NCAA Adds New Rule for LaCrosse.

SoxJox

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2003
7,170
Rock > SoxJox < Hard Place
https://www.si.com/college/pennstate/olympic-sports/ncaa-expands-mens-lacrosse-replay-after-penn-states-loss-to-duke-ncaa-championships

Penn State fell to Duke at the NCAA Championships on a play that wasn't reviewable. It will be next season.
Nearly two months after Penn State's controversial loss to Duke in the NCAA Men's Lacrosse Championships, the NCAA is expanding the use of video review in the game. The NCAA announced Wednesday that the play on which Penn State lost its NCAA semifinal game will be among those reviewable for the 2024 men's lacrosse season.

In late May, Penn State lost to Duke 16-15 when the Blue Devils' Garrett Leadmon stepped into the crease while scoring the sudden-victory goal. The play should not have counted but was not reviewable according to the NCAA's replay rules at the time. Penn State concluded its season at 11-5, having reached the NCAA semifinals for the second time in school history. After the game, Penn State coach Jeff Tambroni said, "There should definitely be a review."

In response, the NCAA Playing Rules Oversight Panel adopted a sweeping series of changes to its policy regarding video review. It added five reviewable plays to the existing list. Among them, replay can be used to determine "if an offensive player was in or landed in the crease before the ball entered the goal.to determine." This addition covers the scenario that occurred at the end of the Penn State-Duke game.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,198
I'm not a lacrosse guy, but can you explain why, if the sport has reviews, something like that wasn't reviewable?
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,198
Because, you know, the current rules didn't allow the review.
Um, yeah, I'm asking why not. If you are coming up with a list of important things to review that *seems* like something so obvious it would be on the list. I'm asking if there's any reason they would not have made that reviewable when they wrote the rules. It's like the NFL coming up with replay rules and not putting "did he go out of bounds before scoring" on the list.

Or, you know, you could be sarcastic again. Either works.
 

SoxJox

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2003
7,170
Rock > SoxJox < Hard Place
Um, yeah, I'm asking why not. If you are coming up with a list of important things to review that *seems* like something so obvious it would be on the list. I'm asking if there's any reason they would not have made that reviewable when they wrote the rules. It's like the NFL coming up with replay rules and not putting "did he go out of bounds before scoring" on the list.

Or, you know, you could be sarcastic again. Either works.
Ah, come on. It was fun poke. I really have no idea why a rule has not been put in place. It's interesting to note that the goal would not have been allowed prior to 2019, the year in which the NCAA brought back the rule that allowed an offensive player to dive while shooting, and then landing in the crease. That brought back that rule ostensibly to increase scoring.