New regime may not like some of them.Head scratcher. Assuming DAndrews returns, interior line already has a lot of bodies.
It’s not like Wolf and Groh weren’t here last year.New regime may not like some of them.
The entire offensive coaching staff wasn;t? It's not like every guard is just plug and play in every offense.It’s not like Wolf and Groh weren’t here last year.
New OL coach. I mean, I’m pretty sure they know who’s on roster and are drafting an OG anyway, so…It’s not like Wolf and Groh weren’t here last year.
Not here last year in that they had a say in the guys that are here from last year and want to keep them, or that they were here last year, saw them practice, study, work out and play and know that some of them are not good enough? It could really cut both ways, but I’d probably go with the latter.It’s not like Wolf and Groh weren’t here last year.
Fair point.Not here last year in that they had a say in the guys that are here from last year and want to keep them, or that they were here last year, saw them practice, study, work out and play and know that some of them are not good enough? It could really cut both ways, but I’d probably go with the latter.
There’s still timeNot thrilled with this one. Seems like a value pick, and not a reach, so that's good - but seems like we have a lot of interior lineman. Would have liked to see a TE project.
This post by CD about Wallace may be relevant here:Not thrilled with this one. Seems like a value pick, and not a reach, so that's good - but seems like we have a lot of interior lineman. Would have liked to see a TE project.
Went back to the Athletic stream for this pick.
Brugler and Tice both said he was probably a little overdrafted at 68, but also probably the next tackle on both their boards.
Brugler mentioned he saw Wallace as a late riser in the process, took a ton of 30 visits (SF, KC, WAS)
Tice mentioned he (Brugler agrees) thinks he can play OT or OG, and fits the Packers OL mold in getting guys who are flexible so they can just put out the best 5 of healthy guys whether that is Onwenu kicking back in, Wallace kicking in, etc.
If nothing else those dimensions: 6’4 315 34.5” arms seem more tackle than guard.This post by CD about Wallace may be relevant here:
I will be zero percent surprised if David Andrews announces his retirement between now and the end of camp.Head scratcher. Assuming DAndrews returns, interior line already has a lot of bodies.
Like: “too much pitching”?I don't htink the interior line has THAT many bodies....
COle Strange (may not be ready for week 1)
David Andrews (May not be back, age/injury concerns)
Sidey Sow
That's your hypothetical starters...
Jake Andrews is you backup C but lacks experience
Antoni Mafi (but he may no longer be a scheme fit.... also he was really bad last year)
Then they have a vet on a glorified camp deal...
Nick Leverett... UDFA, had 1 year he played some for Tampa but played 0% of snaps last year
That's some seriously low depth and you;d have to start moving OTs back inside in you get 1 or 2 injuries.
With the two guys this year, they now have a bit of depth at both positions.
I can't remember where I heard it over the last couple days, but someone mentioned the possibility of the team trying him at OT as well as IOL.If nothing else those dimensions: 6’4 315 34.5” arms seem more tackle than guard.
I think they'll likely be in the market for an OT at the top of next year's draft. (Probably in addition to Edge and WR.) This year is about getting some new guys in the door, hopefully something hits, but they'll still need a top end investment at some point soon. Owenu can always kick back inside too.I could see them moving Strange to center when Andrews hangs it up. Then Sow and Robinson at the guards, with Onwenu at RT and Okorafor (eventually Wallace) at LT.
And also would rather them have drafted Christian Mahogany in round 6 over Milton.
Doubtful, I think. He's not considered a very good athlete. Could have enough versatility to play center though, which might be important. They are very convinced Wallace can move to LT, so it's likely Okorafor to start the season, with Wallace backing him up, and a depth signing.I can't remember where I heard it over the last couple days, but someone mentioned the possibility of the team trying him at OT as well as IOL.
At this point I'd just plug in Onwenu at RG and Wallace at RT and go from there. Let Robinson fight it out for the LG starting spot with Jordan and then Sow/Strange when they're healthy. Onwenu is an average at best RT (a level I believe Wallace could potentially approach even as a rookie), but light years better than Robinson at RG.The issue with Robinson is he has allowed the most pressures of any interior lineman in the NFL through two weeks. He has some nice highlights but way too many lowlights. To me if they had anyone better I’d want to bench him. I don’t get Thorn’s takes sometimes.
Who's playing LT? Or shall they leave it vacant and roll right? Not the worst idea!At this point I'd just plug in Onwenu at RG and Wallace at RT and go from there. Let Robinson fight it out for the LG starting spot with Jordan and then Sow/Strange when they're healthy. Onwenu is an average at best RT (a level I believe Wallace could potentially approach even as a rookie), but light years better than Robinson at RG.
I mean, who's doing that right now?Who's playing LT? Or shall they leave it vacant and roll right? Not the worst idea!
I know he's playing tonight, but is Vederian Lowe out for an extended period of time? I wouldn't move the OL around for a Thursday game anyway, just talking of something I'd like to see happen.Caeden Wallace
His scouting report out of college was that he was good at attacking and not good at building a wall. Mentions that he doesn't read and respond well to stunts and twists, doesn't recover well to being thrown off balance, etc. That's not to say that he won't improve on these things with NFL coaching, and he has plenty of length and size to do it, but his explosiveness and athleticism is a limiting factor for now. His pass blocking was predicted to lag behind his run blocking.Robinson's limitations on pass protection seem like something that will improve over the course of the season with more reps.
That Wallace is playing tonight is why you don't make the move. They have 2 tackles without Onwenu, and guys get hurt both week to week and in games. One thing we've seen pretty consistently is that time together in the same role is one of the best things for a line. Robinson is a rookie, he should see some improvement as time passes, and Onwenu should settle some at RT.I know he's playing tonight, but is Vederian Lowe out for an extended period of time? I wouldn't move the OL around for a Thursday game anyway, just talking of something I'd like to see happen.
Yeah, that's 4th place finish feels like something of a participation prizeRobinson is on Brugler's 2nd team all-rookie.... a sign that OG was not great.
Maybe... I thought Wallace showed some promise post-injury and if he becomes a playable RT that's probably worth more to them.Yeah, that's 4th place finish feels like something of a participation prize
Puni, Powers-Johnson, and to a lesser extent McCormick all had good rookie years.
Only four other rookie Gs got more than ~200 plays, they were all pretty bad, and of them young Layden got the most snaps. So his inclusion feels kinda like a "shrug, give it to the guy who played" move
...
This whole thing also feels like it illustrates something about draft strategy.
The consensus draft boards had Puni around the ~80th prospect. The 49ers took him at 86.
The Pats would be better off today if they'd taken him in the third round (instead of Caedan Wallace) even if it meant only drafting one OLineman, instead of two. Better to have a great OG than a backup OT and a backup OG
If Wallace ever became a playable RT and Robinson is an average starting guard, this draft is a home run on top of Maye. I’d love one of them to be only pretty good.Maybe... I thought Wallace showed some promise post-injury and if he becomes a playable RT that's probably worth more to them.
That's fairMaybe... I thought Wallace showed some promise post-injury and if he becomes a playable RT that's probably worth more to them.
AmenIf Wallace ever became a playable RT and Robinson is an average starting guard, this draft is a home run on top of Maye
Both of those things are conceivable but feel like 90th percentile outcomes. I think that it's more likely that neither is with the team in two years than Wallace is our RT and Robinson a league average starting guard. They were barely rotation guys on a horrific OL as rookies. They'll improve, but so should the rest of the line.If Wallace ever became a playable RT and Robinson is an average starting guard, this draft is a home run on top of Maye. I’d love one of them to be only pretty good.
I’m not saying it’s likely but it’d be the best case scenario. For either of them though, you get one of the top tackles in FA, get Andrews back (if he doesn’t retire), move Onwenu back to RG it’s a much better chance for success. If Robinson was on not a completely garbage OL, could he have grown more or was he just thrown into a shitshow every single snap trying to do too much?Both of those things are conceivable but feel like 90th percentile outcomes. I think that it's more likely that neither is with the team in two years than Wallace is our RT and Robinson a league average starting guard. They were barely rotation guys on a horrific OL as rookies. They'll improve, but so should the rest of the line.
They both flashed something at times, so I get the optimism. Even if they end up only being depth, an upgrade on street FA depth is something. We ran so many street FAs out there this year that it was embarrassing.I’m not saying it’s likely but it’d be the best case scenario. For either of them though, you get one of the top tackles in FA, get Andrews back (if he doesn’t retire), move Onwenu back to RG it’s a much better chance for success. If Robinson was on not a completely garbage OL, could he have grown more or was he just thrown into a shitshow every single snap trying to do too much?
I really don’t expect either to become fulltime starters, but there’s a path where one of them might be and the other is a good backup? Even then, that’s a win.
True, but they'd already drafted Strange, Onwenu, Sow and Mafi at OG in prior years. Imagine the howling if the only lineman they'd taken was another OG, when OT was so clearly the needier position. Of course, then Strange and Sow get (stay?) hurt, and Mafi gets cut. I assume they knew Conor McDermott was ailing, hence his cut the day after the draft was completed. Really, Wallace was as much a draft for a body as much as anything.The Pats would be better off today if they'd taken him in the third round (instead of Caedan Wallace) even if it meant only drafting one OLineman, instead of two. Better to have a great OG than a backup OT and a backup OG
The WR's, probably. Polk started off fine and then the Miami game broke him. He and the staff never figured out a way to get him back on track. They never really god Baker on the field.I do wonder if these players were some of what Wolf was talking about when he mentioned that players didn’t develop as hoped.
Looking back on the year, it's tough enough for young players to adapt to the NFL level. I have to imagine given the insane amount of lineup changes in the line, it must have been quite challenging to give young players consistent coaching. I don't watch line play super closely and love others' write ups, but I have to imagine there is different coaching on footwork, leverage and arms depending on where you are and even on the strengths of the dude next to you. If we can even fill out the roster such that the line can have enough consistency for coaching to compound on itself, I'm optimistic we can see some trend on the individual talents. This year feels like a lost year.I do wonder if these players were some of what Wolf was talking about when he mentioned that players didn’t develop as hoped.
First off, F everything that weasel says. I’ll leave any more to his thread.I do wonder if these players were some of what Wolf was talking about when he mentioned that players didn’t develop as hoped.
Well not entirely. He had a strong rep for being an assistant line coach, but he never ran his room and he was only coaching for 4 years... big step up to being in charge of the whole line vs working with guys on punch techique and the like. Peters was the Jeff Davidson to Callahan's Scar.First off, F everything that weasel says. I’ll leave any more to his thread.
I believe they were getting good coaching along the line, and of all the positions being filled by noobs or incompetents (like vp player personnel) this wasn’t one.
Scott Peters was widely respected and had strong track record at…wait for it…the actual job he was hired to do.
https://www.patriots.com/team/coaches-roster/scott-peters#:~:text=COACHING-,Scott Peters enters his first season as the Patriots offensive,coach for the Cleveland Browns.
Maybe Caedan shows something. Maybe Robinson gets better at pass pro. Occam’s razor leaning into they weren’t good because they aren’t good.
Thanks for digging in @Cellar-Door I stand corrected.]
Well not entirely. He had a strong rep for being an assistant line coach, but he never ran his room and he was only coaching for 4 years... big step up to being in charge of the whole line vs working with guys on punch techique and the like. Peters was the Jeff Davidson to Callahan's Scar.