Celtics vs 76ers, Round 2 Discussion

Bob Montgomerys Helmet Hat

has big, douchey shoulders
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
If they win it all being unable to ever win in crunch time, I will be amazed. I'm going to be emotionally off the bandwagon until they can show me they can do it.

As it stands, if Harden keeps being great they are at risk of losing this series as of today - feels like they can't pull off the going down 3-2 special this time unlike the Bucks last year.
How do you snap your fingers and get emotionally off the bandwagon?
 

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
19,608
Somewhere
I’m guessing part of the no timeout philosophy has to do with not letting the defense get set. Another part is the trust the coach is putting in the players. I think people can disagree but I get the purpose. As someone who likes more flow in the game, I actually prefer it.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,726
I just don't get what upside Joe sees to the no-TO strategy. Sure, in a mid-February game try to instill a killer mentality, fine. But it's May now, that shit didn't work in the regular season, so what's the upside now? To me, there has to be a pretty massive upside in order to buck a league-wide strategy of calling timeout in the closing minutes. He must just massively overvalue not allowing a defense to rest and get coached up because I can't see what else is driving his choices. I mean, on the Harden three, Doc set up a new look that got Embiid on Tatum and away from the guy who was eating his lunch, which inevitably lead to Jaylen's massive blunder. Not calling a timeout doesn't even give the C's a chance to introduce some new wrinkle that might throw Philly off.
I think you actually nailed it. He’s overvaluing giving the opposing coach a chance to make substitutions.

The Sixers are a team where you shouldn’t fear that. Tobias Harris is a weak defender, Tyrese Maxey is a weak defender, James Harden is an awful defender. They’re not going to sub out all 3 of them. I’m not sure he would sub out one but let’s say he does sub out Maxey for Melton. You still have two players that you can absolutely attack with a set play
 

mcpickl

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2007
4,557
More pissed about giving up the 3 to Harden than the non TO
This is it.

There is going to be ten times more complaining about the last offensive possession, where the last defensive possession was the biggest mistake.

Leaving a wide open corner three shooter to double Embiid in the paint after he picked up his dribble up 2 with less than 24 seconds left is an awful decision.

As long as Tatum doesn't foul, the worst that can happen is Embiid hits a shot over Tatum to tie the game and you have the last shot to win the game or go to double OT. Can't leave your man there.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,236
Here
I was wrong, Tatum drove with 4.3 seconds left in OT, not 7. Seven was regulation. And you saw the difference.

If you’re driving with four seconds you need to commit to being the shooter.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,841
Melrose, MA
I was wrong, Tatum drove with 4.3 seconds left in OT, not 7. Seven was regulation. And you saw the difference.

If you’re driving with four seconds you need to commit to being the shooter.
This was the problem. I'm fine with the no-TO stuff, but if they are going to do it Tatum cannot make a mistake like that. And, in his after game comments, he still doesn't get it - he says he should have passed it earlier, not drove earlier. Tatum's execution needs to be better. If it can't be better then Joe should call the time out.
 

JakeRae

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
8,189
New York, NY
Setting aside the end-game scenario, what I saw this game that worried me is that Harden remembered that Jaylen Brown cannot actually defend him off the dribble and utterly dominated our defense off the dribble most of the game. I think we may need to adjust that defensive look again to feature Smart a bit more and shift Jaylen to Harris or Tucker primarily.
 

Light-Tower-Power

ask me about My Pillow
SoSH Member
Jun 14, 2013
16,093
Nashua, NH
Setting aside the end-game scenario, what I saw this game that worried me is that Harden remembered that Jaylen Brown cannot actually defend him off the dribble and utterly dominated our defense off the dribble most of the game. I think we may need to adjust that defensive look again to feature Smart a bit more and shift Jaylen to Harris or Tucker primarily.
Seemed to me that JB was the only one who bothered him and he was going by Brogdon, Smart, and Al at will. Probably would have had him on Harden all afternoon if he didn’t pick up two quick ones.
 

CreedBratton

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 6, 2009
3,753
Setting aside the end-game scenario, what I saw this game that worried me is that Harden remembered that Jaylen Brown cannot actually defend him off the dribble and utterly dominated our defense off the dribble most of the game. I think we may need to adjust that defensive look again to feature Smart a bit more and shift Jaylen to Harris or Tucker primarily.
White needs to play more & guard harden more.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,841
Melrose, MA
The Celtics are 2-2 despite having taken 7 quarters off off playing defense. All of game 1 and the first three quarters of game 4. Then they finally got iy together and played their best defensive quarter of the series, and it ended up just not being enough. One more quarter of defense in this sires and it is 3-1. Two more - one each in games 1 and 4 - it is over.

The good news is that if they stop fucking doing this they should be able to take 2 of 3 against this Philly team.

The bad news, possibly, would be that I trust Doc to make adjustments as the series goes on way more than I do Joe, so, relatively speaking the Sixers may be a better match for the Celtics late.

The other problem is that James Harden is one of the all time playoff underachievers among NBA greats. But, his excellence in games 1 and 4 carried the Sixers. He's closer to the end of the trial than the beginning, maybe he will finally rise aove what he usually is and carry the Sixers to a series win. Today he disproved the idea that it was just the long rest that allowed him to perform in game 1.

Anyway, if the Celtics do not advance, this will be a failure that falls right in line with what the Bruins just did.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,409
Not taking a TO off the make is defensible. Not taking it after it was clear they didn’t have anything going is inexcusable.
You would call a timeout in the middle of Tatum beating his man off the dribble and getting into the lane? We got an open look that happened to be .2 seconds late. The issue was the timing of it all but it was clear we wanted to take the final shot which we should be doing with both these offenses.
 

Light-Tower-Power

ask me about My Pillow
SoSH Member
Jun 14, 2013
16,093
Nashua, NH
You would call a timeout in the middle of Tatum beating his man off the dribble and getting into the lane? We got an open look that happened to be .2 seconds late. The issue was the timing of it all but it was clear we wanted to take the final shot which we should be doing with both these offenses.
Once Tatum went of course not, but I thought it was obvious that he went too late. I would have liked to see him call timeout once that became clear to at least set something up to guarantee a shot. Bigger issue was just Tatum going too late. Biggest issue was Jaylen having his head up his ass on defense the previous possession.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,409
Once Tatum went of course not, but I thought it was obvious that he went too late. I would have liked to see him call timeout once that became clear to at least set something up to guarantee a shot.
I don't think he went to late I just didn't think he expected the entire defense to collapse but our spacing wasn't great. If he goes sooner and scores we leave them with :03 or :04 on the clock which is what we don't want to do. It wasn't as if the timing of the play was egregious.....I mean it literally went to replay.
 

schillzilla

New Member
May 11, 2006
122
I would have preferred Brogdon over Smart for the last possession in regulation and OT. That offensive upgrade to me is greater than Maxey being subbed out. If they called a TO, inserted Brogdon, maybe the entire defense doesn’t collapse on to Tatum because someone would have been attached to Brogdon. The defense was obviously more than happy to leave Marcus and live with the result. Ultimately the Cs were behind because one of the sixers best shooters was left wide open (not Tucker, not Maxey, etc). Would have liked to see if that was the case for Celtics on one of those last possessions, but he was on the bench and we got two attempts by Smart instead.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,276
I don't think he went to late I just didn't think he expected the entire defense to collapse but our spacing wasn't great. If he goes sooner and scores we leave them with :03 or :04 on the clock which is what we don't want to do. It wasn't as if the timing of the play was egregious.....I mean it literally went to replay.
The entire Sixers defense has been hyper focused on Tatum in these late game situations so he should have been ready. It was clear as day once he picked up the ball. I wish he would have risen up for a shot on Maxey after he got by Harris.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,952
The entire Sixers defense has been hyper focused on Tatum in these late game situations so he should have been ready. It was clear as day once he picked up the ball. I wish he would have risen up for a shot on Maxey after he got by Harris.
I think he was ready, he just lost his clock sense and held a half second too long to make sure Smart was as wide open as possible.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,276
I think he was ready, he just lost his clock sense and held a half second too long to make sure Smart was as wide open as possible.
I dunno. It was a dangerous pass. Both Embiid and Harden had a chance to deflect it and end the game. I was holding my breath on that live and not even focused on the shot clock, which ended up being the key issue. But, we’ve now had 2 key plays in last 4 games from Tatum where he lost his clock sense at a key moment. It’s something he needs to figure out because more of these moments are surely coming.
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,573
The whole waiting until the absolute last second thing is so dumb. These guys realize it takes a couple seconds for a shot to reach the basket, yes? There’s really no excuse for leaving such a thin margin when you NEED points above all else. If it were tied I can understand the last shot or bust mentality.

There have been so many of these moments in these snatch defeat from the jaws of victory losses where they just completely lose their heads, forget the situation, and make a backbreaking error. And almost every player on the team has contributed. I’d be much happier if it were simply a matter of missing shots. That happens. This kind of stuff, though, can’t keep happening if you want to win a title.

All that said, have to like their chances in G5. Only one team in this series has had a chance to win every game so far and I don’t see that changing.
 

mcpickl

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2007
4,557
I would have preferred Brogdon over Smart for the last possession in regulation and OT. That offensive upgrade to me is greater than Maxey being subbed out. If they called a TO, inserted Brogdon, maybe the entire defense doesn’t collapse on to Tatum because someone would have been attached to Brogdon. The defense was obviously more than happy to leave Marcus and live with the result. Ultimately the Cs were behind because one of the sixers best shooters was left wide open (not Tucker, not Maxey, etc). Would have liked to see if that was the case for Celtics on one of those last possessions, but he was on the bench and we got two attempts by Smart instead.
Brogdon was on the floor for the one at the end of regulation, and the entire defense collapsed on Tatum. Brogdon just stood still behind the three point line and therefore wasn't open.

Started OT too, but miscommunicated a switch with Jaylen, giving Maxey a layup. Then committed two fouls on the next possession while being hunted by Harden and removed from the game.

Brogdon has become a sneaky awful defender.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,726
Brogdon has become a sneaky awful defender.
I don’t think it’s sneaky anymore. When Georges fucking Niang is blowing by you like a turnstile, you’re just plain awful. Hardens seeking him out whenever they are on the floor together
 

schillzilla

New Member
May 11, 2006
122
Brogdon was on the floor for the one at the end of regulation, and the entire defense collapsed on Tatum. Brogdon just stood still behind the three point line and therefore wasn't open.

Started OT too, but miscommunicated a switch with Jaylen, giving Maxey a layup. Then committed two fouls on the next possession while being hunted by Harden and removed from the game.

Brogdon has become a sneaky awful defender.
My bad, I just rewatched that last possession of regulation , you are right - he was out there. Although Harden was guarding him and he didn’t totally collapse, he hung out at the foul line just playing Harden defense
 

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
14,488
Setting aside the end-game scenario, what I saw this game that worried me is that Harden remembered that Jaylen Brown cannot actually defend him off the dribble and utterly dominated our defense off the dribble most of the game. I think we may need to adjust that defensive look again to feature Smart a bit more and shift Jaylen to Harris or Tucker primarily.
Did we watch the same game?

JB wasn't on Harden for the majority of the first half because of fouls. Then they continually set screens and tried to switch to get JB off of Harden.

Brogdon, Smart, And Al were routinely burned by Harden on the switches or when JB was off of him.
 

GeorgeCostanza

tiger king
SoSH Member
May 16, 2009
7,286
Go f*ck yourself
The whole waiting until the absolute last second thing is so dumb. These guys realize it takes a couple seconds for a shot to reach the basket, yes? There’s really no excuse for leaving such a thin margin when you NEED points above all else. If it were tied I can understand the last shot or bust mentality.

There have been so many of these moments in these snatch defeat from the jaws of victory losses where they just completely lose their heads, forget the situation, and make a backbreaking error. And almost every player on the team has contributed. I’d be much happier if it were simply a matter of missing shots. That happens. This kind of stuff, though, can’t keep happening if you want to win a title.
Have you had a change or heart/philosophy on this? I recall you being pissed when Kemba left .5 on the clock against Toronto by feeding Theis for the dunk.
 

bosockboy

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
20,056
St. Louis, MO
If Boston had won 74 games and bowed out in the second round to a low seed, maybe.
I think we’ll win, but a loss would be devastating considering the following:

•Atlanta winning play-in
•Milwaukee out
•Quite possibly missing both Cleveland and NYK, who both gave them fits this season.

They are the deepest, most talented roster and have been given a golden path.
 

Tony C

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
13,726
How do you snap your fingers and get emotionally off the bandwagon?
Not so hard, I've done it hundreds of times. Er...wait....(insert "they suck ya back in" gif)
The whole waiting until the absolute last second thing is so dumb. These guys realize it takes a couple seconds for a shot to reach the basket, yes? There’s really no excuse for leaving such a thin margin when you NEED points above all else. If it were tied I can understand the last shot or bust mentality.
...
Yep, I don't really get the "Tatum just baaarely mis-timed it" thing. Literally it's true in that the shot left Smart's hand .2 seconds late or whatever. But you have to factor that in when you're dilly-dallying around before starting your move. It's way more important to get a good shot than to make sure the other team doesn't have 2 seconds to throw a length of court pass amid chaos. In that situation you have to leave time for a potential pass or a potential rebound/2nd shot way more than timing it so there's virtually 0 seconds on the clock.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,841
Melrose, MA
Karalis faults the final play execution.

https://www.bostonsportsjournal.com/2023/05/07/karalis-celtics-have-tons-of-potential-but-their-flaws-were-on-display-in-crucial-moments-of-game-4

After the 3 fell, the Celtics brought the ball up without using a timeout. Two main reasons Joe Mazzulla doesn’t call a timeout there are because he likes the matchups and he trusts his guys.

I understand the first part of that. With Harden and Tyrese Maxey on the floor, Boston didn't want to give Doc Rivers the opportunity to sub in better defenders. That makes sense.

I don’t understand the latter, because it’s getting harder and harder to trust that these guys can do this without some extra help.

“We just had to play with a little bit more pace,” Mazzulla said afterwards. “We had the right matchup. Jayson got downhill and made the right play at the rim. We just had to play with a little bit more pace there.”
I agree with him.
They jogged the ball up the floor and didn’t get it over until there were 12 seconds left.

With 11, Tatum was motioning to Brown to stay in the corner.

With 10, Tatum was still walking to his spot.

With 9, Tatum finally made himself available for the pass.

With 8, then 7, Tatum spun and faced the basket.

By this time Boston had committed to either winning or losing this game. They left themselves no margin for error, which is typical. They weren’t going to give themselves time for an offensive rebound. They weren’t going to give themselves a chance to foul if they missed and get another crack at it.

Down to 6 and Tatum waved Marcus Smart away.

At 5 he got the screen he wanted and it was clear he wanted to win the game.
At 4 … 3 … 2 … Tatum wasted every option he had. He didn’t give it to Derrick White, who was all alone at the top of the key. He didn’t rise up for a shot.

With 1.5 on the clock and his momentum taking him the other way, he floated a pass to Smart that was just soft and off enough to take up all the remaining time. [/quote]
Tatum didn't know what he wanted to do there, gradually gave away all of his options except the one he didn't have time to make.

If that is the best execution the team can do, they should call time out.
 

wilked

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
4,068
Tatum can be correctly blamed here. But…. I wonder about why he wasn’t more prepared. They should have done so many dress rehearsals for this moment that it becomes muscle memory. Practice running it with 15 seconds. Now practice with 12 seconds. 8 seconds. Etc. keep drilling it until success rate of a good shot attempt is nearly certain, while mixing up the defense of it.

My gut says CJM is doing too much trust in the players. Trust but verify is the right approach. There’s little question to me that they have not practiced those scenarios enough where they become second nature
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,276
Karalis faults the final play execution.

https://www.bostonsportsjournal.com/2023/05/07/karalis-celtics-have-tons-of-potential-but-their-flaws-were-on-display-in-crucial-moments-of-game-4


I agree with him.


At 4 … 3 … 2 … Tatum wasted every option he had. He didn’t give it to Derrick White, who was all alone at the top of the key. He didn’t rise up for a shot.

With 1.5 on the clock and his momentum taking him the other way, he floated a pass to Smart that was just soft and off enough to take up all the remaining time.
Tatum didn't know what he wanted to do there, gradually gave away all of his options except the one he didn't have time to make.

If that is the best execution the team can do, they should call time out.
[/QUOTE]

Not only that but it was a dangerous pass to make. He had to thread it through Embiid in the paint and Harden on the perimeter. And the reason why there wasn’t enough time for Smart is because he had to throw it across his body, which slowed the ball up just enough to make the shot not count. He had a chance to rise up for a shot once he got past Harris but didn’t take it. That’s 2 straight losses where his indecision has really cost this team. He was decisive the play prior and nailed a 3. When this team overthinks, they generally get in trouble.
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,573
Have you had a change or heart/philosophy on this? I recall you being pissed when Kemba left .5 on the clock against Toronto by feeding Theis for the dunk.
I get your point but the situation is a bit different
  • Celtics/Raptors were tied, so there is less harm in absolutely 100% ensuring the final shot
  • Toronto had a timeout where Philly did not, so they could advance the ball
Ultimately it shouldn’t have mattered anyway if they hadn’t just completely forgotten to cover OG in the corner.

If you are losing, you 100% unambiguously have to get a shot. I am not a game theorist but the only guaranteed ways to lose in that situation are to not attempt a shot or not get fouled (and in this situation it would have taken an armed mugging to draw a whistle). If you leave half a tick on the clock and lose on a 3/4 court prayer, you tip your cap and lament the other ways they screwed up. Not getting a shot at all is way worse.

As long as they win the series it will be forgiven as it was against Toronto.
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
27,144
Newton
I couldn’t watch the game but reading this very measured bunch of threads I want to make sure I have this straight:

1) Tatum isn’t Bird
2) Jaylen isn’t smart
3) Smart isn’t good
4) Mazzola should be fired.

Do I have that right?
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,841
Melrose, MA
I couldn’t watch the game but reading this very measured bunch of threads I want to make sure I have this straight:

1) Tatum isn’t Bird
2) Jaylen isn’t smart
3) Smart isn’t good
4) Mazzola should be fired.

Do I have that right?
No.

1. Tatum isn't Bird (or at least in contention for Celtic Rushmore alongside Bird)... yet. He may never but it is early for him, career-wise.
2. Jaylen's best defense is on-ball. His weakness is off-ball responsibilities and swtiching decisions.
3. What Smart lacks in talent he tries to make up for in will, with some successes and failures. He would never fall prey to the indicisiveness we saw from Tatum on the last play.
4. Mazulla should not be fired, but he might be a liability during this playoff run.
 

the moops

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 19, 2016
4,762
Saint Paul, MN
I don’t think it’s sneaky anymore. When Georges fucking Niang is blowing by you like a turnstile, you’re just plain awful. Hardens seeking him out whenever they are on the floor together
Niang schooled Tatum a few possessions in a row the previous game.
 

Strike4

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
3,919
Portland, Maine
To me these tough series game endings are about:
  1. Putting your great players in a position to win; and
  2. Denying the other team the opportunity to do the same
I think they did that in game 4 - Smart may not be the first option but he got a great look at then end of regulation, after great team defense got them there. For the final part of OT, they pretty much had it set up again, despite not playing as well. It's just that 1) Brown gave Harden way to much space and Harden, as a great player, took advantage of it; and 2) Tatum messed around too much in the face of good Sixers defense, before passing to Smart (who hit what would have been a game winner).

Not sure how much this is on Mazzulla but it's a coach's job to continually improve his team's play, and not just be like "well we're satisfied, just didn't go our way". Brown has done the same thing several times before IIRC - I remember he doubled and it cost them a gut punch game a few years ago against the Wizards.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,276
To me these tough series game endings are about:
  1. Putting your great players in a position to win; and
  2. Denying the other team the opportunity to do the same
I think they did that in game 4 - Smart may not be the first option but he got a great look at then end of regulation, after great team defense got them there. For the final part of OT, they pretty much had it set up again, despite not playing as well. It's just that 1) Brown gave Harden way to much space and Harden, as a great player, took advantage of it; and 2) Tatum messed around too much in the face of good Sixers defense, before passing to Smart (who hit what would have been a game winner).

Not sure how much this is on Mazzulla but it's a coach's job to continually improve his team's play, and not just be like "well we're satisfied, just didn't go our way". Brown has done the same thing several times before IIRC - I remember he doubled and it cost them a gut punch game a few years ago against the Wizards.
Mazzulla takes a lot of heat but sometimes your best players just need to win games and stop making these constant mental errors. The same thing happens over and over again and we get the same meaningless quotes after the game to the effect of “whoops…my bad”.

In the final 2 plays, we had massive brain farts from our two best players. I was on team timeout but maybe it doesn’t make a difference at all. The root problem is that Tatum is being indecisive and Jaylen continues to show very low IQ on defense.

It’s not a winning formula and I hope they can escape this round and not have to play the “what if” game for another summer. Because what else can Brad do? He has his 2 stars surrounded by quality veteran players who fit their style perfectly. It’s on Jaylen and Jayson to take the final step to get that ring.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,841
Melrose, MA
To me these tough series game endings are about:
  1. Putting your great players in a position to win; and
  2. Denying the other team the opportunity to do the same
I think they did that in game 4 - Smart may not be the first option but he got a great look at then end of regulation, after great team defense got them there. For the final part of OT, they pretty much had it set up again, despite not playing as well. It's just that 1) Brown gave Harden way to much space and Harden, as a great player, took advantage of it; and 2) Tatum messed around too much in the face of good Sixers defense, before passing to Smart (who hit what would have been a game winner).

Not sure how much this is on Mazzulla but it's a coach's job to continually improve his team's play, and not just be like "well we're satisfied, just didn't go our way". Brown has done the same thing several times before IIRC - I remember he doubled and it cost them a gut punch game a few years ago against the Wizards.
I think a coach could work with his team (and his stars) on sharper end of game execution. Tatum (and the team around him) were too loose at the end of OT and it cost them.

I also think a coach could prevail on his team to not abandon its defensive intensity for one whole game and then 3 quarters of another game, out of 4 games total.
 

CoffeeNerdness

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 6, 2012
8,881
To me, the upside of keeping Melton off the court is outweighed by the downside that this cast of characters will have an issue executing in the final seconds. In February v. the Sixers, Joe bucked his own philosophy and called a TO, they set up a play, executed, and won the game. Yes, a timeout isn't some magic automatic win button, but why not go with what's worked in the past? Give your players the best chance to succeed.
 

jezza1918

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
2,701
South Dartmouth, MA
Mazzulla takes a lot of heat but sometimes your best players just need to win games and stop making these constant mental errors. The same thing happens over and over again and we get the same meaningless quotes after the game to the effect of “whoops…my bad”.

In the final 2 plays, we had massive brain farts from our two best players. I was on team timeout but maybe it doesn’t make a difference at all. The root problem is that Tatum is being indecisive and Jaylen continues to show very low IQ on defense.

It’s not a winning formula and I hope they can escape this round and not have to play the “what if” game for another summer. Because what else can Brad do? He has his 2 stars surrounded by quality veteran players who fit their style perfectly. It’s on Jaylen and Jayson to take the final step to get that ring.
Agree with your overall post. But don't those two opening sentences contradict each other to a certain degree? If those same mental errors are happening over and over again some of that heat does fall on the head coach. I'd love to know what was said in the TO before the Harden 3...I am not a basketball expert by any means but shouldn't it have just been "hey if Embiid takes a decently contested 2 we can live with that. But never in any circumstances leave the hottest shooter in the game in an effort to double team him." My guess is something along those lines WAS said, and JB still effed up. As far as the TO's not used with a chance to set up a winning play, I personally would've liked him to have used one...but understand the rationale for not using it. That said, on the last play in OT I think once it became clear they looked a bit clueless as to what they were going to run I think he would've put his guys in a better position to win by calling one. Hopefully the next step in Tatum's maturation is nailing end of game process.
So much of the backlash though does seem results, and not process driven though. I feel like if that game ends with a Tatum turnaround (similar to the one he made in closing minutes of game 3), that rims out we'd all be complaining that he plays too much iso at the end...
Last thought before I grind through Monday morning work emails, and this ties in a bit with my first paragraph, overall it's the Coach's job to put his players in the best position to win the game. It's likely not possible, but wondering if there's a stat out there that shows the Celtics success this year in similar situations with or without using a timeout? Or to drill down even further...which options created the best shot? Just to use the last play in regulation as an example, the action they ran resulted in a pretty open Smart 3, which is maybe a 40-42% probability of going in. But can Joe draw up a play out of a TO that results in a shot that is higher than 50? Im just musing here, pre coffee kicking in. Apologies if it's a bit incoherent.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,276
Agree with your overall post. But don't those two opening sentences contradict each other to a certain degree? If those same mental errors are happening over and over again some of that heat does fall on the head coach. I'd love to know what was said in the TO before the Harden 3...I am not a basketball expert by any means but shouldn't it have just been "hey if Embiid takes a decently contested 2 we can live with that. But never in any circumstances leave the hottest shooter in the game in an effort to double team him." My guess is something along those lines WAS said, and JB still effed up. As far as the TO's not used with a chance to set up a winning play, I personally would've liked him to have used one...but understand the rationale for not using it. That said, on the last play in OT I think once it became clear they looked a bit clueless as to what they were going to run I think he would've put his guys in a better position to win by calling one. Hopefully the next step in Tatum's maturation is nailing end of game process.
So much of the backlash though does seem results, and not process driven though. I feel like if that game ends with a Tatum turnaround (similar to the one he made in closing minutes of game 3), that rims out we'd all be complaining that he plays too much iso at the end...
Last thought before I grind through Monday morning work emails, and this ties in a bit with my first paragraph, overall it's the Coach's job to put his players in the best position to win the game. It's likely not possible, but wondering if there's a stat out there that shows the Celtics success this year in similar situations with or without using a timeout? Or to drill down even further...which options created the best shot? Just to use the last play in regulation as an example, the action they ran resulted in a pretty open Smart 3, which is maybe a 40-42% probability of going in. But can Joe draw up a play out of a TO that results in a shot that is higher than 50? Im just musing here, pre coffee kicking in. Apologies if it's a bit incoherent.
Yes, to be clear, I think Joe has earned a lot of the heat. His entire mantra during regular season was to not call timeouts and let his guys learn on the job. That experience was supposed to carry into the playoffs to greater confidence and composure. The problem is that it hasn’t. They’re still making dumb decisions and it’s already cost them 2 games.

With all that said, Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown shouldn’t need constant reminders to make the right play. They’re not making good split decisions and I’m not really sure what can be done about that other than letting White/Smart handle the ball and trying to free one of them up for a catch and shoot.

My hope is that we get to look back and laugh at the handwringing after a tough championship run to #18. My fear is that these mental errors at some point prove to be fatal as the quality of opponents/coaching, if they advance, will only get tougher.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,680
Hingham, MA
On the timeout issue. I thought during the regular season the criticism of Joe was that he was unwilling to call timeouts to quell runs. I don't recall an unwillingness to call timeouts to set up end of game situations. Am I off on this?
 

jezza1918

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
2,701
South Dartmouth, MA
Yes, to be clear, I think Joe has earned a lot of the heat. His entire mantra during regular season was to not call timeouts and let his guys learn on the job. That experience was supposed to carry into the playoffs to greater confidence and composure. The problem is that it hasn’t. They’re still making dumb decisions and it’s already cost them 2 games.

With all that said, Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown shouldn’t need constant reminders to make the right play. They’re not making good split decisions and I’m not really sure what can be done about that other than letting White/Smart handle the ball and trying to free one of them up for a catch and shoot.

My hope is that we get to look back and laugh at the handwringing after a tough championship run to #18. My fear is that these mental errors at some point prove to be fatal as the quality of opponents/coaching, if they advance, will only get tougher.
OK yeah I think we are on a similar, if not the same page. For me, the fact that Tatum and Brown need those reminders is incredibly frustrating (although I do think they will both improve in future seasons, because they've improved at basically everything else); but I know they need those, you know they need those, so I presume Joe needs they need those... So within that context I find Joe not calling the TOs to give them those reminders equally, if not more, frustrating.
 

Humphrey

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2010
3,212
Seemed to me that JB was the only one who bothered him and he was going by Brogdon, Smart, and Al at will. Probably would have had him on Harden all afternoon if he didn’t pick up two quick ones.
Agree w/you. Brogdon was particularly bad, and I think it's probably why White played the last four minutes of the OT. Every time Al was on him due to a switch, I cringed; brought back memories of Game 1; Smart was the best of those 3.

The other two things that happened bad defensively late were forgetting to box out PJ Tucker, which cost them 3 points; plus the bad luck of that "shot" hitting the underneath of the rim.
 

Humphrey

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2010
3,212
The Sixers had no timeouts, so leaving 3-4 seconds wouldn't have been the biggest crime.
Exactly. The clock stops on a basket inside 2 minutes; but most likely the Sixers are at that point not set up to push the ball down the court quickly; as their priorities are defense and rebounding.
 

chilidawg

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 22, 2015
6,015
Cultural hub of the universe
Yes, to be clear, I think Joe has earned a lot of the heat. His entire mantra during regular season was to not call timeouts and let his guys learn on the job. That experience was supposed to carry into the playoffs to greater confidence and composure. The problem is that it hasn’t. They’re still making dumb decisions and it’s already cost them 2 games.

With all that said, Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown shouldn’t need constant reminders to make the right play. They’re not making good split decisions and I’m not really sure what can be done about that other than letting White/Smart handle the ball and trying to free one of them up for a catch and shoot.

My hope is that we get to look back and laugh at the handwringing after a tough championship run to #18. My fear is that these mental errors at some point prove to be fatal as the quality of opponents/coaching, if they advance, will only get tougher.
Smart was as much at fault on that last possession as Tatum. He dicked around for 8 seconds or so before even getting Tatum the ball.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,680
Hingham, MA
Smart was as much at fault on that last possession as Tatum. He dicked around for 8 seconds or so before even getting Tatum the ball.
I can't agree with this, it seemed strategic / intentional. Tatum didn't make his move to separate early enough. Everyone (CJM, JT, MS) was at fault here. But I blame Smart least. I timestamped it in the video. Tatum holds the ball for 3+ seconds after catching it (he catches it around 8.0 and starts moving around 4.8). That was the biggest problem.

View: https://youtu.be/BGroUnL-GCA?t=509
 

CoffeeNerdness

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 6, 2012
8,881
OK yeah I think we are on a similar, if not the same page. For me, the fact that Tatum and Brown need those reminders is incredibly frustrating (although I do think they will both improve in future seasons, because they've improved at basically everything else); but I know they need those, you know they need those, so I presume Joe needs they need those... So within that context I find Joe not calling the TOs to give them those reminders equally, if not more, frustrating.
Isn't almost everything a coach says in any given timeout just repetition and reinforcement of concepts and strategies that all the players should know inside and out? I don't think it's that the players need to be reminded so much as that's just what coaches do. (I agree that a TO should have been called. They need to be coached in the moment. The downside is so minimal.)
 

jezza1918

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
2,701
South Dartmouth, MA
Isn't almost everything a coach says in any given timeout just repetition and reinforcement of concepts and strategies that all the players should know inside and out? I don't think it's that the players need to be reminded so much as that's just what coaches do. (I agree that a TO should have been called. They need to be coached in the moment. The downside is so minimal.)
Yeah exactly. In a perfect world these players wouldn't need these constant reminders, but they do. In the heat of the moment your mind can completely f*ck with you, no matter how elite you are.
I get that it's a tad* different, but just from a coach/player perspective: the best tennis player I ever coached during my college coaching years had one brutal flaw I picked up midway through his freshman year - in tightly contested doubles matches he would go for broke on his first serve and try to win points that way (i dont need to get into why this is horrific strategy, but it is)...he was reminded non-stop to dial it back a bit, in both practice and in match situations. And while he definitely improved over the next 3.5 years, there were plenty of matches over that time period where I was on another court at a pivotal time and wasnt able to remind him, and guess why he got broken at 6-6 those days?

*a tad, or a metric f*ck ton. But I do think the underlying premise of what a coaches job is in the heat of the moment is similar enough that id drop the personal anecdote.