Studnicka could help with that.Where the weak 3rd line wingers really hurt is that they can’t afford shorten the rotation in these situations at all, especially if Bergy/Pasta are both banged up. So you get hemmed in with the 4th line.
Yup. 52/14/20 were the 3rd line tonight because Coyle had to carry two stiffs. Time to make some changes there.Where the weak 3rd line wingers really hurt is that they can’t afford shorten the rotation in these situations at all, especially if Bergy/Pasta are both banged up. So you get hemmed in with the 4th line.
Chara was the worst one out there IMO. Can’t pivot and lost like 20 pucks in his skates.100% need Kuhlman in for Ritchie and arguably Lindholm for Bjork tomorrow. On the back end, maybe getting Clifton or (gasp) Carlo out for Lauzon wouldn't be the worst thing in the world.
Playing for tomorrow. Grumble.Bruce can fuck off with this 4th line bullshit.
That line played basically the same amount as the 2nd line. They were out shot 15-2, out chanced 9-1, 5-0 high danger, outscored 2-0. Way to keep running that train wreck out there. It was only a matter of time before it came back to bite.
They have to get the dead weight away from Coyle so they can actually play him.Bruce can fuck off with this 4th line bullshit.
That line played basically the same amount as the 2nd line. They were out shot 15-2, out chanced 9-1, 5-0 high danger, outscored 2-0. Way to keep running that train wreck out there. It was only a matter of time before it came back to bite.
Sometimes the statistics reveal something you didn't see, and sometimes they show exactly what you think you saw.Bruce can fuck off with this 4th line bullshit.
That line played basically the same amount as the 2nd line. They were out shot 15-2, out chanced 9-1, 5-0 high danger, outscored 2-0. Way to keep running that train wreck out there. It was only a matter of time before it came back to bite.
McAvoy has bailed his ass out so many times this postseason.Chara was the worst one out there IMO. Can’t pivot and lost like 20 pucks in his skates.
Agreed. Those are all pretty damning.Sometimes the statistics reveal something you didn't see, and sometimes they show exactly what you think you saw.
Not great when you can make a case for half the D to take a seat.100% need Kuhlman in for Ritchie and arguably Lindholm for Bjork tomorrow. On the back end, maybe getting Clifton or (gasp) Carlo out for Lauzon wouldn't be the worst thing in the world.
This is well-put.Sometimes the statistics reveal something you didn't see, and sometimes they show exactly what you think you saw.
Who is he kidding? No one is seriously thinking Vladar is playing tomorrow.Cassidy just said no decision on the goalie yet. Would they actually go with Vlader?
Yeah - he gets a bit of a pass from me given how disproportionately he gets d-zone starts, particularly against Kucherov, but he needed to be better tonight. Still don't think he's in their bottom 2 d-men by way of effectiveness, Krug, Carlo, and Clifton all stunk out loud tonight.Chara was the worst one out there IMO. Can’t pivot and lost like 20 pucks in his skates.
Halak played the type of game Rask haters claim Rask plays.Halak with 2 goals he could have prevented. Not much help, but those are goals you want back in the playoffs. Should have gloved the one in OT
Exactly. A good majority of the board would be calling for Rask’s head.Halak played the type of game Rask haters claim Rask plays.
Sure. But Rask makes 7 million and is the clear #1 goalie.Exactly. A good majority of the board would be calling for Rask’s head.
The Coyle line was actually OK. They may have won the game if they got more shifts. They generated 5 scoring chances, allowed 6, and scored a goal. Not great, and they were on the ice for 2 against, but they were far better than the 2nd and 4th lines.. Krejci and Kuraly's lines combined to generate a total of 3 scoring chances while allowing 15 and the 4th line was on the ice for the other 2 goals against. It was a fire drill in our end when those 2 lines were on the ice, at least Coyle's line got a little something going. But the pitch forks and torches are out for Ritchie and Bjork.They have to get the dead weight away from Coyle so they can actually play him.
The lack of execution was frustrating, particularly since the transitions were crisp in game 1. Couldn’t consistently get it to neutral ice.The D just had no ability to punish Tampa for an over-aggressive forecheck. D-men pinned up against the boards hoping for some help or shuffling it up the boards. Need to move faster.
He should have been burned with them out there in the final minute of regulation. Bruce needs to clean it up fast.Bruce can fuck off with this 4th line bullshit.
That line played basically the same amount as the 2nd line. They were out shot 15-2, out chanced 9-1, 5-0 high danger, outscored 2-0. Way to keep running that train wreck out there. It was only a matter of time before it came back to bite.
Halak seemed fine overall, but I have my doubts about him carrying them to the Cup. He’s let in a few softies. They’ll have to turn it up quite a bit to go deep.Halak also bailed them out a lot tonight. The way Tampa was playing and the Bruins D was turning over the puck and defending. We are lucky this went to OT.
I think Halak has done a wonderful job so I’m not getting on him. But if Rask let in a soft goal despite standing on his head for most of the game the tired narratives would come out again.Sure. But Rask makes 7 million and is the clear #1 goalie.
Halak is a backup for a reason, and expectations of him aren't going to be the same for Rask.
I would but I've been saying you needed to steal a game with Vladar in an early round B2B. Im guessing it's gamesmanship though and it will be Halak.Cassidy just said no decision on the goalie yet. Would they actually go with Vlader?
I like the idea of Kuhlman buzzing around on the fourth line but I doubt Cassidy runs without Wagner’s grit.The Coyle line was actually OK. They may have won the game if they got more shifts. They generated 5 scoring chances, allowed 6, and scored a goal. Not great, and they were on the ice for 2 against, but they were far better than the 2nd and 4th lines.. Krejci and Kuraly's lines combined to generate a total of 3 scoring chances while allowing 15 and the 4th line was on the ice for the other 2 goals against. It was a fire drill in our end when those 2 lines were on the ice, at least Coyle's line got a little something going. But the pitch forks and torches are out for Ritchie and Bjork.
I'd take Ritchie out for Lindholm tomorrow to try and fix the 4th line. Maybe Kuhlman in for Wagner as well.
Kuraly - Coyle - Bjork
Nordstrom - Lindholm - Kuhlman
Something like that. Maybe Wagner stays because they've had some success with 20-26-14
I wouldn't start vladar either, but if he doesn't I hope it's not because he's worried about media/fan criticism, he's earned enough rope already that that shouldn't matter.Yeah was talking about it offline with a couple others - my take is Bruce is immune from criticism (rightly so) if he rides a relatively healthy Halak and if they drop the next 3. That changes massively if they start Vladar for even one game and they end up losing the game (and/or series).
.936 AHL sv% is great, but even Murray / Binnington had at least a dozen NHL games under their belt with strong performance before being thrown into the playoffs fire
I think that's fair, but to advance you need a bit more from the goalie in the playoffs. If you put it to Halak, he'd probably tell you he should have had them. That said, it's not fair for me to ignore the remainder of a well played game by him - which is why I said he didn't have much help. I'm not in any way blaming Halak, we could name 3-5 players who didn't do enough tonight.Halak played the type of game Rask haters claim Rask plays.
Earlier in the OT (not that long before the end, I don't think), Pasta took a shift with Coyle and Ritchie.Where the weak 3rd line wingers really hurt is that they can’t afford shorten the rotation in these situations at all, especially if Bergy/Pasta are both banged up. So you get hemmed in with the 4th line.
I love Clifton, but I agree he needs a game or two off. He's fun to watch when he's in control, but he was out of control for the entire game last night, including on the bad interference penalty.Clifton needs to sit. Familiar pattern. He comes off the 9th floor flying, and each game gets more and more offensively reckless and gets caught.
Not to me, you're not. My personal opinion is that he was terrible last night. That's just me though.I really only watch hockey in the playoffs and it’s extremely tough to grade goalie performance but reading through the last few pages of this thread I’m surprised that Halak isn’t taking more of a beating.
2 of the 4 goals he gave up looked to be extremely soft and his inability to catch the puck in OT led fo the GW goal.
Am I missing something (honest question not being snarky)?
Would having Lauzon out there to cycle in and out be any less useful than Ritchie or Bjork?Any thought to dressing 7 D tonight to mitigate Chara’s ice time? Rotate forwards through so the top 6 play more.
I dont know about 7D, but I think Lauzon might free up Grzelcyk a bit, as pairing him with Clifton made him the "defensively responsible one" of that pair.Would having Lauzon out there to cycle in and out be any less useful than Ritchie or Bjork?
He's definitely had some rough moments, but I think people are adjusting their expectations with him. I would imagine most people aren't expecting him to play like a Vezina candidate and he's earned some leeway with how he's played the first few games of the restart so the pitchforks are duller than if it had been Tuukka allowing similar goals.I really only watch hockey in the playoffs and it’s extremely tough to grade goalie performance but reading through the last few pages of this thread I’m surprised that Halak isn’t taking more of a beating.
2 of the 4 goals he gave up looked to be extremely soft and his inability to catch the puck in OT led fo the GW goal.
Am I missing something (honest question not being snarky)?
Agreed family first for sure.Not to me, you're not. My personal opinion is that he was terrible last night. That's just me though.
If Tuukka called tomorrow and said he was willing to come back and go through protocol to get cleared I'd welcome him back gladly. The difference between him and Halak is very stark indeed. But obviously his family comes first and he needs to prioritize them right now.