The idea that should regret GMs not being able to 'close a deal over drinks at a bar' epitomizes the difference between what Nick wants and what I want.
What Nick wants is a story, and people who do things quickly and without the distraction and annoyance of research and analysis. What I want is a GM who has researched and analyzed a move many, many different ways before he commits to it.
What Nick wants is 'gut' decisions that writers can pontificate, and turn into narratives about the relative 'feel' of different executives. What I want is a critical thinking-driven analysis process that is trackable, repeatable, and improveable so we can evaluate results, improve them, and change as necessary.
What Nick wants is to be invited to the subsequent round of drinks to hear the story. What I want is for my team's GM to tell no one what they were thinking or why they made the move so that they don't give up any info that can help another team.
Basically, what Nick wants is a team to operate like Irsay's Colts. And what I want is Bill Belichick.
What Nick wants is a story, and people who do things quickly and without the distraction and annoyance of research and analysis. What I want is a GM who has researched and analyzed a move many, many different ways before he commits to it.
What Nick wants is 'gut' decisions that writers can pontificate, and turn into narratives about the relative 'feel' of different executives. What I want is a critical thinking-driven analysis process that is trackable, repeatable, and improveable so we can evaluate results, improve them, and change as necessary.
What Nick wants is to be invited to the subsequent round of drinks to hear the story. What I want is for my team's GM to tell no one what they were thinking or why they made the move so that they don't give up any info that can help another team.
Basically, what Nick wants is a team to operate like Irsay's Colts. And what I want is Bill Belichick.