Celtics Training Camp--News and Notes

Saints Rest

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
I feel like the reviews of Grant and Romeo now are remarkably similar in broad strokes to the reviews of Marcus and Jaylen, respectively, after their first years.

If either one of them can process as well as Marcus and Jaylen did, we will be in good shape.
 

the moops

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 19, 2016
4,755
Saint Paul, MN
Grant Williams was just really bad on the offensive end and has a lot of improving to do. That's probably causing people to lower their ceiling on him. PJ Tucker seems more like a floor though, or maybe most likely outcome.
PJ Tucker is an extremely limited offensive player. He shoots nothing but wide open corner threes and assisted layups. He never gets to the free throw line (less than 1 FTA per 36), has no handle, nor any post moves. I like PJ Tucker but he has benefited from playing in HOU immensely.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,529
around the way
PJ Tucker is an extremely limited offensive player. He shoots nothing but wide open corner threes and assisted layups. He never gets to the free throw line (less than 1 FTA per 36), has no handle, nor any post moves. I like PJ Tucker but he has benefited from playing in HOU immensely.
Grant was even more limited than that last year, by his own doing IMO. He reminded me of early Theis in that regard. Sure, he'd take the open three, garbage rebound, screen well, and make a pass. But he was so drilled into the moving-with-purpose-good-basketball-plays mode, that defenders could flock away from him most of the time. The ball was a hot potato. It would be better if he felt comfortable attacking the rim when he's disregarded, and his college film shows a guy that can.
 

DannyDarwinism

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 7, 2007
4,901
PJ Tucker is an extremely limited offensive player. He shoots nothing but wide open corner threes and assisted layups. He never gets to the free throw line (less than 1 FTA per 36), has no handle, nor any post moves. I like PJ Tucker but he has benefited from playing in HOU immensely.
Yeah, since he’s been on Houston, he’s been at about 70% 3PAr and 12% FTr, with nearly 70% of those threes coming from the corner. Those are crazy numbers, but a lot of that is the Rockets’ system. He was around 40/22/70, respectively for those stats, with Phoenix. FWIW, Grants usage last year was Tucker’s career average. And keep in mind Tucker basically first started (outside a handful of minutes in his rookie year) his career at 27 after a long stretch in Europe.

Grant is not going to be a go-to scorer like he was in college when he could bully-ball most guys in the SEC. He won’t even be a secondary option, or third most nights. But he’s got soft hands and a good touch near the basket, and he’ll be able to exploit mismatches/switches by getting to the post and scoring or passing out of help. If he shoots, I also think he’ll be able to put it on the floor respectably enough to attacks close outs. Combine that with his sharp passing and thicc screening, and that’s a useful offensive player, maybe about 14/7/4, on low usage, 60-ish TS% in a couple of years from now.

I like him more on defense. Ceiling maybe halfway between PJ and Dray, with the delta between him and Tucker mainly due to superior BBIQ, instincts, and significantly better rim protection and generally better post D against bigs.

Lest be thought of looking at our guys with SamRayNot level optimism, I’m not really expecting too much of Romeo this year. Just not enough time, with the short offseason and the injury. I think he’s projected to return around late February? His D last year was certainly encouraging, as was his flashes on of craft and finishing around the rim, but there just won’t be enough time for him to work on his game for him to improve much. His shot is obviously concerning, and I’d guess that’ll be the main focus of his rehab, along with getting him in game shape for March.
 

TripleOT

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2007
7,783
I feel like the reviews of Grant and Romeo now are remarkably similar in broad strokes to the reviews of Marcus and Jaylen, respectively, after their first years.

If either one of them can process as well as Marcus and Jaylen did, we will be in good shape.
The hopes for Grant and Romeo are the same, but neither guy was anywhere as good as rookies as Smart and Brown. Romeo couldn’t stay healthy to get on the court, and when he did, he was horrible at the offensive end, and ok for a rookie on defense.

Despite the historically bad three point shooting to start his career, Grant learned to play solid defense as a rookie, and found his scoring chops in the bubble. I’m expecting a big leap this season.

I don’t expect much out of Romeo. I see Nesmith getting minutes over him if Romeo ever gets healthy.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,235
Imaginationland
The hopes for Grant and Romeo are the same, but neither guy was anywhere as good as rookies as Smart and Brown. Romeo couldn’t stay healthy to get on the court, and when he did, he was horrible at the offensive end, and ok for a rookie on defense.

Despite the historically bad three point shooting to start his career, Grant learned to play solid defense as a rookie, and found his scoring chops in the bubble. I’m expecting a big leap this season.

I don’t expect much out of Romeo. I see Nesmith getting minutes over him if Romeo ever gets healthy.
Fact. With the slight caveat that the Celtics 2015 and 2017 Celtics weren't quite as good as the 2020 Celtics, Brown/Smart got far more run than Grant/Romeo as rookies:

Smart: 1808 minutes, 38 starts, 2.9 win shares
Brown: 1341 minutes, 20 starts, 1.5 win shares

Grant: 1043 minutes, 5 starts, 1.6 win shares
Romeo: 370 minutes, 2 starts, .2 win shares

Add in the fact that Smart and Brown were drafted much, much higher (theoretically this means a higher ceiling), hoping for a similar leap for Romeo/Grant seems like a pretty tough ask. That's without getting to the fact that a shortened offseason (and injuries) can only hurt the sophomores. I'd happily settle for one of them being playable in the playoffs in the Spring.
 

JakeRae

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
8,169
New York, NY
Fact. With the slight caveat that the Celtics 2015 and 2017 Celtics weren't quite as good as the 2020 Celtics, Brown/Smart got far more run than Grant/Romeo as rookies:

Smart: 1808 minutes, 38 starts, 2.9 win shares
Brown: 1341 minutes, 20 starts, 1.5 win shares

Grant: 1043 minutes, 5 starts, 1.6 win shares
Romeo: 370 minutes, 2 starts, .2 win shares

Add in the fact that Smart and Brown were drafted much, much higher (theoretically this means a higher ceiling), hoping for a similar leap for Romeo/Grant seems like a pretty tough ask. That's without getting to the fact that a shortened offseason (and injuries) can only hurt the sophomores. I'd happily settle for one of them being playable in the playoffs in the Spring.
The stats you cite don’t support the proposition you cite them for. As rookies, Jaylen played 17.3 mpg and Grant Williams played 15.1. I’m not sure we can read much into that difference. Smart was clearly both better and more trusted (he played 27 mpg as a rookie).

I’m not disputing your point about upside, but Jaylen Brown was not good as a rookie. He was completely lost on defense and only showed flashes on offense but generally wasn’t contributing on that end either. Grant Williams wasn’t worse last year than Jaylen was as a rookie. That in no way indicates we should expect a big sophomore leap. Jaylen has always been a premier athlete with solid skills but mediocre at best feel for the game. He has put in work, improved both strengths and weaknesses, but remains someone who doesn’t see the game as well or intuitively as most players of his ability, which is the biggest thing that limits his performance.

Grant is very different. He’s a player who has real athletic limitations but has great feel and instincts and a pathway to very good skills. What he already has let him being a really good defender as a rookie when used in favorable matchups but terrible offensively. He needs to improve his offensive skills and also his defensive versatility (he needs to be able to defend true wings at least solidly) to maximize his talent and his ceiling is still as a lesser player to both Smart and Brown.

Romeo is a complete unknown. His rookie playing time was mostly health driven. He flashed good defensive skills but has a lot of work left on offense.
 

Saints Rest

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
The stats you cite don’t support the proposition you cite them for. As rookies, Jaylen played 17.3 mpg and Grant Williams played 15.1. I’m not sure we can read much into that difference. Smart was clearly both better and more trusted (he played 27 mpg as a rookie).

I’m not disputing your point about upside, but Jaylen Brown was not good as a rookie. He was completely lost on defense and only showed flashes on offense but generally wasn’t contributing on that end either. Grant Williams wasn’t worse last year than Jaylen was as a rookie. That in no way indicates we should expect a big sophomore leap. Jaylen has always been a premier athlete with solid skills but mediocre at best feel for the game. He has put in work, improved both strengths and weaknesses, but remains someone who doesn’t see the game as well or intuitively as most players of his ability, which is the biggest thing that limits his performance.

Grant is very different. He’s a player who has real athletic limitations but has great feel and instincts and a pathway to very good skills. What he already has let him being a really good defender as a rookie when used in favorable matchups but terrible offensively. He needs to improve his offensive skills and also his defensive versatility (he needs to be able to defend true wings at least solidly) to maximize his talent and his ceiling is still as a lesser player to both Smart and Brown.

Romeo is a complete unknown. His rookie playing time was mostly health driven. He flashed good defensive skills but has a lot of work left on offense.
I brought it up originally and was comparing Grant to Marcus (solid defense, questions on offense) and Romeo to Jaylen (athletic with questions about fundamentals especially outside shooting).
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,235
Imaginationland
The stats you cite don’t support the proposition you cite them for. As rookies, Jaylen played 17.3 mpg and Grant Williams played 15.1. I’m not sure we can read much into that difference. Smart was clearly both better and more trusted (he played 27 mpg as a rookie).

I’m not disputing your point about upside, but Jaylen Brown was not good as a rookie. He was completely lost on defense and only showed flashes on offense but generally wasn’t contributing on that end either. Grant Williams wasn’t worse last year than Jaylen was as a rookie. That in no way indicates we should expect a big sophomore leap. Jaylen has always been a premier athlete with solid skills but mediocre at best feel for the game. He has put in work, improved both strengths and weaknesses, but remains someone who doesn’t see the game as well or intuitively as most players of his ability, which is the biggest thing that limits his performance.

Grant is very different. He’s a player who has real athletic limitations but has great feel and instincts and a pathway to very good skills. What he already has let him being a really good defender as a rookie when used in favorable matchups but terrible offensively. He needs to improve his offensive skills and also his defensive versatility (he needs to be able to defend true wings at least solidly) to maximize his talent and his ceiling is still as a lesser player to both Smart and Brown.

Romeo is a complete unknown. His rookie playing time was mostly health driven. He flashed good defensive skills but has a lot of work left on offense.
An extra 2 mpg and 9 additional games comes out to 28.5% more minutes, which is not insignificant (and Brown played 215 playoff minutes to 170 for Grant in the playoffs). The shortened season is an obvious mitigating factor, but no matter how you slice it:

-Brown played hundreds more more minutes as a rookie
-He had far more upside
-Despite his raw ability (compared to Grant's relative polish), he started 4x as many games

All this to say, there is no reason to see that Grant (or Romeo) is about to take a leap as significant as Brown (or Smart) as he enters his second season. Not based off of his role or minutes as a rookie, and definitely not based off of his potential upside.
 

DannyDarwinism

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 7, 2007
4,901
Do people here really think Romeo is in Jaylen’s stratosphere, athletically? I’d say he’s about league average for a wing, and much more on the coordinated/smooth end of the spectrum than Jaylen’s power/explosiveness game.

Though I do think Romeo is stronger than the typical silky glider type guy, which should absolutely help given his ability to get to the rim and his soft touch. Maybe functional athleticism is closer to JB, even if it’s a different kind?
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,235
Imaginationland
I brought it up originally and was comparing Grant to Marcus (solid defense, questions on offense) and Romeo to Jaylen (athletic with questions about fundamentals especially outside shooting).
This makes more sense, although I think it's drastically underselling Marcus' role as a rookie (noted above, but 27 mpg and 38 starts is worlds apart from what Grant provided last year) and overselling Romeo's. The latter really didn't show anything positive last year, other than that he isn't a defensive liability against backups (plus his upside is far lower than Brown's).
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
An extra 2 mpg and 9 additional games comes out to 28.5% more minutes, which is not insignificant (and Brown played 215 playoff minutes to 170 for Grant in the playoffs). The shortened season is an obvious mitigating factor, but no matter how you slice it:

-Brown played hundreds more more minutes as a rookie
-He had far more upside
-Despite his raw ability (compared to Grant's relative polish), he started 4x as many games

All this to say, there is no reason to see that Grant (or Romeo) is about to take a leap as significant as Brown (or Smart) as he enters his second season. Not based off of his role or minutes as a rookie, and definitely not based off of his potential upside.
How do we know the long layoff didn't help young players develop their game more than usual?
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,529
around the way
Do people here really think Romeo is in Jaylen’s stratosphere, athletically? I’d say he’s about league average for a wing, and much more on the coordinated/smooth end of the spectrum than Jaylen’s power/explosiveness game.

Though I do think Romeo is stronger than the typical silky glider type guy, which should absolutely help given his ability to get to the rim and his soft touch. Maybe functional athleticism is closer to JB, even if it’s a different kind?
I don't think that anyone thinks that Romeo is nearly as explosive as Jaylen, and he gives away length as well. But he is sneaky athletic and profiles as JB lite imo. Potential secondary scorer, good in transition, good defender. If he had Brown's twitch and body, he's not on the board at 14.
 

JakeRae

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
8,169
New York, NY
An extra 2 mpg and 9 additional games comes out to 28.5% more minutes, which is not insignificant (and Brown played 215 playoff minutes to 170 for Grant in the playoffs). The shortened season is an obvious mitigating factor, but no matter how you slice it:

-Brown played hundreds more more minutes as a rookie
-He had far more upside
-Despite his raw ability (compared to Grant's relative polish), he started 4x as many games

All this to say, there is no reason to see that Grant (or Romeo) is about to take a leap as significant as Brown (or Smart) as he enters his second season. Not based off of his role or minutes as a rookie, and definitely not based off of his potential upside.
The 27.5% figure is deceptive because, as you note, the season was shorter. The difference is 2 mpg, which is about 13%. It’s also a small enough difference that role flexibility potentially explains the gap.

Jaylen and Grant aren’t comparable players, but it isn’t because Jaylen was better as a rookie or played more but because their respective talents and skills aren’t similar.

That said, Grant has a reasonable pathway toward significant improvement because he had a gigantic hole in his game last year that there are good reasons to be optimistic won’t be present this year. Again, that doesn’t make him like Jaylen. Jaylen’s sophomore season had him on a trajectory to potentially become a borderline All Star if he kept it up. That won’t be Grant Williams, whose ceiling is that of a very good rotation player, but he could still make a big leap this year if he can find a stable offensive role and show that his defensive ability isn’t matchup limited.
 

DannyDarwinism

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 7, 2007
4,901
I don't think that anyone thinks that Romeo is nearly as explosive as Jaylen, and he gives away length as well. But he is sneaky athletic and profiles as JB lite imo. Potential secondary scorer, good in transition, good defender. If he had Brown's twitch and body, he's not on the board at 14.
Yeah, I dunno. I don’t think think Romeo’s particularly athletic for an NBA SG, so it struck me to see him compared to Jaylen on the basis of athleticism, as that was JB’s major selling point coming out of Cal. I think people like to try to contextualize new guys by comparing them to known quantities, but I don’t think JB is a particularly useful frame of reference for Langford, who I think is better thought of as a potential secondary ball handler, who hopefully can run the PnR if a couple of things break right, as opposed to an uber-slasher like JB.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,396
I think Romeo’s comps are more guys like Rick Fox, Eric Williams (an interesting comp given ability to get to line), Ginobili a bit.

That’s a legit nba starter and borderline all star at peak especially since defense looks promising.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,529
around the way
Yeah, I dunno. I don’t think think Romeo’s particularly athletic for an NBA SG, so it struck me to see him compared to Jaylen on the basis of athleticism, as that was JB’s major selling point coming out of Cal. I think people like to try to contextualize new guys by comparing them to known quantities, but I don’t think JB is a particularly useful frame of reference for Langford, who I think is better thought of as a potential secondary ball handler, who hopefully can run the PnR if a couple of things break right, as opposed to an uber-slasher like JB.
Yeah, it would be ideal if he became a secondary ballhandler at his height, but it doesn't seem to be his bread and butter. Imo if he ever earns big minutes on this team, his offensive contributions will likely be as a slasher (and shooter) because he doesn't seem to do much else. I'd love to be wrong and see him turn into a combo guard, but that's why I see him as poor man's JB too.
 

DannyDarwinism

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 7, 2007
4,901
Yeah, it would be ideal if he became a secondary ballhandler at his height, but it doesn't seem to be his bread and butter. Imo if he ever earns big minutes on this team, his offensive contributions will likely be as a slasher (and shooter) because he doesn't seem to do much else. I'd love to be wrong and see him turn into a combo guard, but that's why I see him as poor man's JB too.
I’m a bit bearish on his ball-handling too from what we’ve seen, but I absolutely think PnR ball-handler potential was part of the appeal in drafting him. We had posters here who’ve penciled him in for PG minutes, which I always thought was a stretch. For the team’s sake, I hope we’re both wrong because a Jaylen with average athleticism who can’t really shoot yet is a pretty meh prospect.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,150
Tjarks on the Celtics:

https://www.theringer.com/nba/2020/12/8/22124399/boston-celtics-jayson-tatum-jaylen-brown-marcus-smart
The reality is that Hayward and Walker were never going to be the best players on a championship team in Boston. Tatum might. He could play his way into the MVP conversation this season, and Brown and Smart could be the perfect supporting cast around him. The Celtics should be one of the best teams in the NBA for a long time to come. Their young stars don’t have to fit in anymore. Everyone who comes to Boston from now on has to fit around them
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,833
I think Romeo’s comps are more guys like Rick Fox, Eric Williams (an interesting comp given ability to get to line), Ginobili a bit.

That’s a legit nba starter and borderline all star at peak especially since defense looks promising.
I think his most obvious comp for top end is DeMar DeRozan, similar size, couldn't shoot the 3, entered the league as a limited passer, high emphasis on FTs and finishing. Romeo is a better defender, but not the mid-range shooter young DeRozan was.

On a different approach, RHJ is a comp if he never gets any offense, they are the exact same size.
 

the moops

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 19, 2016
4,755
Saint Paul, MN
I hope they don't start Teague. I fear they will though so as to try and substitute in him as Kemba-light.

I want to see a Smart, Brown, Tatum, Williams, Theis lineup. Teague and Thompson first off the bench.
 

bakahump

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 8, 2001
7,563
Maine
They didnt show Grant williams results on the shot. LOL
And Tacko Dunking is hilarious. "I guess I will hop".
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,716
It originated with the International Man of Mystery, Yi Jianlian. The sixth pick in the Oden/Durant draft.
 

128

Member
SoSH Member
May 4, 2019
10,102
I thought Tristan Thompson was going to miss most of training camp with a hamstring injury. He's in those clips.
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,865
I hope they don't start Teague. I fear they will though so as to try and substitute in him as Kemba-light.

Do you think it matters who starts? You’re right that Smart is better than Teague but maybe letting Teague get his minutes early rather than later is fine.

I don’t have a strong opinion on it, maybe it matters.
 

bigq

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
11,192
It originated with the International Man of Mystery, Yi Jianlian. The sixth pick in the Oden/Durant draft.
Ha! And thus his The Chairman nickname.

Strange coincidence that both Jianlian and Fultz averaged 12 ppg in their 3rd NBA seasons.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,150
I thought Tristan Thompson was going to miss most of training camp with a hamstring injury. He's in those clips.
The post upthread said he'd be "limited". I would bet we don't see much of him in preseason games unless he was way ahead of schedule.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,833
The post upthread said he'd be "limited". I would bet we don't see much of him in preseason games unless he was way ahead of schedule.
yeah, those appear to be some half speed or less walkthroughs, he's not really running hard or jumping or doing anything that would stress the hammy, just getting used to the sets, and his teammates
 

NomarsFool

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 21, 2001
8,259
We didn't see Edwards or Waters, right? Covid?

No Kemba or Romeo, but they are injured.
 

chilidawg

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 22, 2015
5,987
Cultural hub of the universe

128

Member
SoSH Member
May 4, 2019
10,102
The only time I saw Nesmith was in the shot where he was sitting next to Pritchard. Wonder if he's hurt.
 

TripleOT

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2007
7,783
TL not available, apparently.

I love to listen to the game chatter of the players. It reminds me that basketball is basketball, from the local courts all the way to the highest level
 

128

Member
SoSH Member
May 4, 2019
10,102
I love to listen to the game chatter of the players. It reminds me that basketball is basketball, from the local courts all the way to the highest level
Agreed. Sounds like at least one player screamed, "And one!" after every made basket.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,150
Pritchard's finger popped out today at practice--finger on his left hand.