Yes, they can look at it I believe.So that's a massive swing there. But is that something they could look at and put the points back on at halftime?
Yes, they can look at it I believe.So that's a massive swing there. But is that something they could look at and put the points back on at halftime?
For what? It was a slight tick after the shot clock.So that's a massive swing there. But is that something they could look at and put the points back on at halftime?
He threw it hard because he was far away. Also, any frustration in that throw was clearly with himself and not the ref. He knew he pushed off.I like that they are taking the open midrange when it’s there.
WHAT??? You’ve got to be kidding me.Wait, now it counted ??
Apparently the association disagreesFor what? It was a slight tick after the shot clock.
'In other words, you can eat my ass whole.'Hahahaha. Eat my whole ass, Philly.
Her strength is her enthusiasm and she was excellent on the sideline. But as the color person she just babbles on and on.Sad, because when she first started she was great
It’s an objective call. I trust they got it right.For what? It was a slight tick after the shot clock.
That’s a sarcastic Boston fan who’s “tired” of the Harden/Embiid flopping.Who's this sideline girl wearing a nightgown?
Yeah that was the worst defensive play of the half probably. Otherwise quite good.Collapsing on Tucker. Read a scouting report.
It's not even that she's being very pro-Philly. It's almost like she plans what she is going to say before the game and then just wedges it in regardless of what happens. As opposed to some actual insight in her first few seasons doing games.It‘s like AI instructed to announce a game by framing everything as contributing to a positive Philly narrative.
They literally review shot clock violations all the time. Including one in the Celtics favor in the last game.LOL what, good lord
NOW we can review shot clock violations, got it
Unless the refs told them (which they usually don't) there's no way for the crew to knowStill not quite sure what happened there. Bottom line for a broadcast crew ought to be to at least tell you what happened.
I just rewound it frame by frame. Couldn’t tell either way. I think you’ve got to stick with the call on the court.It’s an objective call. I trust they got it right.
A city surrounded by toxic waste dumps on all sidesSecaucus, shit city.
She definitely goes into a game with a few set points and players she wants to complement.It's not even that she's being very pro-Philly. It's almost like she plans what she is going to say before the game and then just wedges it in regardless of what happens. As opposed to some actual insight in her first few seasons doing games.
You can do that when you live at the FT line. Also see Lakers, Los AngelesOnly 14 buckets for the Sixers. 7-16 from three, but only 7-22 inside the arc,
And already -12. He’s been brutally bad.Harden on pace for the rare quadruple-double with 16 points, 10 rebounds, 10 assists, and 10 turnovers
Some baddd Celtics vs Heat/GSW level turnovers tooHarden on pace for the rare quadruple-double with 16 points, 10 rebounds, 10 assists, and 10 turnovers
That’s not reviewable. They can only review made shots with respect to the shot clock.I honestly thought he got it off in time. But where was that eye in the sky the time Brogdon threw a pass to the 76ers to seal a game?
The game does not require analysis on every fucking play.Her strength is her enthusiasm and she was excellent on the sideline. But as the color person she just babbles on and on.
I was referring to G1They literally review shot clock violations all the time. Including one in the Celtics favor in the last game.