From the perspective of a quasi-neutral who would have like to see 90 minutes of 11 v. 11 between two top sides, the part that is galling is that VAR intervened on a very subjective call that the ref looked right at and it was overturned, but then they made a hash of the objective call.
The foul was borderline yellow/red, and while the ref could have stuck with his call after being summoned to the monitor, that never happens. He was all but overruled by video on a play he had judged a yellow, and which was not to me so obviously red as to be a no doubter. If he had simply missed the tackle, ok. VAR needs to step in. But he saw it, and saw it well enough to judge it a yellow. Maybe he didn’t get a good look. Dunno.
I think you maybe can live with one or the other, but not both. VAR subjective but miss the objective. It just makes VAR worse than if you didn’t have it.