The general consensus from Bruins beat writers seems to be that it is no longer a matter of /if/ Tuukka Rask comes back, but when.
View: https://twitter.com/ConorRyan_93/status/1465787821206261771?s=20
View: https://twitter.com/PierreVLeBrun/status/1467886926548111364?s=20
DJ Bean had an interesting article today where the ultimate take away that if signing Rask means demoting Swayman, the Bruins shouldn't sign Rask.
View: https://twitter.com/NBCSBoston/status/1467920380757221379?s=20
Complicating all this is Ullmarks NMC.
So if Tuukka is coming back - how do the Bruins handle this? Moving Swayman down seems like the most logical answer. But if Rask is back for more than one year, does Swayman + DeBrusk potentially net a haul that makes this team a true contender?
Sweeney has really backed himself into a corner with the Ullmark deal. It'll be interesting to see how he manuevers himself out of it.
View: https://twitter.com/ConorRyan_93/status/1465787821206261771?s=20
View: https://twitter.com/PierreVLeBrun/status/1467886926548111364?s=20
DJ Bean had an interesting article today where the ultimate take away that if signing Rask means demoting Swayman, the Bruins shouldn't sign Rask.
View: https://twitter.com/NBCSBoston/status/1467920380757221379?s=20
Complicating all this is Ullmarks NMC.
So if Tuukka is coming back - how do the Bruins handle this? Moving Swayman down seems like the most logical answer. But if Rask is back for more than one year, does Swayman + DeBrusk potentially net a haul that makes this team a true contender?
Sweeney has really backed himself into a corner with the Ullmark deal. It'll be interesting to see how he manuevers himself out of it.
Last edited: