I think someone made this joke last page. We need to manage these posts better.You wonder if Brian Anger is an angry guy? Like how a guy named Brewer back in the 1500s was a brewer?
Watson isn't an MVP candidate. Mahomes won it last year, Lamar won it this year.(or will win) Watson is rated accurately, he's awesome, just not the MVP of the league.Can’t run as well as Lamar. Can’t sling it like Mahomeboy.
Seriously? How did I miss that? For shame johnmd20. FOR SHAME. Joke stealing is bad, even if it was not on purpose.I think someone made this joke last page. We need to manage these posts better.
The invitations for the Belichick-Brady invitational would be extra fancy this year.I’ve felt for a while they were flying a bit under the radar. They would have a punchers chance, but the Ravens are a force. I’m pulling for them to draw the inside straight, however, because I’m spoiled and want the Patriots to host the AFC Championship. Again.
I actually think I only got it half right. It’s a weird rule. You cannot cause a fumble of a player who has a body part (not hands or feet) down. It ends the play whether or not you touch him. But I am not sure the play is over if you only touch the ball and not the player and he keeps possession.This is an amazing piece of information. Thank you.
It makes sense but is contradictory. Which makes it a perfect and typical NFL rule.I actually think I only got it half right. It’s a weird rule. You cannot cause a fumble of a player who has a body part (not hands or feet) down. It ends the play whether or not you touch him. But I am not sure the play is over if you only touch the ball and not the player and he keeps possession.
In other words if the player is down and you punch the ball but don’t touch him (very rare) the play is over if the ball comes out but if he keeps possession I think theoretically he could get up and run.
If that makes sense.
No test on this later though, right?I actually think I only got it half right. It’s a weird rule. You cannot cause a fumble of a player who has a body part (not hands or feet) down. It ends the play whether or not you touch him. But I am not sure the play is over if you only touch the ball and not the player and he keeps possession.
In other words if the player is down and you punch the ball but don’t touch him (very rare) the play is over if the ball comes out but if he keeps possession I think theoretically he could get up and run.
If that makes sense.
Well that’s stupid.I actually think I only got it half right. It’s a weird rule. You cannot cause a fumble of a player who has a body part (not hands or feet) down. It ends the play whether or not you touch him. But I am not sure the play is over if you only touch the ball and not the player and he keeps possession.
In other words if the player is down and you punch the ball but don’t touch him (very rare) the play is over if the ball comes out but if he keeps possession I think theoretically he could get up and run.
If that makes sense.
Thanks.Touching the ball downs the player. Weird but true. You can’t force a fumble by touching only the ball if the player is down.
The commercials are phenomenal. But they feel worthless due to the Cleveland Browns.Baker Mayfield commercials during the playoffs. Biggest flop of an ad campaign since crystal clear Pepsi.
Me too. They are the best thing that has ever happened to football. They are so weird and creepy and awesome and random.I absolutely love the ESPN animations
Watson’s dancing reminded me of Samara from The Ring walking out of the TV.Anyone else freaked out by that QB graphic?
Which is really why they should keep handing it to Gore.Guy just won’t go down.
He is absolutely going to be a top QB in the NFL.Allen looks like Elway.
Brady is the 3rd best QB in the division.Allen looks like Elway.
There is this list of “approved rulings” in the rule that go through a bunch of scenarios and give the result because the rules he selves are so vague. When you read them in order, when you’re done, all you can think is “why the fuck.” I think a few of them are to make replay a bit more easy with black and white seeming rules, but for the most part the only conclusion you can have is the rule is just because.It makes sense but is contradictory. Which makes it a perfect and typical NFL rule.
No doubt. He's strong and fast and one of the best running QBs in the league, probably 2nd to Lamar. And he's improved considerably in his second season. Buffalo has a great one on their hands.He is absolutely going to be a top QB in the NFL.
Brady lost to Miami last week, when a win would have given the Pats a bye. Does that mean he's overrated? What a dumb argument.0 points