Concur. I am 56 and would love to be 37 again. Was watching some YouTube videos of Kluber and he looks like he is in tremendous shape, maybe he will be our next Tim Wakefield and sign contracts until his 40s?Maybe it isn’t.
Concur. I am 56 and would love to be 37 again. Was watching some YouTube videos of Kluber and he looks like he is in tremendous shape, maybe he will be our next Tim Wakefield and sign contracts until his 40s?Maybe it isn’t.
View: https://twitter.com/alexspeier/status/1608269422652784640?s=46&t=_a_7kIWlIL52agoc7HjuLA
Hard to believe they wouldn’t better this for that short of commitment.
They have some big holes to fill and I don’t see how they do it without giving up significant organizational talent.
We still need to free up 2 40 man spots for the turner and Kluber signings. So possiblyYep pretty much have to go the trade route now.
Why do we want Wendle? Not trying to be snarky at all. He was horrendous last year. They need someone better.Does the Segura signing make Wendle available?
Only mentioned him because he was in previous Marlins rumors.Why do we want Wendle? Not trying to be snarky at all. He was horrendous last year. They need someone better.
My picks for dfa would be Brasier and Hamilton. Would love to see a trade involving Duran that got value back, but don't see that happening.We still need to free up 2 40 man spots for the turner and Kluber signings. So possibly
Heard radio conjecture today (MLB Radio, Sirius, forgot who) That the Braves could be looking at Iglesias as Grissom insuranceIglesias and Andrus still available, but yeah, getting to be slim pickings. Maybe they are just gonna go with Story / Arroyo.
As opposed to the 6 games in the last 3 years that Segura has appeared at SS.I wouldn't say I'm disappointed they didn't sign Segura (disappointment happened long ago), but he was clearly the best option left at SS. Story isn't going back to SS. Just a gut feeling, coupled with the weakened arm and not a single appearance there last year.
Great point. No need to be dickish.As opposed to the 6 games in the last 3 years that Segura has appeared at SS.
Bryson Stott came up this past year (2022), for the first time. Segura hasn't played SS since 2019. So Stott's emergence seems to have little to do with Segura's shift to 2B.Great point. No need to be dickish.
His arm strength still grades out lightyears ahead of Story... and the emergence of Byson Stott had a thing or two to do with his shift to second?
What's your hope?
Maybe I'm wrong, but I think the plan is pretty clear, Story is penciled in at SS. Most of the good alternatives are now gone.I wouldn't say I'm disappointed they didn't sign Segura (disappointment happened long ago), but he was clearly the best option left at SS. Really uncertain what the plan is. Story isn't going back to SS. Just a gut feeling, coupled with the weakened arm and not a single appearance there last year.
Hoping the Brewers move Adames. That's my hope.
I could be way too optimistic but I think if Correa is again available, they’ll either jump in and offer him 2/80 or something short with a high AAV or they’ll be sending Devers to NYM. Either would be a big splash, imho.Even if the Mets/ Correa deal collapses, it’s not like we can expect the Sox to get involved. Any move they might make is going to be independent… my guess is whatever middle IF they can get for Duran/ Dalbec/ lesser prospects is added to Story and Arroyo, with the positions shuffled accordingly.
This from about a week ago, just after the Xander news brokeOnly mentioned him because he was in previous Marlins rumors.
Joey Wendle is also on the Red Sox' radar, according to The Athletic's Chad Jennings. Although chief baseball officer Chaim Bloom has identified second baseman Trevor Story as a possible Bogaerts replacement, the club reportedly believes Wendle would fit on the roster as an alternative option.
I think the best option (outside of some bigger trade of course) is to work something for Wendle. He's played a decent amount of ss and 2nd so there is some versatility. He has decent offensive (1.1) and defensive war (1.7). The question would be the price in a trade. They now have Segura, Rojas and Wendle in the fold so something has to give. With 2 40 man spots needing to open up for Turner and Kluber, I am still expecting a trade...but of course we could DFA Brasier, the guy we kept on the roster instead of Thad Ward...I mean that would make sense given this off-season.This from about a week ago, just after the Xander news broke
https://www.nbcsports.com/boston/red-sox/mlb-rumors-red-sox-interested-marlins-inf-joey-wendle
I don't see Correa doing another high AAV low years contract, and I'm skeptical that this FO would offer enough to make that an enticing option.I could be way too optimistic but I think if Correa is again available, they’ll either jump in and offer him 2/80 or something short with a high AAV or they’ll be sending Devers to NYM. Either would be a big splash, imho.
I'm hoping that the bar is a bit higher than this.I'd rather just see Elvis Andrews signed. He can play short well and could likely cover second if he tried. His recent hitting isn't all that different from Wendle and all he'd cost is money. He'd initially be a backup, but would be a starter as soon as the inevitable Arroyo injury arrives.
I imagine everyone else has seen the seem lack of hustle and respect for the game as the rest of us, so his market is at a bottom. Can't hurt to try this.I know basically everyone has written Jarren Duran off at this point, but does anyone have insight as to if there is a reason he can't be an option as part of the 2B puzzle? I believe he was moved to the OF to take advantage of his athleticism, but that experiment feels failed at this point. Does getting him at a position that he can play along with the shift ban and larger bases give a glimmer of hope that Duran can turn back into a useful piece of the puzzle? As the roster is currently constructed it seems worth the gamble especially since you can start the experiment at AAA.
I would be fine with Andrus or Iglesias.... but it creates the problem of the 40 man with 3 guys that would have to come off. That's why I was thinking a trade of someone (s) that come off the 40 in order to create the space needed for Turner, Kluber and whomever they trade for.I'd rather just see Elvis Andrews signed. He can play short well and could likely cover second if he tried. His recent hitting isn't all that different from Wendle and all he'd cost is money. He'd initially be a backup, but would be a starter as soon as the inevitable Arroyo injury arrives.
I'd expect Baty plus back for him. Getting all of Baty's pre-arb time is a splash for us if we're losing Devers. I'd prefer Baty or someone comparable to a QO pick, if we don't move him.I don't see Correa doing another high AAV low years contract, and I'm skeptical that this FO would offer enough to make that an enticing option.
The idea of a Devers trade crossed my mind as a splash, but I don't want to open up that can of worms. Besides that's likely a splash for the Mets, I don't see the Sox getting enough back that they'd count it as a splash in Boston (maybe a belly flop...)
Why do you keep mentioning making a "big splash"?I could be way too optimistic but I think if Correa is again available, they’ll either jump in and offer him 2/80 or something short with a high AAV or they’ll be sending Devers to NYM. Either would be a big splash, imho.
Chisolm? He seems to be another name in the mix with Wendle, Rojas and now Segura. Wouldn't mind adding him... be a high cost than the others, but the bar would be a bit higher IMO.I'm hoping that the bar is a bit higher than this.
Don't forget Mata and Walter, who should both pitch in the majors this yearSince we're here and not really discussing "rumors"... I would agree with your outlook on Sale. But then from last year's rotation....
Boston lost:
- Wacha: 127.1 innings at a 3.32 era (4.14 fip)
- Hill: 124.1 innings at a 4.27 era (4.14 fip)
- Eovaldi: 109.1 innings at a 3.87 era (4.30 fip)
Boston is hopefully replacing those with:
- Paxton: didn't pitch at all last year; I'd assume he could give them ~125 innings in 2023
- Sale: pitched just 5.2 innings last year; I'd assume he could give them ~125 innings in 2023
- Bello: pitched 57.1 innings at the MLB level; I'd assume he could go 150-170 innings in 2023 (he pitched 153.1 total last year)
Now, when healthy (and we don't need to be talking about peak CHRIS SALE here), those bottom three guys are, I think, better than those top three guys. Sale, even at 85%, sure is. Paxton's track record is better than the other three. Bello doesn't, but his last six starts really showed what he can do, after adjusting to life in the majors: 31.1 ip, 2.59 era, 1.53 whip (that needs to improve a lot), 8.9 k/9. He won't put up a 2.59 era in 2023, but he certainly has the ability to be a mid-3's era kind of guy, with improvement still to come after that. The raw talent is there for sure.
But all that still would leave Boston with a gigantic hole in the rotation. Pivetta takes the other spot, but what about the 41 starts and 166 innings started by the trio of Crawford, Winckowski, and Seabold (at a combined era of 6.29!)? Who gets those? Probably some combination of people - maybe Whitlock. Maybe this same trio. Maybe someone else. Who knows. But you'd think that they'd be better than what this trio did in 2022, right?
So back to rumors: I have heard and seen nothing on this front, but I'd hope that the Sox would be pursuing another starting pitcher. Maybe bring Wacha back. Maybe make a trade. I don't know. But I'd sure like to see them add one more starter.
Chisholm is Miami's best, most exciting young player. He's not going anywhere. But this does seem to make a Rojas deal more likely. They're not going to play two 34-year-olds in the MIChisolm? He seems to be another name in the mix with Wendle, Rojas and now Segura. Wouldn't mind adding him... be a high cost than the others, but the bar would be a bit higher IMO.
Maybe as a last resort. I'm expecting a trade for a shortstop with more defensive range than XanderSox gonna grab Iglesias?
I wouldn’t have known it if I hadn’t looked it up, but Elvis Andrus was kind of good last year? I was surprised to learn that. An outlier in the recent years of his career, sure, but yeah, 3 wins by BB-Ref’s reckoning and 3.5 by FG’s.I'd rather just see Elvis Andrews signed. He can play short well and could likely cover second if he tried. His recent hitting isn't all that different from Wendle and all he'd cost is money. He'd initially be a backup, but would be a starter as soon as the inevitable Arroyo injury arrives.
Bear in mind that Justin Turner hasn't been added to the Cot's sheet yet (odd considering Kluber is no more official than Turner at this point), so that would reduce that $29M to ~$17M before a hypothetical Devers extension.With Kluber's signing, Cots has us with just under $29m space below the threshold, including arbitration estimates. If a Raffy extension is happening, let's say doubling his arb number to $33m, that would bring us down to $12.5 available. Is that enough to get Andrus (a Boras client) coming off a 3.5 WAR season plus leave a little space for in season moves? I'm doubtful.
Red Sox Payroll on Twitter is the best source and has us 16.7 million under after Kluber. They can structure the Devers extension so it doesn't change his 2023 salary for luxury tax purposesWith Kluber's signing, Cots has us with just under $29m space below the threshold, including arbitration estimates. If a Raffy extension is happening, let's say doubling his arb number to $33m, that would bring us down to $12.5 available. Is that enough to get Andrus (a Boras client) coming off a 3.5 WAR season plus leave a little space for in season moves? I'm doubtful.
What makes them the "best source"?Red Sox Payroll on Twitter is the best source and has us 16.7 million under after Kluber. They can structure the Devers extension so it doesn't change his 2023 salary for luxury tax purposes
I'm guessing the player's agent would play a big role in this structuring.Red Sox Payroll on Twitter is the best source and has us 16.7 million under after Kluber. They can structure the Devers extension so it doesn't change his 2023 salary for luxury tax purposes
It doesn't make a difference to the player. You can either say that you have a new contract that starts in 2024, in which cases his 2023 AAV is his 6th year arb salary, or you announce that you're ripping up his current deal and have a long term contract that starts in 2023. In the former case, you can still give Devers a raise for 2023 in the form of a signing bonus.I'm guessing the player's agent would play a big role in this structuring.
Yeah, spotrac has us at roughly $23m under right now, but they also still have us on the books for $4m on Hosmer's AAV and Speier said it doesn't count (I trust him more than spotrac) and I assume Cots has removed Hosmer entirely (I just use spotrac because it's easier to see and the numbers are close).With Kluber's signing, Cots has us with just under $29m space below the threshold, including arbitration estimates. If a Raffy extension is happening, let's say doubling his arb number to $33m, that would bring us down to $12.5 available. Is that enough to get Andrus (a Boras client) coming off a 3.5 WAR season plus leave a little space for in season moves? I'm doubtful.
Would love to clear out the dregs of the 40-man for a competent, reasonably priced shortstop.The Athletic says industry sources have SD's Kim and Grisham as being available (Grisham more so), despite Preller's earlier comments. Padres need pitching. Could something like Houck for Kim happen?
https://theathletic.com/4041850/2022/12/29/padres-starting-pitching-grisham-kim?source=user-shared-article
FWIW, Baseball Trade Values agrees with you. Dalbec/Duran/Pivetta is not nearly enough, but Houck alone works. I get the desire to clear out roster spots, but packing up a bunch of flotsam isn't going to bring back much of anything.I'd like that too but I don't think it's realistic. Kim is a valuable asset and those are some scuffed nickels.