Belichick Breakdowns 2015

LogansDad

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
29,992
Alamogordo
One of my favorite parts of football season is watching the genius that is Bill Belichick talk candidly with Scott Zolak about some of the big plays from the week before.  With week 1 this week, he was even more candid than usual, I think, as he specifically lauded at least three players (Canon, Sheard, and Harmon), followed by my favorite part when he calls out Harmon for his failed celebration attempt.
 
I give you, Belichick Breakdowns Week 1
 

singaporesoxfan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2004
11,890
Washington, DC
Great stuff. Liked how he pointed out Harmon's side-to-side range - wasn't something I'd noticed much before, but once Belichick points something like that out it becomes so obvious.
 
And yes, "needs to work on that" (about Harmon's celebration attempt) was my favorite part too.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
No OL guru here, but Andrews nailing his assignment on that blitz on the Gronk pass seemed pretty nice for a rookie in his first game.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,025
Mansfield MA
Stitch01 said:
No OL guru here, but Andrews nailing his assignment on that blitz on the Gronk pass seemed pretty nice for a rookie in his first game.
I like Jackson's block here too, sliding over quickly to get the DT who was lined up on Andrews at the snap.
 

ElcaballitoMVP

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 19, 2008
3,955
The thing about the Harmon play that I liked so much, and Bill may have been referring to it when he talked about Harmon's discipline, is how he disguises his coverage pre-snap. He stays outside the opposite hash until just before the snap, then he takes off to cover the deep middle. As he reads the play, he breaks on the outside receiver and covers a ton of ground to go get the ball. I don't think Ben expected him to be anywhere near the opposite sideline to make the play. 
 

nothumb

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 27, 2006
7,065
yammer's favorite poster
singaporesoxfan said:
Great stuff. Liked how he pointed out Harmon's side-to-side range - wasn't something I'd noticed much before, but once Belichick points something like that out it becomes so obvious.
 
And yes, "needs to work on that" (about Harmon's celebration attempt) was my favorite part too.
Even better than the Harmon burn is that he reminded everyone how much it looked like the game-sealing Flacco pick from last year's playoffs. And showed it.

BB is out for blood. He's gonna keep clowning these chumps every chance he gets.
 

Dollar

Member
SoSH Member
May 5, 2006
11,199
I hadn't noticed Scott Chandler's block on the Lewis touchdown run before now, where he came around Gronk and blocked Aaron Williams from out of nowhere.  Wow, that was nice.
 

Kevin Youkulele

wishes Claude Makelele was a Red Sox
Gold Supporter
SoSH Member
Jul 12, 2006
8,960
San Diego
Stitch01 said:
Slick little hold by Jones on that Collins sack
I don't think I've ever seen a defensive holding penalty called at the line.  Is the rule only against holding receivers downfield or is it only enforced downfield (or have I just not noticed it being called at the line)?  If it's de facto legal, it seems like a great tactic (which the NFL will inevitably ban if the Pats are noticed to be exploiting it).
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
Yup, it can be called, but I don't think its going to get called very often on a guy getting double teamed and putting a little hold on the blocker he's looking to engage to free up the linebacker which is why its slick.
 
I assume this is the kind of thing teams point out to officials if they see the opponent that week doing it often on film.
 

amarshal2

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 25, 2005
4,913
Stitch01 said:
Yup, it can be called, but I don't think its going to get called very often on a guy getting double teamed and putting a little hold on the blocker he's looking to engage to free up the linebacker which is why its slick.
 
I assume this is the kind of thing teams point out to officials if they see the opponent that week doing it often on film.
 
I saw that too and wondered if this is the type of thing Justin Smith was doing for Aldon Smith back when he had a billion sacks.  I remember people would say that the only reason Aldon had all those sacks is Justin Smith would hold on every play.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,888
Melrose, MA
Dollar said:
 
I hadn't noticed Scott Chandler's block on the Lewis touchdown run before now, where he came around Gronk and blocked Aaron Williams from out of nowhere.  Wow, that was nice.
 
That was deceptive and should be illegal.[/Harbaugh]
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,267
I think BB and Zolak had the same shirt on in that one, but BB's was faded because he's probably worn it 150 times.
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
27,194
Newton
If he has, it would seem most of the buttons on BB's shirt came off as well. It appears to be open down to his navel.

Must be taking queues from Felger.
 

JohnnyK

Member
SoSH Member
May 8, 2007
1,941
Wolfern, Austria
On the Gronk touchdown, the three defenders don't really seem to be on the same page on who lines up on Gronk and who lines up on Chandler, and after the play they are screaming at each other.
 
Lack of preparation?
 

Byrdbrain

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
8,588
Yeah the LB went off on the DB that doubled Chandler. I'm assuming he was supposed to be on Gronk, likely on his inside shoulder watching for exactly the route Gronk ended up running for an easy TD. 
 
Apr 7, 2006
2,594
JohnnyK said:
 
On the Gronk touchdown, the three defenders don't really seem to be on the same page on who lines up on Gronk and who lines up on Chandler, and after the play they are screaming at each other.
 
Lack of preparation?
 
I was thinking about that this morning.  I guess I can (baaaaarely) understand if teams didnt have a clear plan about that coming into the season, but once the Patriots showed that "split out all-or-most of the tight ends" goal line formation against Pitt, how is it possible they don't have a stone-cold locked-in plan?  "IF THIS HAPPENS, you two take Gronk, you guys do this..." That seems practically impossible not to have talked to DEATH in the run-up to the game. 
 
I'll be shocked - again - if Jax doesn't seem much more prepared in that situation this week.  (And then Gronk'll score anyway and probably just as easily.)
 

weeba

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
3,540
Lynn, MA
Don't forget, Rex and the Bills were done planning for the Patriots on the Wednesday before the game.
 

LogansDad

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
29,992
Alamogordo
Well, to be fair to the Bills, their time was much better spent going to the media and talking about how much they hate the Patriots.  I mean, they REALLY, REALLY HATE them.  If people don't know that, then how can they possibly hope to win the actual game?
 
I am so glad I am not a fan of just about any other NFL team.
 

loshjott

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2004
15,009
Silver Spring, MD
Mugsy's Walk-Off Bunt said:
I was thinking about that this morning.  I guess I can (baaaaarely) understand if teams didnt have a clear plan about that coming into the season, but once the Patriots showed that "split out all-or-most of the tight ends" goal line formation against Pitt, how is it possible they don't have a stone-cold locked-in plan?  "IF THIS HAPPENS, you two take Gronk, you guys do this..." That seems practically impossible not to have talked to DEATH in the run-up to the game. 
 
I'll be shocked - again - if Jax doesn't seem much more prepared in that situation this week.  (And then Gronk'll score anyway and probably just as easily.)
 
Or more likely, the ball will go to Lewis either as a pass out of the backfield or run up the middle where the LB and safety now doubling Gronk are no longer situated.
 

amarshal2

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 25, 2005
4,913
Mugsy's Walk-Off Bunt said:
I was thinking about that this morning.  I guess I can (baaaaarely) understand if teams didnt have a clear plan about that coming into the season, but once the Patriots showed that "split out all-or-most of the tight ends" goal line formation against Pitt, how is it possible they don't have a stone-cold locked-in plan?  "IF THIS HAPPENS, you two take Gronk, you guys do this..." That seems practically impossible not to have talked to DEATH in the run-up to the game. 
 
I'll be shocked - again - if Jax doesn't seem much more prepared in that situation this week.  (And then Gronk'll score anyway and probably just as easily.)
 
 
weeba said:
Don't forget, Rex and the Bills were done planning for the Patriots on the Wednesday before the game.
 
Exactly.  To be fair the the players, their coach said he was going home early last week.
 

Al Zarilla

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
59,524
San Andreas Fault
LogansDad said:
Well, to be fair to the Bills, their time was much better spent going to the media and talking about how much they hate the Patriots.  I mean, they REALLY, REALLY HATE them.  If people don't know that, then how can they possibly hope to win the actual game?
 
I am so glad I am not a fan of just about any other NFL team.
Packers would be OK, especially with Rodgers at QB vs. when Favre was ther, but I'd freeze to death in Green Bay. Then again, Mike McCarthy...Could freeze in New England too but I don't have to worry about that either. 
 

mwonow

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 4, 2005
7,186
My favourite web content of the week - especially since (IIRC) they "only" appear after wins...
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,859
tims4wins said:
 
Quick SOSH poll:  Have any of you actually seen Caldwell talk when the cameras zoom in on him during a game?  I've seen him on TV a lot and never, ever, ever have I seen him actually moving his mouth.
 

JohnnyK

Member
SoSH Member
May 8, 2007
1,941
Wolfern, Austria
Kind of a different one, I wonder if this is a bit of a format change or a one off. They seem to spend less time on individual plays and only had offensive plays for some reason.
 

GeorgeCostanza

tiger king
SoSH Member
May 16, 2009
7,286
Go f*ck yourself
Love that Bill is baffled that freeman comes out of coverage to go after Brady on that scramble TD pass to Blount. Bradys not much of a threat to run he says, stating the obvious.
 

dynomite

Member
SoSH Member
JohnnyK said:
Kind of a different one, I wonder if this is a bit of a format change or a one off. They seem to spend less time on individual plays and only had offensive plays for some reason.
Doesn't seem like much of a change -- Bill spends a lot of time talking about LGBT's long TD run.

It's actually a fascinating analysis of the play, mentioning how the Pats ran through the gap to one more to the right last year, so this time they take the ball more up the middle.

Really incredible blocking -- Flemming helps on a double team and then spins around to block someone else, Williams pushes someone totally out of the play, and Adams is so concerned about Edelman's route that he is -- as BB says -- playing "soft" and takes himself out of the play.

Haven't seen Belichick so critical of another team's players very often.
 

Saints Rest

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
I thought it telling (and probably unsurprising) that he didn't go near either of the three notable ST plays (onside kick, fake punt, Collins block).  But those are the three (four if you include the second onside kick) that I would most want to have seen him break down.
 

mwonow

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 4, 2005
7,186
The Colts one is definitely different, but I feel like the editorial decisions (offense only, and selected plays there) have something to do with the upcoming Jets game.
 
Damned if I know what it is, though... 
 

dynomite

Member
SoSH Member
Saints Rest said:
I thought it telling (and probably unsurprising) that he didn't go near either of the three notable ST plays (onside kick, fake punt, Collins block).  But those are the three (four if you include the second onside kick) that I would most want to have seen him break down.
Yeah, I thought that was interesting.

It would have been interesting to hear him talk about the ST assignments and how you react to that kind of adjustment, but he may want to keep that close.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,025
Mansfield MA
dynomite said:
Doesn't seem like much of a change -- Bill spends a lot of time talking about LGBT's long TD run.

It's actually a fascinating analysis of the play, mentioning how the Pats ran through the gap to one more to the right last year, so this time they take the ball more up the middle.
Yeah, I loved this part.
 
dynomite said:
Really incredible blocking -- Flemming helps on a double team and then spins around to block someone else, Williams pushes someone totally out of the play, and Adams is so concerned about Edelman's route that he is -- as BB says -- playing "soft" and takes himself out of the play.

Haven't seen Belichick so critical of another team's players very often.
I don't think he meant "soft" as in "not tough" - in context here it seems like a euphemism for playing with a big cushion
 

dynomite

Member
SoSH Member
Super Nomario said:
Yeah, I loved this part.
 
I don't think he meant "soft" as in "not tough" - in context here it seems like a euphemism for playing with a big cushion
I was wondering about that -- you're probably right, but seems like he could have used a different term.

Anyway, even the criticism of the guy dropping out of coverage because he thought Brady was going to run was unusual.
 

Kevin Youkulele

wishes Claude Makelele was a Red Sox
Gold Supporter
SoSH Member
Jul 12, 2006
8,960
San Diego
dynomite said:
I was wondering about that -- you're probably right, but seems like he could have used a different term.

Anyway, even the criticism of the guy dropping out of coverage because he thought Brady was going to run was unusual.
Maybe there is a little disdain for the Colts leaking through into how he discussed the plays.  While he'd never openly admit it, at least during his tenure as head coach, he probably has less than average respect for them.
 
Regarding ST, I imagine he did not want to discuss details of unusual situations/reactions thereto (fake punt & blocked PAT) for competitive intelligence reasons, and the onside kick wasn't a pretty play.
 

GeorgeCostanza

tiger king
SoSH Member
May 16, 2009
7,286
Go f*ck yourself
I didn't notice it during the game but on the sideline throw to chandler holy shit is Amendola wide open. That was a touchdown if Brady went there and hit him in stride. Doesn't look like Tom made it that far in his progression. It was chandler all the way.
 

Import78

Member
SoSH Member
May 29, 2007
2,101
West Lebanon, NH
He was certainly open, but I don't think Tom had the time to find him.  It looks to me like the ball is out before Amendola is open and there are rushers within reach of Tom. Looks like it would have been 7 for sure though.
 
ETA: also, hat tip to the ITP guys who broke down some of the same plays and did as good a job as coach.  Pointed out many of the same things Bill addressed. Spoilers.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,928
Hingham, MA
On the 3rd and 17 play to Edelman, that was really well designed - looked like Gronk was actually a great option on that play as he broke his out at about 8 12 yards but would have only had to beat the LB to pick up the first down
 
here is the screen grab
 
 

Saints Rest

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
tims4wins said:
On the 3rd and 17 play to Edelman, that was really well designed - looked like Gronk was actually a great option on that play as he broke his out at about 8 12 yards but would have only had to beat the LB to pick up the first down
 
here is the screen grab
 
What's interesting to me in that screen grab is that while Gronk is indeed open, Brady is already in motion to throw to Edelman who is not yet open. As that other article (SI I think) mentioned, Brady "threw him open", a phrase I had never heard before.