Pretty incredible that Jon Gruden is going to be the only casualty of the WFT investigation. Good thing Dan Snyder doesn't have an email account.
But Gruden’s behavior was not limited to 2011. Gruden exchanged emails with Allen and other men that included photos of women wearing only bikini bottoms, including one photo of two Washington team cheerleaders.
It depends on what the meaning of is is.May have missed something, but I can’t tell from the article: are those photos of WFT cheerleaders consensual? If not, this goes to an entire new level of trouble for both him and Allen.
That’s right. Forgot about that lawsuit. Seems like sharing them would also be grounds for additional litigation if the photos were part of that. If they were separate photos, and not taken with their knowledge, even worse.It depends on what the meaning of is is.
IIRC, as part of the WFT cheerleader lawsuit, multiple cheerleaders stated they were asked to do things they weren’t comfortable with including posing nude or semi-nude during the calendar photo shoots. I have a hunch the shared photos are related to that. So no, they weren’t consensual.
I mean, I’m not ”bothered”. I just thought the whole “intent doesn’t matter” discussion was a BS digression that detracted from Gruden’s transgression. And, assuming the new reports are true, it’s pretty irrelevant.What's your point?
Every single person here agreed Grudens intent was malicious. They were "discussing" peripheral aspects on a "discussion" board.
Why does that bother you?
This goes WAY beyond “not being PC.” I have to imagine this would be firing for cause in pretty much any business anywhere.He’s scum he should be fired etc but I’m still far from convinced that he is. The Raiders owe him a ton of money and if his lawyers did their job pre hiring legal activities won’t be a basis for termination, the Raiders have had trouble finding good coaches, he’s doing a decent job with the team (not great but decent), and I’ll bet firing a guy for not being “PC” won’t go over well with the fan base. The next time I see the NFL do the right thing in one of these cases will be the first time so im not holding my breath.
Yup. As much as I believe Gruden deserves whatever he has coming, it pisses me off that Goodell is going to get what he wants - and that is revenge, certainly not racial justice.Also - it's sad, but is there any doubt these emails never see the light of day had Gruden not gone after Goodell?
So first I think it is beyond not being PC. Watch though-his departure is going to be a political/culture war football.This goes WAY beyond “not being PC.” I have to imagine this would be firing for cause in pretty much any business anywhere.
He called his boss a “faggot.” That’s a no no.So first I think it is beyond not being PC. Watch though-his departure is going to be a political/culture war football.
obviously I was wrong if he’s resigning.
Honestly I'm more likely to buy the theory that the particular email was leaked at the time it was to help Smith keep his job in the vote a few days later. He's been good for the league because he's bad at his job, they don't want someone more aggressive in that role.Yup. As much as I believe Gruden deserves whatever he has coming, it pisses me off that Goodell is going to get what he wants - and that is revenge, certainly not racial justice.
Might be worth accepting that, in this instance, Goodell is on the side of righteousness.Yup. As much as I believe Gruden deserves whatever he has coming, it pisses me off that Goodell is going to get what he wants - and that is revenge, certainly not racial justice.
Oh, I'm fine with the outcome. But let's not pretend Goodell is a righteous man, in this or any other matter.Might be worth accepting that, in this instance, Goodell is on the side of righteousness.
Good call.Interestingly the article points out that no one in the league will say WHAT vulgar comments Gruden used. I have a strong feeling he made liberal use of words for a bundle of sticks and negative oral pressure on a male chicken in reference to his perception of their masculinity or sexual orientation. I think he’s gone.
I don't think it detracts from Gruden's transgression to assert that he meant what he said and that's meaningfully different from someone who makes an innocent mistake. If anything, it puts a lantern on Gruden's action. I don't want to keep harping any further, I just want to defend myself against a "BS digression." You can PM me if you have a problem with that.I mean, I’m not ”bothered”. I just thought the whole “intent doesn’t matter” discussion was a BS digression that detracted from Gruden’s transgression. And, assuming the new reports are true, it’s pretty irrelevant.
I worded my post carefully and did not say that he was.Oh, I'm fine with the outcome. But let's not pretend Goodell is a righteous man, in this or any other matter.
Yes. Should have been fired immediately. Perhaps better to have him resign (does that matter in re money? .I'd like to save Mark some dough by not paying that fucker.)Wow. What a scumbag. Imagine how Carl Nassib must feel reading that homophobic crap coming from your head coach. Fuck Gruden and the rest of the NFL old school “boys club” fuckfaces.
Beyond needing to be dumped...there is the element of stupidity here. 10 years ago is not 100 years ago. What idiot doesn't know you don't say anything that could even be construed as problematic in an e mail...much less what they were doing? Fools.I don’t take any pleasure in seeing Gruden get sacked, but if he’s not fired tomorrow something is wrong. In addition to the remarks being obviously hateful and bigoted, he was emailing Bruce Allen’s WFT work account? Just beyond stupid.
Also, after the Gruden fallout, Davis can't possibly promote Cable. The Raiders needs someone with a clean rep and, uh, Cable is not it.Marinelli is in his 70s. Cable has a .386 nfl winning percentage and that’s better than what Bradley has.
yeah, maybe just promote the OC?
to be precise when he was at his old job at ESPN he called Goodell homophobic slurs. I’m not in the defending Jon Gruden business but that makes a hell of a lot of difference from both legal and public perception perspectivesHe called his boss a “faggot.” That’s a no no.
Dungy and Brees’ opinions on homosexuality are well known.NBC Sold out backing him last night during half time. Tirico talked about him as having been partners for a decade, no prejudice. Dungy said he's a good man. I think even Brees backed him.
They must not have been given the heads up before commiting.
THis is why you never comment until you know what is out there. You end up saying dumb shit like that to help a guy sell his 1 mistake 10 years ago, wasn't intentional narrative, only for it to come out that for basically a decade he's been absolute trash on main.NBC Sold out backing him last night during half time. Tirico talked about him as having been partners for a decade, no prejudice. Dungy said he's a good man. I think even Brees backed him.
They must not have been given the heads up before commiting.
I’m not sure they sold out, seems a lot of people who know him were saying today they never saw any inkling of racist or other abhorrent behavior from him. That’s valid, and a big reason why this shit is still going on-assholes who feel the way gruden clearly does are very good at hiding their true feelings.NBC Sold out backing him last night during half time. Tirico talked about him as having been partners for a decade, no prejudice. Dungy said he's a good man. I think even Brees backed him.
They must not have been given the heads up before commiting.
This isn’t quite the WWE doing a whole tribute show for Chris Benoit but similar vibes.NBC Sold out backing him last night during half time. Tirico talked about him as having been partners for a decade, no prejudice. Dungy said he's a good man. I think even Brees backed him.
They must not have been given the heads up before commiting.
true.....certainly in re Dungy.Dungy and Brees probably think even more highly of him now.