Draft Lottery Game Thread

SLC Sox

Well-Known Member
Silver Supporter
Jul 16, 2005
538
ifmanis5 said:
Cavs guy doucheing it up.
 
Dr. J should have punched him right in the face and laid him out.  That would have been worth them getting the #1 again.
 

wilked

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
4,112
Well that sucked.  Maybe the Sox will make me feel better...
 
 
...shit
 

PaulinMyrBch

Don't touch his dog food
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 10, 2003
8,316
MYRTLE BEACH!!!!
So worst team has won the lottery 3 times in 21 years ~ 14%, while holding 25% chance of picking first. 
 
The odds are its fixed.
 

bowiac

Caveat: I know nothing about what I speak
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2003
12,945
New York, NY
Between injuries, and coaches decisions-did not play, how many games do Kyrie, Embiid, and Bennett play next year?
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,658
FelixMantilla said:
Why are the players present? They each look like they are headed for the firing squad.
They kinda are.

The poor #1 pick may never get a touch with Kyrie and Waiters in the backcourt.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,702
Here
ESPN really should have put up the alternate graphics for trades. It got confusing a few times.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,658
Nick Kaufman said:
I think a trade for love becomes a no brainer now.
The problem is that our offer just got substantially worse than had we acquired a Top-3 pick.
 

riboflav

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2006
9,842
NOVA
Celts should keep tanking and hope Brooklyn sucks over the next several seasons. Love is not the answer.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,702
Here
HomeRunBaker said:
The problem is that our offer just got substantially worse than had we acquired a Top-3 pick.
I wouldn't have wanted to trade a top 3 I don't think.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,161
Grin&MartyBarret said:
For what it's worth, I don't know that Embiid is a lock at 1. Cleveland's had a hole at the 3 forever now.
Parker?
Nah.
They have no C, and they plan to troll the "Lebron could come back" train as long as possible.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,658
Bongorific said:
Will that dude from Zona fall to 6? He' could wind up being better than the other 3.
Gordon's range is a dunk. He shoots FT's at 44% and his jumper makes Michael Kidd-Gilchirst's look like Ray Allen's.

I'm officially in the "Holy shit Danny you better make this Kevin Love deal a reality as Step One."
 

BoSoxFink

Stripes
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
7,662
South Park
riboflav said:
Celts should keep tanking and hope Brooklyn sucks over the next several seasons. Love is not the answer.
I would also try to trade some of those assets to move into the top 3 this year if possible, although I'm sure it's highly unlikely
 

Tony C

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
13,736
shawnrbu said:
Simmons is the best.
 
I have to admit he loses me at times...and then he gets me back. Loved his Mallory Eden's wins the internet line, too -- didn't catch what he said to Sage after that.
 

Grin&MartyBarret

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 2, 2007
4,932
East Village, NYC
Cellar-Door said:
Parker?
Nah.
They have no C, and they plan to troll the "Lebron could come back" train as long as possible.
Parker or Wiggins. Wiggins can play the 2, also. Verajao, Thompson, LeBron, Wiggins, Kyrie with Waiters off the bench works in the East.
 

bowiac

Caveat: I know nothing about what I speak
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2003
12,945
New York, NY
Grin&MartyBarret said:
For what it's worth, I don't know that Embiid is a lock at 1. Cleveland's had a hole at the 3 forever now.
 
Especially funny that they passed on a health risk in Noel to take a lemon in Bennett. Now gonna reverse course?
 
I think it's a pretty even coinflip between Embiid and Wiggins. Nobody else in the running.
 

timelysarcasm

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2010
1,528
Los Angeles by way of Roxbury
Being in the lottery consecutive years should lower your chances of the #1 pick by an increasing percentage year after year. The league rewards prolonged incompetence and it's annoying.
 
Also, I'm bitter and I hate Cleveland.
 

Grin&MartyBarret

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 2, 2007
4,932
East Village, NYC
timelysarcasm said:
Being in the lottery consecutive years should lower your chances of the #1 pick by an increasing percentage year after year. The league rewards prolonged incompetence and it's annoying.
 
Also, I'm bitter and I hate Cleveland.
They did everything they could to win this year, short of not being a professional sports franchise from Cleveland. Hard to fault a team that traded for Deng and Hawes to push for the playoffs.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,161
Cleveland drafts Wiggins.
He gets arrested at the airport and deported.
Cleveland continues to get what it deserves.
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,982
I don't think the lottery is rigged at all (at least not this year). The NBA doesn't care about LeBron going back to Cleveland, they just love that he went to Miami and formed a super villain like team. 
 
What the problem is that a team should not be allowed to win the lottery, or even get a top 3 pick in back to back years. If you screw up your number one, you shouldn't just get a do-over, thanks to shit luck. It prevents teams from getting back in the top 3 thanks to fucking up their pick, and it prevents  a team that improved to the rate that the odds were nearly/impossible to win the lottery a second time, yet they win it anyways, from getting into the top 3.
 
The NBA has the only system it sports that is so obviously unfair to teams, they need something so new, and this potentially could be the tipping point.
 

BoSoxFink

Stripes
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
7,662
South Park
Serious question here, what is the big deal about just giving the worst team by record the first pick? I mean I honestly could care less if teams tank at the bottom to get the number 1 pick. They are doing so at their owners expense, in the end. I mean does it really make that big of a difference? I would say this method still doesn't prevent teams from tanking anyways.
 

Fred in Lynn

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 3, 2013
4,909
Not Lynn (or Ocean Side)
timelysarcasm said:
Being in the lottery consecutive years should lower your chances of the #1 pick by an increasing percentage year after year. The league rewards prolonged incompetence and it's annoying.
 
Also, I'm bitter and I hate Cleveland.
Weren't they already at a shade under 2% to get the first pick? Talk about good fortune.
 

timelysarcasm

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2010
1,528
Los Angeles by way of Roxbury
Grin&MartyBarret said:
They did everything they could to win this year, short of not being a professional sports franchise from Cleveland. Hard to fault a team that traded for Deng and Hawes to push for the playoffs.
 
Not going to argue on that one, but in general I still think there should be some kind of penalty for constantly being in the lottery.
 
I'm really not a fan of the ping pong ball system though, it's ridiculous to me that it's not like every other sport in terms of draft order. Cleveland should not have even had a chance at the #1, it's dumbassery.
 

bowiac

Caveat: I know nothing about what I speak
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2003
12,945
New York, NY
BoSoxFink said:
Serious question here, what is the big deal about just giving the worst team by record the first pick? I mean I honestly could care less if teams tank at the bottom to get the number 1 pick. They are doing so at their owners expense, in the end. I mean does it really make that big of a difference? I would say this method still doesn't prevent teams from tanking anyways.
I think it makes a big difference honestly. It's a bad feeling to root for your team to lose. Rooting for a rebuilding baseball team is much more fun that way.
 
The problem as you point out is that we haven't prevented tanking anyway.