They took at least 2' with that double substitution plus a ton of other time wasting. It would be more meaningful if we were still down 1 but I thought it was deservedHow 5'?
They all sucked. Arena sucked. The crowd sucked. The announcers sucked.
The whole thing just sucked.
Oh, and this:Tuesday's game against Honduras is going to be a brutal street fight. There's a ton on the line for both teams, San Pedro Sula is a tough place to play, and the Catrachos are reliably the dirtiest team in CONCACAF (and that's saying something).
Great point. I am hopeful that by the time Pulisic reaches his prime we have some players with enough talent to help him.Good luck for the rest of the qualifyers. A WC without the US would miss a lot.
You should remember that Pulisic is still only 18years old. Most of the 2.Bundesliga teams would be happy if they had a 18year old getting regular playing time. And you are basically expecting him to play each game like he can perform on a consistent top level vs.experienced players. Which he can´t, at his current age.
In the post-game chatter on ESPN, they were talking about how Bryan Ruiz was barely touched all night but Pulisic got beaten to a pulp. Arena is famous for his "first foul, first shot, first goal" mantra of how he wants his players to approach the game with intensity. We definitely did not see it last night. A certain manager might even say the team needed to be a bit more "nasty".I was surprised the subs didn't come earlier in the 2nd half to adjust to the way the game was being called, but besides Bradley we have no steel in the midfield. With the way the game was being called we should have hacked more. In the 20+ years I've watched USMNT, professional fouls are something that tactically we never do, it's continually frustrating to watch other teams do it and us not do it.
That all said, CR played really well, finished their chances, and a world class keeper made two ridiculous saves.
In terms of winning games right now it probably makes sense to play dirty. But in the long run I think it impedes progress. The goal should not be to win the Gold Cup or qualify for the World Cup. We can do that without pushing and pulling. The goal should be to get to the level of Germany and Brazil, and to do that we need to be able to win through vision and passing.In the 20+ years I've watched USMNT, professional fouls are something that tactically we never do, it's continually frustrating to watch other teams do it and us not do it.
Sorry I should have been clearer, it's not that they necessarily need to play dirty, it's just that there are instances in a game where stopping play lets the defense reset. On the first goal, Ream was marking Urenas for 15 yards 1v1, then Urenas uses two touches to reposition himself before he got to the box, Ream got juked on the first touch but recovered on the second. Good. Just push him down there, or grab his shirt, and take the yellow card. The goal wasn't entirely on Ream, Howard's initial pass was awful and then he moved too close to the line on the shot, but Ream has to see that the situation was bad and shut it down. I can see how others might consider that dirty, but I think it's smart.In terms of winning games right now it probably makes sense to play dirty. But in the long run I think it impedes progress. The goal should not be to win the Gold Cup or qualify for the World Cup. We can do that without pushing and pulling. The goal should be to get to the level of Germany and Brazil, and to do that we need to be able to win through vision and passing.
With every hack or whack to the shins, and with every tumble to the Red Bull Arena turf, pain seeped into Christian Pulisic’s face. In the 9th minute, it was absent. In the 13th, it simmered. In the 44th, it boiled, and by the midway point of the second-half, it conveyed full-on exasperation.
Don't forget elbows.Pulisic is at risk of significant harm at the hands (feet?) of this Honduras shitshow.
Yet even if the disaster scenario does materialize and the Yanks come away from the international break with zero points, qualification is still a very real possibility as well. It might even be expected. Let’s take a look at why.
I do wonder: if Pulisic becomes the player we all hope he does, will CONCACAF concerns keep him from a Neymar/Mbappe transfer? What club wants to invest that sort of money in a player who is going to be mauled by the opposition every few months?Don't forget elbows.
Squeaky bum time for Borussia Dortmund's front office.
It is hard not to qualify but I think they could do it. Let's hope that players are played in proper positions and that binkies are kept on the bench. Oh, and did anyone buy a time machine? That would help, a lot.A 5:30 kick-off tonight?
Scenarios: https://sports.yahoo.com/u-s-still-good-shape-qualify-2018-world-cup-234236415.html
I think it's a legitimate concern, but in terms of season/career ending tackles I'm not sure it's that much worse than CONEMBOL. I'd think that Neymar, Vidal, Alexis Sanchez, hell, even Coutinho, are in just as much danger of being targeted in a qualifier or continental cup match by a team/player desperate for an edge.I do wonder: if Pulisic becomes the player we all hope he does, will CONCACAF concerns keep him from a Neymar/Mbappe transfer? What club wants to invest that sort of money in a player who is going to be mauled by the opposition every few months?
How have similar "big fish in little ponds" (i.e. big talents playing for lower tier NTs) been handled?
That's 3:36 local time in San Pedro Sula on a workday. It seems like a fairly transparent attempt by the local governing body to have the match played in the mid-afternoon heat.A 5:30 kick-off tonight?
Yeah, I see the point, but is it that much different from what Argentina or Brazil get at games in Bolivia or Paraguay? - plus CONMEBOL's 18-game qualification is even more brutal than the Hex, right?I think it's a legitimate concern, but in terms of season/career ending tackles I'm not sure it's that much worse than CONEMBOL. I'd think that Neymar, Vidal, Alexis Sanchez, hell, even Coutinho, are in just as much danger of being targeted in a qualifier or continental cup match by a team/player desperate for an edge.
Yes. That gives us 2 reasons 2 to do it.I understand the Jones point, but I think the need for an enforcer of that type is an admission that there's a serious problem with both American federations. A team carrying a thug into a competition with the expectation that one or more of its stars is going to be assaulted is a strong signal that that something needs to change.
I don't disagree, and hope that Copa America Centenario and things like that will elevate the federation's style of play. But the unfortunate truth is that this style of play exists because it works. Starting games in the middle of the day, deliberately underwatering the field, all that needs to stop, but it doesn't seem like the federation is capable of making it stop.I understand the Jones point, but I think the need for an enforcer of that type is an admission that there's a serious problem with both American federations. A team carrying a thug into a competition with the expectation that one or more of its stars is going to be assaulted is a strong signal that that something needs to change.
I don't enjoy watching most of the stuff that takes place on this side of the Atlantic. There is incredible talent that translates to thrilling moments, but I find the cringe-worthy playacting, vicious personal attacks, and painful gamesmanship (knocking the ball away from a free kick or throw-in, shoe tying, etc) uncomfortable to view. There are bits of it no matter what league or team is playing, but it's all packed into a tidy 90 minute window when these teams go at it.
There's no doubt that the US performance against Costa Rica lacked steel and bite in the midfield and Jones always brought lots of energy, intensity, and physicality. He's totally past it, though. For LA, he is simply no longer performing at a level anywhere near US international caliber. He'll be 36 in a couple of months - he's had a good run.I know he's not exactly a fan favorite around these parts and certainly he's not the future of the USMNT, but I have always liked what Jermaine Jones adds to the hexagonal. It's a grueling competition played over a year in difficult forums where one goal here, or a yellow there, makes a difference. Qualification requires depth and physical and mental toughness. Sometimes, it requires Connor Caseys as much as it requires Christian Pulisics.
Jones doesn't take shit, and makes players think twice about their ankles. He's plodding, has trouble with linking from the back, and can leave open spaces. On balance, I get why he's not here. I guess he's the kind of player you like to have when you're in a good shape in the competition and are playing for a road point in difficult Concacaf venues, and that's not the position the USA is in at the moment.
I'm not seriously advocating for him to be on the team. I'm saying that I miss what he brings, especially in games like today's.
The US hosted Costa Rica in Denver during the winter last World Cup qualifying. I have no problems with a team doing what they see best off-field to win matches at home. The on-field stuff is exhausting.I don't disagree, and hope that Copa America Centenario and things like that will elevate the federation's style of play. But the unfortunate truth is that this style of play exists because it works. Starting games in the middle of the day, deliberately underwatering the field, all that needs to stop, but it doesn't seem like the federation is capable of making it stop.
One start would be to elevate the level of play in the concacaf champions league. Give the refs better instruction, more liberal cautions, more concern about field conditions.