Offseason rumors

Status
Not open for further replies.

Harry Hooper

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
34,615
The other thing is that the "full throttle" statement didn't happen in a vacuum.

They fired Bloom and it seemed natural to assume it had something to do with consecutive 78-84 seasons.

Then there were the comments of Alex Cora. I don't have the exact quotes, but what he basically said was that it was great that the team's farm system was looking a lot better, but all that really mattered was getting into October. He really put himself out there in a way that's a little unusual for a manager. It was hard to imagine him saying such things if he didn't think the front office was feeling the same and that they supported him speaking out about it.

Breslow also said something at his opening press conference about there not being financial restrictions on improving the team.

There were multiple signals sent out to the fans that this was going to be an aggressive offseason.

Speaking of Cora, is he going to quit if the starting rotation doesn't get some notable improvement by ST?
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,504
deep inside Guido territory

bloodysox

New Member
Sep 25, 2011
2,807
Louisville, Colorado
Wanted him due to the fact he'd be cheaper than Snell but honestly it may make more sense to pay more for a known quantity like Snell (not that I have any faith in the Red Sox shelling out the money to get him).
 

johnlos

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2014
250
Pretty pissed we didn't get him. You knew Cubs would make a splash at some point but I was hoping they'd be left with Snell or JMont. I think Imanaga's going to be really good and was the "moneyball" pick compared to YY.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,274
But 10 11 of the top 15 starters to hit FA (using Fangraphs' projections) are no longer available. They can still make impactful moves, and maybe they will. But without question, there are fewer possibilities.

Fixed.
 

GPO Man

New Member
Apr 1, 2023
571
That’s disappointing. Looks like we will end up trading one of the young studs for a good starter.
 

Harry Hooper

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
34,615
What is going on with the Giants? No doubt they have extra motivation to demonstrate some response to the moves of their rival in LA, but Heyman said earlier today it was down to the Cubs and Red Sox for Imanaga. Plus, they couldn't land Judge last year.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,317
What is going on with the Giants? No doubt they have extra motivation to demonstrate some response to the moves of their rival in LA, but Heyman said earlier today it was down to the Cubs and Red Sox. Plus, they couldn't land Judge last year.
They’ve always kind of been the west coast Red Sox.
 

OCD SS

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
That’s disappointing. Looks like we will end up trading one of the young studs for a good starter.
Why would you assume that they’ll do that as opposed to just rolling with what they have? It seems unlikely that this ownership group is going to give up the cost controlled years of Mayer/ Anthony/ Teel (and for who we’re talking about, I don’t think they should).
 

GPO Man

New Member
Apr 1, 2023
571
Breslow has to have a spending mandate. Has to. There is no reason why we can’t sign Imagana other than being cheap.
 

geoflin

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 26, 2004
712
Melrose MA
There is no reason why we can’t sign Imagana other than being cheap.
That's assuming that if we were the highest bidder he was interested in coming here as opposed to the other teams and cities who were courting him. YY wasn't. We don't know who offered Imanaga what.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,317
At this point, though, why would a player choose the Red Sox? I think they are close to the stage where they need to overpay to land someone of significance, and they clearly don’t want to do that. If all players hear is that a last place team doesn’t have much money to spend- and has been known to trade long term players, manager a potential lame duck, tough division….
 

Harry Hooper

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
34,615
That's assuming that if we were the highest bidder he was interested in coming here as opposed to the other teams and cities who were courting him. YY wasn't. We don't know who offered Imanaga what.
Plus the Cubs pointed out to him they are on the West Coast (of Lake Michigan).
 

ehaz

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2007
4,973
Are the Sox content to just go with the pitchers they have? So much interest, so little in terms of signing players.
So all they've done with the rotation so far for 2024 is replace a combined ~190 innings of 4.00 FIP ball from Chris Sale and James Paxton with Lucas Giolito, who, if he rebounds and doesn't miss a single start, should improve on that slightly.

1. Giolito*
2. Bello
3. Pivetta*
4. Crawford
5. Houck or Whitlock

If that looks volatile to you, just wait till you see what's under team control in 2025:

1. Bello
2. Crawford
3. Houck
4. Whitlock
5. Dick Fitts? Josh Winckowski?

*pending free agent.

Sure, they have $140M to spend in 2025 until the first threshold (lol). But what are they going to do? Sign the entire free agent class? Kidnap Jerry Dipoto until he agrees to finally listen to offers on Logan Gilbert or George Kirby?
 

Benj4ever

New Member
Nov 21, 2022
367
At this point, though, why would a player choose the Red Sox? I think they are close to the stage where they need to overpay to land someone of significance, and they clearly don’t want to do that. If all players hear is that a last place team doesn’t have much money to spend- and has been known to trade long term players, manager a potential lame duck, tough division….
Given ownership's reluctance to go big the past few seasons it's not surprising that they're going small again.
 

SouthernBoSox

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2005
12,119
Speaking of Cora, is he going to quit if the starting rotation doesn't get some notable improvement by ST?
Cora won’t be here in 2025. I think that’s almost a certainty at this point. He’s gonna get his pick of teams and get a ton of money from someone. And he’s going to go to a place he thinks is focused on winning now. The Red Sox are none of those things right now. I’d be shocked if he’s back. Stunned.

As for Imanaga, I just can’t really believe the amount of pressure they are putting on themself to nail a trade when there have been multi arms that could have been had for reasonable money. I just don’t really understand what’s going on.
 

sambamcunningham22

New Member
Dec 11, 2022
11
I believe the red sox reputation with players and agents is in the toilet.
Can not really compete for top FAs
Rep is cheap, dysfunctional and a distracted ownership
Nothing will change until team is sold
 

CR67dream

blue devils forevah!
Dope
SoSH Member
Oct 4, 2001
7,589
I'm going home
I am so disappointed now, I can't even express myself other than in four-letter words not fit to print.
This is not just for ITP, but why with this particular announcement? I was not sold on Imanaga at all from the get go and I haven't even seen the terms yet. How an unproven commodity choosing to sign elsewhere causes this kind of uproar is beyond me. It's January 9.

As I see it nothing they've passed on is anything too special. People just seem to want to see a big splash as a show of faith. It's January 9.

They're not going to work on our timetable. We don't know their real targets or if those targets are even on SoSH's radar.

We don't know nothing.

It's January 9.
 

Bread of Yaz

New Member
Mar 12, 2019
385
This is not just for ITP, but why with this particular announcement? I was not sold on Imanaga at all from the get go and I haven't even seen the terms yet. How an unproven commodity choosing to sign elsewhere causes this kind of uproar is beyond me. It's January 9.

As I see it nothing they've passed on is anything too special. People just seem to want to see a big splash as a show of faith. It's January 9.

They're not going to work on our timetable. We don't know their real targets or if those targets are even on SoSH's radar.

We don't know nothing.

It's January 9.
Seconded. Lance Brozdowski did a YT video on him and concluded that his stuff is fairly middling. No Yamamoto or anything remotely close.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,274
This is not just for ITP, but why with this particular announcement? I was not sold on Imanaga at all from the get go and I haven't even seen the terms yet. How an unproven commodity choosing to sign elsewhere causes this kind of uproar is beyond me. It's January 9.

As I see it nothing they've passed on is anything too special. People just seem to want to see a big splash as a show of faith. It's January 9.

They're not going to work on our timetable. We don't know their real targets or if those targets even on SoSH's radar.

We don't know nothing.

It's January 9.
This is all true. I continue to say that we need to wait to see final painting. It’s undeniable though, that the color palette is a lot more limited than it was 6 weeks ago, and there’s a lot of empty spots on the canvas.
 

geoflin

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 26, 2004
712
Melrose MA
I was not sold on Imanaga at all from the get go and I haven't even seen the terms yet. How an unproven commodity choosing to sign elsewhere causes this kind of uproar is beyond me. It's January 9.
As I see it nothing they've passed on is anything too special. People just seem to want to see a big splash as a show of faith. It's January 9.
100% agree. Throwing a bunch of money at the wrong pitchers just for the sake of getting one or two of them isn't the answer (see Kluber, Corey). I was never sold on Imanaga although I would have signed him for a Senga-like contract (5 years $75 M). I'm not in favor of either Montgomery or Snell for the money or years they're likely to get. I wouldn't have given YY what he got from the Dodgers although I would have had less of a problem with that happening than with any of the aforementioned. Yes, the Sox need pitching but I'd rather see them explore the trade market or pay less money on a shorter term contract than handcuff themselves with a bad, long term contract as they did with Sale.
 
Last edited:

CR67dream

blue devils forevah!
Dope
SoSH Member
Oct 4, 2001
7,589
I'm going home
This is all true. I continue to say that we need to wait to see final painting. It’s undeniable though, that the color palette is a lot more limited than it was 6 week ago, and there’s a lot of empty spots on the canvas.
All true as well, and if in another 6 weeks it doesn't look a lot different, hand me a pitchfork. Imanaga doesn't move the needle for me, that's all.
 

Bob Montgomerys Helmet Hat

has big, douchey shoulders
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
This is not just for ITP, but why with this particular announcement? I was not sold on Imanaga at all from the get go and I haven't even seen the terms yet. How an unproven commodity choosing to sign elsewhere causes this kind of uproar is beyond me. It's January 9.

As I see it nothing they've passed on is anything too special. People just seem to want to see a big splash as a show of faith. It's January 9.

They're not going to work on our timetable. We don't know their real targets or if those targets are even on SoSH's radar.

We don't know nothing.

It's January 9.
You're right, of course. And while I'm usually pretty even-keeled about this stuff, I'm also still the board's resident Dice-K fan. I'm intrigued by pitchers who come from the NPB with interesting stats. I know the home run rate might mean he's a disaster here, but the swing and miss stuff seems intriguing to me. He's likely one of those guys--sort of like Dice--that most here would end up hating but I'd still make appointment viewing.
 

GPO Man

New Member
Apr 1, 2023
571
This is not just for ITP, but why with this particular announcement? I was not sold on Imanaga at all from the get go and I haven't even seen the terms yet. How an unproven commodity choosing to sign elsewhere causes this kind of uproar is beyond me. It's January 9.

As I see it nothing they've passed on is anything too special. People just seem to want to see a big splash as a show of faith. It's January 9.

They're not going to work on our timetable. We don't know their real targets or if those targets are even on SoSH's radar.

We don't know nothing.

It's January 9.
The possibilities are shrinking with each day. Does anyone have any confidence that they are going to sign a good pitcher at this point? They won’t spend the money.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,274
All true as well, and if in another 6 weeks it doesn't look a lot different, hand me a pitchfork. Imanaga doesn't move the needle for me, that's all.
Imanaga by himself doesn’t move it for me either. No one move does. But collectively? Another story. Tough to not detect a pattern.
 

Otis Foster

rex ryan's podiatrist
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
1,712
Breslow has to have a spending mandate. Has to. There is no reason why we can’t sign Imagana other than being cheap.
The possibilities are shrinking with each day. Does anyone have any confidence that they are going to sign a good pitcher at this point? They won’t spend the money.

That’s the second time you’ve arbitrarily stated as fact that they are too cheap, and it’s absurd.. Maybe they thought his skill set didn’t warrant the dollars he was seeking. Maybe they had some data indicating he’d be a disaster in Fenway. Maybe Chicago has a much more vibrant Japanese community where he would be welcome. If you have inside info to support your conclusion, share it with us.

This site isn’t a dumping ground for unsupported venting. There’s been a long dialogue in this thread about not spending dollars for mediocre talent just to say you’ve spent it, most of it supported by in depth analysis from observers, who are much more knowledgeable than I am.. There’s also been a clear admonition from the Dopes not to throw out conclusory statements without data to support your argument.
 

ehaz

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2007
4,973
This is not just for ITP, but why with this particular announcement? I was not sold on Imanaga at all from the get go and I haven't even seen the terms yet. How an unproven commodity choosing to sign elsewhere causes this kind of uproar is beyond me. It's January 9.

As I see it nothing they've passed on is anything too special. People just seem to want to see a big splash as a show of faith. It's January 9.

They're not going to work on our timetable. We don't know their real targets or if those targets even on SoSH's radar.

We don't know nothing.

It's January 9.
Well, we can't know for sure who their real targets were, whether they thought of Imanaga as an upside #3 or just an end of the rotation type. But there's at least some smoke that they thought highly of him. They were reported to have heavily scouted Imanaga at least as far back as September. They've been described as one of the more involved teams since he was posted. Alex Speier said they showed consistent interest in Imanaga throughout the offseason. A couple weeks before that report, Speier said on MLBTV that Imanaga "was of considerable interest" to the Red Sox and that his "pitch characteristics from Japan were quite fascinating to the team." And we know that they were in the bidding up to at least this morning. Doesn't seem like someone they thought was nothing special but who knows. Opinions were pretty divided with BA calling him a #5 starter and Eno Sarris saying he'd rather have Imanaga at $100M than Montgomery at Nola money.

Anyways the pattern isn't great and this lends credence to the hard budget and only 1-2 year signings rumors.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.