That dog will hunt; Henry back to Patriots on 3/27M deal

astrozombie

New Member
Sep 12, 2022
409
Assuming its not massive money, this is good. He's not the best TE of all time, but he seemed to be the one consistently above-average pass catcher the last few years.
 

IdiotKicker

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 21, 2005
10,863
Somerville, MA
Good. Let's see the numbers and then let's draft a young TE somewhere in the middle of the draft this year to build the position out for the future.
 

Curt S Loew

SoSH Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2001
6,773
Shantytown
Very good news. Both that we signed him and he wants to be here. That's not a huge deal and he's a good player.
 

Arroyoyo

New Member
Dec 13, 2021
835
Must have no market or he really likes New England.

Edit: I honestly thought he’d get $12-$13m/yr. I don’t think this is just a bargain, I think it’s borderline shocking. Good for the Pats FO getting this done at those numbers.
 

Mystic Merlin

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 21, 2007
47,052
Hartford, CT
He’s not dynamic and can’t block, but he’s a solid receiver/dependable vet presence at the position. They really need to add talent to the TE room, like every other position on offense, to be sure, but being able to hang your hat on his production is nice.
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,558
He’s not dynamic and can’t block, but he’s a solid receiver/dependable vet presence at the position. They really need to add talent to the TE room, like every other position on offense, to be sure, but being able to hang your hat on his production is nice.
Yup, the thing with rookie tight ends, even the ones who end up being good, is that they usually suck pretty hard at the start of their careers and may have trouble getting on the field if they struggle to block and that sort of thing. Happy to have a guy that you know will be solid.
 

Mooch

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
4,552
He's a legit, middle of the field TE weapon. Happy to have him back.
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,125
He's very fungible but there was a serious lack of talent available at TE and the draft class is below average after Bowers so the signing makes sense in a vacuum. Probably a year longer than I would have liked to see but not the worst signing.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,943
Solid deal, only 16m guaranteed, still a good safety valve and red zone weapon, lets you draft one (or more) of the raw athletic freaks this year and develop them to take over.
 

Mystic Merlin

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 21, 2007
47,052
Hartford, CT
He's very fungible but there was a serious lack of talent available at TE and the draft class is below average after Bowers so the signing makes sense in a vacuum. Probably a year longer than I would have liked to see but not the worst signing.
If he’s only due 16M in guaranteed money (probably the signing bonus plus the first year salary), then he will be easily cuttable after the second year anyways.
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
27,127
Newton
Henry is a guy who produced in 2021 when the offense was humming and still produced some even when the wheels came off in 2023 (I think he was largely hurt and/or ineffective in the 2022 Patricia system). Good possession receiver and decent in the red zone. Which is all to say, he's generally reliable.

Now go get a guy who can block, too.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,233
He’s not dynamic and can’t block, but he’s a solid receiver/dependable vet presence at the position. They really need to add talent to the TE room, like every other position on offense, to be sure, but being able to hang your hat on his production is nice.
Yeah, I think in a better offense, Henry will look better (shocking!). There are skills there and if he can exploit some better matchups if/when we get some other guys in, his numbers should pop a bit.
 
Oct 12, 2023
727
Nice deal. Kind of surprised his blocking has been so bad, he never struck me as a really poor blocker with the Chargers

If they can ever stabilize the OL, perhaps he will need to do less blocking
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,557
around the way
Concur with the chorus that this is a good thing at this money. Many holes to fill, and this is one less. At a time when a lot of teams have money, seems like a no-brainer.
 

NomarsFool

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 21, 2001
8,270
As mentioned above, there was talk of 3/39, so this certainly seems like a nice deal. Solidifies an area of need where there weren't a lot of other options available.
 

Old Fart Tree

the maven of meat
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 10, 2001
14,143
Boulder, CO
Seemed like he was described as blocking type when they first picked him up, then it turned out he had the skills you describe as well.
I was being sarcastic, based on that one goofy play against the jets. I think he’s more of an in line blocking type.
 

Garshaparra

New Member
Feb 27, 2008
541
McCarver's Mushy Mouth
As usual, ostensibly a 2 year deal with a small hit to let him go in year 3 if he falls apart. I do think it's a solid signing. Get Pharaoh back too, and get a fullback that can play TE in a pinch, and we're back in business.
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
27,127
Newton
This is a fair deal for Henry, the guys making 13 million per are all substantially better players than him and he's also coming off his worst season.
He had fewer yards and YPC but more TDs last season and actually one more catch. I’m not sure his 2023 was conclusively worse than his 2022 and at least from the eye test he looked a lot more spry last season.
 

mcpickl

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2007
4,556
I thought there was a chance the Patriots frontload their contracts this year and take the cap hits up front, but this Henry contract is structured with the standard tiny cap hit in year one. If this contract is any indicator, it looks like they are indeed going to be burning that cash this month.

I like that they are continuing on with Belichicks method of having heavy per game bonuses. I like having the players earn that money by being available.
 

BigJimEd

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
4,457
There is no reason to front load a deal when you carry over any unused cap space.

I think Kraft and company like to keep the cash outlay spread out.
 

mcpickl

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2007
4,556
There is no reason to front load a deal when you carry over any unused cap space.

I think Kraft and company like to keep the cash outlay spread out.
Sure there is.

If there aren't enough players out there that you like that'll sign with you this season, you can frontload the guys who do sign with you, rather than spend more money on lesser players. It would leave more cap space in future years to utilize. I think frontloading would be especially beneficial in a season where you are very unlikely to be competitive.

So they're spending over 10M on Hunter Henry this year, but his cap hit is a bit above 5M. They had the option to spend the exact same amount on him, but take a bigger cap hit now so you will have more at your disposal later. When theoretically, you're hoping to be in contention.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,943
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
He had fewer yards and YPC but more TDs last season and actually one more catch. I’m not sure his 2023 was conclusively worse than his 2022 and at least from the eye test he looked a lot more spry last season.
Eh, TDs to me are contextual, don't really like them as a measure of production unless we're talking about a player that's consistently above or below average at getting into the endzone.
 

mcpickl

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2007
4,556
But as Ale said, you can carry over unused cap space.
But as I said, they won't do that.

They'll still spend it. If they don't get enough good players to spend it on this season, they won't bank it. They'll spend it on lesser players if they don't frontload they guys they got.

You think the Krafts wouldn't hear Felger Nation screaming at them for being cheap if they don't spend to the cap? They spend to the cap every year. They'll spend to the cap this year.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,943
But as I said, they won't do that.

They'll still spend it. If they don't get enough good players to spend it on this season, they won't bank it. They'll spend it on lesser players if they don't frontload they guys they got.

You think the Krafts wouldn't hear Felger Nation screaming at them for being cheap if they don't spend to the cap? They spend to the cap every year. They'll spend to the cap this year.
They'll probably use a chunk to extend guys and restructure
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,943
I agree, they probably will.

And I would frontload those extensions and restructures for the same reason.
yeah, I meant it more that I think they aren't going to just sign scrubs to sign them. I think the optimal strategy is the one they have been on so far...
lock up some holes before UFA starts, and do it while using as little cap space as you can. Leaves you flexible to hunt all the top of the market guys, then once that wave is done... you start using the rest of the cap space on extensions/restructures with money in year 1. I really doubt a year 1 GM is planning to build himself a future year timebomb right away. He'll get his big fish early then fill the rest of the space by moving money around.