It's silly that we're in a thread talking about something re: Jayson Tatum, and you have to pop in and say, "Well, what about Jaylen Brown!?" It's silly when we're in a thread talking about Jaylen Brown and someone says, "Well, what about Jayson Tatum!?" If one of them were traded, the same criticisms would exist. They are not interrelated, and it makes as much sense as a Warriors fan bitching about Klay during a cold streak and then another fan saying, "Where's this when Steph misses shots!?" Or repeat that scenario with Bam and Jimmy, or name your duo. It's stupid, it's pointless, and it's uninteresting.
I would not call myself a fanboy. I've said before that Jayson Tatum is the reason this team has not won the title. If he is your best player, it is harder to win than if you had Lebron or Steph or a truly legendary player. It's somewhat of an indictment of his game that he needs the best supporting cast in basketball to even compete for a championship.
That said, he is who we have, and he's the only player on this team who realistically could win an MVP. Jaylen, OTOH, is a really, really, really good complementary player, and he would be that if he played alongside Steph, or Lebron, or Jokic, or whoever. If he was the best player on a team, they would at best make the play-in.
If you replaced Jayson Tatum on this team with a guy who is 80% as good as Jayson Tatum, they would be like a five seed and not a championship contender. If you replaced Jaylen with a guy who is 80% as good Jaylen Brown (OG? Miikael Bridges?), they would lose a few more games, but still be in the mix for a 'chip. Disagree with that if you want, but that's my point of view.
So it is internally consistent for me to talk about Jayson Tatum in terms that wonder if he's doing the right thing by trying to expand his game - because he more than anyone is the player who will determine the fate of this team - and criticize Jaylen Brown in moments when he overestimates his game. The upside of Jayson threatening opponents with an unassisted jumper =/= the upside of Jaylen dribbling off his foot in traffic. Jayson, by nature of being the best player on the team,
has to do too much while Jaylen, as a second scorer, has to play within his game. These are entirely different expectations. Why would we talk about them the same?
So my argument isn't "bullshit" and doesn't have a bunch of "crazy qualifiers," it's actually pretty rooted in logic. As
@RorschachsMask points out (and I've said NUMEROUS TIMES in this thread), I don't see the point in caring about a handful of possessions in the regular season, particularly when the floor for this (healthy) team is ECF. Sorry. You can be a truffle pig for hypocrisy as much as you want, but I'm def tired of the Jaylen vs. Jayson posts because they don't add anything interesting to the convo save for a few posters losing tempers over comments about a player who they've never met.