fair point--I am overexcited. we'll see...dynomite said:If the articles I'm reading are right, Castillo hasn't played professional baseball since 2012. Tossing him straight into ML games at this point seems... ambitious.
johnnywayback said:What about Betts at 3B? He seems to have infield-friendly hands and a 3B-friendly arm. At worst, you can platoon him with Holt there and, against RHP, have him available to play all over in Holt's UTIL bench spot.
http://fullcount.weei.com/sports/boston/baseball/red-sox/2014/08/22/red-sox-agree-to-seven-year-deal-with-rusney-castillo/Castillo will count for $10.36 million against the luxury tax threshold for each of the seven years of his deal, including 2014. However, the Sox cleared enough payroll at the 2014 trade deadline that, as of now, it does not appear that they will exceed the $189 million luxury tax threshold in 2014.
Though Craig has played 217 games at 1B in his career. And for trivia buffs, Craig also has 9 games at 2B and 4 games at 3B. Perhaps he may sub for Napoli at 1B for 20-30 games next year.MakMan44 said:Still got Craig too.
To me this makes sense. Maybe not right away, give him time to see if he'll hit in Fenway. But given his short contract, the likelihood that his next deal will be the type the Sox shy away from, and the poor ob%, I can see Cespedes being dealt.Stitch01 said:Wouldnt bet on it happening, but wonder if flipping Cespedes is a possibility given the new roster makeup and the fact that the OF FA class sucks.
oumbi said:Though Craig has played 217 games at 1B in his career. And for trivia buffs, Craig also has 9 games at 2B and 4 games at 3B. Perhaps he may sub for Napoli at 1B for 20-30 games next year.
Rob Bradford @bradfo 2m
Another FWIW: Castillo has limited trade protection (consistent with most FA signings)
If that were the case, why didn't the Marlins just sign him themselves? Are you saying the Sox would send money along with Castillo? Would be an interesting way to exploit the process if allowed (like buying a prospect whose cost to another team would be low)NJ Fan said:I can't help but think that if he plays for the Sox the rest of this season and performs well, he's then part of a cost-controlled package that's dangled to the Marlins for Stanton.
Think it's becoming more and more evident that taking Craig was the price for getting Kelly. Wouldn't be surprised if the Sox FO are not counting on much from Craigpdub said:I wonder what this means for Bradley Jr., more time in AAA? Interesting signing, worth more than Abreu signed for.
EDIT: Just to clarify, this assumes that we have Cespedes - Craig - Castillo as next year's OF.
foulkehampshire said:I have to think JBJ is the long man out on this.
Castillo makes him irrelevant.
foulkehampshire said:I have to think JBJ is the long man out on this.
Castillo makes him irrelevant.
Buzzkill Pauley said:
No, Castillo makes him trade-bait for the NL. That'll be highly relevant in the offseason.
No, it was always the latter.Papelbon's Poutine said:
So we've now gone from "No way we get Craig for Peavy" to "They had to take him as a dump if they wanted Joe Kelly"?
Lackey.Papelbon's Poutine said:
So we've now gone from "No way we get Craig for Peavy" to "They had to take him as a dump if they wanted Joe Kelly"?
Either way, the timing is great in that they can save $2M a year against the luxury line by spreading it across "seven" years and not the six it really is.Papelbon's Poutine said:
They were never anywhere near the luxury tax threshold. Even if they hadn't moved Gomes, Lester, Peavy and Lackey, they still could have made this signing and not been close.
Madmartigan said:Are there any MLE projections out there for Castillo?
I agree with you in a vacuum on value (although I dont give that much weight to one pro scout opinion).Hee Sox Choi said:I don't know why you would trade Betts++ for the right to pay a guy 20 mil. I had a pro scout tell me that Betts would be our best player in 2 years. I said, "But but but Xander--" He said Betts. I don't think you trade the guy for anyone other than Stanton and certainly not for a pitcher who makes 20 mil or Douchebag Mat Latos. Keep Betts, sign Lester, Scherzer, Shields, Iwakuma, etc.
You don't trade 6 years of Betts for the right to pay a guy 20+ mil, especially when we most likely will have a protected pick.
turnthe2 said:On another note, who is going now? According to Sox Prospects there are two open slots on the 40 however if he is going to see Major League playing time before September 1st, someone is getting the boot. I imagine they'll give him from now to then (9/1) to acclimate which is less than 2 weeks.
I was refuting your claim that 2004 and 2007 was largely moves of another ownership group which I did. Also what team is going to make the playoff every year, you have unrealistic expectations. Any other questions moron?Plympton91 said:1. There are a million other differences between Castillo and Ellsbury too; however, many have compared Castillo to Gardner with more power. Given the value of the contract they gave him, they must hold a similar view. I am with you on the Castillo signing; you just have to trust the FO and their evaluation of his offensive and defensive potential. He's a free agent, and this valuation is of a middle-tier free agent, so they are balanced in terms of both upside and downside risks, I think.
2. I go the other way on the impact of having now won 3 world series on what I'd like to see. I'd rather watch meaningful baseball through the end of September every year than win a world series one year out of the last five (2013), another great pennant race (2011) and turn to football with the mid-July start of training camp in three other years (2010, 2012, and 2014) where they used the "bridge year" philosophy.
3. Manny (the WS MVP this ownership group tried to give away for nothing), Youkilis, Varitek, and Wakefield (189 IP at league average is not easy to find, as this season shows) were still absolutely key contributors in 2007; Manny (again, the guy this ownership tried to give away for nothing), Damon (Would they have signed him to that contract, Duquette's last? I recall a lot of Gammons articles suggesting they were pissed about it), Varitek, Lowe, Wakefield, Nixon, and Pedro were all regulars and Youkilis provided 250 PA of quality depth in 2004. Enough facts for you, newbie?
http://fullcount.weei.com/sports/boston/baseball/red-sox/2014/08/22/red-sox-agree-to-seven-year-deal-with-rusney-castillo/As of roughly noon, while the two sides were working together to define the terms, the agreement had not been formally reached. However, the concept being discussed would have Castillo receiving a prorated minimum for 2014 (receiving a percentage of the roughly $500,000 minimum — likely in the vicinity of $80,000-$85,000 for roughly a month under contract), with the balance of the $72.5 million paid in a signing bonus and spread out over the six full seasons.
http://fullcount.weei.com/sports/boston/baseball/red-sox/2014/08/22/red-sox-agree-to-seven-year-deal-with-rusney-castillo/As of roughly noon, while the two sides were working together to define the terms, the agreement had not been formally reached. However, the concept being discussed would have Castillo receiving a prorated minimum for 2014 (receiving a percentage of the roughly $500,000 minimum — likely in the vicinity of $80,000-$85,000 for roughly a month under contract), with the balance of the $72.5 million paid in a signing bonus and spread out over the six full seasons.
Sorry, I inserted my response in the wrong place.johnnywayback said:What about Betts at 3B? He seems to have infield-friendly hands and a 3B-friendly arm. At worst, you can platoon him with Holt there and, against RHP, have him available to play all over in Holt's UTIL bench spot.
3B Betts/Holt
2B Pedroia
DH Ortiz
1B Napoli
RF Cespedes
CF Castillo
LF Craig
SS Bogaerts
A platoon with Holt will only result in about 40 starts and the only players in your line-up that wouldn't play everyday are Craig and possibly Napoli. They could trade Craig and make make Betts the starting leftfielder but that would be far from maximizing the value for what I believe could be an all-star 2B.
Moving Betts to CF made sense but with that possibility now gone he should probably be traded.
C Vazquez
Bench: C, Betts/Holt, Nava, Victorino
AAA/Traded: JBJ, Middlebrooks, etc.
I don't know as I'd say, "none worth a damn." We're starting to approach the standard minimum sample of 30 at this point, aren't we. 20 at least? That's better than nothing.Buzzkill Pauley said:
Nope. At least, none worth a damn.
This is a pure scouting-only sign....Allard Baird's fingerprints are all over it.
Well, I suppose any time you can spend $10MM instead of $500K, you have to do it.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2014/08/22/cuban-outfielder-rusney-castillo-to-sign-record-deal-with-boston-red-sox/14441443/Castillo is scheduled to undergo his physical Saturday.
RedOctober3829 said:I think you can. Abreu was billed as a much better player than Castillo is. This is a very expensive gamble that we all better hope works out.
That's not what I said. I said that previous ownership had acquired many key players, and that the remaining players had been signed by a team of scouts, asst. GM's, and GM that were now working for other teams. That is indisputable, unless you think that Theo Epstein, Hoyer, and Byrnes were all figureheads and Ben Cherington the real decisionmaker all along. I'd be careful calling others names when you clearly lack basic reading comprehension skills.OptimusPapi said:I was refuting your claim that 2004 and 2007 was largely moves of another ownership group which I did. Also what team is going to make the playoff every year, you have unrealistic expectations. Any other questions moron?
Plympton91 said:This is far more balanced than OptimusPapis presentation of things. A lot of the guys who produced the championships in 2004 and 2007 were acquired by previous owners and many of the best scouts and assistant GMs and GM from those years are now working for other teams.
Stop with the personal attacks. If you can't argue a point without calling someone a moron on here you don't need to be here.OptimusPapi said:I was refuting your claim that 2004 and 2007 was largely moves of another ownership group which I did. Also what team is going to make the playoff every year, you have unrealistic expectations. Any other questions moron?
Can we stop with the Stanton crap? They now have 7 outfielders vying for major league jobs. The actions of this front office are not the actions of a front office planning on acquiring Stanton this winter.fineyoungarm said:
Red - It could be part of a secret plan to package the two Cubans, Cespdes and Castillo, to get Stanton.
johnnywayback said:What about Betts at 3B? He seems to have infield-friendly hands and a 3B-friendly arm. At worst, you can platoon him with Holt there and, against RHP, have him available to play all over in Holt's UTIL bench spot.
3B Betts/Holt
2B Pedroia
DH Ortiz
1B Napoli
RF Cespedes
CF Castillo
LF Craig
SS Bogaerts
C Vazquez
Bench: C, Betts/Holt, Nava, Victorino
AAA/Traded: JBJ, Middlebrooks, etc.
Plympton91 said:I don't know as I'd say, "none worth a damn." We're starting to approach the standard minimum sample of 30 at this point, aren't we. 20 at least? That's better than nothing.
So Craig is the new Carp?bosockboy said:Seems right to me.....massive depth with Craig able to play backup 1B and DH as well, creating playing time for Betts/Holt in LF, and Victorino being a 350-400 AB RF/CF sub and injury protection. Craig also the long term Papi replacement.
Yeah, this pretty well represents my reaction as well. Jeez, that much?! . . . Hmm. . . . . . . Hmm . . . Yeah, this is pretty smart.Savin Hillbilly said:Arthur Schlesinger told the story that Joe Kennedy used to advise his sons against doing something and then if they went ahead and did it anyway, he would turn on a dime and say "best decision you ever made." That's how I'm trying to feel about this. I still think the risk is pretty huge, not so much in dollars as in opportunity costs, but I'm going to remember that they've done their homework and assume that they're really onto something here.
My biggest worry is the plate discipline. Most of the successful recent Cuban defectors actually had <1 K/BB ratios in Cuban ball, according to this site--and they have flipped around to look like hackers in MLB. Castillo has the worst Cuban K/BB of that bunch, at nearly 1.5/1. If the same thing happens to him that happened to Abreu, Cespedes and Alexei Ramirez, he might wind up with really hideous K/BB numbers here. Hopefully part of what's going on there is that because those other three were feared more as power hitters in Cuba, a whole lot of those BB were intentional, and the K/BB spike on hitting the majors wouldn't look so extreme if we only looked at UIBB.
On the plus side, with both Castillo and Cespedes in the lineup, games should be shorter..... :whistling:
OCD SS said:So Craig is the new Carp?