Single-digit temperatures is one factor I think...7 degrees now, dropping to 1 degree later.Why are the packers having trouble selling?
Aren't they used to that weather/have the clothes to bundle up, dress in layers etc.? Season ticket holders alone might go a long way to filling Lambeau. I'm looking for empty seats tomorrow night.Single-digit temperatures is one factor I think...7 degrees now, dropping to 1 degree later.
Nope, the Raiders are finished and Houston's defense is going to wallop Cook.Agreed, I think it's possible Cook is pretty good today and Oakland wins.
The Raiders will win 21-17 ... scoring TD on a kick return, a strip sack return and a Pick-6Nope, the Raiders are finished and Houston's defense is going to wallop Cook.
There is no chance that toothless Oakland offense can do anything against Houston today. The only way Oak wins is by the above, miracle TD's. It's very unlikely. Their season ended when Carr's leg snapped.The Raiders will win 21-17 ... scoring TD on a kick return, a strip sack return and a Pick-6
You teased the wrong way. Loss.Teased Oak, Det and the under in Houston.
That's very cool. Thanks.Online betting isn't showing that: http://www.thespread.com/nfl-football-public-betting-chart
43% on Raiders
46% on Dolphins
I'll double down with you, Jimmy.You teased the wrong way. Loss.
Let's do it. How do the odds work? I'd be happy to wager up to 2k. With half my winnings, when I receive them, to go to the Jimmy Fund.I'll double down with you, Jimmy.
Did you just Mitt Romney me? I got ten points for -110. I did a fun $100 bet on bovada. I don't have near enough confidence to go that large against a finance dude whose bonus just hit. I'll add another 110 against 100 for you.Let's do it. How do the odds work? I'd be happy to wager up to 2k. With half my winnings, when I receive them, to go to the Jimmy Fund.
Plus, OAK's white on gray unis make them feeble and weak.Interesting factoid per Mike & Mike this morning:
The team with the top rated total defense (YPG allowed) has won home playoff games 8 times in the last 8 opportunities: 2015 DEN, 2014 SEA, 2013 SEA and 2008 PIT.
The 2016 top rated defense? Houston. (Among playoff teams, SEA is 2nd and NE 3rd.)
I don't get bonuses, if that makes you feel better. I'm in sales, not management.Did you just Mitt Romney me? I got ten points for -110. I did a fun $100 bet on bovada. I don't have near enough confidence to go that large against a finance dude whose bonus just hit. I'll add another 110 against 100 for you.
I feel kinda ashamed now, baller.
100 million dollars.Someone remind me how much did ESPN pay to broadcast this Texans/Raiders game?
I say overSomething tells me that we are going to see at least 12 punts this afternoon.
I've seen same numbers and guess I don't understand them---the ad buys are before we know who is in the game, so a little surprising they missed demand by THAT much unless it's purely a prestige buy. But someone around here probably actually knows the economics for it, so perhaps they'll explain it.I believe I read they paid $100 million, and are only going to make back ~$25 million on it.
Put odds on that and someone on this board will take a betSomething tells me that we are going to see at least 12 punts this afternoon.
That is just for one year? Or multi year?$100 million to broadcast one wild card game on Saturday afternoon. That contract is almost as bad as Osweilers.
Watches and hookers, man. And this is a snowy day fun bet, not I feel super strong about it bet. When I win, all to JF too, but you can walk up the street and hand me the $$$.I don't get bonuses, if that makes you feel better. I'm in sales, not management.
But 110 against 100 is confirmed. I thought you were a lawyer. Don't you get bonuses?
edit - note, when I win, all will go to Jimmy Fund.
Cross sport: Kyle Snyder v Jason Johnson bad.I've seen same numbers and guess I don't understand them---the ad buys are before we know who is in the game, so a little surprising they missed demand by THAT much unless it's purely a prestige buy. But someone around here probably actually knows the economics for it, so perhaps they'll explain it.
I still think Cook may be the better QB in this game
I'm not a watch buyer, I've worn the same one since 2007. So I have plenty of money to blow on random internet wagers.Watches and hookers, man. And this is a snowy day fun bet, not I feel super strong about it bet. When I win, all to JF too, but you can walk up the street and hand me the $$$.
I haven't owned one since 1977I'm not a watch buyer, I've worn the same one since 2007.
You're also like 75. Do you even know how to tell time anymore?I haven't owned one since 1977
Isn't that the consensus way to look at it? Because a bad offense and/or special teams can put defenses in bad situations? I don't know for sure - that's why I'm asking/Leagues #1 defense... by YPG, not PPG. Such a flawed way to look at it.
No need; the nurses do it for meYou're also like 75. Do you even know how to tell time anymore?
iPhone?You're also like 75. Do you even know how to tell time anymore?