Ain't small sample sizes fun?

glennhoffmania

meat puppet
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
8,411,707
NY
Savin Hillbilly said:
Jose Bautista, in 59 PA, has a BABIP of .097 and an ISO of .277. Only 3.3% of his plate appearances have resulted in a single.
 
Yeah I noticed his odd line yesterday.  .149/.322/.426,  His BB rate is almost 19% and his K rate is 20%.  His GB/FB is .33 and he's hitting 60% FB.  Very weird start.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,239
mikeford said:
The entire team is hitting a combined .230 to open the season.

I coulda sworn the FO spent roughly the GDP of a small African nation to fix the offense but here we are.
 
Yeah, but the whole premise of this thread is that's it's too early to say the offense isn't fixed, just to lament that it's not producing yet.
 
 

charlieoscar

Member
Sep 28, 2014
1,339
Savin Hillbilly said:
April stat volatility summed up: if I'm doing the math right, Mookie Betts raised his OPS by 51 points tonight. And he didn't even have an extrabase hit.
 
And Ortiz raised his 60 points...but he did have an HR. However, both of them got their batting averages out of the .190s into the .200s.
 

Humphrey

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2010
3,212
What's the point at which Napoli's 8 for 56 start (w/10 walks) stops becoming a SSS?    End of May?  End of June?   You know the talk shows will have him on the bench retroactive to a week ago, but fortunately that doesn't count for anything.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,837
By my math, every team in AL was within 3.5 games of a playoff spot. Parity here we come.

May make mid-season deals hard/expensive too if this keeps up.
 

Al Zarilla

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
59,411
San Andreas Fault
Humphrey said:
What's the point at which Napoli's 8 for 56 start (w/10 walks) stops becoming a SSS?    End of May?  End of June?   You know the talk shows will have him on the bench retroactive to a week ago, but fortunately that doesn't count for anything.
Napoli's OPS is .469. Other notable hitters around that are:
 
Carlos Gonzalez ..559
Carlos Beltran (or is he washed up) .530
Ryan Howard, ditto, .526
Jason Kipnis .524
Chase Utley .450
 
Not much company. Grim neighborhood. 
 

geoduck no quahog

not particularly consistent
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 8, 2002
13,024
Seattle, WA
More importantly, I'm getting concerned about the use of abbreviations. I've seen "an HR" twice in 24 hours, which works if you call a homerun an h-r. This is troubling, along the lines of RBI's versus R'sBI...
 
I think it's a small sample size (2 out of 189,645 posts), but it's trending.
 

Reverend

for king and country
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2007
64,629
geoduck no quahog said:
More importantly, I'm getting concerned about the use of abbreviations. I've seen "an HR" twice in 24 hours, which works if you call a homerun an h-r. This is troubling, along the lines of RBI's versus R'sBI...
 
I think it's a small sample size (2 out of 189,645 posts), but it's trending.
What is the function of the apostrophe in this post?
 

geoduck no quahog

not particularly consistent
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 8, 2002
13,024
Seattle, WA
I stand corrected: RsBI
 
Unless, of course, the Run possesses the Batted...
 
Which is why I'm only a grammar deputy and not police.
 

In my lifetime

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2003
959
Connecticut
Al Zarilla said:
Napoli's OPS is .469. Other notable hitters around that are:
 
Carlos Gonzalez ..559
Carlos Beltran (or is he washed up) .530
Ryan Howard, ditto, .526
Jason Kipnis .524
Chase Utley .450
 
Not much company. Grim neighborhood. 
 
Other much less notable, but very familiar hitters in the same OPS neighborhood who I would be worried about a lot more than Napoli:
Victorino .474
Nava .461
Craig .376
 
I don't expect any of these players to remain at these sub-Mendoza levels, but I would bet that at the end of the season Napoli has the highest OPS of the 4 RS player listed by a substantial margin.
 
Nevertheless, Castillo can't get healthy fast enough. Let's hope it takes ~2 weeks to get ready at Pawtucket starting next week and then a promotion.
 

kieckeredinthehead

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2006
8,635
Napoli
 
May 2014: 606 OPS
June 2013: 668 OPS
May 2012: 699 OPS
April 2010: 514 OPS
 
Those are full months, if I'd timed the 66 PA samples to the beginning and end of a streak, they'd look even worse. Dude can be pretty hot or cold. 
 

charlieoscar

Member
Sep 28, 2014
1,339
Red Sox home runs with RBIs this season vs. MLB average for the past five seasons...shades of Earl Weaver
 
Homers  BOS     MLB (2010-14)
1-run  52.17%  58.13%
2-run  17.39%  28.93%
3-run  26.09%  10.73%
4-run   4.35%   2.21%
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,544
@PeteAbe: #RedSox offense, conversely, sixth in runs, 5th in HRs despite assorted slumping stars.
 

Toe Nash

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2005
5,638
02130
soxhop411 said:
@PeteAbe: #RedSox offense, conversely, sixth in runs, 5th in HRs despite assorted slumping stars.
And 13th in wOBA and 17th in wRC+ (park- and league-adjusted. So far, they walk a lot, they hit some homers, and they use a brain ray to force the other team's defense into mistakes. But I'm not sure it's a good offense overall, yet.
 

Hank Scorpio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 1, 2013
7,006
Salem, NH
Does Team ERA divided by Team WHIP tell us much in regards to how lucky/unlucky a pitching staff has been? Higher numbers would show a team's ERA is too high for their WHIP, etc...
 
2015 Red Sox ERA/WHIP: 3.73
2014 MLB Average: 2.93
2014 League Worst: 3.36 (Rockies)
2014 League Beat: 2.61 (Nationals)
2015 MLB Average: 3.01
2015 MLB Best: 2.15 (Cardinals)
 
Granted, the teams that allowed the most/least ER in 2014 were the "unluckiest" and "luckiest" in terms of ERA/WHIP - but once you get past the top/bottom couple of teams, there seems to be a lot less correlation in ER vs ERA/WHIP. There's still a general correlation, but it doesn't seem very tight. Might graph it later.
 

EricFeczko

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 26, 2014
4,852
Toe Nash said:
And 13th in wOBA and 17th in wRC+ (park- and league-adjusted. So far, they walk a lot, they hit some homers, and they use a brain ray to force the other team's defense into mistakes. But I'm not sure it's a good offense overall, yet.
I'd be cautious in using any weighted statistics in small samples. You have two sources of error which leads to reduced reliability. Not that any of these stats (weighted or otherwise) are predictive right now.

Stats like wOBA and wRC+ are also strongly influenced by BABIP. The red sox currently rank 26th (.263) in BABIP, which explains why they have low wOBA and wRC+. In terms of raw OBP, the red sox are 6th, which is driven by their league leading 10.3% BB rate. However, they are also putting the ball in play (17.3% K rate, good for 3rd best in the league).
 
Not that this means anything yet. The red sox may have a low BABIP because they haven't hit many line drives (LD rate is at 17.7%) as a team. Although if you break this down by player, there appears to be some relationship between the two metrics (30 percent of variance in BABIP is explained by LD rate), which is largely driven by a single Brock Holtean outlier (with the outlier excluded, only 2 percent of variance in BABIP is explained by LD rate). Guys like Hanley have a whopping 23 % LD rate, but a measely 0.232 BABIP, while guys like Xander have a 11% LD rate with a 0.327 BABIP.
 
Ah, the joys of mostly meaningless data :D
 

Hank Scorpio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 1, 2013
7,006
Salem, NH
I was looking at the Sox numbers with RISP, and this one jumped out at me:
 
Hanley Ramirez: 5 for 28 (.179), 5 home runs.
 
And for the record, Brock Holt (.200), Pablo Sandoval, Shane Victorino, Hanley Ramirez, Mike Napoli, Dustin Pedroia, Allen Craig, Sandy Leon, and David Ortiz (.138) are all hitting .200 or less with RISP.
 
Mookie Betts (.300) and Xander Bogaerts (.296) have been good overall with RISP.