I think lots of stuff is getting ignored tonight.DannyHeep said:
I think we are ignoring the rules tonight.
I think lots of stuff is getting ignored tonight.DannyHeep said:
I think we are ignoring the rules tonight.
Eh, okay. In that case I blame the ref who was standing right there not blowing his whistle.shawnrbu said:The ball is dead in college in the endzone.
Ironically college football, namely 1994 Penn State and 2004 Auburn. However, the playoffs will most certainly prevent that from happening again.DannyHeep said:
Move on. You are wrong It is ok, You will be wrong again. Name one sport where an undefeated team is denied a shot at the championship. If you can't you should move along.
tims4wins said:So FSU is good because they cough up "soft as shit" fumbles and drop passes? Uh ok?
johnmd20 said:
0% chance. 1am. Ouch.
tims4wins said:Well it's New Year's Day and I've been drinking for how many hours so I'm gonna say yes.
Just having a little fun. I get why FSU was there and like I said upthread the committee had no choice. It is just slightly frustrating since a lot of folks had a feeling they would get destroyed.
johnmd20 said:
FML.
I'm glad I'm my own boss because there is a 0% chance I am waking up at 5:50am tomorrow for work. Still, I hate showing up to the office later than 7:30am. At least it's a Friday.
54thMA said:
Wibi just texted his coworker that fun fact to put a cherry on the ballbreaking sundae he's been serving up
McBride11 said:
Well I'm off tomorrow regardless. Gonna have another Southern Tier Unearthly and a shot of Fireball. And I don't care what anyone says, Fireball is delicious and I'm 31.
Poulsonator said:Ironically college football, namely 1994 Penn State and 2004 Auburn. However, the playoffs will most certainly prevent that from happening again.
Right, which is why they need a playoff that doesn't exclude deserving teams. I think everyone agrees that means a minimum of 6 teams and probably not more than 8.johnmd20 said:
A lot of folks felt ND would get murdered by Alabama two years ago, too. And they did. They still made the game b/c the record got them there. If you win all your games, which is a perfect result, metrics are thrown out the window.
Problem is it could be close for a half and then go completely one-sided like the previous game.Freddy Linn said:Please let this game be exciting.
BigSoxFan said:That was some awful tackling
johnmd20 said:
Is that like the old Fire and Ice liquors that were popular in the 90's? I don't drink anymore but I loved that crap back in the day.
Jones is hard to tackle. I hope that holds for the rest of the game.
Right, which is why I think it's insane how close it came to happening again this year, and how many people are genuinely upset that a 13-0 defending champ from a major conference made a four-team playoff. It's lunacy.DannyHeep said:
Thanks for making my point.
wibi said:
Im not that much of a dick. No need to rub salt into the wounds at this point
As soon as an 8 seed wins the tournament - and it will happen - every 9th best team until the end of time will have a very legitimate beef.DannyHeep said:
That wasn't the question. Name a time where the 9th ranked team deserved the championship. Otherwise you agree.
staz said:As soon as an 8 seed wins the tournament - and it will happen - every 9th best team until the end of time will have a very legitimate beef.
Mitigation works right up until it's your team that gets mitigated out of the tournament. It's a fool's errand.Fred in Lynn said:This is a weak response. The inability to entirely fix it is no justification not to mitigate it, and mitigating it wouldn't be brain surgery.
I don't. That's the point. People will always find flaw, no matter what.johnmd20 said:
Where do you draw the line?
johnmd20 said:
Where do you draw the line?