Because Garrett is fine playing for a FG because reasonsWhy not call the TO with 25 seconds left
Save it for the last play.Why not call the TO with 25 seconds left
This really is one of the best comments in the history of NFL game threads.Playing for OT feels to me like a FG miss here, if karma should prevail.
Never. Guy has photographs of the Jones family. It's the only explanation at this point.so when does Jason Garrett get fired
It would be ironic if JJ fired him now. They’ve underachieved for most of Garrett’s tenure, but I think 3-4 is a decent showing given the talent on hand and injuries.so when does Jason Garrett get fired
The fact that the defensive player looked like he had seen a ghost, and didn't even motion towards the offense like they had moved was enough to tell me that the refs jobbed Dallas on that call. Pretty standard with the way the rest of the game was officiated.What exactly was the snap infraction? Aren’t you generally allowed to handle the ball some as long as you don’t bob it back?
Meh, I was ok with the call. If you’re going to place the long snapper off-limits as a defenseless player, it’s not too much to ask him to hold the ball still.The fact that the defensive player looked like he had seen a ghost, and didn't even motion towards the offense like they had moved was enough to tell me that the refs jobbed Dallas on that call. Pretty standard with the way the rest of the game was officiated.
Wasn't there another defensive player standing there with his hands on this head like wtf did you doThe fact that the defensive player looked like he had seen a ghost, and didn't even motion towards the offense like they had moved was enough to tell me that the refs jobbed Dallas on that call. Pretty standard with the way the rest of the game was officiated.
You saw the ball move? I didn't see much of anything there from the snapper, but didn't really have a good look. Like I said, the Redskins didn't seem to know the call was going their way until it did.Meh, I was ok with the call. If you’re going to place the long snapper off-limits as a defenseless player, it’s not too much to ask him to hold the ball still.
Heheheheh. Googles 'karma'Which coach was it that pushed for the change in XP...
He's probably getting a contract extension this week. He's going nowhere.Never. Guy has photographs of the Jones family. It's the only explanation at this point.
He moved it. Not much, but he did.You saw the ball move? I didn't see much of anything there from the snapper, but didn't really have a good look. Like I said, the Redskins didn't seem to know the call was going their way until it did.
Yeah Skip is right for once, it was fucking atrocious.I haven't seen a good replay of the snap yet, but Skip Bayless says it was a terrible call, so I expect to soon see video that it was a clear snap violation
Huh?, he moves the ball a considerable distance and the defense comes across. It doesn't get any more textbook than that. That's a clearly correct call.Yeah Skip is right for once, it was fucking atrocious.
This is pretty good.New rule suggestion by Bal:
Have the goal posts on a moving track and you have to try and kick it thru the uprights while its moving
Like this:
He does the same thing on the XP to make it 20-17. No flag.Huh?, he moves the ball a considerable distance and the defense comes across. It doesn't get any more textbook than that. That's a clearly correct call.
The officiating twitter explains exactly why one was called and the other was not, in one case the defenders jumped across on the movement, therefore they have to call it because there is contact.He does the same thing on the XP to make it 20-17. No flag.