You should see his commercial.Reverend said:Who's that thug she's pictured with?
http://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=kp&v=TImlf71j4K8
You should see his commercial.Reverend said:Who's that thug she's pictured with?
Sidney Rice walked away from what has been his life and into a new chapter of his life on Wednesday.
Rice, 27, was limited to eight games with the Seahawks last season and nine in 2011 because of injuries that prompted him to start thinking about life after football – a process that led him to announce his retirement after seven NFL seasons.
Tony C said:How does not paying portions of the Beast's signing bonus due to him not reporting effect the salary cap. Is it a separate fine that is irrelevant or, since it's ties to bonus money, will it start to open up a small chunk of salary cap change?
DanoooME said:
It's the team actually fining him, so it doesn't have any impact on his salary cap number. The money comes back to them, but it only saves them the cash going out. The salary cap impact stays the same.
DanoooME said:He's getting his 2014 salary guaranteed, plus his roster bonuses ($500K) and incentive bonuses ($500K for 1500 yards rushing) paid up front, plus he's getting $500K up front from his 2015 salary. So that accounts for the $1.5 million difference. So he'll make $6.5M this year guaranteed. In 2015, he'll have $5M not guaranteed, plus a potential $2M in roster bonuses. His cap number will be $8.5M in 2015, but only $1.5M in dead money if he's cut.
They were at 82 as of this morning after releasing eight players on Monday - OT Wade Smith, CB Terrell Thomas, OT Cory Brandon, RB Demitrius Bronson, S Mike Dobson, DE Jackson Jeffcoat, WR Kevin Smith, and CB Thomas Wolfe -- and the final seven today are all injury-related moves.
The Hawks waived (with an injury designation) DT Michael Brooks, LB Horace Miller, and WR David Gilreath. They put LB Heath Farwell on the injured reserve, along with CB A.J. Jefferson, and placed CB Eric Pinkins on the non-football injury list with his foot issue.
BigSoxFan said:Yes. What happens to the offense when Harvin's annual injury happens? But the defense looks impressive.
Archie Manning > 345 Park Ave:DanoooME said:Any questions?
I agree.ThePrideofShiner said:Man, I don't want to say it, but watching tonight they certainly seem like they are better than last year. With Harvin, it completely changes the offense. What will you guard? The sweep or the inside? And Wilson is much, much better than last year.
This team is filthy.
I think a lot of people thought getting Rodgers back was going to fix everything , but they were not a very good defensive team last year and not much has changed .tims4wins said:If anything last night just showed that the Packers don't appear to be a contender like a lot of people had them pegged.
There is no doubt Seattle is the team to beat, but stuff happens.
BigSoxFan said:Yeah, as we've seen the past couple of seasons, the finesse teams like the Broncos, Saints, Packers, etc. get eaten alive by these guys. The Niners are probably the toughest matchup for them but they have all sorts of issues this year. Philly probably falls into the same problem as the other finesse teams.
wutang112878 said:One thing came up in last nights game thats a pretty interesting strategy discussion: Seattle would not switch Sherman from LCB when GB would just avoid him completely.
I was thinking last night of the positives and negatives about this:
Negatives:
Positives:
- Sherman, their best player, wasnt involved in the game whatsoever
- GB eventually was putting their worst receiver on the field against Sherman which gave GB better matchups on the other side of the field
- Sherman required no safety help and so I believe Settle could focus their safeties on the other side of the field
- I'm not familiar enough with their personnel but I'm assuming that part of the decision was based on allowing Sherman & Maxwell to play LCB and RCB respectively, where I'm assuming each is better at that position rather than flipping back and forth
Am I missing anything else? Considering all of this I really couldnt tell if this was a smart decision or not. Ultimately they held Rogers and the offense in check and got a pick as well so it looked like the gamble paid off. But over the course of the season, I really think the big negative is that it allows the other team to get some really good matchups on the other side of the field and eventually I have to imagine that would come back to bite Seattle.
And does anyone know if they played this way all of last season?
bankshot1 said:The scary thing is that the D just about pitched a shout-out against one of the best QBs and one of the more highly regarded offenses in football. Lesser QBs with lesser weapons against that D?