Shohei Ohtani’s attorneys accuse interpreter of ‘massive theft’ tied to alleged gambling

NDame616

will bailey
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
2,344
The legal issue he will run into isn't placing the actual bet (although I'm not sure if that's legal or not) if he placed the bet and then wired money to the bookie (with the memo "loan") but he will get looked at for things like wire fraud, tax evasion, maybe money laundering etc
 

Yaz4Ever

MemBer
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2004
11,292
MA-CA-RI-AZ-NC
Evidence Ohtani bet on MLB games. Suspension

Evidence Ohtani bet on his teams games.
Lifetime ban is the precedent.

Evidence that Ohtani bet on other sports but not baseball.
Why would there even be ANY punishment?

Basically, without proof he bet on baseball this is a huge nothingburger.
Sports gambling, other then horse racing and DFS, is illegal in CA.
Personally, I have no problem with him gambling on anything other than baseball. Even if he was betting on his team winning, I'd have no issue with it (although MLB would, for sure). Then again, I'm disgusted that Pete Rose is still not in the Hall.
 

Lose Remerswaal

Experiencing Furry Panic
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Personally, I have no problem with him gambling on anything other than baseball. Even if he was betting on his team winning, I'd have no issue with it (although MLB would, for sure). Then again, I'm disgusted that Pete Rose is still not in the Hall.
We’ve litigated the Rose thing over and over. Betting on your own team, especially as a manager, is as close to game fixing as you can get, and is worthy of a total ban.
 

Average Reds

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 24, 2007
35,432
Southwestern CT
There’s no agenda in thinking that law enforcement wouldn’t dig deep into their playbook with some aiding and abetting charge to force Ohtani to flip on the gambling operation. That’s the only way anyone would be going after a bettor. Is there a precedent of this occuring for any other reason? Ohtani’s concerns otherwise would only be with MLB.
Your original post described a hypothetical attempt to charge Ohtani with violations of federal laws as a way to “frame” him.

We can disagree over the appropriateness of using federal fraud and money laundering statutes, but your categorizing the use of those laws as “framing” is both false on its face and pretty strong evidence of your agenda, which is to declare this a nothingburger.
 

Tokyo Sox

Baka Gaijin
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 16, 2006
6,169
There
I think it’s entirely possible that Shoei didn’t understand that paying his translator’s debt was illegal. Draftkings ads are everywhere. Players are allowed to gamble, just not on baseball.

His biggest issue is that Shoei has no way of proving that his translator wasn’t placing bets for him. I think that’s probably the biggest issue, and why we saw the knee jerk change of story from his lawyers, trying to insulate Shoei completely.

I would imagine the truth is likely the original story, and Shoei intended to help his best friend out of a mess, and now he’s gotten himself into a jam.
"Shohei"

The idea that you would refer to the possibility of criminal charges for wire fraud or federal money laundering (“interstate laws”) as an attempt to “frame” Othani suggests that you might be the one with an agenda.

I’ll repeat what I said earlier in the thread: the original story from Othani’s camp - that he was paying off his friend’s debt - is one that may have technically exposed him to criminal liability, but wasn’t (IMO) going to result in any charges or punishment by MLB. Changing stories so abruptly and making the interpreter the fall guy is the only reason I feel like there may be a problem for Othani.

We’ll see how it goes today, but it feels like a foolish risk to have Othani say anything at this point.
Your original post described a hypothetical attempt to charge Othani with violations of federal laws as a way to “frame” him.
"Ohtani"
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,385
Your original post described a hypothetical attempt to charge Othani with violations of federal laws as a way to “frame” him.

We can disagree over the appropriateness of using federal fraud and money laundering statutes, but your categorizing the use of those laws as “framing” is both false on its face and pretty strong evidence of your agenda, which is to declare this a nothingburger. .
It was late and by “frame” I was referring to charging him with an obscure law which is rarely used for the purpose of having him flip on their primary target in this case being the illegal gambling operation. Nothingburger meaning he isn’t going to jail for betting with a bookmaker, something millions and millions of people do every year, some legally as a profession. …he’ll maybe have to make statements to support the charges against the operation to improve their legal leverage to negotiate a plea but as far as legal issues what else are you expecting? His primary issue is going to be with MLB.
 
Last edited:

Average Reds

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 24, 2007
35,432
Southwestern CT
It was late and by “frame” I was referring to charging him with an obscure law which is rarely used for the purpose of having him flip on their primary target in this case being the illegal gambling operation.
I disagree with how rare it may be, but I understand your point and I don’t have an issue with that. Apologies for the digression.
 

Remagellan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
We’ve litigated the Rose thing over and over. Betting on your own team, especially as a manager, is as close to game fixing as you can get, and is worthy of a total ban.
I don't have a problem with a player doing it as long as he is betting on the team to win, since a player should always be putting their best effort into the team winning every game it plays.

But it is different for a manager, because if he's having key pitchers throw longer than might be reasonable to win a game he has money on, he's hurting his team, whether or not he realizes it.
 

Tokyo Sox

Baka Gaijin
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 16, 2006
6,169
There
lol - my dyslexia rears it’s head again.
Colonel Jessup don't I feel like the fucking asshole dot gif

I wouldn't have highlighted either post but it was like 4x each so I thought maybe not typos.

Anyway. This will all go away soon...right?
 

Max Power

thai good. you like shirt?
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
8,027
Boston, MA
I don't see how his statement is going to be anything other than, "This is an active investigation and I can't talk about it, so don't ask any more questions."
 

Tokyo Sox

Baka Gaijin
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 16, 2006
6,169
There
I don't see how his statement is going to be anything other than, "This is an active investigation and I can't talk about it, so don't ask any more questions."
That is my full expectation as well. "We're cooperating fully, right now I'm just focused on what I can control which is preparing to play baseball and help my team." yada yada
 

Lose Remerswaal

Experiencing Furry Panic
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
any proof he bet against his team, though? If so, I completely agree.
Read @Remagellan ’s last paragraph above. Betting on your team to win yesterday tells the bookies that your team will probably lose today if you don’t bet in them because you overused your best reliever(s) yesterday to win your bet which means you don’t have them available at their best today.
 

Yaz4Ever

MemBer
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2004
11,292
MA-CA-RI-AZ-NC
Read @Remagellan ’s last paragraph above. Betting on your team to win yesterday tells the bookies that your team will probably lose today if you don’t bet in them because you overused your best reliever(s) yesterday to win your bet which means you don’t have them available at their best today.
I saw that after I posted. I still consider Rose to be an incredible competitor that would never jeopardize his team winning, but have to also agree with you and @Remagellan that it's a slippery slope and cannot be condoned. I hadn't considered that angle.
 

jayhoz

Ronald Bartel
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
17,411
That is my full expectation as well. "We're cooperating fully, right now I'm just focused on what I can control which is preparing to play baseball and help my team." yada yada
I expect he’ll add in a statement about how neither he nor anyone in his circle ever made any bets on baseball.
 

Hyde Park Factor

token lebanese
SoSH Member
Jun 14, 2008
2,830
Manchvegas
I saw that after I posted. I still consider Rose to be an incredible competitor that would never jeopardize his team winning, but have to also agree with you and @Remagellan that it's a slippery slope and cannot be condoned. I hadn't considered that angle.
It's well known that he inserted himself into the lineup even though better match ups were available when he was chasing Ty Cobb and the all time hits record. Hell, he needed roughly 2,600 more at bats to get around 60 more hits.

Add in the gambling and I'm not sure that the bolded is really true. Personal opinion: I've never cared for him as a person or as a player.
 

jayhoz

Ronald Bartel
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
17,411
I'm not even sure if that would be advisable ATM.
I'm sure it would be better if he said nothing at all, but I'm guessing the PR folks will be pushing for him to give the media and his fans an easy way to defend him in the court of public opinion.
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
I'm sure it would be better if he said nothing at all, but I'm guessing the PR folks will be pushing for him to give the media and his fans an easy way to defend him in the court of public opinion.
I agree 100% about the court of public opinion, but at this point he and the PR folks MAY have bigger concerns for what he offers. I guess we'll find out in a few hours.
 

RG33

Certain Class of Poster
SoSH Member
Nov 28, 2005
7,239
CA
I saw that after I posted. I still consider Rose to be an incredible competitor that would never jeopardize his team winning, but have to also agree with you and @Remagellan that it's a slippery slope and cannot be condoned. I hadn't considered that angle.
Rose was / is a degenerate gambler. He 100% would have (did) jeopardized his team winning if that meant he could have lowered his debts.
 

moretsyndrome

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 24, 2006
2,229
Pawtucket
I saw that after I posted. I still consider Rose to be an incredible competitor that would never jeopardize his team winning, but have to also agree with you and @Remagellan that it's a slippery slope and cannot be condoned. I hadn't considered that angle.
Another angle is that he overused his best relievers in games he bet to win. He possibly risked promising young careers in order to ensure his bets played out. That's unforgivable.
 

LogansDad

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
29,806
Alamogordo
I'm not sure how the merch $$$ is divied up, but I would think that it's the endorsement $$$ that should be a bigger concern.
This is why I kind of lean toward naivety here, as I don't think Ohtani would have signed the contract the way he did if there was even a chance of his endorsements drying up.

I doubt today's presser accomplishes anything, and I have a feeling we will never know the "full truth", and this whole thing makes me sad as a baseball fan.
 

moretsyndrome

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 24, 2006
2,229
Pawtucket
This is why I kind of lean toward naivety here, as I don't think Ohtani would have signed the contract the way he did if there was even a chance of his endorsements drying up.

I doubt today's presser accomplishes anything, and I have a feeling we will never know the "full truth", and this whole thing makes me sad as a baseball fan.
I'm hoping he was naive, but I can't say I'm leaning that way. Between Ohtani's protection of his privacy and the language barrier, he's almost a blank slate to the American baseball fan. There seem to be a lot of people throwing an ignorance of the law defense his way, but that's assuming he's prone to ignorance.

I don't know what's he's prone to. All I can tell is that he's a great player. Anecdotally, most great pitchers seem to fall on the high end of the MLB IQ curve. Also, Japan maintains an extremely rigorous educational system. He's a grown man, and I think it's unlikely that he's not that bright. I think it's a long shot (sorry) that he was in the dark the whole time, unfortunately.
 

CFB_Rules

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2016
1,636
If you were a bookie, why on Earth would you accept a bet on baseball from a MLB player? Seems like a sure fire way to lose money
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,614
There’s no agenda in thinking that law enforcement wouldn’t dig deep into their playbook with some aiding and abetting charge to force Ohtani to flip on the gambling operation. That’s the only way anyone would be going after a bettor. Is there a precedent of this occuring for any other reason? Ohtani’s concerns otherwise would only be with MLB.
The easy one is that if *he* was betting and winning, there could be tax implications.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,385
If you were a bookie, why on Earth would you accept a bet on baseball from a MLB player? Seems like a sure fire way to lose money
When I was a small time bookie in my 20’s I had two NHL players betting with me. Hockey too. They didn’t bet on their teams games but they literally never won. Athletes are notoriously terrible gamblers.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,385
I saw that after I posted. I still consider Rose to be an incredible competitor that would never jeopardize his team winning, but have to also agree with you and @Remagellan that it's a slippery slope and cannot be condoned. I hadn't considered that angle.
As was mentioned upthread….

I agree that Rose would never “intentionally” jeopardize his team winning. However, if he has a bet on the Reds in a tight game he may use his bullpen differently and give them the next day off when he doesn’t bet them. Iirc, there was record of one of his worst pitchers seeing action in these “throwaway games” that he did NOT wager on the Reds immediately following games when he did have a wager on his team. In Pete’s twisted mind he likely didn’t see anything wrong with this and easily justified it.

Edit: Ugh triple post. I’m like Zion up 20 with a minute left in the game.
 

Tim Salmon

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 24, 2005
3,313
If his interpreter truly stole $4.5M from him, how would he even know if the guy bet on baseball?
He wouldn't. Which is why it's in his best interest to not say anything. As an interested observer who thrives on chaos, I hope he says a lot.
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
27,121
Newton
I am stunned that anyone still believes Rose didn’t throw games because he was such a fiery competitor.

“I didn’t gamble.”

“I didn’t bet on baseball.”

“I didn’t bet as a manager.

"I didn't bet as a player.”

“I didn’t bet on Reds games.”

All things he insisted were true, all lies. Why would anyone ever think he’s telling the truth about never betting against the Reds? Gambling is a disease and Rose has been very, very sick for a very, very long time.
 

jayhoz

Ronald Bartel
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
17,411
If his interpreter truly stole $4.5M from him, how would he even know if the guy bet on baseball?
Good point. Maybe he just says that he never bet on baseball and never asked anyone to bet on baseball for him. Or he does the smart thing and says nothing.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,932
Maine
If you were a bookie, why on Earth would you accept a bet on baseball from a MLB player? Seems like a sure fire way to lose money
Why wouldn't you? How he bets is info I can use to set lines and odds for other bettors. Especially if he's betting on his own games.

And that's before considering the opportunities should I decide to float him some credit and have him end up owing me $4.5M or something like that.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,674
Oregon
If Ohtani's team is going with the narrative that this was all the trainers doing, then he needs to fire his financial advisors for not noticing $4.5 million could be "stolen" that easily
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,385
I am stunned that anyone still believes Rose didn’t throw games because he was such a fiery competitor.

“I didn’t gamble.”

“I didn’t bet on baseball.”

“I didn’t bet as a manager.

"I didn't bet as a player.”

“I didn’t bet on Reds games.”

All things he insisted were true, all lies. Why would anyone ever think he’s telling the truth about never betting against the Reds? Gambling is a disease and Rose has been very, very sick for a very, very long time.
Because we later saw the betting logs and there was not a single wager placed against the Reds.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,270
If Ohtani's team is going with the narrative that this was all the trainers doing, then he needs to fire his financial advisors for not noticing $4.5 million could be "stolen" that easily
Or, they questioned and were told to stand down…
 

CalSoxGal

New Member
Dec 17, 2023
23
Or, they questioned and were told to stand down…
Or the interpreter was the financial advisor...stranger things have happened.

Edit: one would hope his agent would advise against such an arrangement, but if they truly were besties and the interpreter was as involved in Ohtani's life as reported, I could see it as possible.
 
Last edited: