL caliber LB on the team. of course, that dipshat GM spent $50M on two linebacksers just over a year ago. amazing how bad that is.
 
tannehill looked ok, still throw to his primary guy every time, but was relatively quick and accurate. he had a great practice today, too, from what I read.
 
this team I think is average or better at QB, RB, WR, PK, Kick returns
above average: secondary, P and DLine
Below average: OLine, LB
 

dwainw

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
2,405
Minneapolis, MN
Clears Cleaver said:
I just watched the Falcons game on tape. holy crap they cannot tackle. embarrassing. evidently philbin put them through a practive devopted to fundamentals and tackling today and the beat guys were all pissing on how bad it was. basically there isn't one NFL caliber LB on the team. of course, that dipshat GM spent $50M on two linebacksers just over a year ago. amazing how bad that is.
 
tannehill looked ok, still throw to his primary guy every time, but was relatively quick and accurate. he had a great practice today, too, from what I read.
 
this team I think is average or better at QB, RB, WR, PK, Kick returns
above average: secondary, P and DLine
Below average: OLine, LB
A "forgotten" component of this is their inability to force turnovers.  You'd like to think the reason they're missing tackles at times is that they're gambling on forcing some fumbles and going for picks.  But not so much.  Admittedly, they were 4th in interceptions last year, but they've been middle of the pack/near the bottom in defensive turnovers for years now and they haven't had a positive ratio since 2008 when they led the league at a whopping +17.   Anyone remember that year?  For a perpetually mediocre team like Miami, that seems like a significant statistical trend.
 

pdaj

Fantasy Maven
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2002
3,385
From Springfield to Providence
Burnett's still available. I sure as hell wouldn't mind a seeing a reunion.
 
In other news, Brady Quinn has been signed, and Devlin's been released. 
 
Could Moore get cut? He's making 5-5.5, 1.5 guaranteed. Still, don't see it happening. He's someone who could win a game or two if Tannehill got injured and needed some time out. There's been some rumblings that he's not 100% though, so Quinn could see some immediate time during the preseason. 
 

Clears Cleaver

Lil' Bill
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2001
11,370
Moore was throwing today in practice, fwiw. supposedly the LBs were better today. Misi at MLB is only lock to start though
 

mcaqua

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 15, 2011
306
So this isn't good:
 


That changed yesterday, when the Sun-Sentinel's Omar Kelly reported that Clay's injury has been diagnosed as a re-aggravation of his Clay's arthroscopically-repaired knee. It's not uncommon for football players to get their knees "scoped" in the offseason to reduce pain or swelling that comes from wear and tear, and the timetable for return is generally 3-4 weeks after that type of minor operation. What apparently happened to Clay is that he had his knee scoped, then was cleared to return to practice, but during the Dolphins scrimmage on August 2nd, his knee flared up. It's unclear whether the aggravation occurred on a hit or if it was a non-contact injury. Regardless, as of 3 days ago, Charles Clay was still unable to do sprints in practice due to pain and swelling, but he was able to practice catching passes while stationary and wearing a knee brace.
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sports/miami-dolphins/dolphins-blog/sfl-dolphins-trying-to-address-tight-end-issues-add-another-rookie-20140812,0,5220888.story
 

mcaqua

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 15, 2011
306
pdaj said:
 
It was only one series, but Miami's revamped offensive line looked really good in pass protection. Hopefully that's a sign of future performance. Ju'waun James was given quite a bit of PT; and while he graded very well in pass protection, he struggled with his run blocking, particularly on the edge. That'll be something to pay attention to going forward. If the offensive line can be just average, I like the potential of this offense with Miller/Moreno and Wallace-Hartline-Gibson-Matthews-Landry-Clay.
 
My new top concern? This linebacking unit. Misi looked a bit lost at times at the Mike, and he's absolutely horrific in coverage. A 2-down guy in the past, is this a dude we really want to see on the field on 3rd downs? Meanwhile, Wheeler continues to suck, while Ellerbe made several poor reads. Right now, this is easily the team's worst unit. On the bright side, Tripp looked pretty good.
 
I was disappointed in DJ's first game. He played nearly 3 quarters, registered just 1 tackle, and created zero pass rush. I was looking to see him dominate Atlanta's 2nd-team. In the secondary, Will Davis got challenged often and looked pretty good; while Jamar was God-awful. 
 
Tripp is going to start for this team, maybe not Week 1, though according to the beat guys he's getting looks with the starters at practice today.  Ultimately, I think he's more suited to play inside (which should help mitigate some of his deficiencies in space) while shifting Misi outside and getting Ellerbe off the field entirely.  That said, there is no doubt that LB play is going to be a fatal flaw with the '14 iteration of the Dolphins.  I think that unit in particular will hold the defense back from being truly special.
 


2. Dolphins linebackers: Miami has defensive talent at a lot of positions. But perhaps the biggest concern is at linebacker. Starters Philip Wheeler, Dannell Ellerbe and Koa Misi didn't have a good first showing in last week's 16-10 loss to the Atlanta Falcons. There were missed tackles and inconsistent coverage as Atlanta quarterback Matt Ryan completed all seven of his passes. Tackling has been a major emphasis in practice this week, which is needed. The Dolphins' linebackers did an "Oklahoma drill" this week against the running backs and put on an ugly display. Miami’s running backs dominated the drill, which didn't offer much hope that Miami's tackling will drastically improve.
 
Ominous.
http://espn.go.com/blog/miami-dolphins

 
 
On a more positive note, Terrence Fede and Chris McCain have continued to sustain the momentum they generated early in camp.  Fede in particular has been a revelation by all indications. 
 

pdaj

Fantasy Maven
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2002
3,385
From Springfield to Providence
C'mon now, I'm not the only one who watched the game, right?
 
First things first, Tannehill looked good at times in this one, but then also had his usual lapses in judgment, making some really poor reads and then later getting stripped for the turnover. He's going to have to avoid these "WTF?" moments to lead this team to the playoffs. I'm still a huge Tanny believer, but it's a concern.
 
I watched the game for the third time tonight, and man, did Dallas Thomas shit the bed Saturday night. Sure, he had a difficult matchup, and I think it would have made sense to scheme a little help on McCoy, but the kid got absolutely destroyed. With defensive fronts Miami will be facing within the division, I'm scared for this guy. I'm talking Jonathan Martin bad X2. And Colledge wasn't any good, either.
 
I'm hoping Philbin/Benton get a good look at a possible Smith-Satele-Turner trio inside the next couple weeks. A lot of Lazor's offense, like Chip's, seems to operate off the run. If the Smith-Pouncey-Turner trio can get the ground game working, a lot of the passing game is going to come off play fakes, screens, and quick reads, neutralizing a potentially average to below average pass blocking. Considering the fact Colledge + Thomas also offer "eh" pass protection, I'd rather the run blocking advantage with Turner and Smith.
 
Smith was moved up to 2nd-string LG before the TB game, so I think he's directly competing with Colledge for the starting spot. And after Thomas' past 2 games, you know Turner's going to get a solid look. I expect both to start in this week's game, but we'll see.
 

Clears Cleaver

Lil' Bill
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2001
11,370
you have to think that one of the starting guards and a starting LB may not even be on the roster yet. Why is it so hard to trade in the NFL. Fish have excess DLinemen. 
 

sodenj5

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
6,623
CT
Fins cut Michael Egnew, per Schefter.
 
Not entirely surprising. I felt like if he was ever going to contribute, it would be this year with the Fins moving more towards a spread system and they could use Egnew in basically the same role he had in college. Maybe he'll catch on with another team and a fresh start will do him good, but I don't think the light was ever going to come on in Miami for him. 
 

sodenj5

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
6,623
CT
I think the biggest story line to come out of the third preseason game is Knowshon Moreno. He looked great, and Miami looked like an entirely different offense when he's running the ball. Dallas's D is terrible, but Knowshon is also still probably at 75-80% healthy and not fully in game shape yet.

The defense also looked good against what should be a good Dallas offense. With Misi out, they mixed and matched the linebackers all night and did a good job of containing Romo and co. There were far fewer blown tackles this week as well.

Tannehill looked ok. Hard to say because it seemed clear that they were trying to emphasize the run this game. He did miss a wide open Wallace by about ten yards on what would have been an easy TD. He also forced an INT into double coverage.

Clay looked good on his one reception and the offensive line as a whole looked improved, with the running game flourishing and Tannehill being fairly well protected.

That's pretty much a wrap on the pre season. I'd expects the starting LBs to get some more work in the 4th game, but everyone else should be resting up for week 1.
 

Clears Cleaver

Lil' Bill
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2001
11,370
specials were bad, too, but philbin said he was playing a high # of rookies there to gauge their abilities. Landry fumbled a punt. I bet thigpen appreciated that. 
 
Dallas Thomas was again bad from what I read. They have to find another guard via waivers or trade.
 
Tannehill wasn't great. Missed a few, had two or three drops and that Wallace miss was an easy six.
 
Grimes has been mediocre so far. Guy signs the contract and has gotten beat a lot last two weeks. After being elite last year. let's hope he's not hurt and its just preseason stuff
 

pdaj

Fantasy Maven
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2002
3,385
From Springfield to Providence
Moreno just looks like a natural fit in this offense. Despite inferior speed/bust compared to Miller, he's much more efficient and appears to have greater invision. He also breaks tackles. Hopefully he can stay healthy -- keeping his "pitch count" down will be key.
 
The line looks significantly better with Smith at RG. Add the fact that Pouncey returned to practice today (crazy), and things are looking up.
 

Red PR

Member
SoSH Member
pdaj said:
Moreno just looks like a natural fit in this offense. Despite inferior speed/bust compared to Miller, he's much more efficient and appears to have greater invision. He also breaks tackles. Hopefully he can stay healthy -- keeping his "pitch count" down will be key.
 
The line looks significantly better with Smith at RG. Add the fact that Pouncey returned to practice today (crazy), and things are looking up.
 
Hope the good news keeps up with this team, they do need it. Thanks for the updates 
 

pdaj

Fantasy Maven
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2002
3,385
From Springfield to Providence
And we have our 53 (for now). 5 UFAs made the team. Highest since? Intrigued by Gator, Orleans, and McCain. Also glad to see the FO keep 6 WR. I love the depth of this group, and an injury is always possible. In other news, no PUP for Pouncey.
 
QB (2)
Ryan Tannehill
Matt Moore

RB (4)

Lamar Miller
Knowshon Moreno
Damien Williams
Orleans Darkwa


TE/FB/H-Back (3)

 
Charles Clay
Dion Sims
Gator Hoskins


WR (6)
Mike Wallace
Brian Hartline
Brandon Gibson
Jarvis Landry
Rishard Matthews
Damian Williams

OL (10)

 
Branden Albert
Daryn Colledge

Samson Satele
Mike Pouncey
Dallas Thomas
Ja'Wuan James
Shelley Smith
Billy Turner
Jason Fox
Nate Garner

DL (8)

 
Cam' Wake
Randy Starks
Jared Odrick
Earl Mitchell
Olivier Vernon
Derrick Shelby
Terrance Fede

Anthony Johnson

LB (8)

 
Koa Misi
Phil Wheeler
Dan Ellerbe

Jasen Trusnik
Jelani Jenkins
Jordan Tripp
Chris McCain
Jon Freeny

DB (9)

 
Brent Grimes
Cortland Finnegan
Will Davis
Jamar Taylor
Louis Delmas
Jimmy Wilson
Don Jones
Michael Thomas
Walt Aikens

Specialists (3)

 
Caleb Sturgis
Brandon Fields
John Denney
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
8,975
Dallas
Adrian's Dome said:
I don't have anything of value to add, but "Gator Hoskins" is a fantastic football name.
 
And my binky. No surprise at all he made the cut given my...uh track record ;).
 
I'd love to see him get enough play to be able to make a leap in the next two years.
 

sodenj5

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
6,623
CT
SMU_Sox said:
 
And my binky. No surprise at all he made the cut given my...uh track record ;).
 
I'd love to see him get enough play to be able to make a leap in the next two years.
 
The reports out of camp were that he looks Clay-esque out there. If I recall correctly, he missed a week or more with a strained hamstring, so he must have really made an impression while he was out there healthy.
 
A little surprising they kept only 3 TE's. My guess is they add one more to the PS. Also, glad to see they've kept both Damian and Damien Williams. Both have looked very good in their snaps in pre-season.
 
Thigpen being released is a bit surprising. He has potential as a receiving option, but his bread and butter is returning. Hickey and company must feel comfortable enough having Landry or Williams doing the returns.
 

dwainw

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
2,405
Minneapolis, MN
What, no comments on the Daniel Thomas cut?  Allow me:  what a disappointment.   Well, then, let the games begin.....  :unsure: 

Anyway, I always appreciate you regulars' take on things in here [talking to you sodenj5 & pdaj], even I don't have much in the way of substance to add.  As for the coming season, I want to be more excited than I am, I really do.  There are bright spots*, of course, but too many question marks or too much mediocrity to realistically have high expectations.  Greg Cote of the Herald has them going 8 - 8 and making the playoffs.  That's the most optimistic scenario I'm willing to embrace. 

And by "embrace" I mean some time in early November, sitting in a corner with arms wrapped tightly around my knees--pressed tightly against my chest, gently rocking, babbling quietly, incoherently........

*Why I'll be "excited" to watch:  Tannehill's development, the Tannehill-Wallace "chemistry," the new offense, the defensive front, a potentially playmaking secondary, the return of Jones, Jordan, and Pouncey (if they can stay afloat 'til then, that should be a nice boost).  Am I missing anything?
 

Clears Cleaver

Lil' Bill
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2001
11,370
dwainw said:
What, no comments on the Daniel Thomas cut?  Allow me:  what a disappointment.   Well, then, let the games begin.....  :unsure: 

Anyway, I always appreciate you regulars' take on things in here [talking to you sodenj5 & pdaj], even I don't have much in the way of substance to add.  As for the coming season, I want to be more excited than I am, I really do.  There are bright spots*, of course, but too many question marks or too much mediocrity to realistically have high expectations.  Greg Cote of the Herald has them going 8 - 8 and making the playoffs.  That's the most optimistic scenario I'm willing to embrace. 

And by "embrace" I mean some time in early November, sitting in a corner with arms wrapped tightly around my knees--pressed tightly against my chest, gently rocking, babbling quietly, incoherently........

*Why I'll be "excited" to watch:  Tannehill's development, the Tannehill-Wallace "chemistry," the new offense, the defensive front, a potentially playmaking secondary, the return of Jones, Jordan, and Pouncey (if they can stay afloat 'til then, that should be a nice boost).  Am I missing anything?
 
The key to the season is Tannehill, of course, but for this team to win they need to win the takeover battle and be better against the run and running the ball. they were in the mid-20s last year in all three categories. 
 
Beat the Pats week 1. 10-6 or better is a possibility. This is best 53 man roster they've had in a long time, even with the suspensions.
 

sodenj5

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
6,623
CT
Have to credit Hickey for keeping what he felt was the best 53 regardless of draft status or anything else. Letting Thomas and Egnew go were the right choices.

Also, Chris McCain was rated by Football Outsiders as the #1 4-3 OLB this preseason. Obviously he's going against 2's and 3's, but he looks like a great signing thus far.
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
sodenj5 said:
Have to credit Hickey for keeping what he felt was the best 53 regardless of draft status or anything else. Letting Thomas and Egnew go we're the right choices.
 
Easier to do when they are your predecessor's picks but the overall point is a good one - no "status" should factor in other than "the best 53". 
 

pdaj

Fantasy Maven
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2002
3,385
From Springfield to Providence
soxfan121 said:
Easier to do when they are your predecessor's picks but the overall point is a good one - no "status" should factor in other than "the best 53". 
 
It sounds simple, but "best" is still awfully subjective. A 34 year old 4th CB might be better than your 6th-round rookie, but you project the rook' to be better next year; plus, you have two CB up for FA next season. You might also have  10th or 11th OL who deserves to be on the team, but he's caught in a number's game, and you end up keeping an inferior player on the DL. But I agree that keeping a player solely due to the fact that was taken with a high pick isn't an effective way to manage a roster.
 
Damian Williams (WR) and S Don Jones were cut for S Brandian Ross (Raiders) and CB Sammy Seamster (Ravens). I understand the Jones-for-Seamster swap, but I would have much preferred to keep Williams. What if there's an injury in Wk 1? The move had to be about $. It was reported by Abramson that DM's salary would have been guaranteed after Wk 1.
 

Clears Cleaver

Lil' Bill
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2001
11,370
I think there is a good chance Damian Williams is resigned after week 1.
 
they still need a LB... 
 

pdaj

Fantasy Maven
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2002
3,385
From Springfield to Providence
Clears Cleaver said:
I think there is a good chance Damian Williams is resigned after week 1.
 
they still need a LB... 
 
I thought Williams looked more comfortable in the return game than the rookie. Landry scares me a bit.
 
We kept 8 LB. That's a large #.
 

Clears Cleaver

Lil' Bill
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2001
11,370
when I said we need, it means we need a quality, not quantity. Misi is the best and he's below average. McCain? Dion Jordan gonna be a LB? 
 
Landry is explosive but yeah, he fumbled a punt vs Tampa and not sure his decision-making is gonna be great. Kickoff returns seem less important these days given all the touchbacks
 

pdaj

Fantasy Maven
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2002
3,385
From Springfield to Providence
Clears Cleaver said:
when I said we need, it means we need a quality, not quantity. Misi is the best and he's below average. McCain? Dion Jordan gonna be a LB? 
 
Landry is explosive but yeah, he fumbled a punt vs Tampa and not sure his decision-making is gonna be great. Kickoff returns seem less important these days given all the touchbacks
 
Beyond the fumbling, he looks a bit like a 3B playing CF when he's fielding punts -- that's what makes me the most nervous.
 
I agree with you about our LB unit, but I would have been shocked to see a quality LB good enough to start becoming available at this point.
 

CouchsideSteve

Well-Known Member
Gold Supporter
SoSH Member
Apr 16, 2013
438
Norwalk, CT
So, it's Monday... six days until the opener.

I'm a bit ambivalent about this team's prospects. In terms of the long-term outlook, there is a lot to feel good about after bottoming out at the end of last season: jettisoning Ireland for Hickey, and Sherman for Lazor; addressing the OL with a blue chip player like Albert and a 1st round pick with upside; other smart decisions later in the draft; bringing in a really good running back in Moreno, while cutting bait on Thomas. All signs pointing to a brighter future.

On the other hand, I'm less bullish than most on this season, predicting 7 or 8 wins. The Pouncey injury, the Jordan suspension, the lack of cromulent LBs despite having so much money invested at the position, the fact that Cortland Finnegan will play a prominent role in our secondary... all major concerns to me. I hope I'm wrong, but I can just see this team being maddeningly inconsistent again.

It's September, so hope springs eternal. I do think we'll give a Gronk-less Pats team a tough game Sunday. And who knows? We'll learn a lot more about Tannehill's future in the next four months, and if he takes the leap many have forecast, all bets are off. I just have a feeling we're one more offseason away from being a legitimate threat to win this division.
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
pdaj said:
 
It sounds simple, but "best" is still awfully subjective. A 34 year old 4th CB might be better than your 6th-round rookie, but you project the rook' to be better next year; plus, you have two CB up for FA next season. You might also have  10th or 11th OL who deserves to be on the team, but he's caught in a number's game, and you end up keeping an inferior player on the DL. But I agree that keeping a player solely due to the fact that was taken with a high pick isn't an effective way to manage a roster.
That's an excellent clarification of what I was getting at and I thank you for writing it out so clearly. 
 
No sacred cows, no "status" being more important than production and potential to help the team, now or in the near future.
 

pdaj

Fantasy Maven
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2002
3,385
From Springfield to Providence
dwainw said:
Looks like Gronk is a go for Sunday.  We can only hope he's not 100%.  Should be interesting to see if this squad has learned how to cover a tight end.
 
Even if he wasn't going to play, he'd dress, and the Pats would say, "We'll see." It's the smart thing to do. I expect him to play the role of key 3rd down specialist and decoy. 10-12 snaps. Just another variable that makes this game incredibly interesting.
 

Tony C

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
13,726
I have no idea why the assumption throughout this thread has been that Gronk wouldn't play and, now that he announces it will, it'll just be as a decoy for 10-12 snaps. That's an incredibly rosy view from a Dolphins perspective, but I don't think wishing it makes it true. We shall see, but all the report are positive and last year in his first game back Gronk played 51 snaps. I suspect it'll be a lot closer to 50 than 10.
 

sodenj5

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
6,623
CT
Tony C said:
I have no idea why the assumption throughout this thread has been that Gronk wouldn't play and, now that he announces it will, it'll just be as a decoy for 10-12 snaps. That's an incredibly rosy view from a Dolphins perspective, but I don't think wishing it makes it true. We shall see, but all the report are positive and last year in his first game back Gronk played 51 snaps. I suspect it'll be a lot closer to 50 than 10.
Right, but last year he wasn't 8 months removed from a devastating knee injury. I'm not trying to downplay Gronk or say he's going to be a decoy, but 50 snaps would be surprising.
 

Tony C

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
13,726
Yeah, that's probably right -- i think 10 and a decoy would be a surprise, too, given that at least the media reports that in practice he's been letting it rip for weeks. Maybe 30-ish as a speculative guess?
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA
Tony C said:
I have no idea why the assumption throughout this thread has been that Gronk wouldn't play and, now that he announces it will, it'll just be as a decoy for 10-12 snaps. That's an incredibly rosy view from a Dolphins perspective, but I don't think wishing it makes it true. We shall see, but all the report are positive and last year in his first game back Gronk played 51 snaps. I suspect it'll be a lot closer to 50 than 10.
I think so, too. That 51 was in an OT game (so 79 offensive snaps overall, which is a lot), but the 35 he played the following week was the fewest he played. If he could only play 10-12 snaps, I doubt he'd be active. 35-50 would be my guess.
 
The X factor here is that Hoomanawanui has been hurt, too (he didn't play in the preseason either) and Tim Wright has only been on the team a week. So it's not like there's another option to take a big load.
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
Super Nomario said:
I think so, too. That 51 was in an OT game (so 79 offensive snaps overall, which is a lot), but the 35 he played the following week was the fewest he played. If he could only play 10-12 snaps, I doubt he'd be active. 35-50 would be my guess.
 
The X factor here is that Hoomanawanui has been hurt, too (he didn't play in the preseason either) and Tim Wright has only been on the team a week. So it's not like there's another option to take a big load.
 
Lots of two back sets with Devlin and three WR?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.