Protecting the Shields -- The Nick Cafardo Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,759
The idea that should regret GMs not being able to 'close a deal over drinks at a bar' epitomizes the difference between what Nick wants and what I want.

What Nick wants is a story, and people who do things quickly and without the distraction and annoyance of research and analysis. What I want is a GM who has researched and analyzed a move many, many different ways before he commits to it.

What Nick wants is 'gut' decisions that writers can pontificate, and turn into narratives about the relative 'feel' of different executives. What I want is a critical thinking-driven analysis process that is trackable, repeatable, and improveable so we can evaluate results, improve them, and change as necessary.

What Nick wants is to be invited to the subsequent round of drinks to hear the story. What I want is for my team's GM to tell no one what they were thinking or why they made the move so that they don't give up any info that can help another team.

Basically, what Nick wants is a team to operate like Irsay's Colts. And what I want is Bill Belichick.
 

TheoShmeo

Skrub's sympathy case
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
12,890
Boston, NY
The Analytics versus Traditionalists segment of that notes column may have been Nicky's most idiotic, simplistic and off base piece ever.

Does Cafardo really think there is a burning war among major league executives along these lines? Don't all teams use both sabermetric data and other dreaded analytics AND the more traditional scouting mehtods, including focus on attitudes and make-up, on a daily basis?

If the Red Sox were not factoring in all of those things into their decision making, I would be shocked and pissed off. That some teams may rely on analytics more than others hardly suggests that it's an either/or proposition.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,756
The Analytics versus Traditionalists segment of that notes column may have been Nicky's most idiotic, simplistic and off base piece ever.
That some teams may rely on analytics more than others hardly suggests that it's an either/or proposition.
This is, of course, the truth. The idea that the Giants or Royals dont employ "analytics" is just bullshit:

http://www.hardballtimes.com/royals-royals/
The club has no fewer than four full-time employees who work in analytics, and that doesn’t include any interns or consultants. Mike Groopman, who has spent eight years with the franchise and previously worked at Baseball Prospectus, was promoted to the role of director of baseball operations/analytics back in January. In fact, he just became the first BP alum to be part of a World Series-winning team.


http://deadspin.com/5956642/the-giants-sure-use-a-lot-of-sabermetrics-for-an-anti-sabermetric-team
 

JBJ_HOF

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 5, 2014
541
November 6th:
The Indians would make Carlos Carrasco and Danny Salazar available, but likely not Corey Kluber. The Red Sox had a chance to deal for Carrasco at the deadline, but he seems to be more of what they already have.
November 10th:
Dombrowski admits the majority of his trade discussions revolve around the front of the rotation. Obviously, the Mets have it in Matt Harvey, Jacob deGrom, Steven Matz, etc. The Indians have it in Danny Salazar, Carlos Carrasco, and Corey Kluber.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
21,037
Maine
So I'm watching MLB Network's Hot Stove show this morning and they just teased hour two in which they'll have a segment with Nick Cafardo live from the GM meetings to talk about...."the on-going battle of Scouting versus Analytics". One of the co-hosts of this show is Harold fucking Reynolds.

Heads may explode.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,933
Oregon
So I'm watching MLB Network's Hot Stove show this morning and they just teased hour two in which they'll have a segment with Nick Cafardo live from the GM meetings to talk about...."the on-going battle of Scouting versus Analytics". One of the co-hosts of this show is Harold fucking Reynolds.

Heads may explode.
Brian Kenney might break a chair in the green room
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,756
So I'm watching MLB Network's Hot Stove show this morning and they just teased hour two in which they'll have a segment with Nick Cafardo live from the GM meetings to talk about...."the on-going battle of Scouting versus Analytics". One of the co-hosts of this show is Harold fucking Reynolds.

Heads may explode.
It should be broadcast in 4:3 B&W.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
21,037
Maine
It was every bit as bad as expected. They opened the segment with a disturbing photoshopped image of Cafardo taking a steam with Dombrowski and Wally. All in line with Vasgersian's running gag all morning that the meetings were being held at Del Boca Vista, phase 2. Shudder inducing before they even got into the ridiculous topic at hand.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,756
It was every bit as bad as expected. They opened the segment with a disturbing photoshopped image of Cafardo taking a steam with Dombrowski and Wally. All in line with Vasgersian's running gag all morning that the meetings were being held at Del Boca Vista, phase 2. Shudder inducing before they even got into the ridiculous topic at hand.
Laugh at your own risk. When the Oakland A(nalytic)'s computer breaks and it can't spit out a starting lineup, Nick will have a pen that writes upside down.
 

JBJ_HOF

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 5, 2014
541

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,756
Matt Harvey, Jacob DeGrom, Steven Matz, Noah Syndergaard, and the comebacking Zack Wheeler (who won’t be ready until about June) are not available. At least that’s the story here in the second week of November. How long the offense-needy Mets stick to it is anyone’s guess.

“Just in case, they want to hear it from us that we’re probably not moving them,” Ricco said at the general managers meetings. “And ‘very unlikely’ is what we’ve been telling them.”
OK. So "very unlikely" = "are not available." But . . . .

On the flip side, White Sox GM Rick Hahn, when asked whether there was anyone on his team that was “untouchable,” cited his owner, Jerry Reinsdorf, who also owns the Chicago Bulls.
“Mr. Reinsdorf always said the only untouchable in his career on both teams wore No. 23 [Michael Jordan],” Hahn said.
“I don’t believe in the concept of untouchables. I don’t believe in closing off avenues of conversations, but I do believe in the concept of extraordinarily difficult to acquire. And we have some of those.
“Fundamentally, I’m not doing my job if I don’t listen. You never know; you might be surprised. There are elements of the core of our roster that you’d have to be overwhelmed to move.”
So at least you can talk to Hahn about lefthander Chris Sale.
But "extraordinarily difficult to acquire" means you can talk about Chris Sale.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/2015/11/12/making-pitches-for-pitchers-high-red-sox-agenda/OUiL8ONrUr3wcx2LeLIQAL/story.html
 
Last edited:

John Marzano Olympic Hero

has fancy plans, and pants to match
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2001
24,715
You guys. Know what's totes unfair? The draft.

And you guys. You know who's got an awesome answer to how to fix it and it's a reason that's completely altruistic and would not put another nickel in his pocket and he's just throwing it out there because he loves baseball sooooooooo much? Scott Boras.

And you guys know who is so adorable that he lets Boras ramble on for six paragraphs without a follow up question or any points of contention? Nick Cafardo.

And BTW, since it's the off season, it's time for the New York Yankees to be rumored in on every single trade and free agent signing. You know why? Because they're only the best!
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,756
If only Nick were writing about himself (except the "athlete" part):

There comes a time in every athlete’s life when his body, his soul, his head tell him it’s over.
You can dangle a zillion dollars in his face, and nothing can change his mind. He looks forward to the last time he has to go through a grueling offseason workout just to endure another season.
He looks forward to the last time he has to make grueling road trips that have gotten worse with the strange scheduling you’re seeing year in and year out around major league baseball.
The older a player gets, the tougher it is to be in shape. Everything starts to hurt a little bit more, and you reach the point of diminishing returns
https://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/2015/11/18/david-ortiz-faces-reality-that-all-great-athletes-must-face/yy1bMpd26tVHN4cOK4mlAJ/story.html
 

ifmanis5

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2007
64,279
Rotten Apple
Wtf is 'strange scheduling?' So playing in Philly once in a while instead of Detroit more often is making you quit? Nick is an old strange dude who should have been shown the door a long time ago.
 

jimbobim

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2012
1,558
Nick was on the analytically slanted MLB Now with BK on MLB Network today and he was like a child flailing in the deep end.

Tried to be contrarian on what it meant that guys like Alvarez and Carter were dropped and the other panelists ganged up on him. Continued with Nick saying a big market team would have tendered Holland whose sitting out for year. Hilariously out of his depth.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,933
Oregon
Continued with Nick saying a big market team would have tendered Holland whose sitting out for year
Quite possibly true, or at least work out a two-year deal with him. After all, the Red Sox once paid Curt Schilling $8M to get fat
 

Papelbon's Poutine

Homeland Security
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2005
19,615
Portsmouth, NH
Quite possibly true, or at least work out a two-year deal with him. After all, the Red Sox once paid Curt Schilling $8M to get fat
Work out a two year deal, sure. But why would you tender an arb 3 guy that won't play? You'd be paying for quite literally nothing except possibly goodwill when he becomes a free agent, at which point he still can go sign elsewhere. The Schilling fiasco had a few factors that kind of make it apples to oranges.
 

OzSox

New Member
Dec 8, 2005
157
From today's story on David Price:
His big-game ability — a 68-27 record against teams that finished the season .500 or better, ranks second in modern baseball history. Only Sandy Koufax (64-45) places higher.
This doesn't make any sense, right?
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,756
From today's story on David Price:
His big-game ability — a 68-27 record against teams that finished the season .500 or better, ranks second in modern baseball history. Only Sandy Koufax (64-45) places higher.
This doesn't make any sense, right?

"Scouts say that Koufax pitched those games with more heart and grit; the analytic nerds rely on "winning percentage" to place Price first."
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
21,037
Maine
From today's story on David Price:
His big-game ability — a 68-27 record against teams that finished the season .500 or better, ranks second in modern baseball history. Only Sandy Koufax (64-45) places higher.
This doesn't make any sense, right?
Well, he got both records wrong, for one. Price is 68-37 against teams that finished .500 or better (.648 winning percentage). Koufax's record was 84-45 (.651). By those numbers, Cafardo's claim is probably correct (no idea how to verify it easily). But since he got both numbers wrong, he looks like typical bonehead Cafardo.
 

The Gray Eagle

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2001
16,970
If the question is who is more likely to be dumb and wrong, Cafardo or some random intern, I would bet on Cafardo.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,933
Oregon
Sunday Notes are up

Did you know that Clay Buchholz would make a perfect trade target for the Kansas City Royals?
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,602
White Sox I — Dustin Pedroia for Jose Quintana. Comment: Don’t think the Red Sox would trade their de facto captain, especially with Ortiz leaving after this year. But anything is possible


14. Padres II — Shaw and Brian Johnson for Tyson Ross. Comment: I’ll pass on this one.

16. Reds – Owens, Holt, and a mid-level prospect for Todd Frazier. Comment: A few things would have to take place before Frazier comes to the Red Sox. For one, they’d have to move Ramirez and/or Sandoval to make room at first or third

19. Tigers – Ramirez for Justin Verlander. Comment: Two bad contracts (Verlander has four more years at $28 million per year, plus a vesting option for a fifth year), but this one was already officially shot down by Dombrowski and Tigers GM Al Avila.

How did this shit get approved?
 

Byrdbrain

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
8,588
White Sox I — Dustin Pedroia for Jose Quintana. Comment: Don’t think the Red Sox would trade their de facto captain, especially with Ortiz leaving after this year. But anything is possible


14. Padres II — Shaw and Brian Johnson for Tyson Ross. Comment: I’ll pass on this one.

16. Reds – Owens, Holt, and a mid-level prospect for Todd Frazier. Comment: A few things would have to take place before Frazier comes to the Red Sox. For one, they’d have to move Ramirez and/or Sandoval to make room at first or third

19. Tigers – Ramirez for Justin Verlander. Comment: Two bad contracts (Verlander has four more years at $28 million per year, plus a vesting option for a fifth year), but this one was already officially shot down by Dombrowski and Tigers GM Al Avila.

How did this shit get approved?
I refuse to click on anything Cafardo writes as I have too much stupidity in my life already but I assume those are potential trades he is throwing out there. That said I don't understand your last comment Cafardo is a columnist, he posts what he thinks, why should there be any approval required? If the question was how does an person who has managed to get a job writing about baseball for a major newspaper think any of these proposals make any sense at all then I right there with you.
 

burstnbloom

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 12, 2005
2,762
That column was the worst thing I've ever read. Shaw and Brian Johnson for Tyson Ross. Nick will pass. What is happening?
 

Pilgrim

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 24, 2006
2,409
Jamaica Plain
This is the second or third time I can remember him writing a column like that where he asks "baseball insiders" to think up ideas for him and they are completely insane. I wonder if he is making them up, or his sources are fucking with him or something. Not trying to be snide, the article was that weird.
 

Humphrey

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2010
3,225
He couldn't knock the Sox for signing Price because he's been blathering about them signing "an ace" since they didn't sign Lester...but signing Price made Miley quite expendable. You can only have so many lefty starters.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,756
Nick "No Shit" Cafardo mines an unusual topic today:
Hanley Ramirez, Pablo Sandoval big question marks for Red Sox


Anyone have any ideas what an "evaluator" is? If it was a scout, GM, or generic "executive," he would say so.
“Don’t want him on my team,” said one American league evaluator about Ramirez.
We’ve heard from one former Sox teammate who used to keep three of his buttons undone on his jersey, but because Ramirez did the same thing he decided to button up because he didn’t want to be linked with Ramirez.
So who is the more juvenile operator here, Cafardo or the "former player." (Napoli was a big unbuttoned shirt guy, wasn't he? When he was wearing one, that is)

he baggage Ramirez carries as a difficult teammate can only be erased by a monster offensive season.
I could have missed it, but were there any rumblings last year about him being a "bad teammate" (as opposed to just a shitty player?)
 

John Marzano Olympic Hero

has fancy plans, and pants to match
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2001
24,715
We’ve heard from one former Sox teammate who used to keep three of his buttons undone on his jersey, but because Ramirez did the same thing he decided to button up because he didn’t want to be linked with Ramirez.
An adult person said this? Holy shit this is fucking ridiculous. Even for Nick Cafardo, this is bordering on lobotomy-level stupidity to call this out as a reason to get rid of Ramirez.

What's next, the player is not going to wear pants because Hanley Ramirez wears pants? Hopefully this stupid asshole decides not to breathe because Hanley Ramirez breathes.
 

TheoShmeo

Skrub's sympathy case
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
12,890
Boston, NY
Nicky once again demonstrates his Captain Obvious skills this morning with a review of the Sox infield D.

Guess what?

Hanley is a question mark at first and could be really bad. Dustin is getting older and might have lost a step but is going to work on his quickness. Xander is very good and should get better with more experience. Pablo is overweight and needs to get in better shape.

And playing good infield D is important to run prevention.

Viewing that effort in its most favorable light, there was a sliver of new information regarding Pedroia (with a comparison to Kinsler and his improvement at second).
 

Granite Sox

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 6, 2003
5,085
The Granite State
He was also on MLB Tonight this evening calling the Sox infield the worst in the AL, got in another shot about trading Wiley, and then promptly selected the Sox as the favorite to win the AL East.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.