Divisional Round Weekend

CFB_Rules

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2016
1,636
How would that even work? The offense lines up and then the official stands over the ball until the defense figures out who to cover/not cover? How long does the defense get? Do they signal they're good when they have figured it out?
More specifically, I would treat it exactly like a substitution. Run up to the ball and hold the snap, make your announcement. Look to see if defense is substituting/scrambling. If yes, wait for match up. If no, release the snap.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
35,912
Deep inside Muppet Labs
More specifically, I would treat it exactly like a substitution. Run up to the ball and hold the snap, make your announcement. Look to see if defense is substituting/scrambling. If yes, wait for match up. If no, release the snap.
I thought the defense was only given the grace to sub if the offense was subbing players, that such hold wasn't expected or allowed if the offense didn't sub in players.
 

Trlicek's Whip

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 8, 2009
5,607
New York City
Thank you. I'll also ad the complete fatigue with all the Tay-tay nonsense.
This isn't the players or teams' fault, though. This is the NFL and the five or six networks they have separate money dollars deals with to air games, and the obvious priorities for "number goes up" ratings and income.

The "fiasco" with only airing the KC/Miami game on Peacock - a gambit to get Taylor Swift fans to sign up - is the tell.

They don't want or need sunk cost long time area football fans. They want certain demographics that aren't "just" these fans. They want younger dudes that toggle between Fanduel and their fantasy teams at the B-dub watching every game on every screen. The ones that are checked-out, bored and moneyed tourists in the stands and luxury boxes at the Super Bowl. The ones that host SB parties primarily to watch and rank the commercials and the halftime show. They want casual, crossover, non-football fans.

You even saw CBS trying to make fetch happen with the pre-game intro positioning Josh Allen and Patrick Mahomes as this generation's Brady/Manning. It was absurd. That might have been for the Area Fans.

But the oversaturation of Mahomes and Kelce and Taylor Swift was the primary narrative that CBS wrote going into the Bills/Chiefs game, which the telecast director followed like a Mad Lib, and it wasn't for football fans watching the game. It was for people that are far less invested in the laundry.
 

CFB_Rules

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2016
1,636
I thought the defense was only given the grace to sub if the offense was subbing players, that such hold wasn't expected or allowed if the offense didn't sub in players.
Yeah that's the current procedure I'm just saying what I would have changed instead of making the rule change that ineligibles have to be within the tackles or whatever they changed. I feel like the ineligible/eligible thing is more akin to a substitution anyways, since you don't know what position any of the players out there are until the Referee makes his announcement.
 

BigJimEd

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
4,455
It's a matter of recognizing the formation and determining who's eligible or not. Although that's not exactly obvious in the NFL.

The thing is you still need to account for that ineligible player. If the offense has numbers they can run a quick screen to that side and don't forget that "ineligible" player can catch a lateral.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,540
Hingham, MA
I am apoplectic all over again @dhellers and others who were saying there was an agreement in place. @DennyDoyle'sBoil ?

“Not a gentleman’s agreement,” Bowles said Monday. “They were in field-goal range, they had 12 seconds calculated after using that timeout to come back from it, then we would’ve been down 11 points, it’s kinda pointless. You kinda know when the game is over. The game was over.”

No, Todd. It was like a 47 yard field goal. Kickers can miss. And there were 36 seconds on the clock.
 
Last edited:

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,027
AZ
I am apoplectic all over again.

“Not a gentleman’s agreement,” Bowles said Monday. “They were in field-goal range, they had 12 seconds calculated after using that timeout to come back from it, then we would’ve been down 11 points, it’s kinda pointless. You kinda know when the game is over. The game was over.”

No, Todd. It was like a 47 yard field goal. Kickers can miss. And there were 36 seconds on the clock.
I think what he's referring to is what his calculation was at the start of the Lions' drive. Which is fucked up because it wouldn't have been 12 seconds. The Lions could have run the clock out. A kneel down takes 2-3 seconds. If you take the step backwards, it's 3 to 4 seconds. So, what the Lions should have done is:

1:33 first down, kneel. Bucs call time out.
1:30 second down, kneel. 2-3 seconds for the play, 40 seconds for the play clock.
:48 third down, kneel. 2-3 seconds for the play, 40 seconds for the play clock.
:05 fourth down. Roll out and throw the ball away.

So, I can see Bowles' point at the beginning of the series, and it's a completely rational decision to me not to call the time out after the first or even the second play. It's a useless act. I understand the "make 'em play it out" idea, but teams don't fuck up victory formation.

But if there was no agreement, once the Lions fucked up on third down, you absolutely have to call time out. To me, the Lions' fuck up is the far more significant one. If there was no agreement, that was as boneheaded as decision as you'll ever see. Just an absolute brain fart that could have cost the game.

It's also bad the Bowles did not capitalize. Best guess is that he was on the sideline taking off his gear and never imagined that the Lions would fuck up that bad. But that's not an excuse. The game is not over until it's over.
 
Last edited:

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,540
Hingham, MA
I think what he's referring to is what his calculation was at the start of the Lions' drive. Which is fucked up because it wouldn't have been 12 seconds. The Lions could have run the clock out. A kneel down takes 2-3 seconds. If you take the step backwards, it's 3 to 4 seconds. So, what the Lions should have done is:

1:33 first down, kneel. Bucs call time out.
1:30 second down, kneel. 2-3 seconds for the play, 40 seconds for the play clock.
:48 third down, kneel. 2-3 seconds for the play, 40 seconds for the play clock.
:05 fourth down. Roll out and throw the ball away.

So, I can see Bowles' point at the beginning of the series, and it's a completely rational decision to me not to call the time out after the first or even the second play. It's a useless act. I understand the "make 'em play it out" idea, but teams don't fuck up victory formation.

But if there was no agreement, once the Lions fucked up on third down, you absolutely have to call time out. To me, the Lions' fuck up is the far more significant one. If there was no agreement, that was as boneheaded as decision as you'll ever see. Just an absolute brain fart that could have cost the game.

It's also bad the Bowles did not capitalize. Best guess is that he was on the sideline taking off his gear and never imagined that the Lions would fuck up that bad. But that's not an excuse. The game is not over until it's over.
I completely agree. It was a MASSIVE fuckup by BOTH teams. Just completely inexcusable. A 15 year old playing Madden would have done better.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
35,912
Deep inside Muppet Labs
I completely agree. It was a MASSIVE fuckup by BOTH teams. Just completely inexcusable. A 15 year old playing Madden would have done better.
Yeah I think the Lions' mistake is worse. They gave TB the chance to force a crazy ending. I think Bowles wasn't paying a ton of attention at that point because he never expected them to screw up that badly.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,540
Hingham, MA
Yeah I think the Lions' mistake is worse. They gave TB the chance to force a crazy ending. I think Bowles wasn't paying a ton of attention at that point because he never expected them to screw up that badly.
I agree the Lions' mistake was worse, but for Bowles to not be paying attention... I mean, as soon as the Lions took their 2nd knee with time left on the play clock, I was starting to post about it on SoSH, text my dad and brother, and scream at the TV. Why wasn't HE paying attention?!
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,246
Imaginationland
Is it absurd?
Josh Allen isn't in the same conversation as Mahomes (or Brady, or Manning). He's definitely been the nail to Mahomes' hammer in the same way that Manning got flattened by Brady every year for the first 5 years of their rivalry, but left unsaid is that while he kept losing, Manning was a 6x pro bowler, 3x all-pro and 2x MVP before finally breaking through and beating Brady in 2006. He would've unequivocally been the best player in the league, were it not for him always losing to Brady and the Pats.

Josh Allen has always been slightly more promise than performance. 2 pro bowls and 0 all-pro appearances in 5 years as a full-time starter...Josh Allen is Philip Rivers, not Peyton Manning. Lamar Jackson (2 MVPs without much playoff success) is a helluva lot closer to Manning.
 

loshjott

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2004
15,005
Silver Spring, MD
Reading some Pats fans on SoSH high on 20 years of an all-universe, unicorn run of individual and team dominance go hoarse rooting for Miami, Buffalo, and the Ravens in three consecutive weeks is amazing to watch.

It's also a through the looking glass glimpse of how everyone else in American football thought of the Patriots, and Pats fans for the past two decades. I know we all know how fandom and fan projection works, but it's still wild to see it with such little self-awareness when the script is flipped.
I'm 100% self aware of my anti-Chiefs fandom.
 

ilol@u

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 2, 2009
4,248
Foxboro

Stay classy Bills fans.
I have a sick satisifaction of going on athletes social media pages after they have massive blunders and seeing what the world is saying about them.

To be fair to Bills fans - a majority of the messages were gamblers and people who had money on the game.
 

Awesome Fossum

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
3,910
Austin, TX
I think what he's referring to is what his calculation was at the start of the Lions' drive. Which is fucked up because it wouldn't have been 12 seconds. The Lions could have run the clock out. A kneel down takes 2-3 seconds. If you take the step backwards, it's 3 to 4 seconds. So, what the Lions should have done is:

1:33 first down, kneel. Bucs call time out.
1:30 second down, kneel. 2-3 seconds for the play, 40 seconds for the play clock.
:48 third down, kneel. 2-3 seconds for the play, 40 seconds for the play clock.
:05 fourth down. Roll out and throw the ball away.

So, I can see Bowles' point at the beginning of the series, and it's a completely rational decision to me not to call the time out after the first or even the second play. It's a useless act. I understand the "make 'em play it out" idea, but teams don't fuck up victory formation.

But if there was no agreement, once the Lions fucked up on third down, you absolutely have to call time out. To me, the Lions' fuck up is the far more significant one. If there was no agreement, that was as boneheaded as decision as you'll ever see. Just an absolute brain fart that could have cost the game.

It's also bad the Bowles did not capitalize. Best guess is that he was on the sideline taking off his gear and never imagined that the Lions would fuck up that bad. But that's not an excuse. The game is not over until it's over.
He unwittingly baited the Lions into complacency by not taking the timeout after first down. It would have been sort of brilliant, but he had obviously mentally checked out at that point. What I really can't believe is that there weren't any assistants, any players screaming at him about it. NO ONE was paying attentionI? That's why I assumed the stadium scoreboard must have been wrong. f I were a Bucs player I would have called the timeout myself.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,540
Hingham, MA
He unwittingly baited the Lions into complacency by not taking the timeout after first down. It would have been sort of brilliant, but he had obviously mentally checked out at that point. What I really can't believe is that there weren't any assistants, any players screaming at him about it. NO ONE was paying attentionI? That's why I assumed the stadium scoreboard must have been wrong. f I were a Bucs player I would have called the timeout myself.
Seriously.

Again, the Ravens did something very similar in 2014. They let the Pats kneel on 1st and 2nd down, then called timeout after 3rd. The difference was the Pats (shocker) correctly ran the play clock down every play. The Ravens still ended up with a hail mary opportunity, but if the Pats were as dumb as the Lions, they'd have had much more time.

The lesson, as always, is Bill Belichick is smarter than Dan Campbell, and John Harbaugh is smarter than Todd Bowles.

News at 11.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,027
AZ
He unwittingly baited the Lions into complacency by not taking the timeout after first down. It would have been sort of brilliant, but he had obviously mentally checked out at that point. What I really can't believe is that there weren't any assistants, any players screaming at him about it. NO ONE was paying attentionI? That's why I assumed the stadium scoreboard must have been wrong. f I were a Bucs player I would have called the timeout myself.
Yeah, my assumption in the game thread was that there had to have been a nod to just call it. We've seen that before. I can even remember once when the camera caught Belichick signaling the opposite coach.

By far the most common situation where that happens is when the timeouts are absolutely irrelevant. Like if there are 50 seconds left and a team has a time out, it won't call it to make the other team snap three times instead of twice. We've seen that a lot. The coaches start running across the field with 30 seconds left, even though they could call the last time out just to make the other team do a kneel down one more time.

With the news today that there was no nod or agreement, I'm pretty floored by how bad Campbell or Goff fucked that up. It makes me wish that Bowles had been on top of it because that would have been all time epic.
 

Awesome Fossum

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
3,910
Austin, TX
Frankly, even if there had been a nod, imo the Lions forfeited that understanding when they kneeled with so much time left on the play clock, because now you're putting the other coach in a situation where he looks clueless.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,540
Hingham, MA
Frankly, even if there had been a nod, imo the Lions forfeited that understanding when they kneeled with so much time left on the play clock, because now you're putting the other coach in a situation where he looks clueless.
In fairness, Todd Bowles always looks clueless.
 

Humphrey

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2010
3,211
Frankly, even if there had been a nod, imo the Lions forfeited that understanding when they kneeled with so much time left on the play clock, because now you're putting the other coach in a situation where he looks clueless.
Not only did the Lions fuck up, they fucked up TWICE. Second down, ran the play w/13 seconds left on the play clock. Third down, ran it w/6 seconds left. If Bowles used his time-out at that point, the FG attempt or whatever else the Lions decided to run would have come off between 25-30 seconds.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,540
Hingham, MA
Not only did the Lions fuck up, they fucked up TWICE. Second down, ran the play w/13 seconds left on the play clock. Third down, ran it w/6 seconds left. If Bowles used his time-out at that point, the FG attempt or whatever else the Lions decided to run would have come off between 25-30 seconds.
36. That's when they snapped it on 3rd down. 36 seconds.

If they missed the FG, the Lions would have had 30 seconds from their own ~37 yard line. That's already hail mary range. Or you could throw it once for 15-20 yards, spike it, and get a ~40-45 yard hail mary instead.
 

ilol@u

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 2, 2009
4,248
Foxboro
36. That's when they snapped it on 3rd down. 36 seconds.

If they missed the FG, the Lions would have had 30 seconds from their own ~37 yard line. That's already hail mary range. Or you could throw it once for 15-20 yards, spike it, and get a ~40-45 yard hail mary instead.
Agreed - there are chances for something even greater happening - like a fumble at the snap, penalty, blocked kick, return kick, etc. It's insane that Bowles/Tampa didn't even bother, it's the playoffs!

Baker has a cannon of an arm, so a Hail Mary/PI is defintely on the table at the 37 yard line.
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
2,511
Yeah, my assumption in the game thread was that there had to have been a nod to just call it. We've seen that before. I can even remember once when the camera caught Belichick signaling the opposite coach.

By far the most common situation where that happens is when the timeouts are absolutely irrelevant. Like if there are 50 seconds left and a team has a time out, it won't call it to make the other team snap three times instead of twice. We've seen that a lot. The coaches start running across the field with 30 seconds left, even though they could call the last time out just to make the other team do a kneel down one more time.

With the news today that there was no nod or agreement, I'm pretty floored by how bad Campbell or Goff fucked that up. It makes me wish that Bowles had been on top of it because that would have been all time epic.
That's on Goff. What a story flip it would have been. We thought Buffalo got quiet fast. Half of Deteoit would have been incapacitated.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,027
AZ
That's on Goff. What a story flip it would have been. We thought Buffalo got quiet fast. Half of Deteoit would have been incapacitated.
If Bowles calls it, I think Campbell has to kick. Badgley probably makes it -- he's been pretty good this year (not many attempts though) and it's a dome. So, the Detroit angst would probably have resolved quickly -- still, if he had missed, that would have been something.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,540
Hingham, MA
Agreed - there are chances for something even greater happening - like a fumble at the snap, penalty, blocked kick, return kick, etc. It's insane that Bowles/Tampa didn't even bother, it's the playoffs!

Baker has a cannon of an arm, so a Hail Mary/PI is defintely on the table at the 37 yard line.
This is exactly what I was saying last night - when everyone was piling on me for saying the game was over anyway.

Crazier shit has ABSOLUTELY happened in the playoffs.

Bowles conceded the game and it is IN-EX-CUS-A-BLE.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,767
What? He whined about it. The Pats didn't do anything wrong in that game except confuse his players. They had told the refs before the game and the refs handled that situation just fine. '34 IS INELIGIBLE, DO NOT COVER 34" over the stadium loudspeakers. And the Ravens covered him anyway.

And after that game he was so mad about the strategy he told the Colts the Pats were deflating balls. Harbaugh sucks.
Exactly. Belichick employed a scheme that had been run that same year by Detroit and a college team, all perfectly legal. Harbaugh’s douchiness came after Brady dunked on him in the post game press conference. That’s what led to deflategate.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,674
Oregon
Please, go on
Let's just say that we've all been there; that something has agitated us to the degree that we couldn't let it go. So, there's a bit of schadenfreude involved with keeping the one who's upset continuing to post. That's how I read it, at least. That, and others trying to get the conversation over with.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,540
Hingham, MA
Let's just say that we've all been there; that something has agitated us to the degree that we couldn't let it go. So, there's a bit of schadenfreude involved with keeping the one who's upset continuing to post. That's how I read it, at least. That, and others trying to get the conversation over with.
Fair, I agree, we have all been there. But this is a weird one to me. The coach conceded a playoff game down by a single score with the chance to get the ball back with 30 seconds left. That feels really, really, out there to me.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,674
Oregon
Fair, I agree, we have all been there. But this is a weird one to me. The coach conceded a playoff game down by a single score with the chance to get the ball back with 30 seconds left. That feels really, really, out there to me.
I tend to believe what was said earlier ... that neither he nor his staff realized how badly the Lions were screwing it up and it got away from them. He wasn't going to throw the Lions under the bus in his PC today; so he tried to explain it away.
People make mistakes at critical moments. Jackie Smith doesn't catch the ball. The side judge and back judge miss the PI call in the Saints game. It happens
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,540
Hingham, MA
I tend to believe what was said earlier ... that neither he nor his staff realized how badly the Lions were screwing it up and it got away from them. He wasn't going to throw the Lions under the bus in his PC today; so he tried to explain it away.
People make mistakes at critical moments. Jackie Smith doesn't catch the ball. The side judge and back judge miss the PI call in the Saints game. It happens
He doubled down today though. Which makes him look all the more dumb IMO.
 

Awesome Fossum

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
3,910
Austin, TX
Fair, I agree, we have all been there. But this is a weird one to me. The coach conceded a playoff game down by a single score with the chance to get the ball back with 30 seconds left. That feels really, really, out there to me.
I totally agree with you. This should be the lead story of the news cycle. I'd be apoplectic if my team's coach did this.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,674
Oregon

103mph Screwball

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 9, 2010
903
Upstate NY
I'm sorry for you because you're a good, knowledgeable fan. The problems with the Bills seem intractable.

Do you think there's a realistic chance Hardo gets shown the door?
IMO there's a less than 1% chance they fire him. The Pegulas seem very content with just "not sucking" with the Bills, and McDermott gives them that. He's a good coach, IMO, but they really should've canned him after 13 seconds. And once he got to stay after that, I'd be shocked if he gets let go this offseason. They need a fresh mind/voice in that locker room. I'd love an offensive minded coach, but I just don't see it happening.
 
Oct 12, 2023
720
Bowles not calling a time out there at the end is a fireable offense. It’s not beyond the realm of possibilities that a team could fumble in victory formation, and it wouldn’t be unthinkable for something crazy to happen if the Lions do some “snap the ball to the punter and have him run around to kill the clock” play. You simply cannot concede a one score game in that situation.

extremely unlikely that the Lions turn it over, but not impossible nor unheard of. Even if it’s a .0001% chance, you have to use your timeout. Just awful awful coaching.

In a 3 score game, go ahead and concede. But down 8 in a playoff game? I’d be livid if I were a Tampa fan.
 

janicks

New Member
Jul 18, 2005
14
Hardo should be fired for that little stunt. Running a fake punt deep in your own territory by handing the ball off to a former dead guy? It’s like he was plotting a Disney movie.

Hardo shows his ass and the Bills loose in excruciating, nut crushing fashion. It’s like Christmas all over again.

The Bills are $40 million over the cap for next year. They acted like they deserved to win when Brady left the division. No one has talked more and won less than the Bills and their fans.
Hard for me to understand someone who lived through 2003 and everything that led up to it taking delight in the suffering of another fan base.

A friend of mine was at the game and said there was a sound in the stadium after Bass missed the field goal that he had never heard at a sporting event before. It was something like a collective sigh groan after an entire stadium who knew the game was over but still secretly held out a small hope for a miracle watched the ball slice wide right. Nobody was even that upset. Mostly just numb. Bills fans aren't entitled; you clearly have never met one. We are whatever the word for that noise that day was. Sports are stupid and I hate that I care so much about something that doesn't matter. I'm rooting for Detroit's fans the rest of the way.