Microballing: Steve Ballmer's LA Clippers

wutang112878

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2007
6,066
The Social Chair said:
 
I couldn't disagree with this more. There are only 30 teams in the NBA, and the way the league salary system is set up makes it almost impossible for players to play where they want and get paid their full value. It's the NBA owners who let this creep stay in the league for 30 years, and we expect the workers to sacrifice a significant share of their life earnings because the NBA, as entity, did nothing to get this guy out of the league? The only people you seem to be asking to make a sacrifice are the black workers.
 
I specifically noted that for Paul to sign elsewhere he had to give up significant dollars, so him I can understand.  Doc got the same money there that he would have got here, he gained a better team, but he had an option here or the option of trying to go to a team that wasnt the Clippers as well.  Doc wasnt sacrificing money and thats a significant difference.
 

The Social Chair

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 17, 2010
6,143
BoredViewer said:
 
People other than black guys play (edit --> and work) in the NBA and even for the Clippers.  There's also a rumor that some non-black players aren't automatically cool with racism.
 
Fascinating point. Thank you. But it was in reference to the other poster mentioning Chris Paul.
 

BoredViewer

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
3,092
The Social Chair said:
 
Fascinating point. Thank you. But it was in reference to the other poster mentioning Chris Paul.
 
I took his point to be about greed being an underlying factor in all of this... with Doc and Paul being the biggest, most obvious, and most recent examples (who happen to be black).  I wouldn't have taken his opinion to be any different if the highest profile players/coach happened to be another race - which I thought was the point you were making.
 
* Something like "If the white owners aren't going to be outraged first and put something on the line, why should the black players/coaches?!?!"
 

Merkle's Boner

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2011
3,863
I realize he's a billionaire and all, but $5 million sounds like a huge fine. Has there ever been a bigger fine handed down to an individual?
 

scottyno

late Bloomer
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2008
11,393
Merkle's Boner said:
I realize he's a billionaire and all, but $5 million sounds like a huge fine. Has there ever been a bigger fine handed down to an individual?
500k is the largest fine ever in the nba for an individual unless you count fines from loss of time due to suspension
 

scottyno

late Bloomer
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2008
11,393
jose melendez said:
 
Which means what?
can't go to games practices anything team related, be involved in personnel decisions, or go to board of governors meetings
 

jose melendez

Earl of Acie
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 23, 2003
31,303
Geneva, Switzerland
scottyno said:
can't go to games practices anything team related, be involved in personnel decisions, or go to board of governors meetings
 
So who does make those decisions on behalf of the Clippers?  How does the NBA determine he's not involved with decisions etc?  
 
And he still gets to keep all of the profits right?
 

mabrowndog

Ask me about total zone...or paint
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 23, 2003
39,676
Falmouth, MA
scottyno said:
can't go to games practices anything team related, be involved in personnel decisions, or go to board of governors meetings
 
He's also banned from anything NBA-related, meaning he'll never be allowed to enter any NBA arena or facility.
 

TheRealness

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 8, 2006
11,717
The Dirty Shire
mabrowndog said:
 
He's also banned from anything NBA-related, meaning he'll never be allowed to enter any NBA arena or facility.
 
And Silver has "urged" the Board of Governors to vote to force him to sell the team. When asked about how much support he has, he indicated he spoke with "several" owners and has their full support. 
 
This is just getting started. 
 

jose melendez

Earl of Acie
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 23, 2003
31,303
Geneva, Switzerland
I assume the notion is to make it so unpleasent and humiliating he'll sell.
 
I'm still curious about how Doc, Blake, Paul etc will feel about the benefits of their work going into this guy's pocket.
 

DukeSox

absence hasn't made the heart grow fonder
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2005
11,764
What legal entity forces him to pay that fine? Especially since he's "banned" anyway?
 

NatetheGreat

New Member
Aug 27, 2007
619
DukeSox said:
What legal entity forces him to pay that fine? Especially since he's "banned" anyway?
 
Presumably there's something in NBA bylaws saying that if you want to own an NBA team you have to abide by NBA rules, including fines. I'm sure he can fight them, but it may well give them stronger standing to simply strip him of the team outright.
 

mabrowndog

Ask me about total zone...or paint
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 23, 2003
39,676
Falmouth, MA
jose melendez said:
 
So who does make those decisions on behalf of the Clippers?  How does the NBA determine he's not involved with decisions etc?  
 
And he still gets to keep all of the profits right?
 
I believe the league will place the operational aspects of the team into a trust, meaning the NBA can not only dictate who is involved in the front office of the franchise, but can appoint league representatives to those positions on an observational, advisory or executive basis. It means Donald Sterling can't even order a box of paper clips from Staples for his secretary.
 
As for the profits, yes, those will remain his until a sale is effected. If Sterling doesn't proceed with the sales process at a pace and progress that the NBA deems satisfactory or reasonable, the NBA can place the franchise under receivership and handle the sale on its own. This mechanism is part of every NBA franchise agreement.
 
I suspect the only reason they're not going straight to a receivership is to avoid any legal challenges that would only further stall the process and serve as a further distraction.
 

jose melendez

Earl of Acie
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 23, 2003
31,303
Geneva, Switzerland
The fine they'll get, I want to know who runs the team now and how they ensure that person isn't taking orders from Sterling. 
 
This is pretty clearly just a first step in an effort to force him out, but most of what I know about Sterling suggests he doesn't go down quiet.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
DukeSox said:
What legal entity forces him to pay that fine? Especially since he's "banned" anyway?
The NBA constitution is the governing document here, and Id guess remedies for non-payment of fines is pretty server.  Sterling isn't stupid enough to throw away his billion dollar asset to contest a $2.5MM fine.
 

bowiac

Caveat: I know nothing about what I speak
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2003
12,945
New York, NY
DukeSox said:
What legal entity forces him to pay that fine? Especially since he's "banned" anyway?
Presumably, if he didn't pay, they would initiate proceedings against him, and a court/arbitrator would ultimately make him pay, unless the NBA bylaws just allow them to withhold national TV dollars instead.
 
I think jose is correct, he's gonna sell now. There's no point in owning a team just for the profits.
 

jose melendez

Earl of Acie
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 23, 2003
31,303
Geneva, Switzerland
bowiac said:
Presumably, if he didn't pay, they would initiate proceedings against him, and a court/arbitrator would ultimately make him pay, unless the NBA bylaws just allow them to withhold national TV dollars instead.
 
I think jose is correct, he's gonna sell now. There's no point in owning a team just for the profits.
 
Wait, I said he wasn't going to sell.
 

Lose Remerswaal

Experiencing Furry Panic
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
mabrowndog said:
 
I believe the league will place the operational aspects of the team into a trust, meaning the NBA can not only dictate who is involved in the front office of the franchise, but can appoint league representatives to those positions on an observational, advisory or executive basis. It means Donald Sterling can't even order a box of paper clips from Staples for his secretary.
 
As for the profits, yes, those will remain his until a sale is effected. If Sterling doesn't proceed with the sales process at a pace and progress that the NBA deems satisfactory or reasonable, the NBA can place the franchise under receivership and handle the sale on its own. This mechanism is part of every NBA franchise agreement.
 
I suspect the only reason they're not going straight to a receivership is to avoid any legal challenges that would only further stall the process and serve as a further distraction.
 
If this results in more shenanigans like the Chris Paul/New Orleans deal when the NBA owned that team, we may not be so pleased with this outcome.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,218
bowiac said:
Presumably, if he didn't pay, they would initiate proceedings against him, and a court/arbitrator would ultimately make him pay, unless the NBA bylaws just allow them to withhold national TV dollars instead.
 
I think jose is correct, he's gonna sell now. There's no point in owning a team just for the profits.
Under the agreements it is already treated as having the same binding power as an arbitration decision, one of the reasons Cuban always just pays the fine no matter what. The could pretty easily have it enforced just by getting a court order based on the arbitration decision.
 

mabrowndog

Ask me about total zone...or paint
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 23, 2003
39,676
Falmouth, MA
TMZ ‏@TMZ 5m
#Breaking: The NBA has decided to suspend Clippers owner, Donald Sterling, INDEFINITELY
 

Alex Kennedy ‏@AlexKennedyNBA 2m
TMZ reports that the NBA will suspend Donald Sterling indefinitely and fine him $5 million. He won't be forced to sell team.
 
 

Lifetime.
 
$2.5M
 
Will be forced to sell.
 
That's a pretty massive 0-for-3 whiff by TMZ as the "Breaking News" guys on the block.
 

bowiac

Caveat: I know nothing about what I speak
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2003
12,945
New York, NY
jose melendez said:
 
Wait, I said he wasn't going to sell.
Ah - I took "I assume the notion is to make it so unpleasent and humiliating he'll sell." as you saying you thought he'd sell.
 
He may well challenge the ban, but if it holds up, I think he'll sell. The Clippers' value in a sale will far exceed their value as a business. Why keep a billion dollar asset that you can't have fun with, in exchange for ~$10-20M/year in profits?
 

riboflav

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2006
9,842
NOVA
bowiac said:
Ah - I took "I assume the notion is to make it so unpleasent and humiliating he'll sell." as you saying you thought he'd sell.
 
He may well challenge the ban, but if it holds up, I think he'll sell. The Clippers' value in a sale will far exceed their value as a business. Why keep a billion dollar asset that you can't have fun with, in exchange for ~$10-20M/year in profits?
 
Not to mention he's allowed to "sell" to his family.
 

Brohamer of the Gods

Well-Known Member
Silver Supporter
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
4,005
Warwick, RI
mabrowndog said:
 
 
 

 

Lifetime.
 
That's a pretty massive 0-for-3 whiff by TMZ as the "Breaking News" guys on the block.
 
I'll give them 1/2 credit for lifetime - the length of Sterling's life is indefinite.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,952
Oregon
Just a side note, but thank god it isn't the snarky arrogance of David Stern in this press conference
 

bowiac

Caveat: I know nothing about what I speak
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2003
12,945
New York, NY
riboflav said:
 
Not to mention he's allowed to "sell" to his family.
I assume NBA sales are subject to league approval. I can't imagine they'd go for that.
 

mabrowndog

Ask me about total zone...or paint
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 23, 2003
39,676
Falmouth, MA
Not Bill Walton ‏@NotBillWalton  2m
Known racist Donald Sterling's NBA tenure under David Stern = 10,988 days. Sterling's NBA tenure under Adam Silver = 88 days. Point: Silver.
 

mabrowndog

Ask me about total zone...or paint
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 23, 2003
39,676
Falmouth, MA
von wafer ‏@vonwafer13
we gotta open our eyes Elgin Baylor tried to tell us about Donald sterling years ago.
 

Swedgin

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2013
703
riboflav said:
 
Not to mention he's allowed to "sell" to his family.
What is the basis for that statement.  The NBA, like all the major sports, requires league approval of a sale.  There is zero chance that Silver/Board of Governors is approving a sale to a Sterling family member.  
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,218
mabrowndog said:
 
 
 

 

Lifetime.
 
$2.5M
 
Will be forced to sell.
 
That's a pretty massive 0-for-3 whiff by TMZ as the "Breaking News" guys on the block.
 
The best part is that the $2.5M being the maximum allowed fine language has been everywhere this week.