2019-20 College Football Bowl Megathread (and Schedule)

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,903
Reading the comments on the incomplete/fumble.... some of you are 100% convinced that it’s obviously a catch and fumble. Others are 100% convinced it’s obviously incomplete.

Same play, such opposite views, everyone fully convinced that it’s “obvious”.
Sort of means call on field should stand, correct?
 

54thMA

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2012
10,169
Westwood MA
just do away with the "football move" nonsensical bullshit; he caught it, clearly had possession, did not bobble it, had it knocked out, fumble.

Just idiotic to complicate a simple thing.
 

dhappy42

Straw Man
Oct 27, 2013
15,771
Michigan
They called it a catch in real time.
Right. If it was called incomplete on the field, you could understand not overruling the call. But it was ruled a fumble and TD. To overrule a TD based on a replay that shows a catch and three or four steps is inexcusable.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,091
New York City
just do away with the "football move" nonsensical bullshit; he caught it, clearly had possession, did not bobble it, had it knocked out, fumble.

Just idiotic to complicate a simple thing.
It wasn't being bobbled, it was in his hands, he took at least three steps. Even if "a football move" is complicated, that call wasn't. It's not like he was going to the ground and it was unclear.

And the fact that they overturned it is even crazier, because they are saying it was indisputably not a catch. Which is bats.
 

Fred in Lynn

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 3, 2013
4,909
Not Lynn (or Ocean Side)
We’re just never going to know why they overturned it because they didn’t explain their rationale, but it has to be because they felt he didn’t “maintain control of the ball long enough to enable him to perform an act common to the game, i.e. long enough to pitch or hand the ball, advance it, avoid or ward off an opponent, etc.” If that’s the explanation, then that would make sense. I’d hate to have had to make that call. It was close.

See Section 4, Article 3 of the NCAA rulebook.
 

McBride11

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
22,211
Durham, NC
Move common to the game.

Secures control of a live ball in flight before the ball touches the ground, and touches the ground in bounds with any part of his body, and then maintains control of the ball long enough to enable him to perform an act common to the game, i.e., long enough to pitch or hand the ball, advance it, avoid or ward off an opponent, etc.

If 3 steps and taking the ball from overhead to near his chest isnt a common move this is absurd.

but again - even if borderline - how is that video indisputable, it looks more a catch on replay than live.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sbnation.com/platform/amp/college-football/2018/8/30/17481378/ncaa-catch-rule-nfl-differences
 

Mystic Merlin

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 21, 2007
47,070
Hartford, CT
Waaaaaay too much cushion
Safety isnt playing press on a slot receiver there unless he has serious man coverage skills (which college safeties really don’t). If he tries it, that play could be 5-6 yards open rather than 1-2.

He did what he should have, but he got beat physically and the throw was good.
 

Soxy

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2008
6,095
I barely watch college football, but is there a reason OSU didn't go for 2 there?
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,052
AZ
That would be a legitimately weird concern. That might have just been a mistake by Ryan Day.
Yeah, it was a bad joke. Only reason I can think of is that it ensures another TD and extra point requires Clemson to score twice. Maybe there is some math that makes that a thing. Two field goals makes it 8 too but not really enough time to make that realistically a thing I don’t believe.