Kristaps Porzingis to Celtics!!!!!

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
19,708
Somewhere
I wonder if Brad inquired about Delon Wright in this deal. He would have been a nice guy to add at the backend of the guard rotation. I'm guessing the salaries would have been too difficult to match.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
6,262
See, here's what you don't understand: Trades and other player acquisitions can be judged immediately. There's no need to wait to see how things play out.
You like this trade and seem fairly certain the Celtics "won" the deal.

I am not as sure though I agree they needed to reallocate resources. I can accept that you are right and I am wrong however that's not settled yet.
I think it was a good deal. I think it helps the team.

Obviously there's the possibility it fails. I am also capable of accepting the possibility that I'm wrong. I am often wrong. This feels like a silly digression.

There's been talk of how Smart covered up for other people's mistakes and orchestrated the D. I guess I just didn't see that last year. I saw a team that defended really well when it had a healthy rim protecting presence and was mediocre defensively when it didn't.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,285
I wonder if Brad inquired about Delon Wright in this deal. He would have been a nice guy to add at the backend of the guard rotation. I'm guessing the salaries would have been too difficult to match.
money was basically impossible. However.... keep an eye on him or Monte Morris in a Grant S&T situation, if someone is giving him 15-16M a year or more then it's basically a perfect salary fit for one of those guys (Grant is a BYC guy so only half his salary counts).
 

bosockboy

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
20,225
St. Louis, MO
money was basically impossible. However.... keep an eye on him or Monte Morris in a Grant S&T situation, if someone is giving him 15-16M a year or more then it's basically a perfect salary fit for one of those guys (Grant is a BYC guy so only half his salary counts).
Would we just need a wing then? Or would we be better off keeping Grant?
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,285
Would we just need a wing then? Or would we be better off keeping Grant?
I see no situation where Grant is on this team honestly. I think if they add a wing (might not) it'll be a cheap vet or with the #25 pick.
On the other hand, I actually really think that we're going to make at least 1 more trade.
 

Imbricus

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 26, 2017
4,902
Some reactions from the Wizards' thread on Reddit:

This one came up a few times:
How tf did Boston get 2 firsts and KP for Smart
Seriously, I’m shocked we couldn’t even scratch a first out of either team for a borderline elite center on a career year.
I want to scoop my eyes out of my head
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,614
Santa Monica
If Brad could figure out how to add Kyle Andersen & Delon Wright while using Brogdon's salary that would complete the offseason in my book
 

sezwho

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
2,043
Isle of Plum
I wonder how much, if any, of this is removing Marcus’s voice from the locker room and the bench in order to make this fully Tatum’s team. Conversely, I can see Memphis loving the idea of bringing Smart’s voice into their locker room.
Not much if I follow the timeline and the preference was to move Brogdon before pivoting to a Smart deal? These are some pretty pragmatic dudes, and my sense was it was about return not addition by subtraction.

I see no situation where Grant is on this team honestly. I think if they add a wing (might not) it'll be a cheap vet or with the #25 pick.
On the other hand, I actually really think that we're going to make at least 1 more trade.
Really none? He kills from 3, plays solid D against beefy bigs, and if they can get him at a reasonable deal they might just to hold a 12-15mm salary slot alive in advance of the coming CBA trade limitations (Cs will be spending $ for forseeable future).

Edit: a question for those that watched more non-Cs (aka Nuggets and or Wiz)...is there any reason to think the KP move is part of countering Jokic, or is that a non-factor? They must expect to meet him next year for the trophy.
 

bosockboy

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
20,225
St. Louis, MO
I see no situation where Grant is on this team honestly. I think if they add a wing (might not) it'll be a cheap vet or with the #25 pick.
On the other hand, I actually really think that we're going to make at least 1 more trade.
He’s a pretty key piece dealing with Giannis and Embiid. I’m not sure.
 

Return of the Dewey

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 17, 2001
3,143
Pants Party
This trade reminds me of a couple of Red's trades in early and mid '80s.
1. After debacle of playoff exit in 1983, they trade Rick Robey and draft picks for DJ because the team lacked a bigger guard who could defend.
2. After losing in 1985 championship because of lack of depth , they trade the 1984 Finals MVP, Maxwell, for backup center Bill Walton, and a bunch of draft picks for backup guard, Sichting.

They could have very easily ran it back in 1984 and 1986 with essentially the same teams as 1983 and 1985 respectively...they were good enough to compete for championship. But, sometimes you need to address weaknesses to win, and not just compete, for championship. This current trade may not work, but I understand the logic behind it as I think that it makes them a better team, even though I'm sad to see Marcus go.

Side Note: In 1984, the Celtics also traded fan-favorite Gerald Henderson to Seattle for its 1986 1st round pick, which ended up being Len Bias. What a f'n run of trades and drafts by Red from 1978 (drafting of Bird early)-1987 (drafting of Reggie Lewis at #22). I don't think that it will ever be matched or could be matched with today's rules.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,828
The problem with keeping Grant isn't about the player, it's about the roster and the cap.

1. He's basically a big and they have three better, and fairly expensive, bigs already (plus option to play tatum at 4)
2. Unless the market surprises us, he's going to be paid like a starter or sixth man, e.g. $13-$17 mil a year. Celtics just don't have space for that Apron-wise and tax-wise it's a massive incremental amount to keep him
3. Skill-wise he is a nice fit, and adding another big who can space means he is less unique than he was yesterday
4. The biggest roster needs are a wing defender (he's passable there, but not elite) and a distributor (not his thing) so up agains the above, hard to see the fit

I think post-trade them simply letting him go for a big offer sheet with no return is not impossible. Not likely, not my prdiction, but conceivable which it was not (to me) yesterday
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,773
I have a feeling in about 11 months, people on here are going to be really, really upset with Porzingis. I hope I'm wrong, but man, expectations seem real high.
Well I’m upset with the whole existing team already so…
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,285
Not much if I follow the timeline and the preference was to move Brogdon before pivoting to a Smart deal? These are some pretty pragmatic dudes, and my sense was it was about return not addition by subtraction.



Really none? He kills from 3, plays solid D against beefy bigs, and if they can get him at a reasonable deal they might just to hold a 12-15mm salary slot alive in advance of the coming CBA trade limitations (Cs will be spending $ for forseeable future).

Edit: a question for those that watched more non-Cs (aka Nuggets and or Wiz)...is there any reason to think the KP move is part of countering Jokic, or is that a non-factor? They must expect to meet him next year for the trophy.
He’s a pretty key piece dealing with Giannis and Embiid. I’m not sure.
I think he's a great piece, but unless they are cutting money somewhere else I just don't see them committing what he'll get. I think 16M is his floor based on what we've seen on extensions. Someone is going 16-18M, and if that's the price I'd rather give Porzingis an extension in the mid 20s.

I think they will be looking to get a budget version of Grant either in the draft or trade markets.
 

koufax32

He'll cry if he wants to...
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2006
9,142
Duval
The East comes down to this following:

1. How well can you defend Giannis?
2. How well do you match up against MIA?
3. How well can you defend Embid?

What’s the best way going forward to do these three things? Can KP help with 1 & 3 specifically? If so, what else can be done to address #2? I fee like moving GW hurts #1.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,285
The East comes down to this following:

1. How well can you defend Giannis?
2. How well do you match up against MIA?
3. How well can you defend Embid?

What’s the best way going forward to do these three things? Can KP help with 1 & 3 specifically? If so, what else can be done to address #2? I fee like moving GW hurts #1.
I think to the Celtics they would say the East comes down to.... can you stop the Celtics. And Porzingis makes that a lot harder. Beyond his defense, and his ability to stretch teams out, he adds a PnR element, and another versatile scorer to an offense that at times bogged down.

Boston shouldn't be worrying about how they match up with another team, they are the best team in the conference on paper and they should be building the best juggernaut they can and let everyone else try to match up with them.
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
2,589
Grant undoubtedly helps this team. He gives them tools to match up with different teams. He probably helps more on a team without Smart. It's the cost that's prohibitive. I don't see how they make it happen unless his market is barren. One consequence of the new CBA could be to squeeze non-elite guys on their second contracts.
 

Bunt4aTriple

Member (member)
Silver Supporter
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
4,434
North Yarmouth, ME
View: https://youtu.be/R7Vr6MmoBQE


I knew about his rim protection and ability to score, but I'm somewhat surprised by his passing touch on some of these highlights.
I do love how he goes full Bill Russell with most of the blocks in this video. Not just rejecting into the seats, but either redirecting to a teammate or swallowing the ball up mid air and coming down with it. Pair him with Rob and it's gonna be tough inside!
 

Mooch

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
4,629
I think to the Celtics they would say the East comes down to.... can you stop the Celtics. And Porzingis makes that a lot harder. Beyond his defense, and his ability to stretch teams out, he adds a PnR element, and another versatile scorer to an offense that at times bogged down.

Boston shouldn't be worrying about how they match up with another team, they are the best team in the conference on paper and they should be building the best juggernaut they can and let everyone else try to match up with them.
Plus, the three teams listed above have their own issues. The Harden situation in Philly, Milwaukee possibly losing Lopez and/or Middleton and Miami with another year of tread off of Butler’s tires and Vincent/Strus possibly leaving.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,762
I’m shocked we traded Smart. I want to dislike this trade because I am a huge Smart fan. But I can’t. It’s another very good basketball and roster management move by Brad Stevens. It would be a reasonable move without the picks even. Porzingis is a little younger, more talented, and has a much higher peak performance level. He’s higher variance, but that is mostly a question of is he as good as Smart or meaningfully better. He’s not the healthiest player, but Smart isn’t either, although I trust Smart to be on the court in the playoffs and I’m not sure how true that is for Porzingis. Porzingis also fills a greater need. White and Smart were always fairly similar overall players, so some of Smart’s loss can be filled by increasing White’s minutes. Porzingis lets us play 2 bigs consistently. He gives us another rim protector. He gives us a genuine post threat to add that dimension to the offense. He gives us a big that can set screens in the playoffs to create huntable mismatches for both himself and Tatum/Brown. He’s a guy who can play a high usage role in the offense that should take pressure off of Jaylen when Tatum isn’t on the court. And I think there’s reason to hope Porzingis can become better in Boston, or at least consistently play at a higher level, than he has on the flawed teams he has previously played for. I don’t agree with those who think Smart is in decline and I think his next several seasons will prove them wrong, but I also think we’ve seen his ceiling. Add in 2 firsts and this is a great trade based on any sort of rational analysis. I’m not really ready to go there yet because I’m still a bit stuck in the denial phase of it all, but I know that’s what we should be thinking. Stevens keeps making great and unexpected roster moves and is rapidly making it clear he’s one of the best GMs in the league.
Yes, the fact that the Celtics have the team they have, along with 8 1sts in the next 7 years, is a huge credit to Stevens. He's been shockingly good at getting value for players and low 1sts.
 

Toe Nash

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2005
5,675
02130
I posted just yesterday that I would shocked if Smart was dealt largely because of his "voice" and intangibles. Obviously I was wrong on that. But I think part of this is definitely a way to "shake things up" besides being a talent and fit upgrade on paper.

I look forward to the next moves.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,404
Yes, the fact that the Celtics have the team they have, along with 8 1sts in the next 7 years, is a huge credit to Stevens. He's been shockingly good at getting value for players and low 1sts.
Keeping my dream of Brogdon and all the pickz deal for OG barely alive…
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
49,200
I wonder how much, if any, of this is removing Marcus’s voice from the locker room and the bench in order to make this fully Tatum’s team. Conversely, I can see Memphis loving the idea of bringing Smart’s voice into their locker room.
Maybe they were planning all along on moving Smart this off-season but this transaction initially had Brogdon outgoing based on the reporting.

I think Smart's inclusion wasn't necessarily planned before the Clippers angle fell apart so this feels more like Stevens deciding they needed this deal versus getting Smart gone.
 

soxin6

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
7,034
Huntington Beach, CA
Grant undoubtedly helps this team. He gives them tools to match up with different teams. He probably helps more on a team without Smart. It's the cost that's prohibitive. I don't see how they make it happen unless his market is barren. One consequence of the new CBA could be to squeeze non-elite guys on their second contracts.
That squeeze is definitely going to happen. The stars are going to get paid huge amounts of money under the new CBA and role players are going to get less of the pie. Many here want to give supermax contracts to Brown and Tatum and that creates issues for how you build the rest of the team. I think you will see teams having to make many changes each year and only a few players will stay on teams for an extended period.
 

soxin6

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
7,034
Huntington Beach, CA
Maybe they were planning all along on moving Smart this off-season but this transaction initially had Brogdon outgoing based on the reporting.

I think Smart's inclusion wasn't necessarily planned before the Clippers angle fell apart so this feels more like Stevens deciding they needed this deal versus getting Smart gone.
This certainly seems to be the case based on the information that we have. For all we know, the Clippers were dragging their feet, Memphis heard about it, and Memphis put out an offer of more but they wanted Smart. In either case, this was about getting KP, not getting rid of Smart. There are those, including me, that felt like he needed to go if Brown and Tatum are ever going to become the leaders of the team, but I doubt Brad was thinking about any of that when he made the trade and he likely doesn't even agree with the sentiment.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,738
It’s not a given that it is two late firsts, a significant injury to Thompson or Curry, potentially combined with Green opting out could make the Warriors pick a late lottery pick.
That’s the hope, but the flipside is that the ‘24 draft pool is pretty sucky and it would be a miracle if Boston gets a rotation guy out of it with their picks if they’re both in the 20+ range. And the West is bad enough at the moment that the Warriors could win 50 games out there.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,738
Sure, but I never saw his value in stopping quick guards, it was murdering everyone else 2-5.
That’s a real hole on the roster now. White struggles defending larger players, he’s great at defending 1s, but guys like Butler looked at him like the hole. I’m thrilled that Morant’s lunacy netted Boston two late firsts for Marcus (and the salary space to add KP). But they do need to find a jack of all trades guy to replace Marcus. Those guys are invaluable. I wonder if Bruce Brown would consider signing with Boston now that Marcus is out?
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
6,262
That’s a real hole on the roster now. White struggles defending larger players, he’s great at defending 1s, but guys like Butler looked at him like the hole. I’m thrilled that Morant’s lunacy netted Boston two late firsts for Marcus (and the salary space to add KP). But they do need to find a jack of all trades guy to replace Marcus. Those guys are invaluable. I wonder if Bruce Brown would consider signing with Boston now that Marcus is out?
Hoping for him. He'd be a great add and would replace most of Smart's defense, I think.
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
2,589
That squeeze is definitely going to happen. The stars are going to get paid huge amounts of money under the new CBA and role players are going to get less of the pie. Many here want to give supermax contracts to Brown and Tatum and that creates issues for how you build the rest of the team. I think you will see teams having to make many changes each year and only a few players will stay on teams for an extended period.
That would really be unfortunate, and it'd be interesting to be a fly on the wall during the players' association discussions on this issue. Maybe the salary floor helps because teams have to pay someone and not every team will have two elite level guys?
 

Imbricus

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 26, 2017
4,902
I spent some time reading the RealGM fans' forum for the Wizards, and checking out their reaction to the trade. Mostly they ranged between "we got screwed" and "oh well, what could we have done."

Some good comments on Porzingis re: character/work ethics:
Porziņģis has been well-liked by teammates, coaches and team officials ever since the Wizards traded for him in February 2022. He’s had a positive influence on his young teammates, most notably forward Deni Avdija. ... One of my favorite Wizards ever. Extremely easy to root for. Always played hard, was unselfish, funny guy in all the behind the scenes videos. Was never a big ego guy in any of his interviews. Great player.
A lot of disbelief that they gave up Porzingis and didn't get either of those 2 Memphis first-rounders that went to Boston:
No **** way Memphis trades 2 firsts and both go to Boston. Washington what the **** are you doing? ... The Celtics got two 1st round picks for exchanging Marcus Smart for Porzingis????? That has to be wrong. ... Yeah maybe it’s a mistake by Woj. Wizards should be getting those picks. ... If this is the deal, then Winger is a goof, or he's working on his next job with the Celtics because this is RIDICULOUS. ... This makes no sense. How come we aren’t getting those Memphis 1sts? This is some of the worst GM work ever. ... What pisses me off most is the fact Celtics managed to get TWO FIRSTS and Porzingis out of this. That's a damn steal. ... We can’t get one single 1st round pick from Porzingis/Beal/Kuzma, and the Celtics just got two from flipping Smart for Porzingis.
There was also a sense that Memphis got screwed too:
Am I the only one who things this deal is just beyond stupid, for the grizz. Like meh it's what ever for us. Tyus Jones is a decent player. 35 is nice. Gallo and jones can probably be something later. I think we all need to realize that KP was probably gonna opt out and said get me to Boston or I walk. Look at the end of the day this wasn't a horrible awful trade for us. ... How do the Celtics move up 10 spots. Get KP for smart muscala and gallo and we get Jones and 25 and they get a first next year and why on earth is Memphis trading 2 firsts for a smart Jones swap ... Memphis sent out Jones & 2 R1 picks for Marcus Smart? Wow. Those are some smart guys in the Memphis FO, but that strikes me as a lot. Obviously, the Ja disaster was in play here.
Then they think their GM got outsmarted:
Stevens schooled Winger big time here ... Boston really really wanted KP, and THEY get the 25th pick and another 1st rounder next-year for a player the same age as Beal? WOW, now that is some A+ GM work.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,738
Denver can offer him more than Boston can, right?
Yes, they can offer him a raise over the MLE, but given that the Nuggets are loading up on picks to add roleplayers (in this draft no less) there’s no guarantee that they’re willing to do that. If Boston already has an idea of who wants to sign Grant, and can work out a deal in that regard, then it’s possible to go higher (the mechanics would be ugly for sure). Ime and Houston seem to be in that market (they’ve been linked to PJ Washington), so Ime might look favorably at having back one of his guys. Something along the lines of a Williams sign & trade for Eason and a separate deal of Brogdon into cap space for a pick allows a pivot to Denver for a Brown sign & trade. And the Nuggets sure do seem to be stocking up on draft picks now.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,738
I spent some time reading the RealGM fans' forum for the Wizards, and checking out their reaction to the trade. Mostly they ranged between "we got screwed" and "oh well, what could we have done."

Then they think their GM got outsmarted:
Yeah, they weren’t dealing with the reality that KP was a free agent in a poor free agent market when teams had money to spend. Getting #35 for a guy that they were losing anyway was about as good as they were going to get.
 

patinorange

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 27, 2006
31,309
6 miles from Angel Stadium
This trade reminds me of a couple of Red's trades in early and mid '80s.
1. After debacle of playoff exit in 1983, they trade Rick Robey and draft picks for DJ because the team lacked a bigger guard who could defend.
2. After losing in 1985 championship because of lack of depth , they trade the 1984 Finals MVP, Maxwell, for backup center Bill Walton, and a bunch of draft picks for backup guard, Sichting.

They could have very easily ran it back in 1984 and 1986 with essentially the same teams as 1983 and 1985 respectively...they were good enough to compete for championship. But, sometimes you need to address weaknesses to win, and not just compete, for championship. This current trade may not work, but I understand the logic behind it as I think that it makes them a better team, even though I'm sad to see Marcus go.

Side Note: In 1984, the Celtics also traded fan-favorite Gerald Henderson to Seattle for its 1986 1st round pick, which ended up being Len Bias. What a f'n run of trades and drafts by Red from 1978 (drafting of Bird early)-1987 (drafting of Reggie Lewis at #22). I don't think that it will ever be matched or could be matched with today's rules.
I like this. We have watched two years where they came close. But not good enough. All kinds of risks in this deal and losing Macus hurts. But something needed to be done. I applaud Brad for being bold.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
10,138
This part of it sucks. He's going to a good situation though. I'm sure he'll come around.
he will 100% come around and I am sure he will love Memphis (and Memphis will love him)….but I can’t blame him for being shell shocked. I thought he was Brad’s guy and I never thought Brad would trade him
 

DeadlySplitter

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 20, 2015
33,891
Important note in that article, Brad did not "panic" with an hour to go like some people want to believe:

A league source said the framework for a secondary plan that would send Smart to the Grizzlies in a three-team deal had been formulated earlier in the day as a backup. Celtics president of basketball operations Brad Stevens then chose to act on it.
 

Royal Reader

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 21, 2005
2,301
UK
I feel like WSH did OK. They had a guy who could walk, and got a decent player who they can probably flip at the deadline for a mid first if they want.

It's the Memphis part I don't get. They trade Tyus for Smart which still leaves them a guard light, with Marcus the presumptive lead ball handler while Morant is suspended, and they give up effectively one and a half firsts to do it. They get older and more expensive, and I don't see how this significantly raises their ceiling.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
49,200
That allays a lot of fear.
It doesn't for me. It feels like the Clips giving Stevens cover if he is trying to deal Brogdon elsewhere.

Malcolm didn't suddenly get better after midnight last night but he definitely needs a better narrative health-wise.
 

Garshaparra

New Member
Feb 27, 2008
547
McCarver's Mushy Mouth
It's definitely a tough one to swallow. Smart was the ultimate team guy from day 1.

- He entered the league at the dawn of the Warriors' rise to prominence, the prototype to take on any 3-and-D guys AND take charges.
- He spent 9 years on the same team, virtually all of that in the top 9 rotation, 5 years as a starter. Who's the only other player still with his original team since the 2014 draft? Embiid, and he's basically red-shirted 1/3 of his career through The Process.
- He got a big extension with Bird rights, but not so big that his money would prevent one or both Jays from re-signing down the road. 19M per year? That's 20-25% less than he could have earned as a free agent.
- His hustle went viral. Do we really think Grant Williams or Derrick White would have had the success they did as defenders without his efforts?

I'm excited for The Unicorn, but definitely worried about losing the heart of the Celtics.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
25,274
Unreal America
I’ve always loved how deeply Marcus bled green. His game, needless to say, could absolutely infuriate me at times.

I see a lot of “heart and soul” comments, but I really don’t think that’s been the Cs problem. Rather, I think they need more “brains”. I’m not the diehard many of you are, but to me there were stretches in games last
season where the team played unfathomably stupid.

I’m certainly not suggesting that Marcus was the sole culprit, not at all. But I do think they need to play a helluva lot smarter, so perhaps opening more minutes for White (or another guard) will help in that regard.

Anyway, I’m happy they’re not just running it back. I don’t think that was gonna work.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,938
Here
People definitely seem to be valuing Porzingis at his peak because of his counting stats and assuming health isn't an issue. And people also seem to be discounting Smart but that's always been the case.

I don't know who "wins" the trade because nobody does but I wonder how this team defends going forward. Smart did a lot of the on the court orchestrating of the D and could cover up for just about anyone in a pinch. That's gone and there's nobody obvious on the roster who can do that sort of stuff.

The rosy takes could be accurate but the downside ones where this team struggles to get stops, especially if the rim protection is on the shelf, should be weighed as well.
I gotta be honest, it feels like the rosy outlook in this post is being bestowed upon Marcus Smart. The Marcus Smart you’re describing was not part of the Celtics last year. There was a very significant dropoff in his defensive energy and consistency in 2022-23, so much so I’d say he was the 4th or 5th best defender on the team, and the second best guard. The man has taken a lot of punishment and it appears to me the motor cannot run like it used to.
It doesn't for me. It feels like the Clips giving Stevens cover if he is trying to deal Brogdon elsewhere.

Malcolm didn't suddenly get better after midnight last night but he definitely needs a better narrative health-wise.
The Clippers are leaking info to Adam Himmelsbach to do a solid for the Celtics after leaking the opposite to Woj last night?